--- On Sat, 4/16/11, deandddd <deandddd@uol.com.br> wrote:
> From: deandddd <deandddd@uol.com.br>
> Subject: Re: Srila Prabhupada's astrology chart 2
> To: "tim lee" <angel108b@yahoo.com>
> Date: Saturday, April 16, 2011, 9:14 AM
> Tim,
>
> Death, including mode of death and timing, are indicated in
> one's horoscope. I insist that Shrila Prabhupad's horoscope
> didn't indicate that he could have lived ten more years, it
> indicated that he was going to die when he did.
>
> That a horoscope has jurisdiction, in the sense of
> indication and not cause, over one's duration of life, can
> be confirmed in the first canto of the Shrimad Bhagavatam,
> where the birth of Parikshit Maharaj is described. There,
> Parikshit's mode of death and its timing was predicted, and
> the prediction came true.
>
> Dharmapad
PD: OK, so when Srila Prabhupada says, "My only request is, do not toruture me and put me to death; Someone is giving me poison; Ravana will kill me here if I stay in this room; Yeh sab friends are discussing me being poisoned" etc; And there is separated blood and marrow in his urine (heavy metals poison symptom); And ALL the people in the room are ALL agreeing he says he is being poisoned; And there are those saying in whispers that the poison is going down (as verified by audio forensics); And there is an excess of arsenic and cadmium metals in his hair sample etc. -- this has no meaning becuase it was predicted and inevitable, so its not important? I still do not get your argument at all? Why are all these evidences not important, even if his death was predicted? And why is your analysis avoiding all these points? Are you saying astrology transcends reality? You are also avoiding -- what he said, vahi bat, ye hamko poison diye, someone is giving me poison, to which all the people in the room agree, he says he is being poisoned, it seems you are thus claiming to be a higher authority than he is by discounting his own statements. ys pd
> From: deandddd <deandddd@uol.com.br>
> Subject: Re: Srila Prabhupada's astrology chart 2
> To: "tim lee" <angel108b@yahoo.com>
> Date: Saturday, April 16, 2011, 9:14 AM
> Tim,
>
> Death, including mode of death and timing, are indicated in
> one's horoscope. I insist that Shrila Prabhupad's horoscope
> didn't indicate that he could have lived ten more years, it
> indicated that he was going to die when he did.
>
> That a horoscope has jurisdiction, in the sense of
> indication and not cause, over one's duration of life, can
> be confirmed in the first canto of the Shrimad Bhagavatam,
> where the birth of Parikshit Maharaj is described. There,
> Parikshit's mode of death and its timing was predicted, and
> the prediction came true.
>
> Dharmapad
PD: OK, so when Srila Prabhupada says, "My only request is, do not toruture me and put me to death; Someone is giving me poison; Ravana will kill me here if I stay in this room; Yeh sab friends are discussing me being poisoned" etc; And there is separated blood and marrow in his urine (heavy metals poison symptom); And ALL the people in the room are ALL agreeing he says he is being poisoned; And there are those saying in whispers that the poison is going down (as verified by audio forensics); And there is an excess of arsenic and cadmium metals in his hair sample etc. -- this has no meaning becuase it was predicted and inevitable, so its not important? I still do not get your argument at all? Why are all these evidences not important, even if his death was predicted? And why is your analysis avoiding all these points? Are you saying astrology transcends reality? You are also avoiding -- what he said, vahi bat, ye hamko poison diye, someone is giving me poison, to which all the people in the room agree, he says he is being poisoned, it seems you are thus claiming to be a higher authority than he is by discounting his own statements. ys pd
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.