Is Aryan the new living guru?

PADA: Aryan has no evidence that Srila Prabhupada appointed a successor "in private meetings" like Gaura Govinda. Srila Prabhupada would never have appointed a successor in private meetings, knowing this would create chaos for ISKCON because no one would believe this person had been appointed. Prabhupada always made letters and announcements, so he would have made a letter to all temples saying he had appointed a successor. As for GGM himself, he never mentioned that he had been appointed as the succesor in 1978, rather he supported the 11 bogus successors, why did he not challenge them in 1978 saying he had been appointed, not them? GGM was only later on voted in as guru at the recoronation of a known homosexual, why does Aryan think a person is a guru when he is voted in when child molester acharyas are being re-coronated? Worse, Aryan still has not told us who is the lving guru now, he does not have any, he cites Srila Bhaktivinode and GGM, both of them are departed, he has never cited one word from any living person -- except himself,  so Aryan clearly thinks he is the living guru and we have to accept him? He has never told us any other living person other than himself, he thinks he is our new live guru. ys pd