FAQ On Lokanath Case (S Dasi)

FAQ On Lokanath Case

1. Is she (S Dasi) racist against Indians? Is that why she is going after Lokanath?

[PADA: Wow, the Lokanath victim is from an India heritage family. So as soon as anyone defends a molesting victim -- from India -- they are "against Indians"? What is wrong with these Lokanath people? And what is their point? It is fine to molest India heritage 11 years old girls, because we don't give a heap of manure about molesting girls from India heritage? 

Same problem PADA has had with some other Lokanath people -- PADA is defending an India heritage young woman, therefore PADA is anti-Indian. OK it looks like Lokanath ilk are declaring open season on molesting India family members, then complaining it is racist to defend India's folks. They are contradicting themselves right out of the gate.] 

SD: Believe it or not, the Lokanath case is about him molesting a child. That’s it. It is about looking at the standards of our ISKCON society and who we give the honor and privilege to, our highest seat in the society, a guru, someone who spiritually guides others. (As well, the victim is Indian, so some might say “If you don’t support the victim you are racist against Indians.")

[PADA: Hee hee, yup Lokanath people are apparently dumb as a rock. They evidently think defending an India person is racist against India persons. Even any first grade level child in the USA knows that defending an India person is not attacking any India person. Only Lokanath and his dull witted folks have no idea that India folks are from India. 

Why does the Lokanath group want to open the door for molesting India's folks -- in the first place? India's ICC should be at the head of the fight against molesting of India girls, instead -- us mlecchas have to defend India's girls from the ISKCON ICC's folks. We mlecchas have to defend little girls -- from them.]

2. Why is she bringing up this case 30 years later?

SD: Most ISKCON devotees, including myself, did not know about the case of Lokanath sexually assaulting a child. I might have heard one or two very vague mentions of something that did not even remotely come close to what actually happened (I’m guessing others had this experience too). What prompted me to look further in April 2021, to find out what *really* happened was that someone on Facebook was saying Lokanath was a child molester. 

I thought, “I would like to verify this.” So through my connections I procured confidential case documents related to the case. Within 24 hours of getting the documents and reading them, I shared them publicly with others who might also be concerned that a man who molested a child was being worshipped and adored as a guru. 

[PADA: Actually a follower of Lokanath said LNS is "God incarnate." Wow, how lucky we are to be born in mleccha land, because we never think child molesters are "God incarnate" over here. In fact the whole idea that molesters are God incarnate never even enters the mleccha's people's brains. The mlecchas just could not put together these two incongruent ideas -- "molesters" and "God incarnate" -- into the same thought process. 

It really never occurs to the mlecchas that (A) molesters and (B) God incarnated should ever be juxtaposed together. They just don't have their brains wired to connect these two items. It is only Lokanath and his perverts called an ICC that blends molesters and God incarnate together.]  

I had assumed all the leaders knew the details of the case and did not care. I was pleased to find out this was not the case, that many leaders did not know the details of the case, and were equally horrified as I was. Sickened really. The details are worth reading and noting because it changes the GBC’s official report on the Lokanath case which in contrast was a grossly minimized narrative verging on a complete flat-out lie.

[PADA: At the same time many leaders did know about this case, as well as hundreds if not thousands of other cases, and they suppressed those cases as well as the Lokanath case.]

3. What's with Sara getting in the frontline? Is she going to get a cut if there's any settlement?

I'll get 100% of the money nobody has asked for, and that ISKCON hasn’t paid.

[PADA: Yep, Lokanath followers told me same thing, PADA is only doing this to get a cut of the money. I have never taken one penny from any molesting case and never would. There is zero evidence we ever got a penny either. So far no one has even asked for any money in the Lokanath case either, it is a mute point. Another smokescreen to hide the real issue.]

SD: Seriously though, I work with many sincere devotees who believe that protecting our society’s children is crucial for it to function on any sort of level - morally, spiritually, ethically, legally… There is an inner circle of us but I just happen to be the most vocal. 

We are a great team. As well, I have an outer circle of many devotees who have offered to help through their support of encouraging words, writing letters to the GBC, public statements, connections, networking, intel, etc. It is a marvelous journey, and I am honored to be of service to Srila Prabhupada’s movement on this very important matter.

Right now we are just asking that the GBC please honor their promise from May and give the Lokanath case BACK to the Child Protection Office. That is all. If a court case happens that would be great, because the GBC would then be forced to remove Lokanath, but ISKCON does not need a court case for them to remove a child abuser from leadership. The GBC members of ISKCON can simply follow their own Resolutions from past years which is not allowing a child abuser to hold any leadership position in ISKCON.

In 2011 the GBC stated in their Resolutions: “The GBC holds those who represent Srila Prabhupada as sannyasis and diksa gurus to the highest standards of moral and ethical behavior.” 

Is child molestation considered the highest standard of moral and ethical behavior?

4. Does she have something personal against Lokanath?

Other than name, I did not know who Lokanath was. There are hundreds of gurus and sannyasis in ISKCON and I am not familiar with most of them.

[PADA: Lokanath has something personal against us, his program is banning, beating, molesting, suing and killing us since 1978. He needs to stop. Or be exposed. ys pd]

PADA: A person who follows strictly is called a kanistha adhikary, i.e. he still has anarthas. The madhyam platform is still not complete, but it is starting when a person has attained anartha nrvritti, freedom from material desires. A person who touches a little girl is neither of these above platforms, it is deviation and not a bona fide platform for even basic levels. Meanwhile a Lokanath follower is writing that he is "God incarnate." Another Lokanath follower wrote to tell me LNS is "taking our sins." So there is wholesale misrepresenting of the levels of devotional service going on here. Unfortunately, Srila Prabhupada told the story of the snake being eaten by ants. The snake was formerly the guru of the ants, and he promised to take their sins, but he did not have the potency to do so. When the disciples found out that they had been cheated they were infuriated and they asked Yamaraja how they could take revenge. So Yamaraja made the disciples into ants, and he made their guru a snake, and when the snake crawled onto the ant hill, he was eaten alive by the ants. None of these people has the potency to absorb the sins of others, that should be self evident at this stage. ys pd