Thursday, June 11, 2026

Mahatma Das (Martin Hausner) Apologist for Molester Messiahs Project / ETC. 06 11 26


DUAL FLUTES.
[TWO PART HARMONY]

==========





PADA: OK folks, our Hare Krishna culture is supposedly based on fighting against evil doers from our Bhagavad Gita history, and many other Vedic histories of challenging evil doers. In fact Krishna is downright famous for challenging evil doers, and so are His top followers such as Arjuna, the acharyas etc. 

But nope! According to Mahatma -- the Gita is a story of Krishna's defect -- a lack of forgiveness -- and Krishna's anger management problem, which can only be fixed when Krishna and Arjuna enroll in Mahatma's anger management and forgiveness therapy classes, at the special "Krishna only" discount price of $250 per session. 

All this anger is the result of -- Krishna and the Pandavas -- "guarding their failures with victimhood." Yes, poor Krishna and Arjuna are failures, who are suffering from victimhood syndrome. Again, that is because they forgot to sign up for Mahatma's therapy classes! 

But wait, you mean all the devotees Mahatma's program banned, beat, molested, sued and killed are "failures"? They failed to get out of the way of the GBC's army tank? They failed to leave ISKCON sooner? But how could five years old children get away from their molester messiah's program, at age five? At all?

Who knew! The entire Bhagavad Gita is NOT at all about Krishna's preaching of "justifiable revenge." It is "preaching" that we should abandon the battlefield, hide under a rock, and forgive our opponents, even when they aggress the Vaishnava ladies, and other devotees, and try to poison, burn and kill Arjuna's Vaishnava family. Just walk away, and let the evil doers conduct all the more treachery more and more! That will fix things!

Mahatma thinks, as any bogus reader of the Gita like him would know, Krishna's asking Arjuna to avenge the Pandavas is low class tamasic guna anger. And this is a sign Krishna suffers from victimhood syndrome. Krishna is an angry victim, and He is thus not preaching forgiveness, because He is overcome by raja guna anger -- and vengence, all stemming from His victimhood cry baby attitude. 

Poor Krishna needs Mahatma's "go back to sleep and allow crimes to go on left and right" training classes! Wait, Mahatma Gandhi preached the same things, roll over and allow yourself to be a victim. Ahimsa! And Srila Prabhupada said, this is totally bogus. And no small amount of DANGEROUS.

Yes who knew, even Krishna is full of low class blame and anger. And Krishna's anger makes Him artificially feel powerful. The Pandavas forgiveness would be theirs and Krishna's sign of showing weakness, so they decided to fight based on low class angry vengence and victimhood instead. Forgiveness would be the only path out of the door of this vengence and pain, because the Pandavas and Krishna are feeling pain due to mundane rajas and tamas guna anger issues.  

Mahatma is more advanced than Krishna, while Krishna gets angry at offenders to His devotees, Mahatma never feels any anger at evil doers at all! 

Sorry! Not what happens in the teachings of Krishna! Committing atrocities to Vaishnavas makes Srila Prabhupada and Krishna VERY angry. And this should therefore also make their devotees VERY angry. If the devotee is supposed to dovetail his desires with Krishna's, then Krishna wants to see evil doers retaliated against. And strongly. 

All sorts of banning, beating, molesting, suing and killing is going on in Mahatma's empire, so it is time to forgive the perps and allow them -- to ban, beat, molest, sue and kill -- all the more victims. No one should protest! The beatings will continue until morale improves!

But hey Mahatma is just one out of many hundreds of similar people who are forgiving the evil doers. Many times I told devotees, their guru is taking drugs and having sex, and perhaps also allowing -- if not encouraging -- a child molesting program, and a variety of other assorted crimes, and they just looked like they had fallen asleep on their feet. Sex? Drugs? Guru? Child abuse? And all this is found in Krishna's successors? Not my problem prabhu! Forgive them and move on! 

And that is why Jane Wallace of CBS news said to me, Kirtanananda's sitting on a big seat, covered with the hands of a couple dozen boys is "pedophile heaven." So why are all these Bhagavad Gita warriors, chanting "Jaya Bhaktipada"? And why is no one taking him off that seat? 

She said, I am not even a student of Bhagavad Gita, but if some self evident pedophile was sitting on a big seat in my Church, I would personally go up on the platform and -- take him off that seat all by myself, even if I would be attacked for doing so.  

In any case, no, we are not supposed to sit idly by as Vaishnavas are banned, beaten, molested, sued and killed. And it is amazing we even have to point that out. Because allowing or acquisecing mistreatment for some victims, continues to allow it for other victims, as happened REPEATEDLY. And that is why Krishna wants us to stop these things immediate fashion, right out of the gate. The entire teaching of the Gita is, do your duty -- as MY devotee -- to stop harassment of other devotees and Vaishnavas, that is your obligation to God.

Someone said that Mahatma is like the apologists the medieval Popes had. When women were raped by clergy, and people were burned at the stake, tortured, killed and so on, the relatives were naturally upset. So the Popes had official apologists writers -- who would write letters to the victim's families to try to appease them. And Mahatma is an apologist for his bogus Popes, like Rambhouru and the other "therapy" folks. 

Problem for them is, more and more of the people who are victims are not buying that the victims are the problem, and not the perps and their apologists. By some miracle, the victims are not the actual victims, and the victims are suffering victimhood, when they know very well -- they are the victims. They already know, Mahatma's program is the problem -- and has been all along. 

All the banning, beating, molesting, lawsuits and murders are a result of his process, and he cannot cover that up forever. MORE people are waking up more every day. Never mind Yamaraja was onto their bogus apologism tricks right from day one in 1978.  

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com   

====

MORE CRIMINALS IN CHARGE OF CHILDREN?

Dear All,

It has come to my attention that the appointment of Eka Varna (also known as Vincenzo Barba / Enzo Barba) as organiser and leader of the UK youth bus tour operating under the ISKCON name.

My concern is not directed at personal matters, but at the suitability, safeguarding standards, and governance processes associated with a role that involves significant responsibility, including leadership over devotees, the interaction with overseeing and managing young participants including minors, the representation of ISKCON publicly, and management of organisational resources.

Safeguarding and suitability concerns.

I understand that participants are required to undergo background checks before joining the tour. Given this, I am seeking clarification on what equivalent due diligence, safeguarding assessments, risk evaluations, reference checks, and suitability processes were undertaken in relation to the appointment of the organiser.

A number of devotees have expressed concerns regarding conduct and suitability for leadership responsibilities. These concerns include reports of aggressive or inappropriate behaviour in prior service contexts, interpersonal conflicts within temple environments, and concerns about temperament and judgement in leadership settings.

*It is well known that Eka Varna the organiser of the UK Bus Tour is a convicted criminal with convictions of assaults and drug use.*

Given Eka Varna’s temperament, I sincerely do not think it is appropriate for him to supervise minors under the age of 18 along with his vast criminal background.
Above all, my greatest concern is the welfare, protection, and spiritual well-being of children, teenagers, and young devotees who may participate in this tour. 

Individuals placed in positions of authority and influence over young people are entrusted with a significant responsibility, and it is essential that safeguarding considerations remain paramount in any appointment.

There are devotees willing to provide their first account experiences with Eka Varna. Although most people know his true character within Bhaktivedanta Manor, ISKCON Soho, Inish Rath Island, Budapest Temple and Krsna Valley in Hungary where his own guru Sivarama Swami asked him to leave Krsna Valley because of his misdeeds. When is the GBC going to start paying attention to who they place in charge of children?

From BATH UK.

=================

In Brihad-Bhagavatamrita, Sanatana Goswami beautifully narrates the journey of a soul to the kingdom of God. Gopa Kumara is that fortunate soul who decides to go back to the kingdom of God, Goloka Vrindavan. In this world we are on a never-ending journey. We have been wandering in this material world away from God for an uncountable number of years.

Sometimes we travel to the upper planetary systems to enjoy good karma. Sometimes we are compelled to go to the lower planetary systems to suffer bad karma. Sometimes we wander in a human body, sometimes in a non – human body. Sometimes we live on land, sometimes in water and sometimes in the sky. The dollops of happiness given to us during our travels hardly give any joy, in fact it brings more frustration. Just as the water of the ocean cannot quench our thirst the allurements of this world cannot satiate our hearts.

During our journey we come across other travelers too. We identify them as our father and mother, brother and sister, spouse and children, friends and foes. We start liking their company. We desire to live with them forever. But just as the waves of the ocean devoid of emotions demolishes the castle of sand, the unconquerable time unmoved by our tears crushes all our dreams and steals all our loved ones from us. This is the nature of this world. This is how this world has been functioning since the dawn of creation.

We are residents of the spiritual world

So, Krishna, the architect of this world, warns us that nowhere in this entire material creation one can enjoy forever, miseries are everywhere because death is everywhere. Bhagavad Gita 8.16. But away from this material world is the spiritual world which is not ephemeral but is eternal. In that world there is no death and is free from all sufferings. We originally belong to the eternal spiritual world. So, Krishna asks us to return back to the spiritual world. Srila Prabhupada in his writings have underlined the importance of returning to the spiritual world thousands of times. In fact, he started a monthly magazine and named it as “Back to Godhead (BTG).”

Just as a fish separated from water will always remain miserable similarly as long as we are separated from our eternal spiritual homes we will continue to suffer. Krishna gives opportunity to each and every one to come back to him. You and I can also live with Krishna in his beautiful kingdom.

