Who is This Sarah Jones? (ISKCON GBC Internal Letter)

[PADA: Who is this Sara Jones (see below)? Hee hee. These GBC guys are jokers and not proper managers, clearly.  

So anyway, the post 1978 GBC overall plan has self evidently been -- to make their very nice -- but stinky like dog manure --- homosexual, sexual predator, porno swami, sex with cats in samadhi -- and overall pedophile "Krishna's successor gurus" process: 

-- which would in turn de-populate ISKCON into a ghost town as the citizens ran away in disgust, fleeing their stinky program, and the molested children would naturally decamp en masse;

 

-- and the overall plan was to drive out almost all the Western people; 

-- so they could empty out the temples and make a Hindu deity showing business; 

-- and then bankrupt ISKCON morally and financially so they could further hi-jack the ISKCON buildings for their Hindu business model; 

-- and then have Sridhar Maharaja folks, Narayan Maharaja folks, Mahanidhi, Basu Ghosh, Gopal Krishna, Jayapataka, Radhanath, Bhakti Vikas swami, Bhakti Caru, Jagat Guru swami, and many prominent others -- make India their headquarters -- as they had to flee their pedophile guru mess over here in the West, and Hindu-ize their programs here in the West -- so they could keep cash coming in for their opulent living leaders;

-- have to admit, their plan has worked very well for them. And their few defenders (who call us ill names) like Cyril Wohrer are stating to realize, we cannot defend the indefensible. 

Even a Bhakta, Bhakta Chaitanya, says ISKCON is disintegrating into factions, and the pro-pedophile guru's faction is fighting with the "reform" group that is starting to realize the pro-pedophile guru's program will eventually poison ISKCON totally, so we have to try to at least appear like we are trying to remove it. Never mind the "reformers" were "2/3 show of hands voted in as gurus" by the pedophile guru's program's leaders in the first place.

So the reformers are sort of fighting with their own shadow. 

Even Lokanath was saying in 1988, the temples are empty ghost towns, so he was evidently well aware of what they were doing and why. Now they are making their "Hindu deity showing business" headquarters in India, and making Lokanath their last stand main leader of their Hindu business operation. 

OK, but since the whole foundation of their whole enterprise all along is -- to make illicit sex with men, women and children into their "Krishna successor acharyas"; and self evidently to orchestrate a program to mass molest children; and to have "God's successor's gurus" -- who molest disciples; and to orchestrate a system to ban, beat, sue and kill dissenters; and to even currently defend one of their current pedophile acharyas; eventually that foundation would be challenged, even in India. And it is.

So I'd say clearly, we've got them on the run. 

And thus clearly more people are now deciding to worship Srila Prabhupada and not them, which is making our program start to take off more and more. I just got a new contact from a prominent GBC preaching ISKCON group in India and he says -- PADA is right, Lokanath swami -- has to go. He just stinks too bad to keep him on as God's guru and messiah. "It is an embarrassment for us that the GBC keeps protecting him all this time." 

We cannot have dubious people in the post of Krishna's successor. This new contact devotee gets it, and more people are getting it all the time. Anyway, now these Hindus will have to be re-educated after they take over the buildings. And that is happening gradually. Overall, we are making good progress as Western and India folks are now starting to see the light, acharyas have to be pure devotee or else -- they are not acharyas. ys pd

angel108b@yahoo.com

=======================  

Who is this Sara jones?

