Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Who is That Rascal?

Hunyadi prabhu: All Glories to Srila Prabhupada !
There is not a single example in Srila Prabhupada’s books of a formally authorised diksa guru, in our disciplic succession, ever deviating from the path of devotional service. The rejection of Sukracarya is sometimes used by the bogus GBC gurus to validate the view that acaryas fall down, or can be rejected, but this example is highly misleading since he was never an authorised member of our disciplic succession. 
Lord Brahma’s pastimes with his daughter are sometimes mentioned. Yet it is clearly stated in the Srimad-Bhagavatam that these incidents occurred before Lord Brahma became the head of our sampradaya. Indeed, when the disciple Nitai referred to the pastime as an example of an acarya falling down, Srila Prabhupada became most displeased.
Aksayananda: I was recently told by one devotee that the acarya does not have to be a pure devotee. [....]
Prabhupada: Who is that rascal? [...]
Aksayananda: He said it. Nitai said it. He said it in this context. He said that Lord Brahma is the acarya in the Brahma-sampradaya, but yet he is sometimes afflicted by passion. So therefore he is saying that it appears that the acarya does not have to be a pure devotee. So it does not seem right. [...]
Prabhupada: He manufactured his idea. Therefore he’s a rascal. Therefore he’s a rascal. Nitai has become an authority? [...] He thought something rascaldom, and he is expressing that. Therefore he is more rascal. These things are going on. (Morning Walk, Vrindavan, December 10th, 1975)
[PADA: The bogus GBC' sidea that pure devotees deviate is rascaldom, that's the right conclusion.]

1 comment:

  1. Aksayananda: He said sometimes (Lord Brahma) is afflicted by the mode of passion.

    Prabhupada: Therefore he's a rascal.

    The point being made here is when Lord Brahma "lusted" over his daughter it was a pastime meant to enlighten us as to the danger of association with women. This does not prove that Prabhupada never meant his disciples to become gurus because they used to associate with women before they became gurus. It only means if they become gurus and cannot stop associating with women then they are bogus gurus, in other words, they are not even gurus, they are cheaters. But real gurus are there, just as real gold is there. If there wasn't any real gold how would the cheaters know what to make look like real gold that isn't real and sell it as real?


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.