Sanatana Goswami in his book, Brihad-Bhagavatamrita, tells the story of a fortunate soul, Gopa Kumara, who also got an opportunity to return back to the spiritual world. Just like us, Gopa Kumara was also in this material world where we are living now. But Gopa Kumara unlike us consciously decided to leave this material world and return back to the spiritual world. 

In his magnum opus, Brihad-bhagavatamrita, Sanatana Goswami explain in detail Gopa Kumar’s journey to Goloka Vrindavan. Goloka Vrindavan is the abode of Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Each nugget of the book allows us to experience the emotions he went through during his travel. The book captivates our mind and tantalizes us to join Gopa Kumara in his journey.

Gopa Kumara decides to go back to the spiritual world

Gopa Kumara wanted to end all his sufferings. “Enough is enough. I no longer want to suffer the pains and pleasures of this ephemeral world,” he thought. So, as soon as he got the chance to go back to his original spiritual home, he immediately grabbed it. With enthusiasm, confidence and complete faith in the Supreme Lord, he decided to march towards his final destination. 

On his way to Goloka Vrindavan, he also went to the higher planets of this material world where lots of opportunity for sense gratification was present. But he wasn’t happy there. So, from there he went to the spiritual world. He went to different spiritual planets of the spiritual world. He went to Vaikuntha, to Ayodhya, to Dwarka. In that spiritual abode he met the spiritual residents who were as glorious as the Supreme Lord and all were in utter bliss. There he experienced unlimited joy, he achieved complete perfection.

But still he missed something. He missed Krishna. He missed brajvasis, the residents of Vrindavan. There was a tinge of dissatisfaction in his heart. His heart longed to be with Krishna. He desperately wanted to go to Goloka Vrindavan. How will Krishna not fulfill the desire of his dear devotee? A celestial plane which travelled faster than the speed of the mind travelling along a wonderful path took Gopa Kumara to that glorious land which is the topmost of all the spiritual planets.

Gopa Kumara arrives in Goloka Vrindavan

Sages and saints meditate for thousands of years to get a glimpse of that land. In that glorious land of Goloka Vrindavan Gopa Kumara’s heart attained supreme satisfaction. He wanted to see Krishna and so began searching Krishna. He saw the brajvasis, the most exalted devotees, and inquired from them about Krishna. But they were so absorbed in Krishna that they were not able to say a word. 

One elderly man who was overwhelmed with emotions in broken words showed him the palace of Gopa King, Nanda. At the palace he saw millions and millions of wonders which he had never seen or imagined. At the entrance of the palace, Gopa Kumara inquired from an elderly brajvasi about Krishna. With a heavy heart she said, “he who has stolen our hearts left with his friends and cows in the morning to the forest to enjoy his pastimes.”

Unable to bear separation from Krishna the brajvasis with great difficulty were spending their time in the day. To alleviate their pain some had absorbed themselves in remembering his many pastimes. Some composed songs which described his many activities and sang it throughout the day. Many got busy in preparing delicious preparations which they planned to serve him as soon as he returns. Engaged in different activities, everyone tried their best to hide their emotions, but their eyes belied them, tears constantly flowed from their eyes and in broken words they kept calling Krishna, Krishna. It was difficult for anyone to understand whether they were in bliss or were in pain. Whether they were with Krishna or not with Krishna.

They were desperately waiting for Krishna to return from the forest. And as soon as it was evening, all frantically ran towards the shore of Yamuna. Fixing their eyes towards the forest trying their best not to blink they were eagerly waiting for him. Gopa Kumara was also present there.

Krishna welcomes Gopa Kumara to Goloka Vrindavan

Suddenly the atmosphere got filled with the melodious sound of the flute. The Yamuna stopped flowing. The birds flying in the air stood still. The trees decorated with beautiful flowers spread their arms to embrace the sound. Some of the brajvasis overwhelmed with emotions fainted. Many desperately tried looking in the direction of the sound but their tears blurred their vision. Some stood stunned. Gopis carrying pots of delicacies ran hurriedly. Some fell on the ground. And in great pain of separation they cried again and again. Yashoda with her husband, Nanda Maharaj, Radharani with her many friends and along with all the moving and non- moving residents of braj anxiously waited to have a glimpse of Krishna.

And suddenly a bluish boy in yellow garments appeared. He was decorated with forest flowers and was wearing crown made of peacock feathers. The fortunate flute whom the bluish boy had embraced with his lips joyfully danced and informed all that Krishna has arrived. It was celebration time. Krishna was so happy to see all. After whole day work, he was back home. But suddenly Krishna’s joy multiplied manifold!

Krishna is so happy to see Gopa Kumara

Amongst the brajvasis who had assembled at the shore of Yamuna, he saw Gopa Kumara. He stopped playing his flute. Leaving his friends, leaving his cows, and leaving all confused he ran frantically towards him. He leaped towards Gopa Kumara and embraced him. Seeing his dear friend after such a long time, Krishna overwhelmed with emotion fainted in the arms of Gopa Kumara. After regaining consciousness, Krishna took the hand of Gopa Kumara in his lotus hand and inquired, “How are you? I missed you so much, Sarupa. Every day I waited for you hoping that you will return one day for sure. I am so thankful. I am so grateful. You are back. Now please stay here. Don’t go anywhere.” Gopa Kumara’s name in the spiritual world was Sarupa. Although Gopa Kumara had forgotten the name Sarupa but Krishna remembered. Sarupa got reunited with Krishna and with his spiritual family in the spiritual world to live eternally and blissfully.

In the spiritual world there is no anxiety, no fear. It is free from all kinds of suffering which afflict us in this world. Scriptures tell us that the same destiny awaits us too. Through his book, Brihad-bhagavatamrita, Sanatana Goswami is inviting us to the spiritual world, our original spiritual home. Are we ready?

========

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Luv and Kush / Jiva Fall Issue 06 10 26



LUV and KUSH Defeat Rama's Army

The story of Luv and Kush stopping the horse of Rama as part of the Ashvamedha Yajna is a significant episode in the Ramayana, particularly in the Uttarakanda, the later section of the epic. After the return of Rama, Sita, and Lakshmana to Ayodhya and the establishment of Rama’s reign, peace and prosperity prevail in the kingdom. However, due to the whispers and doubts among some citizens regarding Sita's chastity during her time in Lanka, Rama decides to send her to the forest near the hermitage of Sage Valmiki.

While living in Valmiki's ashram, Sita gives birth to twin sons, Luv and Kush. The sage Valmiki takes them under his wing, imparting education and the knowledge of the scriptures, as well as the warrior's martial arts. The boys grow up unaware of their royal lineage. Years later, Rama decides to perform the Ashvamedha Yajna, a horse sacrifice ritual intended to establish his sovereignty and ensure the prosperity of his kingdom. As part of the ritual, a consecrated horse is let loose to wander freely. The regions where the horse roams must either accept the supremacy of the king who releases it or challenge it by capturing the horse and engaging in battle.

The consecrated horse from Rama’s Ashvamedha Yajna wanders into the forest near Valmiki’s hermitage. Luv and Kush, having been trained in the art of warfare and unaware of the horse’s significance, capture it. They tie the horse to a tree, thus issuing a challenge to the authority of the king who sent it. When Rama’s generals and soldiers come to retrieve the horse, they find it guarded by the two young boys. The soldiers attempt to take the horse back by force, but Luv and Kush, with their extraordinary military prowess, defeat them. Eventually, Lakshmana, Bharata, and Shatrughna arrive to confront the twins, but they too are defeated by the young warriors.

Upon hearing about the repeated defeats of his warriors, Rama himself comes to reclaim the horse. He is astonished by the strength and valor of the boys. Valmiki then appears and reveals the true identity of Luv and Kush as Rama’s sons. Rama is overcome with joy and emotion, embracing his sons and acknowledging them. And that explained the mystery of why they could not be defeated in battle. 

======

THE JIVA FALL ISSUE



CP DASA: Gour Govinda Maharaja said that Srila Prabhupada never once mentioned in his books that the conditioned soul was with Krsna before falling into the material world. Not once. According to him, Srila Prabhupada never once said such a thing.

But this is totally wrong, false.

If we read Srila Prabhupada's books, we can see how Srila Prabhupada said hundreds or maybe thousands of times that the conditioned soul, before coming to the material world, was with Krishna, was fully Krishna conscious. This is the meaning of "original" and "originally."

-----------

"As soon as one is ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ it is to be understood that one is in his pure,๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ constitutional position.
.
This state of existence is called ล›uddha-sattva, which means that it is transcendental to the material qualities."
(SB 4.3.23.Purport)
-----------------------------------

“Being situated in his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐š ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐๐ž๐ฏ๐จ๐ญ๐ž๐ž does not identify with the body.”
(Upadesamrta 6.Translation)

------------------------------------

"In this verse it is very nicely explained how ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ, becomes polluted and we gradually become almost completely forgetful of our relationship with the Supreme Lord.
.
When intelligence is affected, one loses ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ญ๐š๐ฌ๐ญ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ."
(SB 4.22.30.Purport.)

-----------------------------------------

๐Ž๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ because we are part and parcel of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a.


When this consciousness is misguided and one is put into the material atmosphere, which pollutes the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ one thinks that he is a product of the material elements.

Thus ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ฆ๐›๐ซ๐š๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐š๐ฌ part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, just as a man who sleeps forgets himself.

In this way, ๐ฐ๐ก๐ž๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐œ๐ก๐ž๐œ๐ค๐ž๐, all the activities of the lost soul are performed on a false basis. (SB 4.22.31)

----------------------------------------

So if we want to be saved and elevated to ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, then only means is Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness. 