---------- Forwarded Message ----------

Letter PAMHO:32861998 (24 lines)
From: Internet: "Sara Jones" <sararichardson@gmail.com>
Date: 13-Aug-21 14:34 (10:34 -0400)
To: Badrinarayan Swami (San Diego - US) [151087] (forwarded:
13-Aug-21
14:40)
To: Bhakti Caitanya Swami [216243] (received: 13-Aug-21 14:56)
To: Bhakti-bhusana Swami [113043]
To: Bhaktimarga Swami (Canada) [36441] (forwarded: 13-Aug-21 14:40)
To: Bhaktivaibhava Swami [81985]
To: Bhanu Swami (Madras - IN) [317577]
To: Giridhari Swami [108967] (forwarded: 13-Aug-21 14:40)
To: Guru Prasad Swami [166173]
To: Kavicandra Swami (GBC Japan) [159870]
To: Lokanath Swami [112145] (forwarded: 13-Aug-21 14:40)
To: Prahladananda Swami [224536]
To: Romapada Swami [457455] (received: 13-Aug-21 14:50)
To: Anuttama (das) ACBSP (IC N.America) [217051] (forwarded:
13-Aug-21
14:40)
To: Dina Sharana (dasi) ACBSP (Wiesbaden - DE) [49818] (received:
13-Aug-21 15:05)
To: Madhu Sevita (das) ACBSP (GBC) (I) [64583]
To: BPS [161767]
To: Gauranga (das) RNS (Chowpatty, Mumbai - IN) [105808] (forwarded:
13-Aug-21 14:40)
To: GKG [143904]
To: Hrdaya Caitanya (das) SDG [220538] (forwarded: 13-Aug-21 14:40)
To: Praghosa (das) SDG (IRL) [390959] (received: 13-Aug-21 14:55)
To: sethspellman@gmail.com
To: iskcon.myfamily@gmail.com
To: lns.sp108@gmail.com
To: bnarayan@earthlink.net
To: acyutatma.rsp@pamho.ru
To: anuttama@iskcon.org
To: bbgs@me.com
To: revati.raman.tpt@gmail.com
To: bhaktimargaswami@gmail.com
To: bkgoswami@earthlink.net
To: chandra08_8@yahoo.com
To: chaitanyachandra@mail.ru
To: devamrita.swami108@gmail.com
To: govardhana.bcais@gmail.com
To: jayapataka@gmail.com
To: malatidevi108@gmail.com
To: nrs@niranjanaswami.org
To: paulmurphy260474@gmail.com
To: rkd@krisna.hu
To: rswami108@gmail.com
To: ramai_swami@me.com
To: romapada.swami.acbsp@gmail.com
To: sesa.gbc@gmail.com
Cc: "Bob Cohen" <bobcohen@ivs.edu>
Cc: Champakalata (dasi) (Durban - ZA) [20076] (received: 13-Aug-21
14:53)
Cc: "Devakinandana das (Singapore)" <iskconlawdepartment@icloud.com>
Cc: "Devakinandana das (Singapore)" <dndmvg@yahoo.com>
Cc: "Tamohara dasa" <tamohara@yahoo.com>
Cc: iskconlaw@gmail.com
Attached: 32861998.eml (12586 bytes) "Original email file"
Subject: Lokanath Swami v. Cardinal McCarrick
------------------------------------------------------------
Hare Krishna Members of the GBC:

Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.
Something I shared online today. "The Hare Krishna movement is currently
wrestling with a 30-year-old case of one of its leaders, Lokanath Swami
<https://www.facebook.com/LokanathSwami?__cft__[0]=AZVowNM0oLuyslcliCGiJYWbY
Fgj
tjJZlUuwPJx8HTA1qMiBiJmrDXDMJpyii6yuvq6MY81_6FfhuWcAcmRvxzs-Mj7-sQW8Ozq1OpzI
NIG
p-dMAlmZWkid3VrNSYLBFWSs&__tn__=-]K-R>,
molesting a child.
The Catholic Church has recently handled a 50-year-old case of one of their
leaders, Cardinal McCarrick, molesting a minor.
There are similarities between the two cases:
- both cases involve molestation of a minor
- both cases span decades
- both cases involve a high-ranking spiritual leader
- both cases were covered up by other leaders
One glaring difference between the two cases though is that Cardinal
McCarrick was removed from his position and will be arraigned in court
September 3.
...while Lokanath Swami is still being honored, worshiped, and revered as a
spiritual leader in ISKCON.
Further information on the unresolved Lokanath Swami case:
https://satyavrata.wixsite.com/lokanathswami/
<https://satyavrata.wixsite.com/lokanathswami/?fbclid=IwAR0-9989M8qdR2Is9I0O
n4D
ZHfxKCQs3dVcYs3H6xdSvosSInPWjW0Xvnsc>
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/29/1022412555/ex-cardinal-mccarrick-has-been-cha
rge
d-with-sexually-assaulting-a-teen-in-the-70"
Thank you. Your servant, Saraswati dasi
(Text PAMHO:32861998) --------------------------------------

------- End of Forwarded Message ------

> Who is this Sara jones?

