[PADA: A disciple of Radhanath has discussed the GBC's use of Tantric Black Magic to our associates, and has many details of these alleged goings on. We are trying to get this person's permission to publish these details. It does seem that Radhanath is not monitoring the goings on in ISKCON, especially if these statements of his follower are factual. Of course, we have heard various claims about this black magic stuff way back in the 1980s.
In addition, it seems Radhanath and the entire GBC are not even monitoring the public statements of their followers and disciples regarding their making offenses to the publications of Srila Prabhupada. The whole claim to the GBC guru program is based on the idea that they are able to give "personal direction" but -- it seems not much "monitoring and direction" are being done?
Worse, when the Mahanidhi situation was reported ten years ago, nothing was done. They are monitoring, what exactly? Meanwhile some GBC have said Radhanath is bogus for burying Kirtanananda in a samadhi in Vrndavana, but nothing was done about that either? It seems like there is no actual correcting, monitoring, direction, containment of problems etc. -- the actual job of the GBC? And now Harivilas' Vancouver temple has sent out a flyer with Krishna dressed as SANTA CLAUS, and is there anything being done? Nope! ys pd]
BY: B. RADHA-GOVINDA
In regards to Lalitanatha prabhu's (offensive) statement (opinion) regarding Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is, in consideration of the fact that Srila Prabhupada lectured from His own (unchanged)] Bhagavad-gita As It Is -- throughout His years of preaching on the planet, the fact that through Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is so many people became devotees - the ISKCON temples filled during these years with devotees living in the temples, as well as so many congregational members who would come - as well as Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is being accepted by so many scholars throughout the world (and praised by them) at that time, it seems that Lalitanatha prabhu in making his "editor's" comments, never took into consideration the words from the Srimad Bhagavatam 1.5.11 verse:
"That literature which is full of descriptions of the transcendental glories of the name, fame, forms, pastimes, etc., of the unlimited Supreme Lord is a different creation, full of transcendental words directed toward bringing about a revolution in the impious lives of this world's misdirected civilization. Such transcendental literatures, even though imperfectly composed, are heard, sung and accepted by purified men who are thoroughly honest."
His email being listed as lalitanatha.rns@pamho.net, Lalitanatha prabhu is a disciple of Radhanath Swami. Thus, the following question: Before saying or writing this statement in criticism about his Param Guru Maharaja's, Srila Prabhupada's, Bhagavad-gita As It Is, wouldn't Lalitanatha prabhu (as a disciple of Radhanath), have followed the etiquette of first approaching his own guru, either taking permission or getting a denial from Radhanath Swami, before making such a statement? And if he got Radhanath Swami's approval, then what does that say about Radhanath Swami?
So I'm wondering now, when this picture with Lalitanatha prabhu's words gets around, will Radhanath Swami make some public statement in regards to his disciple's having written/spoken this statement?
My own question to Radhanath Swami is: "What do you have to say in relation to what your disciple has stated in regards to Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is?
"That literature which is full of descriptions of the transcendental glories of the name, fame, forms, pastimes, etc., of the unlimited Supreme Lord is a different creation, full of transcendental words directed toward bringing about a revolution in the impious lives of this world's misdirected civilization. Such transcendental literatures, even though imperfectly composed, are heard, sung and accepted by purified men who are thoroughly honest."
His email being listed as lalitanatha.rns@pamho.net, Lalitanatha prabhu is a disciple of Radhanath Swami. Thus, the following question: Before saying or writing this statement in criticism about his Param Guru Maharaja's, Srila Prabhupada's, Bhagavad-gita As It Is, wouldn't Lalitanatha prabhu (as a disciple of Radhanath), have followed the etiquette of first approaching his own guru, either taking permission or getting a denial from Radhanath Swami, before making such a statement? And if he got Radhanath Swami's approval, then what does that say about Radhanath Swami?
So I'm wondering now, when this picture with Lalitanatha prabhu's words gets around, will Radhanath Swami make some public statement in regards to his disciple's having written/spoken this statement?
My own question to Radhanath Swami is: "What do you have to say in relation to what your disciple has stated in regards to Srila Prabhupada's Bhagavad-gita As It Is?
And what if Radhanatha finds out just who is speaking against him, truth or not? Will he order one or more of his loyal goons to go out and beat that person to a pulp?
ReplyDeletePrabhupada never ever ordered anyone to be beaten. Prabhupada kicked out the bogus Kritanandana when he was in maya. Would Prabhupada have wanted K. Swami to have an actual Samadhi built for himself after he died? What for?!
The only person who could possibly wish to have a samadhi built for K. Swami is someone who took sannyasa from K. Swami and needs to use him as their link to that ashrama, even though when K. Swami was booted out of ISCKON the GBC claimed most of those sannyasa intitiations were bogus.
Hari Bol,
ReplyDeletepamho AGTSP
I got a personal testimony from a senior disciple of Srila Prabhupada that Harikesh was using black magic as well.
They had to do a "Ghost Busting" Kirtan for him, while Srila Prabhupada was still physically present and exiled Harikesh to Germany for an offense he commited against Srila Prabhupada.
Later Harikesh used some sort of tantric magic to hypnotise the devotee and change his mind about leaving Germany and going back to India to serve Srila Prabhupada there.
Same with my former bogus Guru. My Godbrother(now Prabhupadanuga) also said he was 100% affected by Ghosts and later after he fell down he did a black magic Voodoo ritual to harm his former "disciples" Seems like all these Kali Chelas in the dress of Vaishnava Acharyas are involved in the black arts like left hand tantra.
Looks like Hansadutta is lieing here?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtnxeTYbdeI
that bogus b. radha govinda swami has no room to criticize others. what would prabhupada say about her for leaving his shelter and taking a new name and bogus female sannyasa initiation from outside iskcon. u leave prabhupada's movement so you can have the false prestige of being a female sannyasa. so look in the mirror before u fault find others. To her and everyone else; unless you are without fault yourself, you follow all 4 of the regulative principles, chant 16 rounds, and are actively preaching and making new devotees...if you are not doing all these things then ..SHUT THE HELL UP! if you arent following prabhupada strictly and actively preaching his nessage, then your criticism of others will do nothing more than send you to hell for criticising those who trying to spread krishna consciousness. Dont criticise others, but be the example of what you think prabhupada wants us all to be like. put up..or shut up!
ReplyDelete[PADA: Well she was booted out of ISKCON, just like all the rest of us. Yes, if we are booted out for saying that homosexuals and deviants are not acharyas, we may start our own organizations. You are foolish to think we will not do our own program? You mean we should just get booted out and do nothing? ys pd]