So we should try to avoid the material existence and come to ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž, ๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž, ๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ž, ๐ฌ๐š๐œ-๐œ๐ข๐-๐š๐ง๐š๐ง๐๐š-๐ฏ๐ข๐ ๐ซ๐š๐ก๐š [๐๐ฌ. 5.1].

(ลšrฤซmad-Bhฤgavatam 7.6.5 -- Vแน›ndฤvana, December 7, 1975 )

---------------------------------------
๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ž ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.

Letter to Jananivasa—Vrindaban--27 August, 1967

So as eternal servitors of Krishna—our ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง— ๐ฐ๐ž ๐Ÿ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ง when we try to become the enjoyer, imitating Krishna. ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐Ÿ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ.

Krishna is the Supreme Enjoyer, and we are ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ to be enjoyed by Him, and when we ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง there is ๐ง๐จ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ๐š.

K.C. gives us the opportunity of rendering service to Krishna, and this service attitude only can ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ž ๐ฎ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.

------------------------------------

SB 10.7.1–2,๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐š๐ฅ- ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž

“this root cause of suffering can be removed by ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐š๐ฅ of our Kแน›แนฃแน‡a ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ.

All the Vedic literatures presented by Vyฤsadeva and other great sages are therefore intended ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž our Kแน›แนฃแน‡a ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ, which begins ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž with ล›ravaแน‡a-kฤซrtanam. 

The process ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž one’s Kแน›แนฃแน‡a ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ is ฤdau ล›raddhฤ tataแธฅ sฤdhu-saแน…gaแธฅ (Bhakti-rasฤmแน›ta-sindhu 1.4.15).


The pastimes of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a can be properly received from devotees.

-----------------------------------------------------

Srila Prabhupada-Montreal, Canada June 15, 1968:

Ladies And Gentlemen,

This Krsna ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ movement is meant for ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ.


At present, owing to our long association with matter, our ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ has become ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ž๐, just as rain water becomes ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ when it falls from a cloud.

๐Ž๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ the water is ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž, ๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐, but as soon as it falls onto the earth, it becomes mixed with many dirty things. 

Similarly, ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ , as spirit soul, our ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ is ๐ฎ๐ง๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ž๐, but because of our present association with matter, our ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ is ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ž๐.
Therefore we have so many varieties of ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ.

Disagreements between one person and another are due to ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ. I think some way; you think otherwise. Therefore we do not agree.
But ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ , your ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ and my ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ were one.
And what is that "one"? That ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ is to think, "God is great, and I am His eternal servant." That is ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ.

As soon as we want to imitate God or artificially become one with God, ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง begins.

A Bengali verse states,

krsna-bahirmukha haรฑa bhoga-vancha kare nikata-stha maya tare japatiya dhare

"When an individual soul ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ž๐ญ๐ฌ his eternal relationship with God and tries to lord it over the material nature, that ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ž๐ญ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ condition is called maya, or illusion."

So at present, especially in this age, ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐ž๐ญ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ of our eternal relationship with God is very strong.

But by chanting the transcendental sound Hare Krsna, the first result is that
our heart or mind becomes ๐œ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐ž๐ of all dirty things. This is not a theoretical proposition; it is a fact.

---------------------------------------------------

Similarly, we are part and parcel of the Supreme Lord.

So long we are not ๐š๐ ๐š๐ข๐ง linked up with His service, with His...

So long we are not ๐š๐ ๐š๐ข๐ง ๐ซ๐ž๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ก๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ฉ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š, we shall remain restless. That is our ๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.

(From minute 3:29 to minute 4:01 )

https://prabhupadavani.org/.../%C5%9Br%C4%ABmad-bh%C4.../
ลšrฤซmad-Bhฤgavatam 5.5.2-Sept. 1, 1969

-------------------------------------------------
Our svarลซpa, means ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ, ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง,๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š.
๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ž, ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, going ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค home, ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค ๐ญ๐จ Godhead when he turns back towards ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค home, ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค ๐ญ๐จ Godhead, then he is ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ค๐ญ๐š. ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐›๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.

---------------------------------------------------------

Our svarลซpa, means ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ, ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, is jฤซvera svarลซpa haya nitya-kแน›แนฃแน‡a-dฤsa [Cc. Madhya 20.108-109], 

๐ž๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐Š๐ซ๐ฌ๐ง๐š.

So as soon as we place ourselves in ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐œ๐ž, then you are ๐ฅ๐ข๐›๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ immediately.

When we understand this, and try to get free from this business, then we become eligible for going ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค home, ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค ๐ญ๐จ Godhead.

Tadฤ janaแธฅ samparivartate 'smฤd. Samparivartate, ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, asmฤt.

And when he turns back towards ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค home, ๐›๐š๐œ๐ค ๐ญ๐จ Godhead, then he is ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ค๐ญ๐š.
๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐ข๐›๐ž๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง.

(ลšrฤซmad-Bhฤgavatam 5.5.9-Oct. 31, 1976-Vแน›ndฤvana)

https://prabhupadavani.org/transcriptions/761031sbvrn/

------------------------------------------------------------
What is the business of the conditioned soul?

"That business is to ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐œ๐ญ his ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ relationship with Kแน›แนฃแน‡a."

ลšrฤซmad-Bhฤgavatam 3.25.14-Nov. 14, 1974-Bombay

-------------------------------------------------------------

His ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness, (SB 5.18.11.Purport)

----

His ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position as an eternal servant who is part and parcel of the Lord

(SB 5.18.11.Purport)

----

They ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž their ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness,

(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----

He then ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ quality of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness.

(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----------------
If one can cleanse his mind, he immediately comes to his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness, and thus his life becomes successful.

(SB 5.18.11.Purport)

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/sb/5/18/11

----
In this way, simply by hearing of the powerful activities of the Lord, the devotee’s heart becomes almost completely cleansed of material contamination, and thus his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position as an eternal servant who is part and parcel of the Lord becomes manifest. 

(SB 5.18.11.Purport)

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/sb/5/18/11

----

As explained in the next verse,  
Kแน›แนฃแน‡a is the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ source of all living entities.
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)
----

All living entities are part and parcel of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a, and therefore when they ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž their ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness, they possess all the good qualities of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a in a small quantity. (SB 5.18.12.Purport)

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/sb/5/18/12

----

When one engages himself in the nine processes of devotional service
(ล›ravaแน‡aแน kฤซrtanaแน viแนฃแน‡oแธฅ smaraแน‡aแน pฤda-sevanam/ arcanaแน vandanaแน dฤsyaแน sakhyam ฤtma-nivedanam [SB 7.5.23]), one’s heart becomes purified, and
he immediately understands his relationship with Kแน›แนฃแน‡a.

He then ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ quality of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness.

(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/sb/5/18/12

----

In the ฤ€di-lฤซlฤ of Caitanya-caritฤmแน›ta, Chapter Eight, there is a description of some of the qualities of devotees. For example, ลšrฤซ Paแน‡แธita Haridฤsa is described as being very well-behaved, tolerant, peaceful, magnanimous and grave. In addition, he spoke very sweetly, his endeavors were very pleasing, he was always patient,
he respected everyone, he always worked for everyone’s benefit, his mind was free of duplicity, and he was completely devoid of all malicious activities.

These are all ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† qualities of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a, and when one becomes a devotee they automatically become manifest. (SB 5.18.12.Purport)

Link to this page: https://prabhupadabooks.com/sb/5/18/12

----

Although crocodiles are very fierce animals, they are powerless when they venture out of the water onto land. When they are out of the water, they cannot exhibit their ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ power. (SB 5.18.11.Purport)

------------------------------------------------

NOTE. Meaning of ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ :

Thousands of candles may be kindled by an ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ candle, and all will have the same candle power. (CC Adi 3.71, Purport)

---

“we take the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ candle as ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ candle,” (Room Conversation with Metaphysics Society -- February 21, 1975, Caracas).

---

“So each candle is of the same power, lighting power. But still ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐จ๐ง๐ž is called ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ.” (Room Conversation with Prof. Regamay, Professor of Sanskrit at the University of Lausanne -- June 4, 1974, Geneva)

---

Although the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ candle you can say ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฆ๐›๐ž๐ซ ๐จ๐ง๐ž candle, but all the candles are equally powerful. (Speech at Gaudiya Math Center -- Visakhapatnam, February 19, 1972)

----

According to the dictionary, ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ means :

This condition is ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ , in its origin, initial, at the beginning, the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ condition in its history, preceding all others in time, the first condition.
.

The ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ condition is the first condition in the history of something or someone.
.

The word ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ is used to indicate a real and existing fact at the beginning.
.

If something does not exist, preceding other conditions in time, then the word ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ is not used.
.

It is absurd to say that something is first, initial, original, etc., if it never actually existed.
.

If something never existed, then it cannot be first or second, or anything at all.
.
Daily examples :

" the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ part of the house."(At first,at the beginning of his coming into existence)

"the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ owner of the house."(The first owner,at the beginning)

"restored the house to its ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ CONDITION ."(His first condition,at the beginning)

--------------------------------------------------------------

๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ - ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜†
.

