RE: Bhaktivedanta Institute Princeton BVISCS (Madhava Puri Maharaja)

BVISCS Princeton

Paramadvaiti swami

Present acharya of the Sridhara Maharaja mission?

Ooops, complaints he is a predator of female disciples?

Who is in charge of their mission if this stuff is allowed?

http://bviscs.org/

‎Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Institute of Spiritual Culture & Science‎ 
to Ontological Distinction BTW MECH. Chemical & Biological Systems

Modern Science must answer the question:

What automates the animate living objects that does not seem to be present in the dead ones?

"We consider animate objects to be living, and the inanimate ones dead. Yet we consider both as being material objects since they are both composed of atoms and molecules. Even if the composition may be a little different for the two, still the living objects can die and thus become the same as the dead objects. Thus the difference does not seem to be specifiable within the material aspect of the object."

⁠— Sripad Bhakti Madhava Puri Maharaja, Ph.D.

(Serving Director of Princeton Bhakti Vedanta Institute of Spiritual Culture and Science, NJ, USA)

PADA: Thanks for your question S Dasi about the idea of preaching to scholars and in particular your nearby "preaching at Princeton." First of all, there needs to be some sort of spiritual foundation for any bona fide preaching. And the Bhakti Madhava Puri Maharaja program supports and promotes BR Sridhara Maharaja, founder father of the bi-sexual acharya's program of the 1936 Gaudiya Matha. 

Did I forget to mention the current alleged "Sridhara Maharaja acharya successor" Paramadvaiti swami has ALSO had various complaints of alleged sexual predatory nature with female followers, including apparently minor aged females, as one "not so secret" photo seems to indicate? 

It is self evident why the "guru" Paramadvaiti swami continues to act as a spiritual guide, there are no functioning checks and balances in their process. Notice also that despite all sorts of nonsense going on with various alleged "God's guru successors" in their mission, there seems to be no method to contain their false guru outcroppings. That means Sridhara Maharaja is making a huge mistake by rubber stamping these maverick independent -- if not debauchee -- people as acharyas in the first place, and thus empowering, enabling, establishing, supporting and co-creating such false gurus. 

Then Sridhara handily says he is "staying aloof" after his Frankenstein false gurus start causing mayhem everywhere, including sometimes orchestrating murders of dissenters. And the followers of Sridhara Maharaja do basically the same thing, they are no where to be found when their zombie Frankenstein false acharyas start to run amok. Sulochana said that when His Divine Grace Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura said there will be a fire in the math, it was Sridhara Maharaja who was then tossing fire bombs around the place to light the place up with his false acharya's idea. And now Paramadvaiti is running amok and their policy is the same, to "stay aloof." Great, that really helps!

And in the 1930s, those who refused to worship Sridhara's bi-sexual deviant 1936 messiah found themselves being banned, beaten, having their faces pushed into dogs stools, some had their skulls cracked with bricks, and some were killed. So Sridhara Maharaja was already well known after 1936 to be the founder / promoter of his own self generated false messiah's project -- which may create subsequent violent personality cult bogus guru programs. How are scholars going to be attracted to this process, when the temples of these false guru folks are empty ghost towns? Even the regular rank and file devotees have rejected all this and exited en masse, never mind the scholarly.

Sridhara's false guru program forced people to worship deviants as their gurus, or face dire consequences including assassinations. And in sum -- his program produces a culture where dissenters are banned, beaten and even killed. And that is also what people are telling PADA now, they cannot complain about the so-called Sridhara Maharaja successor "Paramadvaiti swami" in their location because he has "violent fanatical followers."

And after Sridhara's 1936 false guru fiasco went down in flames, after 1977 Sridhara Maharaja endorsed yet another wave of false gurus, this time the GBC's bogus 11 gurus. And the same things happened, dissenters were being banned, beaten, sued and assassinated. Of course all sorts of other crimes were going on left, right and center from among Sridhara's "appointed 11 gurus" sabha. And worse, children were being mistreated and molested, and the same things happened, those of us who protested these deviations were being violently suppressed by the regime Sridhara Maharaja was supporting.

Same basic thing was going on with the ISKCON "Bhaktivedanta Institute" headed by Swarupa Damodar Maharaja also known as Dr. Thoudam Damodara Singh. He was promoting the study of the relationship between science and Vedanta. Except he forgot something, no where in Vedanta are we told to worship Swarupa Damodara's (GBC's) illicit sex deviants program as God's guru successors? So all he is doing is turning the intelligent and scholarly class AWAY from the Vedic process by misrepresenting that the Vedas teach that we have to worship a lineage of fools and debauchees to attain God. 

That foolishness is not ever going to be accepted by intelligent scholars, or even our local trash man. No actual religion teaches that the path to God is to worship sexual predators and deviants as God's "living successors." Nor do we find bona fide acharyas being voted into such illicit sex guru projects like Swarupa Damodara was "2/3 show of hands voted in," after Sridhara Maharaja said the bogus 11 could vote in more gurus, like Swarupa Damodara was. How can deviants vote for others as acharyas?

Swarupa Damodar was also co-founder and regional director of United Religions Initiative, meanwhile supporting the GBC who says worship of Jesus is the bogus ritviks program. How can we unite religions by telling people they cannot worship their acharya, and we need to worship the voted in GBC debauchees acharyas process instead? 

Anyway, before we can preach to the scholars, we need to provide them with a bona fide person that they can have faith in -- to see as the worshiped personality who represents the Vedas. Guess what? Illicit sex with men, women and children deviants are not going to be accepted as gurus by such scholars. 

It always amazed me that when Hansadutta was being arrested for shooting at occupied buildings and so on and so forth, the ISKCON "Bhaktivedanta Institute" people were trying to organize a "conference of scholars," who would be told -- they have to worship someone like Hansadutta as God's messiah if they wanted to accept the Vedas. That is the way to convince the scholars? 

Anyway, Sridhara Maharaja was a huge supporter of the 11 GBC gurus, and the original advocate of their system of voting in more gurus, as if the people engaged in illicit sex with men, women and children can vote in more messiahs? No scholarly person worth his pedigree will accept this. These folks need to first of all establish who is the acharya of the Vedas, before they can get large numbers of people to accept the Vedas. ys pd   

https://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2019/11/farewell-to-paramadvaiti-maharaja.html