Hare Krishna news
Thanks Wyatt but we have no idea what your point is? Are you saying we should take shelter of a pure devotee, or not? ys pd
Dear Puranjana dasa, you should not be shy to publish my commenteven if it does not support your cause. Your Madhu Pandit lacksunderstanding of Srila Prabhupada teaching. What has christianitygot to do with vaishnavism. More specifically what has ourguru parampara got to do with Jesus Christ taking the sins ofothers.Taking shelter of a pure devotee/s, yes. But don't disguise it as means to propagate the bogus ritvikism.Hare Krsna.
Ok so who is taking the sins in your proposal? You cannot simply say we are wrong, that called neti neti, you are discounting the opponnent. That neti neti style is not allowed in Vedic debates, you also have to give the actual conclusion. You have not told us who is accepting the sins? So we do have a conclusion, you have none? You are simply saying that a pure devotee like Jesus cannot absorb sins today, but Srila Prabhupada says he still is? And you have not told us who is going to replace someone like Jesus either? You have to do better than neti neti. ys pd
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.