1.If one can cleanse his mind, he immediately comes to his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness, (SB 5.18.11.Purport)

----

2.and thus his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position as an eternal servant who is part and parcel of the Lord becomes manifest. (SB 5.18.11.Purport)

----

3.Kแน›แนฃแน‡a is the ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ source of all living entities.
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----

4.therefore when they ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž their ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness,
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----

5.He then ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ quality of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness.
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----

6.These are all ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† qualities of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a,
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----

7.When they are out of the water, they cannot exhibit their ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ power.
(SB 5.18.11.Purport) 

------------------------------------------------------------

His ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness, (SB 5.18.11.Purport)

----

His ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ position as an eternal servant who is part and parcel of the Lord
(SB 5.18.11.Purport)

----

They ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž their ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness,
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

----

He then ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ his ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ฅ quality of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a consciousness.
(SB 5.18.12.Purport)

-----------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

Intimate Associates -- or -- Bed Bugs? 06 09 26




ANTARANGA (Intimate Devotee)

—ลšrฤซla Bhaktiprajรฑฤna Keล›ava Gosvฤmฤซ Mahฤrฤja

(Translated from Gauแธฤซya 15th Volume , Issue number 17 ,Year 1935)
— Siddhanta Vฤแน‡ฤซ Publications

Overview :

A widespread misconception prevails within many devotional circles that anyone who physically served, accompanied, or remained in close bodily proximity to the transcendental vapลซ of a great ฤcฤrya or even to Bhagavฤn Himself—must necessarily be an intimate disciple (antaranga-bhakta) or confidential associate who knows the true heart of Great Acaryas. 

This article was penned by the Paramahamsa Jagadguru ลšrฤซla Bhaktiprajรฑฤna Keล›ava Gosvฤmฤซ Mahฤrฤja to dispel this superficial and materially conceived notion of intimacy, and to firmly establish devotees in the ontological understanding of what truly constitutes intimacy with Guru and Bhagavฤn.

By distinguishing external, physical association from genuine spiritual affinity founded upon faithful adherence to the heart and teachings of the ฤcฤrya, this profound and revolutionary essay reveals the actual qualifications of an antaranga-bhakta. It demonstrates that true nearness is not determined by bodily proximity, but by the degree of one's surrender, fidelity, and alignment with the inner purpose and conception of the Guru-varga.

For every aspiring devotee who sincerely desires to understand who is genuinely a follower of the ฤcฤryas and who wishes to avoid the pitfalls of sentimentalism, personality-cultism, and external considerations, this article is not merely beneficial; it is essential reading.
__________

Those who outwardly surround an Acarya or great saint, who remain constantly near him, render bodily attendance, perform various forms of physical service, or execute his orders are not thereby necessarily to be accepted as eternal associates or intimate devotees. Many persons approached the great personalities such as the Vaisnava-sarvabhauma Om Visnupada Srila Jagannatha dasa Babaji Maharaja, Om Visnupada Srila แนฌhakura Bhaktivinoda, and Om Visnupada Srila Gaurakiล›ora dasa Gosvami Maharaja with diverse ambitions, and they even enacted various forms of external service before them. 

Yet their inner disposition was entirely different from that of these great souls; this is demonstrated by their many concealed immoral activities and hypocritical, heretical conduct. From an examination of the lives of these eternally perfected Vaisnava mahajanas — Srila Jagannatha dasa Babaji, Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, Srila Gaurakisora dasa Gosvami, and others — it is learned that many persons, even while imitating the act of daily partaking of their remnants, nevertheless remained hypocrites and antagonistic toward Vaisnavas.

On one occasion, a certain individual stated that those who massage the feet of great saints more, who can sit on the same seat, share the same bed, or dwell privately with them, are the true intimate associates. Hearing this, a certain Vaisnava remarked that, if this were so, then mosquitoes and bedbugs would have to be counted among the most intimate associates of great saints; for they remain constantly on the saint’s bed, even upon his head always keeping his company and nourishing themselves -- by sucking his pure, sattvika blood. 

If, under the guise of serving and associating with Sadhus, great Saints, and Acaryas, we remain busy collecting multifarious forms of gain, worship, and prestige, then our imitation of service to the Saint or Guru is nothing but bloodsucking, like the so-called service rendered by mosquitoes and bedbugs to a Saint’s body. Therefore, to attempt to suck the pure, sattvika blood of the Sadhus and Gurus in the name of serving them, and to mistake such deception for affection, is the most terrible misfortune. 

To ensure that our intelligence is not corrupted by such misfortune, we must always remain vigilant and sincerely pray before Hari, Guru, and Vaisnavas.

PADA: This is really the biggest problem we have had personally with ISKCON's post-1978 situation. "Prabhu you are wrong about the leaders -- and a great offender to advanced senior Vaishnavas! These senior devotees are the most intimate servants of Srila Prabhupada! They love Srila Prabhupada and will only do his bidding after he departed."

Maybe so, and maybe not. Looking at their track record -- of all the banning, beating, molesting, suing and -- sometimes killing of us Vaishnavas, it would seem these "senior men" had lots of self motivation for position, power, prestige, worship, and no small amount of desire to usurp the post of acharya for themselves, to control -- aka seize -- the manpower, money, and buildings, which they did. 

Right. So what happens if they are simply giant sized bed bugs -- sucking the sattvic blood of a pure devotee? What if they are simply posturing externally as great servants, while inwardly hiding nefarious personal motives for self aggrandizement? What if they "nevertheless remained hypocrites and antagonistic toward Vaisnavas." 

And that might explain why the 1940s Gaudiya Matha had such a big problem with -- how did you guess -- banning, beating, sexual deviant gurus, and suing and killing Vaishnavas? The leaders usurped the mission and made it into their personal guru business arrangement.

And what happens if the "intimate servants" are really exploiting blood sucking mosquitos and bed bugs? And that is why Srila Prabhupada said his Gaudiya Matha Gobrother "gurus" were like bugs, sitting on the lap of the king, while biting the king. 

And this is why -- when we said there is a problem, so many devotees chastised PADA and they glorified the GBC -- bed bugs -- who have been sitting on the lap of their guru -- biting their guru, and essentially destroying ISKCON and its citizens, to turn it into a Hindu cultural hall business, as they have done. 

This also explains why we had so much initial resistance, even from some so-called ritviks, on the poison issue. "Hell no prabhu, they loved Srila Prabhupada and would never treat him badly, never mind give him poison." But that is not what his statements, and the surrounding evidence, suggests? What is interesting to me is that this type of "usurping the post of guru" has a long history, and we just lived another -- more recent -- chapter of that ongoing story. 

And this explains why guys like Henry Doktorski and his ilk cannot understand what really happened here. He (and all kinds of current and former GBC blood sucking bed bug worshipers) keep insisting that these leaders are the dear most servants of guru and Krishna.  

Whereas we believed -- even in 1970s -- they are self motivated, if not ill motivated, and somewhat power hungry and -- prone to fall down into illicit behaviors. Which they did in spades. Never mind all the constant cat and dog fighting over encroaching -- by taking people from "my zone," and keep "your zone's pickers out of my zone," and "we are not going to help the crisis your zone" and etc. That was all going on in the 1970s all along.

"For every aspiring devotee who sincerely desires to understand who is genuinely a follower of the ฤcฤryas and who wishes to avoid the pitfalls of sentimentalism, personality-cultism, and external considerations, this article is not merely beneficial; it is essential reading."

Yup. So that means a small cabal of a few: self‑absorbed; self‑centered; egocentric; egomaniacal; self‑obsessed; conceited; vainglorious; pompous; imperious; haughty; proud / smug; boastful; self‑serving; self‑seeking; self‑important; psychopathic; megalomaiacs -- hijacked ISKCON. 

And then we wonder why there were so many problems? Because when the blood sucking bugs sitting on the king's lap become worshiped as the king's successors, there will be nothing but problems. Guaranteed 100%. 

As happens. As will always happen. And unless a person is very alert to distinguish the king from the bed bugs biting the king, he will become bewildered and mistake the bugs as the king's successors and representatives, instead of his blood sucking aggressors. 

Oddly, even at the time of Krishna there were plenty of people who were personally associated with Him, but they did not like Him, and sometimes wanted to kill Him etc. Or like Satrajit, they argued with Him and refused His orders. Personal association might be useful, and might be harmful. 

But personal association is no guarantee of surrender and faithfulness, and might produce a lot of envy and toxic desire to "kill guru and become guru" -- including poisoning -- as we found out here. Someone sent me a video of Navayogendra getting all sorts of his fans swarming all over him. 

He has become another bed bug biting the king. He is stealing worship meant for the king, for himself. And all of the people who do that are going to suffer severe reactions, because we are not allowed to steal from anyone, never mind a pure devotee. But for those who can see the bed bug is not the king, then they can be released from that illusion and move forward, and more people are all the time. 

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com

=====

WAKING UP THE DEAD


You cannot make someone see clarity when they find comfort within their fog.

No matter how much evidence is presented.

No matter how patiently things are explained.

No matter how obvious the truth appears from the outside.

Some people are not resisting clarity because they can’t see it.

They’re resisting it because seeing it would require change.

And change is uncomfortable.

Clarity demands accountability.

It asks difficult questions.

It challenges old beliefs.

It exposes excuses.

It shines light on things a person may not be ready to face.

So instead, they prefer to stay in the fog.

Not because it’s healthy.

But because it’s familiar.

The fog protects them from taking responsibility.

Protects them from self-reflection.

Protects them from having to admit that perhaps the problem was never entirely outside themselves.

And this is where many people exhaust themselves.

They spend years trying to save, fix, convince, explain, or awaken someone who has no desire to wake up.

They mistake effort for influence.

Love for control.

Patience for responsibility.

But Awareness cannot be forced.

Truth can be offered.

It cannot be imposed.

Because every person reaches clarity in their own time - or sometimes not at all.
And that realization is both painful and freeing.

