Friday, November 18, 2011

Satyaraja dasa (Stephen Rosen) is a follower of Narayana Maharaja

[PADA: Thanks for your question about Satyaraja dasa (Stephen Rosen). Yes, he is the biggest writer outside of Jayadvaita swami for the GBC. Yet he has always been a big promoter of Narayana Maharaja, whom he glorifies in his writings. Of course now the GBC says Narayana Maharaja is bogus, but Stephen Rosen is a great writer? Yes this is a contradiction. Anyway, this is an old article about Satyaraja which might help you clarify his position somewhat:]

Winter 2004/5 In BTP 2 we saw how Bhakti Tirtha Swami, an ISKCON "Guru" who claims to be in contact with aliens, was upset at being called a "demon" by another unauthorised ISKCON Guru, Bhakti Vikash Swami.

[PADA: Bhakti Vikas swami was recently made to apologize for criticizing the other gurus like this. Anyone (ok like Bhakti Tirtha swami) who writes that we are all descendents of space aliens who originally inhabited the now sunken continent of MU cannot be criticized, period.]

In BTP 5 we saw how ISKCON's most powerful "Guru", Jayapataka Swami, is seen as "sick", "obsessive" and "dishonest" by his Guru peers, who fear he wants to steal all their disciples. Now Suhotra Swami (another voted-in ISKCON Guru) has accused all his GBC Guru cohorts of making a massive offense to Srila Prabhupada by actively supporting the publication and promotion of the book "Hidden Glory of India" by Steven Rosen (aka Srila Prabhupada disciple Satyaraja Das, but who according to Suhotra "would rather be known by his karmi birth name than his initiated one"), in which he claims...

"...Srila Prabhupada's preaching mission to America is linked by saccharine words to "the distinguished swamiji Vivekananda." Not only that, but to a member of the Gaudiya Math whom we know was dismissed by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura as a black snake. Not only that, but to an elderly Indian scholar who is a contributor to an Internet website that viciously criticizes Srila Prabhupada and calls Srimati Radharani a bogus deity. Not only that, but to a host of other mundane people."

The book has been widely distributed throughout North America and Europe with the full blessings and co-operation of ISKCON's GBC, which is comprised almost entirely of self-appointed or voted-in Gurus. Indeed, as Suhotra Swami states, the book was "the BBT's main distribution book for North America".

If Suhotra Swami is correct, it means that practically every Guru in ISKCON is implicated in seriously offending Srila Prabhupada. It is certainly a huge blunder by the BBT (Bhaktivedanta Book Trust), which was established to exclusively publish Srila Prabhupada's books, to so enthusiastically sponsor Mr. Rosen's (pictured right) book since he is an ardent advocate of HH Narayana Maharaja, the GBC's arch-enemy. 

The GBC were foolish enough to use Narayana Maharaja as their star witness in their 1990 ISKCON Journal when they wanted to crush support for Srila Prabhupada's directive on ritvikinitiations for ISKCON (see BTP issue 5), thus opening the door for him to swipe huge chunks of the Movement. And now they widely distribute a book by someone who has made the following gushing comments:

"Narayan Maharaj! He's from the Gaudiya Math an extremely advanced devotee, and a renowned scholar (...) he's such a great soul, a genuine sadhu (...) Narayan Maharaj is extraordinary (...) When you love someone, you want to know as much as possible about them (...) He has translated many important Vaishnava works into Hindi, and is now considered one of the leading Gaudiya Vaishnava devotees in all of India. So you are very fortunate to have met him."(Steven Rosen, In Defense of Reality, published by Equal Vision Records, 1993).

So, another classic own-goal by the GBC. However, Suhotra Swami's devastating assessment of his fellow Guru hoaxers goes way beyond the implications of just this one awful book:

"My realization is that for the past six or eight years I have been struggling not to admit to myself that there is a clear trend among ISKCON's leadership to minimize Srila Prabhupada's mood and teachings, and to promote relativity, mediocrity, mediacracy, bureaucracy, and quasi-Hinduism as the new mindset of ISKCON. (...) My realization is that this book is a landmark of offensiveness against the Founder-acarya of ISKCON.

(...) Now, if this book is being distributed in America, that further more means "somehow or other" the North American GBC don't see anything wrong with it. That's all the proof in the world that the fish is rotting from the head."

Strong words, but it appears not to have occurred to Suhotra Swami that this minimising of Srila Prabhupada has been going on a lot longer than "six or eight years". It started when the GBC unauthorisedly removed Srila Prabhupada from his rightful position as ISKCON's sole initiating Guru, way back in 1977.

Suhotra Swami thus hypocritically accuses his Guru colleagues of minimising Srila Prabhupada when he is just as guilty himself. He has fully supported and participated in both the great Guru hoax parts 1 and 2. Suhotra Swami laments: "When I note that so many leading figures in our movement continue to putter on with their prescribed duties in the blackening shadow of this offense, I am not at all encouraged."

But what bigger offense can there be than effectively kicking Srila Prabhupada out of his own mission and stealing all his disciples? We might all be more "encouraged" if Suhotra Swami started dealing with that issue, which is the original mother of all the many deviations he has identified.

So here we have the absurd situation where one Guru, who is meant to be as good-as God, claims many other supposedly good-as-God Gurus are acting offensively, minimising Srila Prabhupada, and preaching complete nonsense. He's right of course; but he also needs to look in the mirror. 

1 comment:

  1. I worked with Suhotra for at least 10 years and his career is quite flimsy. The reason why he was able to become established as European co-GBC of Harikes was that he and Hari were former friends.

    When Hari had about 3000 disciples they started to kick out all Prabhupada disciples and shortly after, Hari appointed Suhotra, Sacinananda, Bhaktivaibhava, Rohinsuta, Smitakrishna, Krishnaksetra, Bhaktibhusana, to be gurus too.

    By 1998 when Harikes decided to leave, all rank&file Prabhupada disciples were kicked out, as well as "inconvenient" senior disciples of the new gurus.

    1998, with so many frustrated ex-Harikes disciples, things got out of control and Suhotra's camp also got unsettled. Subsequently he resigned from the GBC board, resigned his sannyas danda and last but not least resigned from being a guru.

    His reputation so damaged, he couldnt even stay in Europe anymore and relocated to live in India were he died at April 8, 2007, Mayapur.

    In consideration of the tremendous destruction of Prabhupada's movement he was involved in Europe, what he confessed before his sudden death was something like an act of desperation.

    The way he presented things was immediately classified by other GBCs as rampage of a fallen devotee. Suhotra must have felt that his future will be a bleak one.

    But still, he was too puffed up and did not appologize for anything. He never got in touch with any kicked out devotees. In sum, his sudden death was nothing of that kind - blissful leaving to Vaikuntha.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.