Jayapataka / NM Folks Re-write History

Householders Had To Be Purged for This Agenda 

Dear PADA: Isnt this a blatant lie, "Srila Prabhupada told Jayapataka Swami that in the future things will be the other way around. At that time most of the devotees were living in the temple and only a few outside . He said in the future most of the devotees will be living outside the temple and only a few inside." Gaura Das (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152101613041291&set=a.60830626290.95795.706816290&type=1&theater)

WHY ARE THE TEMPLES NOT AS FULL AS THEY USED TO BE?

A devotee wrote to me today asking me this question. I didn't realize at that time that he had his own agenda, and didn't care for my response in the end. Rather than waste it entirely, I thought to share some of my thoughts with those who can share without tearing others to pieces, and are on the path of forgiveness. "Regarding your question why temples are not as filled as they used to be, this is a question which is going off topic of this original post .... Srila Prabhupada told Jayapataka Swami  ---

=================================

[PADA: A follower of Narayana Maharaja named Jean Prem has also asked a similar question, since everyone was booted out of ISKCON, what are the ritviks doing to help the elderly Prabhupadanugas? OK, but she has failed to answer our first question, who authorized her and her ilk to support the Tamal and Narayana Maharaja plan to kick out all of the devotees, so these devotees would be living in isolated situations with no help -- in the first place?

NM said we are "poison ritviks" so he could have all of us banned, beaten if not sometimes killed, and the NM program knows full well all along we would all be kicked out -- by their propaganda against us, and now that we are all kicked out, they expect us to have a functioning society, after their bogus guru's program destroyed our society?

And since the NM program she has supported kicked out almost everyone away from use of the assets of ISKCON, how can she expect we can make a program to help these exiled people now, when her process supports their being exiled? And their program has supported the hi-jackers to grab all of the assets, claiming they are "gurus"? And now that our devotees have no use of these assets, we are supposed to care for other people, under her team's plan -- that we have no asset to care for them?

So first of all -- these people supported a program to remove us from use of any asset -- then they ask, why are you not giving assets to your people in need? Why? Because your program helped have all of our assets get stolen from us, duh! And now Jayapataka is saying the same thing, we were removed from ISKCON because this was the authorized plan all along.  

This is another smokescreen to cover up the fact that the Jayapataka regime (supported by people like NM) kicked out 95 percent of the Srila Prabhupada disciples. They is now saying: this was a natural development, because Srila Prabhupada wanted all these people to move out of ISKCON and become householders with karmi jobs.

Except, Srila Prabhupada wanted the householders to stay in ISKCON, and to make varnasrama programs, farms, restaurants and so forth. He never said he wanted all the householders to move out of the temples, and go out and get jobs in factories, offices, and basically merge back into material life? Here in Berkeley we had three houses full of householders, and the GBC sold all the houses, pocketed the money, and dispersed all the residents.

Hardly none of these householders even visits these temples anymore, its a ghost town. There are maybe a dozen people living in the temple and so -- there is hardly any manpower and money to keep the basics going. On Sunday they are lucky to have a few dozen guests, mostly expatriate Hindus. Lets face it, the householders were put on a death march out of ISKCON to be exiled, they were not wanted because they did not want to worship Jayapataka's illicit sex gurus (a program supported by the Jean Prem's NM folks as well) and so they were removed.

The San Francisco temple was simply closed altogether, the Mt. Kailash farm was closed, Ramesvara's Three Rivers rural place was closed, the Oklahoma farm was closed, and there has been a problem with cows being abused because there is no one left to care for them. So this is another propaganda piece. The GBC are now trying to say that everyone would have left anyway, and that is what Srila Prabhupada would have wanted, that all of his devotees would be scattered and away from ISKCON to get karmi jobs and move hundreds of miles away from his temples and simply work in mundane jobs. And this is what NM groupies like Jean Prem are saying, the Tamal / NM program of removing all these people is justified.

Nope, the GBC wanted everyone to worship their illicit sex messiahs program and anyone who disagreed was booted out, and that means, 95 percent had to be booted out. So yes, then the 95 percent had to go out and get jobs, work hard to get an apartment or house, and be separated from ISKCON and etc. That is not what Srila Prabhupada wanted, to scatter all the devotees, and force them back into working in jobs like materialists, and make his temples into ghost towns.

The criminals are trying to justify their crimes. This is also why some of them are saying the molested children just got their karma, they are trying to justify all their crimes by saying, this was all pre-destined anyway. So, a bank robber could plead in court that the bank was destined to get robbed anyway, so the robber was making destiny occur, but the court would still find him guilty of bank robbery anyway.

To sum, there is really no good excuse for their emptying out ISKCON of all its manpower so they could establish their program of -- worship of illicit sex with men, women and children as their bogus messiahs. And they will have to answer to the higher authorities for this crime. And their accomplices like NM will also have to answer for supporting such a vicious regime. ys pd