Painful because it means accepting that not everyone will understand.

Freeing because it means no longer carrying the impossible burden of making them.

Sometimes the wisest thing someone can do is stop arguing with the fog.

Stop chasing understanding from those committed to confusion.

Stop trying to drag people toward a truth they aren’t ready to face.

Because clarity is not something that can be given.

It is something that must be chosen.

And until a person wants the truth more than they want the comfort of their illusions…

No amount of light will remove the fog they insist on living in.

PADA: Well yup!

Monday, June 8, 2026

Manasa Puja / Siddhanta Vani Publications / 06 08 26




PADA: Some very important instructions here. First of all, all deity worship has to be authorized by the pure devotee or it is not effective. That was my first objection in 1978, we cannot offer bhogha to conditioned souls like Jayatirtha. Gaura Kishore Das Babaji used to reject temple prasadam offered by the temple priests and he preferred food offered to him by the poor and lower class of people, considering that food more pure. 

That means the official temple food is not pure when offered by materialistic contaminated brahmanas. ISKCON has been infected with these paid brahmanas and / or persons offering bhogha to conditioned souls, if not sexual exploiters. 

I had one experience where I told the ISKCON temple leaders and poojari their guru was advocating wearing condoms for illicit sex, and they and the poojari insisted on keeping their guru's photo on the altars anyway. Because they are all getting paid a salary and need to keep their business going.

Nowadays most devotees are disconnected from temples and serving the deities there. So they can get their own deities at their home, and make a home temple if possible. However, if we come to a situation where we are no longer in a temple or home temple, we can still worship Krishna mentally. 

Hence, manasa puja, or serving Krishna mentally even when we are absent a proper deity worship situation. Of course this is generally considered as only possible for the very advanced, but we should understand the concept because what it really means is, training the mind to serve Krishna at all times wherever and whatever, because mental pooja does not require any material situation. 

Our material situations may change, but Krishna does not change, and we can connect to Him anywhere, at any time, in any situation, and that is the concept of manasa pooja. So we may not be advanced enough to perform such pooja now, but we should understand the process even theoretically as a goal for our gradual development. In the end, training the mind to worship Krishna constantly is the goal of life, and that is the overall idea here. This process cannot be imitated, but it can be aspired for.  

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com 

Mฤnasa-Pลซjฤ: (Smaraแน‡a Worship of the Pure Devotees)

— Published under the Guidance of ลšrฤซla Bhakti Siddhฤnta Sarasvatฤซ แนฌhฤkura Prabhupฤda

(Weekly Gauแธฤซya, Vol. 2, 1926–27)

— Siddhanta Vฤแน‡ฤซ Publications

The infinitely compassionate Supreme Lord, desiring to bestow His mercy upon the conditioned souls burdened with countless anarthas, descends into this mundane realm in the forms of ลšrฤซ Nฤma, ลšrฤซ Arcฤ, and ลšrฤซ Mahanta-Guru. Yet, even while descending into the domain of material perception, He forever remains transcendental to it. This is His divine sovereignty (ฤซล›itฤ).

Those bewildered by the limitations of sensory and mundane knowledge (akแนฃaja-jรฑฤna) can never comprehend this truth by their own endeavor. It becomes an object of realization only for those whose hearts are inclined toward service (sevฤ-unmukhatฤ). ลšrฤซ Arcฤ manifests within this world in eight distinct forms. As stated:

ล›ailฤซ dฤrumayฤซ lauhฤซ lepyฤ lekhyฤ ca saikatฤซ |

manomayฤซ maแน‡imayฤซ pratimฤแนฃแนญa-vidhฤ smแน›tฤ ||

(ลšrฤซmad-Bhฤgavatam 11.27.12)

“The Deity form (pratimฤ) is remembered as being of eight kinds: fashioned from stone, wood, metal, clay or sandal-paste, painted or drawn, sand, jewels, and the form conceived within the mind.”

Thus, ลšrฤซ Arcฤ may appear as stone, wood, metal, clay, sandal-paste, painting, sand, jewels, or as the mental form (manomayฤซ). Yet none of these should be misconstrued as ordinary material substances. The Viแนฃแน‡u-pratimฤ, or ลšrฤซ Arcฤ, is not a temporary object produced within the realm of distorted material reflections.

Within ลšrฤซ Arcฤ there is no distinction between body and indwelling self. The clay doll or wooden figure meant for the gratification of the senses and the transcendental worshipable reality (adhokแนฃaja-sevya-vastu) known as ลšrฤซ Arcฤ are not the same thing. Therefore it is said:

pratimฤ nฤhi tumi—sฤkแนฃฤt vrajendra-nandana

“You are not a mere image; You are directly the son of the King of Vraja Himself.”

(Caitanya-caritฤmแน›ta, Madhya 5.96)

And again:

dฤru-brahma-rลซpe—sฤkแนฃฤt ล›rฤซ-puruแนฃottama

“In the form of the wooden Deity, You are directly ลšrฤซ Puruแนฃottama Himself.”

(Caitanya-caritฤmแน›ta, Madhya 15.135)

Furthermore:

‘nฤma’, ‘vigraha’, ‘svarลซpa’—tina eka-rลซpa |

tine ‘bheda’ nฤhi—tina cid-ฤnanda-rลซpa ||

deha-dehฤซra, nฤma-nฤmฤซra kแน›แนฃแน‡e nฤhi ‘bheda’ |

jฤซvera dharma—nฤma-deha-svarลซpe ‘vibheda’ ||

ataeva kแน›แนฃแน‡era ‘nฤma’, ‘deha’, ‘vilฤsa’ |

prฤkแน›tendriya-grฤhya nahe, haya sva-prakฤล›a ||

(Caitanya-caritฤmแน›ta, Madhya 17.132–134)

“ลšrฤซ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s Name, Form, and Essential Identity are one reality. There is no difference among them, for all are manifestations of pure spiritual bliss and consciousness. In Kแน›แนฃแน‡a there is no distinction between body and possessor of the body, nor between the Name and the Named. Such distinctions belong only to the conditioned jฤซva. Therefore Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s Name, Form, and Divine Pastimes can never be grasped by material senses; they reveal themselves by their own intrinsic potency.”

Likewise:

ฤซล›varera ล›rฤซ-vigraha sac-cid-ฤnandฤkฤra |

se vigrahe kaha sattva-guแน‡era vikฤra ||

ล›rฤซ-vigraha ye nฤ mฤne, sei ta’ pฤแนฃaแน‡แธa |

aspแน›ล›ya adแน›ล›ya sei, haya yama-daแน‡แธya ||

(Caitanya-caritฤmแน›ta, Madhya 6.166–167)

“The divine form (ล›rฤซ-vigraha) of the Lord is of the nature of eternity, consciousness, and bliss (sat-cid-ฤnanda). How can anyone claim that such a form is merely a transformation of material goodness (sattva-guแน‡a)? One who refuses to accept the transcendental reality of ลšrฤซ Vigraha is a heretic (pฤแนฃaแน‡แธฤซ). Such a person is unfit for association, unworthy even of being seen, and remains subject to the chastisement of Yamarฤja.”

The conditioned soul, burdened with innumerable anarthas, must certainly take shelter of the lotus feet of a Vaiแนฃแน‡ava sad-guru and engage in arcana according to the prescriptions of the Sฤtvata Paรฑcarฤtra. For a prosperous householder in particular, the path of Deity worship (arcana-mฤrga) is primary. Indeed, for every initiated person who has approached a Vaiแนฃแน‡ava sad-guru and received dฤซkแนฃฤ, the personal worship of ลšrฤซ Mลซrti with one’s own hands is absolutely indispensable.

The scriptures declare that one who becomes negligent in arcana incurs spiritual ruin and falls into hellish conditions. An initiated devotee should never delegate the worship of his worshipable Lord to hired priests or professional worshippers. Rather, he should personally and carefully worship his iแนฃแนญa-deva according to ล›ฤstra, employing the mantras and procedures received from his sad-guru. ลšrฤซla Jฤซva Gosvฤmฤซ has discussed this point in particular detail in his Krama-sandarbha commentary on the verse:

arcanaแน vandanaแน dฤsyaแน

(ลšrฤซmad-Bhฤgavatam 7.5.23 [commonly cited from 7.5.23–24 sequence]).

Among the eight forms of ลšrฤซ Arcฤ mentioned previously, namely ล›ailฤซ, dฤrumayฤซ, lauhฤซ, lepyฤ, lekhyฤ, saikatฤซ, manomayฤซ, and maแน‡imayฤซ, it is the seven forms excluding the saikatฤซ (sand-made deity) that are generally worshipped by devotees of Bhagavฤn. The saikatฤซ-pratimฤ, however, is ordinarily accepted only by those who seek material objectives. Since such a form is inherently temporary and subject to both preservation and destruction, it becomes unfavorable to the cultivation of pure loving devotion (prฤซti). Therefore it is not embraced by selfless devotees who seek only divine love. As ลšrฤซla Jฤซva Gosvฤmipฤda explains in his Krama-sandarbha (11.27.12):

“saikatฤ saikatฤซty arthaแธฅ; eแนฃฤ tu sakฤmฤnฤm eva na tu prฤซtฤซcchลซnฤm, tad-rakแนฃaแน‡ayoแธฅ prฤซti-virodhฤt.”

“The term saikatฤซ refers to a form made of sand. Such a deity is suitable only for those who possess material desires, not for those who aspire for pure love, because its preservation and inevitable destruction are opposed to the mood of loving devotion.”

