PADA: Thanks H dasa for sending me a photo of "HG Jananivasa prabhu ji and HG Pankajanghri prabhu ji" and telling PADA how much their valuable service "sends a message of how to be steady in serving Krishna despite all difficulties." And "whatever else is wrong with Mayapura ISKCON, at least these two brothers show us how dedicated service can be done there." Ooops, except, aren't they serving the illicit sex acharya's program, and one of its main founder fathers, Jayapataka swami? And wouldn't that make them co-opted help mates of "the troubles"? We agree, there are many "difficulties," ok fine, but aren't they the hand maidens of the trouble maker's program?
In other words -- fine, we have to serve, but what and whom are we serving? We also have to preach, again fine, but what are we preaching? Now when we sometimes see videos of Mayapura, a number of our God brothers are there self-apparently smiling and laughing when Jayapataka enters the temple room, because they are encouraging him to be "the guru of Mayapura."
And they are often proud that Jayapataka has so many disciples, sometimes we hear he has as many as 20,0000, others say 30,000, yet others say up to 50,000 and etc. And how is that working out for them? How can Jayapataka swami absorb the sins of even one other conditioned soul, much less tens of thousands? And if there are so many disciples, why are many Muslims being employed to do things there, and many other temples have become ghost towns?
Suppose I say, today I am going to lift one Volkswagen over my head. Sorry, it can't be done with even one Volkswagen, what to speak of me lifting 50,000 Volkswagens over my head? Srila Prabhupada says, we neophytes cannot absorb the sins of others, and if we attempt that artificially, we will HAVE to SUFFER. So from our point of view, HG Jananivasa and Pankajanghri et al. have simply encouraged a conditioned soul like Jayapataka to absorb the sins of other conditioned souls, and just as Srila Prabhupada says they will HAVE to SUFFER because they are not qualified to take sins. Unfortunately, the people who promote such false acharyas share in their bad karma, at least according to Sri Isopanisad and other shastra?
So all of this amounts to "the cheaters and the cheated," i.e. JPS says he can take the sins of others, and he is fooling others into believing that. And Jananivasa and Pankajanghri are the hand maidens of all this cheating? Worse, it appears all these cheer leader people are actually KILLING their God brothers by encouraging them to take sins, which is clearly taking them DOWN.
One ex-kuli says Jayapataka looks like the creation of Dr. Frankenstein. Hee hee, and if that is the case, aren't Jananivasa and Pankajanghri Dr. Frankenstein's helpmates? Why don't they know by now, their idea of promoting conditioned souls as acharyas has failed? And then again, what kind of consciousness is being promoted as the so-called "acharyas of ISKCON"? Isn't this also the art of Dr. Frankenstein's program?
Sorry, we would have to say that these brothers are not serving Krishna properly. To promote a program that says Krishna's guru parampara of successors are often -- debauchees, drunkards, drug addicts, sexual predators, deviants and criminals is NOT the way to serve Krishna anywhere. And to establish this odious preaching in the holy dham of MAYAPURA is VERY SINFUL.
To say God's successor acharyas are often debauchees should NOT be preached ANYWHERE, but to have that preaching going on in the HOLY DHAM is most sinful. Imagine if Lord Chaitanya was here, and we went to tell Him, "Yours, the Six Goswamis, Srimate Radharani's, and Sri Krishna's guru succession is populated by fools, drunkards, drug addicts, sexual predators, criminals, and deviants of the worst order"? Would He accept that as "nice preaching"? Of course not! So, why should we as His followers?
Srila Prabhupada says various so-called sahajiyas and babajis go to the HOLY DHAM to establish that pure devotees are often debauchees, and thus they are gliding to hell. He even said these folks are ALREADY residents of Naraka. Thus! We should not be using the ISKCON's premises, especially in the HOLY DHAM, to establish these same deviated ideas? So I am sorry to say, serving the debauchee acharya's process is not serving the actual prescribed program given by the acharyas. It is deviation, and that is being very generous because far worse terms could be used. ys pd