Basu Ghosh dasa: Maharaj, her name is "Saraswati", and "Richardson" was her father's pre-initiated legal name, and "Jones" is her husband's surname, taken upon marriage.

Her parents are SP disciples Vishalaksha Prabhu and Kalalalapa Devi Dasi,

both of whom I know from my first year in ISKCON at Chicago, back during

1973.  Yes, it was 48 years ago!

She and her mother (both parents I don't recall meeting since those days when they were based at ISKCON Detroit) are my "Facebook friends". Later on I met Saraswati years ago - before she married - at Vrindavan and Mayapur (can't recall the dates and details), so I am somewhat aquainted with her.

She has become an "activist for social justice" on "social media", mostly

via Facebook.

She believes - and we feel mistakenly - that Lokanath Maharaj sexually

molested a girl, Satya (then) Pandey - during his one week stay with her parents at their home near Philadelphia, during 1990. 

Anyone who reads the statements / testimony of Satya recorded during 1993 can

easily understand that Lokanath Maharaj did NOT sexually molest Satya. It is a fact that Satya felt "harassed" in some way, and complained, and that complaint went to the GBC, who sent Maharaj for evaluation - during 1993 - by a group of specialist psychologists, the "CAP Associates", for evaluation.

They concluded that Maharaj was NOT a "sexual predator", nor a pedophile, and not a danger to children.

These issues are taken every seriously in the West, for the past several decades, and the sexual absuse of childen by Priests of the Catholic Church has cost the Church in the USA and Europe literally billions of dollars in punative damages that do not exist in the Indian legal system.

The topic of "child sexual abuse" is a "live wire" over here (I am presently

in the USA)! The case was again dealt with by the GBC during 2010, due to Satya raising an objection to Lokanath Maharaj's presence and leading a kirtan at the New York Jagannath Rathayatra.  Again, he was cleared by the GBC.

What Saraswati and others are campaigning for is a review of the case by the

ICPO. Right now the only "proof" of their claim that Maharaj sexually abused Satya is the letter - yes, signed by Maharaj (he felt compelled to sign it), but

written by others - that he was guilty.  Yashoda Devi Dasi (ACBSP? - not

sure) has admitted in writing that she wrote the confession letter.

Also note that Lokanath Maharaj had no history of alleged abuse before this

one incident, nor afterwards.   Unlike literally hundreds of Catholic Priests who regularly sexually assaulted young children, as documented in so many places.

And there is Bhagavad-gita 9.30.  Prabhupada explained falldowns (in the plural) in the purport.  And this instance is hardly a falldown, but it was innappropriate for Maharaj to have been alone with the then 11 year old Satya, even if Radha Raman Maharaj was in the next room (then serving as his brahmachari assistant).

The fact is that the CAP Associates psychologists were specialists in "child clerical sexual abuse", and far more qualified than anyone within ISKCON ICPO.

In fact the creation of a "CPO" itself was seen as a necessity by the ISKCON

leadership in the West due to the legal system and punitive damages that exist there.  Srila Prabhupada never envisioned, nor spoke of the necessity to create a CPO.  The natural way to protect children is the varnashram system. Anyway, this is a large subject, and I don't want to write an essay here.  

This is already too long, but those reading this should be informed.

das,

Basu Ghosh Das

[PADA: Yep, here we go! A spokesman for the illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara, also machine gun swamis, LSD club messiahs who get their heads chopped off for sex with someone's wife, Vodka messiahs, porno swami messiahs, sex with cats samadhis etc., that bans, beats, molests, sues and kills dissenters says "there is no problem here." Ya think! ys pd]