In truth, the so-called deity worship performed by impersonalists (nirbheda-jรฑฤnฤซs) or the followers of the paรฑcopฤsanฤ system is founded upon the conception that the deity form is temporary and that the ultimate goal is absorption into an undifferentiated, impersonal reality. Consequently, their worship of form is merely a deception—a refined form of idolatry (pauttalikatฤ).

The service of the Deity performed by a devotee of Bhagavฤn, however, is never idolatry, for it is non-different from service to the eternal sat-cid-ฤnanda-svarลซpa of Bhagavฤn Himself.

Because the gross material conception remains strong within devotees situated on the neophyte platform (kaniแนฃแนญha-adhikฤrฤซ prฤkแน›ta-bhaktas), they worship Bhagavฤn in those externally visible forms such as stone, wood, metal, clay, painting, and jewels,that is, in the six manifest forms of ลšrฤซ Arcฤ. Yet it is also observed that, from time to time, these same six forms of Arcฤ are worshipped by highly elevated devotees. 

The worship performed by such exalted souls, however, is not at all of the same nature as the worship performed by neophytes. Their worship is not based upon external perception; rather, it is bhฤva-sevฤ, service performed in divine spiritual emotion or even sฤkแนฃฤt-sevฤ, direct personal service unto Bhagavฤn Himself. In their vision, the Deity is not an object representing the Lord; He is directly the ever-living, self-manifest Supreme Reality standing before them and accepting their service.

The Arcฤ employed in external worship (sthลซla-pลซjฤ) consists of the forms known as ล›ailฤซ (stone), dฤrumayฤซ (wooden), lauhฤซ (metal), lepyฤ (formed of clay, sandal-paste, etc.), lekhyฤ (painted or drawn), and maแน‡imayฤซ (jeweled). The Arcฤ of mฤnasa-pลซjฤ, however, is the manomayฤซ-pratimฤ, the Deity manifest within the purified mind.

The temporary and mutable symbol fashioned within the imagination of a paรฑcopฤsaka or an impersonalist (nirbheda-jรฑฤnฤซ) according to the molds of his mind’s inclination toward enjoyment is entirely distinct from the pure manomayฤซ-arcฤ perceived by a devotee whose sole aspiration is the pleasure of ลšrฤซ Hari.

Those who are only Vaiแนฃแน‡ava-like (vaiแนฃแน‡ava-prฤya), whose hearts are still overpowered by anarthas, or who remain situated on the platform of the kaniแนฃแนญha-adhikฤrฤซ prฤkแน›ta-vaiแนฃแน‡ava, are not qualified to worship the manomayฤซ-arcฤ. Even a wealthy householder who, imitating a niแนฃkiรฑcana devotee whose anarthas have been eradicated, attempts to engage in the worship of the manomayฤซ-arcฤ is merely deceiving himself. 

Such imitation is a symptom of self-delusion and financial miserliness or duplicity (vitta-ล›ฤแนญhya). Until transcendental spiritual intelligence (cinmaya-buddhi) has awakened, true mฤnasa-pลซjฤ of the manomayฤซ-arcฤ remains impossible. For Vaiแนฃแน‡ava sannyฤsฤซs and niแนฃkiรฑcana devotees of Bhagavฤn, however, mฤnasa-pลซjฤ alone is prescribed in the ล›ฤstra. ลšrฤซla Jฤซva Gosvฤmipฤda writes in his Krama-sandarbha:

“gautamฤซye—sannyฤsinฤแน mumukแนฃuแน‡ฤแน mฤnasopahแน›tiแธฅ param iti.”

“The Gautamฤซya declares that for sannyฤsฤซs and those aspiring for liberation, mental offerings are supreme.”

He further cites the glory of this practice from the ลšrฤซ Nฤrada Paรฑcarฤtra, where Lord Nฤrฤyaแน‡a says:

“ayaแน yo mฤnaso yogo jarฤ-vyฤdhi-bhayฤpahaแธฅ...”

“This mental yoga removes the fears of old age, disease, and worldly afflictions.”

And again:

“yaล› caitat parayฤ bhaktyฤ sakแน›t kuryฤn mahฤmate |

kramoditena vidhinฤ tasya tuแนฃyฤmi ahaแน mune ||”

“O great sage! Whoever performs this worship even once with supreme devotion, following the prescribed method, I become fully pleased with him.”

Those whose intelligence remains confined to material conceptions often observe that niแนฃkiรฑcana Vaiแนฃแน‡avas do not visibly engage in external forms of worship and therefore conclude that such exalted souls neglect Viแนฃแน‡u-pลซjฤ or show disrespect toward arcana. But this conclusion is entirely mistaken.

Translator’s Footnotes: The fact is that the worship of such devotees has not ceased, it has deepened. Having transcended gross external vision, they engage in uninterrupted service within the realm of awakened spiritual consciousness. What appears externally as an absence of worship is, in reality, the culmination of worship. Their hearts have become temples, their remembrance has become service, and their every thought is absorbed in direct attendance upon the eternal ลšrฤซ Bhagavฤn, whose presence shines within the purified consciousness of His surrendered servant.

The niแนฃkiรฑcana devotees serve the manomayฤซ-arcฤ through a variety of mental offerings. They daily worship that manomayฤซ form of the Lord with spiritually conceived sandalwood paste, tulasฤซ leaves, incense, lamps, fruits, flowers, and every other article of worship offered within the realm of pure devotional emotion.

Sometimes, however, materially-minded persons who are attached to external ritualistic worship observe that exalted devotees do not outwardly perform such practices as ceremonial bathing, the application of tilaka, and similar observances, and thus they commit offenses at the feet of those devotees. They are unaware of the scriptural conception of mฤnasa-snฤna (mental bathing) and similar internal acts of worship. As the ล›ฤstra declares:

dhyฤnaแน yan manasฤ viแนฃแน‡or mฤnasaแน tat prakฤซrtitam

“That meditation upon Viแนฃแน‡u performed within the mind is known as mฤnasa-snฤna.”

Among the seven kinds of bathing described in the smแน›ti-ล›ฤstras, it is this mental bathing that is recognized as supreme.

Thus it is said:

snฤnฤnฤแน mฤnasaแน snฤnaแน manv-ฤdaiแธฅ paramaแน smแน›tam |

kแน›tena yena mucyante gแน›hasthฤ api vai dvijฤแธฅ ||

“Among all forms of bathing, the sages headed by Manu have declared mental bathing to be the highest. By performing it, even householding brฤhmaแน‡as become freed from all varieties of impurity and anartha.”

The exclusive devotees of Bhagavฤn are never bereft of remembrance of Viแนฃแน‡u, even for a moment. Therefore they are perpetually bathed and perpetually purified. To judge, from a mundane and external standpoint, that those who constantly engage in Hari-saแน…kฤซrtana are neglectful of bathing and other purificatory rites is to commit offense at the feet of the Vaiแนฃแน‡avas. For this reason ลšrฤซman Mahฤprabhu told ลšrฤซla Haridฤsa แนฌhฤkura:

kแนฃaแน‡e kแนฃaแน‡e kara tumi sarva-tฤซrthe snฤna |

kแนฃaแน‡e kแนฃaแน‡e kara tumi yajรฑa-tapo-dฤna ||

nirantara kara tumi veda-adhyayana |

dvija-nyฤsฤซ haite tumi parama-pฤvana ||

(Caitanya-caritฤmแน›ta, Antya-lฤซlฤ 3.251–252)

“At every moment you bathe in all holy places. At every moment you perform sacrifice, austerity, and charity. Continuously you study the Vedas, and you are more purified than all brฤhmaแน‡as and renunciants.”

The ritual procedures described in such Transcendental smแน›ti compilations as ลšrฤซ Hari-bhakti-vilฤsa are primarily intended for pious and affluent household Vaiแนฃแน‡avas, not for those great souls who have renounced all worldly possessions and attachments. This is explicitly stated by ลšrฤซla Gopฤla Bhaแนญแนญa Gosvฤmipฤda at the conclusion of Hari-bhakti-vilฤsa:

kแน›tyฤny etฤni tu prฤyo gแน›hiแน‡ฤแน dhaninฤแน satฤm |

likhitฤni na tu tyakta-parigraha-mahฤtmanฤm ||

ekฤntinฤแน prฤyaแธฅ kฤซrtanaแน smaraแน‡aแน prabhoแธฅ |

kurvatฤแน parama-prฤซtyฤ kแน›tyam anyan na rocate ||

“These prescribed observances have been written chiefly for pious householders possessing material resources, not for those great souls who have renounced all possessions. For the exclusive devotees (ekฤntinas), who with supreme love constantly engage in the kฤซrtana and remembrance of the Lord, no other duty is attractive or necessary.”

Thus, for such exalted souls, kฤซrtana and smaraแน‡a are themselves the entirety of worship. Through these alone their bhฤva-mayฤซ mฤnasa-sevฤ, their inward service saturated with divine spiritual emotion is perfectly accomplished. Their worship does not cease when external ritual diminishes; rather, it enters a more profound domain where every breath becomes remembrance, every thought becomes service, and every movement of the heart becomes an offering at the lotus feet of ลšrฤซ Bhagavฤn.

The worship (arcฤ-pลซjฤ) performed by So-called Vaiแนฃแน‡ava whose consciousness remains bound to material perception is gross (sthลซla). The mฤnasa-pลซjฤ of those whose anarthas have become contracted and weakened is subtle (sลซkแนฃma). But the bhฤva-sevฤ of the completely purified souls, the mahฤ-bhฤgavatas and exclusive devotees whose anarthas have been totally eradicated is most subtle (su-sลซkแนฃma), belonging wholly to the realm of transcendental realization.

The worship of ลšrฤซ Gaura-Nฤrฤyaแน‡a at the Yogapฤซแนญha in ลšrฤซdhฤma Mฤyฤpura, the service of Guru-Gaurฤแน…ga-Gฤndharvikฤ-Giridhฤrฤซ at ลšrฤซ Caitanya Maแนญha, the service of Dฤru-Brahma ลšrฤซ Jagannฤtha upon the shores of the Ratnฤkara at Nฤซlฤcala, and the worship of ลšrฤซ Vแน›ndฤvana-candra near Keล›ฤซ-tฤซrtha, these manifestations of ลšrฤซ Arcฤ have all appeared solely for the welfare of conditioned souls burdened with anarthas.

Again, in the Krama-sandarbha we encounter an account, cited from the Brahma-vaivarta Purฤแน‡a, concerning the mฤnasa-pลซjฤ of a Vaiแนฃแน‡ava brฤhmaแน‡a residing in Pratiแนฃแนญhฤnapura. There once lived in that city a simple-hearted and impoverished brฤhmaแน‡a. One day, while listening to a gathering of learned brฤhmaแน‡as discussing Vaiแนฃแน‡ava-dharma, he learned that the practices of Bhฤgavata-dharma could be performed even by a person afflicted with extreme poverty. 

Even one who possessed none of the wealth, resources, or elaborate articles of worship available to prosperous persons could nevertheless worship the Lord through mฤnasa-pลซjฤ, rendering service unto the Lord’s manomayฤซ-arcฤ within the mind. Upon hearing this, that poor and simple brฤhmaแน‡a began to perform mฤnasa-pลซjฤ himself.

Within his mind he gathered magnificent and costly articles of worship worthy of an emperor of emperors and offered them to his beloved Lord. There he constructed a splendid worship far surpassing anything available to him externally. One day a desire arose within his heart to offer to his worshipable Lord a preparation of paramฤnna (sweet rice richly soaked in clarified butter) served upon a golden plate. Filled with the aspiration to satisfy the senses of Lord Viแนฃแน‡u, he mentally prepared that ghee-soaked paramฤnna with great care and devotion. Then, within his meditation, he placed the offering in a golden vessel and reverently presented it before his cherished Lord.

Thus, although externally destitute and possessing nothing of value in this world, within the kingdom of devotion he became wealthier than kings, for the treasure of loving service offered through a purified mind is accepted directly by Bhagavฤn Himself.

He became utterly absorbed and immersed in his mฤnasa-sevฤ, entering a state of profound spiritual samฤdhi. All of his senses, being wholly engaged in endeavors meant solely for the pleasure of ลšrฤซ Hari, became so deeply occupied in His service that within his service-filled meditation he perceived: “This paramฤnna is exceedingly hot. Indeed, even my own two thumbs, having come into contact with it, are being burned.”

The brฤhmaแน‡a, whose heart was constantly intent upon seeking only the happiness of Hari, became distressed, thinking: “How shall I offer this excessively hot preparation for the Lord’s enjoyment?”

As this anxiety for the Lord’s comfort interrupted his samฤdhi, he returned to external awareness and found that even in his outward bodily condition his thumbs had become scorched and were burning from the heat. At that very moment, ลšrฤซ Vaikuแน‡แนญha-nฤtha, seated in Vaikuแน‡แนญha, beheld this extraordinary example of His devotee’s complete absorption in service and began to smile. Seeing Him laugh, ลšrฤซ Lakแนฃmฤซ-devฤซ and the other divine potencies inquired about the cause of His amusement.

Then Vaikuแน‡แนญha-nฤtha summoned His loving devotee to His own abode by a celestial aerial conveyance and showed the assembled divine energies the devotee’s two thumbs, which had been burned by the heat of the paramฤnna. Thereafter, granting him eternal service, He established him forever at His own side.

Likewise, when Nanda-nandana ลšrฤซ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a manifested in the house of Nanda Mahฤrฤja, the countless gifts of cows bestowed at that time also transcended all considerations of the gross material world.

Such is the nature of mฤnasa-pลซjฤ performed by one who has developed genuine taste (ruci) while following the path of vaidhฤซ-bhakti.

And the mฤnasa-sevฤ or bhฤva-sevฤ spoken of in relation to liberated souls upon the path of rฤga-mฤrga is of an entirely different order. It is not merely imaginative worship, nor does it involve any superimposition of thought upon an absent reality. Neither is it interrupted by any discontinuity. Rather, such service is direct service itself.

There, one attains direct vision of Bhagavฤn, direct contact with Bhagavฤn, and, within one's own eternally perfected spiritual sentiment (svarลซpa-siddha-rasa), renders every variety of transcendental service unto Him.

To persons governed by materialistic, sense-born knowledge (akแนฃaja-jรฑฤna), such service may appear no different from the gross worship performed by a novice devotee. Examples include: the service of ลšrฤซ Gopฤla by ลšrฤซla Mฤdhavendra Purฤซpฤda, the service of ลšrฤซ Gopฤซnฤtha by ลšrฤซla Gadฤdhara Paแน‡แธita Gosvฤmฤซ, the service of ลšrฤซ Gaura-Gadฤdhara by Dvija Vฤแน‡ฤซnฤtha at Campฤhaแนญแนญa, and the simple sฤttvika service rendered by ลšrฤซla Raghunฤtha Dฤsa Gosvฤmฤซ Prabhu to the Govardhana-ล›ilฤ bestowed upon him by ลšrฤซman Mahฤprabhu. 

Yet although these services may externally resemble the worship performed by those attached merely to ritualistic arcana, in reality they are nothing but outward manifestations of the devotees’ aแนฃแนญa-kฤlฤซya mฤnasa-sevฤ. In other words, the eternal services that they perpetually render within the pure realm of Vแน›ndฤvana, in their own eternally perfected spiritual identities (nitya-siddha-svarลซpas), become externally visible through such activities.

Similarly, the worship of ลšrฤซ ลšrฤซ Gaura-Nityฤnanda performed on the banks of Kuliyฤ by the exalted and nishkiรฑcana Bhฤgavata-mahฤtmฤ ลšrฤซpฤda Vaแนล›ฤซdฤsa Bฤbฤjฤซ Mahฤล›aya is also to be understood as belonging to the category of bhฤva-sevฤ.

In all such rฤga-mฤrga bhฤva-sevฤs, and the vaidhฤซ-mฤrga arcana performed by a conditioned neophyte (kaniแนฃแนญhฤdhikฤrฤซ) devotee in the state of material bondage, there exists a difference as vast as that between heaven and the netherworld. If a materialistic devotee imagines the bhฤva-sevฤ of the path of spontaneous devotion to be equivalent to his own ritualistic worship, or if, becoming unlawfully self-willed, he attempts to imitate such rฤga-mฤrga bhฤva-sevฤ, he will inevitably deviate from the path of true welfare.

The service rendered unto Nฤma-Brahma by ลšrฤซ Bhagavฤndฤsa Bฤbฤjฤซ Mahฤล›aya of Kฤnnฤ may indeed be described as bhฤva-mฤrgฤซya-sevฤ. Nevertheless, such a particular mode of service is not generally observed in the lives of the Gosvฤmฤซs or in those of the renounced Gauแธฤซya devotees who appeared before and after them. Therefore, even when a particular mode of worship is seen in the life of some extraordinary mahฤjana, it does not necessarily follow that it is meant to be imitated by ordinary persons.

Materialistic persons, or those who are merely Vaiแนฃแน‡ava-like in external appearance, are often incapable of understanding the aspiration to satisfy Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s senses that exists within exalted souls. Consequently, they frequently commit grave offences at the feet of the Vaiแนฃแน‡avas by arrogantly attempting to force those uttama-bhฤgavatas, whose every endeavor is solely for the pleasure of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a (kแน›แนฃแน‡ฤrthe akhila-ceแนฃแนญฤ) and whose only concern is the happiness of divine service, into the narrow confines of their own mental speculations and petty notions of right and wrong.

Some persons of meagre intelligence imagine that by the power of their own reasoning they can thoroughly comprehend, from books and historical accounts, the lives and methods of worship of the previous ฤcฤryas, and then use that understanding as a standard by which to judge genuine mahฤ-bhฤgavata Vaiแนฃแน‡avas. Such a mentality is merely a sign of their ill fortune.

The activities of a mahฤ-bhฤgavata, or the conduct of a truly qualified spiritual personality, cannot be grasped by materialistic persons.

abodha, agamya adhikฤrฤซra vyavahฤra

ihฤ bai siddhฤnta nฤ dekhi kichu ฤra

The conduct of an exalted adhikฤrฤซ is inconceivable and inaccessible to ordinary understanding. Beyond this, I see no other conclusion.

adhikฤrฤซ vaiแนฃแน‡avera nฤ bujhi' vyavahฤra

ye jana nindaye, tฤ'ra nฤhika nistฤra

One who, failing to understand the conduct of an exalted Vaiแนฃแน‡ava, criticizes him, has no deliverance.

adhama janera ye ฤcฤra yena dharma

adhikฤrฤซ vaiแนฃแน‡aveo kare sei karma

An act that appears ordinary or even blameworthy when performed by a fallen person may sometimes be performed by an exalted Vaiแนฃแน‡ava as part of his divine service.

kแน›แนฃแน‡era kแน›pฤya ihฤ jฤnibฤre pฤre

e saba saแน…kaแนญe keha mare, keha tare

Only by Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s mercy can one understand these truths. In confronting such matters, some perish, while others successfully cross beyond them.

— ลšrฤซ Caitanya-bhฤgavata, Antya-khaแน‡แธa 10.382, 387–389

The service of an uttama-bhฤgavata is svฤrasikฤซ-sevฤ , spontaneous service arising from the innate current of his perfected spiritual disposition. Whatever he desires is precisely that which Kแน›แนฃแน‡a Himself desires. Whatever is pleasing to him is pleasing to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a, and whatever is displeasing to him is likewise displeasing to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a. For the movements of such a mahฤ-bhฤgavata's heart and the innermost wish of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a are strung together upon a single thread.

An exclusive, fully surrendered devotee has merged all his personal desires into the desire of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a. Therefore, whatever is tasteful and agreeable to him is also agreeable to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a.

When a sense-enjoying person, devoted to gratifying his own senses, says, “I like to eat this particular thing,” or “I desire this object,” such a disposition is properly described as jihvฤ-lampaแนญya (greed of the tongue) or udara-lampaแนญya (greed of the belly).

But when an exclusive devotee, out of mercy, reveals to an intimate servant, “I find such-and-such an item pleasing,” it should be understood that Kแน›แนฃแน‡a Himself has desired that object.

The tasting of sweet rice (kแนฃฤซra) by ลšrฤซ Mฤdhavendra Purฤซpฤda and the indulgence of a materialistic sahajiyฤ who, under the pretense of honoring prasฤda, merely nourishes the greed of his tongue, are by no means the same. Frequently, some prฤkแน›ta-sahajiyฤs or persons governed by external, mundane perception, failing to understand the conduct of exalted Vaiแนฃแน‡avas, may remark: “These people eat without first offering the food to Bhagavฤn.” “Unlike me, they do not offer food with tulasฤซ leaves before eating.”

Such statements arise from a mentality that mistakes Tulasฤซ-devฤซ, the eternal, spiritual beloved of Hari, for an ordinary plant or mere leaf. Their conception of a material “tulasฤซ plant” or “tulasฤซ leaf” is entirely different from the actual transcendental reality of Cinmayฤซ Haripriyฤ Tulasฤซ. Such remarks merely reveal offenses committed at the lotus feet of exalted Vaiแนฃแน‡avas by materially inclined sahajiyฤs.

Yet such persons should remember one important truth. They may enter the temple room, ring bells repeatedly, and recite mantras countless times, but they do not thereby acquire the power to offer anything to Bhagavฤn. Their materially inclined, enjoyment-seeking senses can never present transcendental foodstuffs before the transcendental Lord. This is what they forget.

For this reason the scriptures prescribe bhลซta-ล›uddhi before arcana. However, until spiritual consciousness (cinmaya-buddhi) awakens through faithful service to the devotee and through following in the footsteps of Bhagavฤn's devotees, even the practice of bhลซta-ล›uddhi remains merely another variety of ritualistic activity (karmฤแน…ga). Consequently, their elaborate worship with the แนฃoแธaล›opacฤras (the sixteen traditional offerings in arcana) does not truly reach Bhagavฤn in a direct and living sense.

Only when worship is animated by genuine and awakened disposition of service born from devotion—does it transcend the realm of ritual and become actual service rendered unto the Supreme Lord. For Bhagavฤn is not attained through mechanical ceremony, but through the surrendered current of pure devotion flowing from the heart of His devotee.

Particularly in the case of such practitioners, there remains at every moment the possibility of committing sevฤ-aparฤdha and nฤma-aparฤdha. But the exclusive devotees, whose hearts are wholly dedicated to the pure Holy Name and whose sole aspiration is the joy of rendering service unto Bhagavฤn, are free from all offense. There exists not even the slightest obstruction within them that could stand between the Sevya (the Lord who is to be served) and the sevaka (the servant).

Therefore, because their current of service is eternally unobstructed, ever-manifest, and effulgently pure, they alone are capable of directly serving Bhagavฤn in every conceivable manner with all those objects that He truly desires. They alone can directly feed the Lord. Indeed, sometimes, being wholly intent upon discovering what will give pleasure to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a, they may act like ลšrฤซ Godฤ-devฤซ (ฤ€แน‡แธฤแธท), who would first taste an article before offering it, simply to ascertain whether it would be pleasing to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a. Thereafter, she would offer that very article unto Him.

Such devotees possess the qualification for viล›rambha-sevฤ, intimate service founded upon sacred confidence and affection. At times they serve Bhagavฤn with the mood of a dependent ward (pฤlya-jรฑฤna), and at other times they render service with their very own limbs and being. Such capacities are found only in these exalted devotees of the Lord.

To the fully surrendered and exclusive devotee, the vision of ฤชล›ฤvฤsyam, the perception that everything is pervaded by and belongs to the Supreme Lord manifests everywhere. Such devotees never assume the role of an independent enjoyer and never accept anything in the mentality of a bhoktฤ.

Apart from the surrendered devotee, however, all other persons in this world, whether knowingly or unknowingly, whether openly or covertly, remain enjoyers to a greater or lesser degree within this Lord-owned universe (ฤซล›ฤvฤsya-jagat). Therefore, except for the exclusive surrendered devotee, everyone else retains some measure of bhoga-buddhi , the mentality of enjoyment in relation to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a.

The surrendered devotee serves all objects of this world with the understanding that they are Kแน›แนฃแน‡a-ucchiแนฃแนญa-vastu–articles belonging to Kแน›แนฃแน‡a and sanctified by their relationship with Him. In contrast, the materialistic sahajiyฤ, possessing an intelligence contaminated by karma and mundane calculation, imagines that by placing a few leaves of tulasฤซ upon his sense-perceptible offering and momentarily engaging a portion of his enjoyables in the worship of Bhagavฤn, those very objects may later return to him as fuel for his own enjoyment or as instruments for gratifying the greed of the tongue.

The transcendental Bhฤgavata, however, perceives things very differently. He understands that all objects of this world have, from eternity, been designated solely for the satisfaction of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s senses (kแน›แนฃแน‡endriya-tarpaแน‡a). In their beginning, middle, and end, they are eternally meant for Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s enjoyment alone. Nothing can exist independently of having first been enjoyed by Kแน›แนฃแน‡a; indeed, apart from being the remnants of Kแน›แนฃแน‡a nothing in this world possesses any real existence.

It is only through the distorted vision of vivarta-buddhi that one becomes separated from the understanding that all things are Kแน›แนฃแน‡a's remnants and develops the mentality of personal enjoyment toward them. The entire system of arcana has therefore been established merely to gradually rescue the conditioned soul from the captivity of this enjoyer’s mentality (bhoga-buddhi).

But those who are perpetually devoted to the service of Hari and are capable of perceiving the true nature of things see otherwise. As it is said:

“yฤแน…hฤ nadฤซ dekhe, tฤแน…hฤ mฤnaye kฤlindฤซ.”

“Wherever they behold a river, they perceive the Yamunฤ.”

Thus, when they behold excellent fruits upon the trees, pure waters flowing in rivers, blossoming flowers in the forests, or fragrant breezes moving through the gardens, they do not respond as enjoyment-seeking persons do, with the desire to gratify their own senses. Rather, they become joyful and delighted upon seeing all such objects engaged in satisfying Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s senses. And with the understanding:

“kแน›แนฃแน‡era saba ล›eแนฃa, bhakta ฤsvฤdaya”

“Everything is Kแน›แนฃแน‡a’s remnant, and the devotee relishes those remnants in the ecstasy of divine love for Kแน›แนฃแน‡a.

Many people observed in the life of the foremost among paramahaแนsas, Oแน Viแนฃแน‡upฤda ลšrฤซla Gaurakiล›ora Dฤsa Gosvฤmฤซ Mahฤrฤja, that on numerous occasions he would reject articles known conventionally as “Kแน›แนฃแน‡a-prasฤda,” which had been offered by temple priests with tulasฤซ leaves and mantras, and instead would beg cooked food from the homes of persons socially regarded as low-born such as ล›vapacas (dog–eaters) and accept that food directly as mahฤ-prasฤda.

Such conduct on the part of a mahฤ-bhฤgavata lies entirely beyond the grasp of material intelligence. From an external perspective, such food may appear highly objectionable. Moreover, according to outward considerations, no tulasฤซ leaves had been offered upon it in the manner expected by materialistic sahajiyฤs. Therefore they may ask:

“How can such food be accepted, while food formally offered with tulasฤซ and mantras by a brฤhmaแน‡a is rejected?” The prฤkแน›ta-sahajiyฤs will never be able to satisfactorily resolve this question.

Nevertheless, they must understand one fundamental truth: the vigraha, tulasฤซ, and mahฤ-prasฤda apprehended by their material senses and mundane knowledge are entirely different from the transcendental realities of ลšrฤซ Vigraha, the sac-cid-ฤnanda form of Bhagavฤn manifest as the worshipable Deity; ลšrฤซ Tulasฤซ, who delights Mฤdhava; and ลšrฤซ Mahฤ-prasฤda, the conscious, spiritual remnant non-different from Viแนฃแน‡u Himself. These realities are completely beyond the jurisdiction of material perception.

Therefore, a conditioned person possesses no capacity to properly understand the conduct of exalted souls. The behavior of great devotees is not to be judged by external standards, ritual formalities, or social conventions. It can be understood only through devotion, through service, and through the mercy that descends from those very souls whose conduct appears so mysterious to mundane vision.