Hanuman Croatia Supports "Pied Piper From Hell"?

Kailash Chandra das

My review of “Beyond Institutional Gurus, Initiations, And Party Men”

By Hanuman das Guru list strategy Kailasa Candra das

Wow, I just finished reading Kailasa Candra’s new book “Beyond Institutional Gurus, Initiations, And Party Men”

[PADA: Kailash says that there does not need to be a current diksha guru, and that the ritviks are bogus for promoting worshiping a "posthumous, post samadhi and post mortem" pure devotee. Of course that means Kailash is with the GBC, which is why he wrote "position papers" for the GBC and the GBC's gurus like Trivrikrama swami were circulating Kailash's writings. 

Its amazing to me that Hanuman always ends up supporting the people who are writing position papers for the illicit sex acharya's process, which claims that acharyas are post mortem, dead and gone, and thus not relevant, thus we need to worship the "living" -- deviants? Of course the GBC gurus and Kailash are relevant -- because they are breathing? Sulochana used to say, "right, even a dog is breathing, that does not make it a guru."

Of course Kailash also has no program to make devotees, make deity programs and temples, print books, have children's Sunday schools, make cow protection programs, have Rathayatras etc. Ooops, the rtiviks are doing that and they have to be stopped!]

My impressions are overwhelmingly positive.

[PADA: Hanuman supports Kailash, who says we cannot offer bhogha and disciples to the pure devotee, but that is the first principle of spiritual life, we need to know who to offer things to?]

I almost forgot how uncompromised preacher sounds like. Due to associating with ISKCON corporate gurus for many years, I almost forgot how real Krishna conscious person sounds like. Kailasa Candra das compares real Krishna consciousness with today’s ISKCON.

[PADA: Writing papers that are being circulated by the GBC gurus is not compromised? Then what is?]

In the last couple of years, I studied ISKCON history a lot with special emphasis on ISKCON corporate guru ideology. How it came about, how it mutated to a Gestapo organization. And I also wrote many articles about it. But Kailasa Candra das is in a much better position to explain the whole story because he actually lived through it.

He was a friend of Sulocana, he helped him write his book called “Guru business“.

[PADA: Wrong. Sulochan told me that he agreed with me, that our children should have Srila Prabhupada as their guru. He thought Kailash's idea "our children will have to go out and find their own guru -- like we did," was utterly laughable foolishness. If all our children "go out and find another guru somewhere," there will be nothing left of ISKCON. Sulochan said that Kailash's idea to send our ISKCON children out to "find other gurus somewhere" will be the death of ISKCON, because without the children there will be no one left to carry on the legacy. And that is what has happened ... 

Sulochana said that once all the children are worshiping different gurus, there will be chaos and disintegration of ISKCON. Some will worship GBC gurus, some will worship Gaudiya Matha gurus, some will go to India and worship babajis, and in short, there will be no children left to carry on ISKCON. Actually that is what has happened, and Sulochana said this will be the end result of Kailash's eliminating Srila Prabhupada as the guru of our children. 

Sulochana was helping ME write "Our Living Guru," where we established that Srila Prabhupada will be the guru ongoing, for our children and for everyone else. Sulochana never agreed with Kailash -- that our children should go out and seek another guru other than Srila Prabhupada. Hanuman is totally mis-representing Sulochana's position. Sulochana wanted our children to have the same guru as we have.

Anyway, Sulochana is right, he said these Kailash guys are "pied pipers." They are taking away our children to unknown destinations, to unknown "other gurus," or really to HELL. And as such these deviant folks are very dangerous for our children. He said if we know who our guru is, then it is our DUTY to save our own children and give them the right guru, and not send them on Kailash's wild goose chase "looking for another guru somewhere else." And Kailash is such a fool he cannot even identify who this "other guru" is, so its total speculation. Why would we tell our children to look for a rusty tin can, while we are holding gold in our hands? This is cruelty to children.]

In his books, Kailasa Candra destroys all three major sahajiya deviations which happened after Srila Prabhupada’s disappearance, namely Rtviks, Neo-Gaudiya Math and the “ISKCON” corporation.

Not that Kailasa Candra das is only well-versed in real Krishna consciousness, he is also a talented writer. He is also very brave, since here is fighting a fake “ISKCON” organization for over 40 years. He is also obviously not materially motivated, and not interested to sell cheap Krishna consciousness. Only rare people are able to see beyond ISKCON circus, and thus he might never have a huge number of followers like ISKCON “guru” who likes to parade girls through the cities.

Here are some of the quotes which show what can you expect to find in the book:

About imagined “guru approval process”:

In effect, you could make a motion to the governing body as to your desire to become a recognized guru of “ISKCON.” As long as there were not three commissioners against you, your motion passed. Soon, this process also received warranted criticism. As such, another fix-it-as-you-go modification was concocted: The No-Objection Certificate, which is current to this day.

As per this “adjustment,” the prospective institutional guru makes his proposal and receives a recommendation, and the vitiated G.B.C. decides upon a waiting period for him (usually one to three years). Then, if he keeps his nose clean and remains loyal, it issues a No Objection Certification, i.e., he becomes institutionalized guru by Commission imprimatur.

Kailasa Candra also defeats all arguments used by members of ISKCON cult to fight opposition:

Similarly, there was another devastator that was used effectively throughout both that period and especially during the years just previous to it. That one was: “But what have you done for Śrīla Prabhupāda?” When devotees would criticize what was going on in “ISKCON,” its gurus and Party Men would respond with this retort. They would take cumulative credit for whatever accomplishments had been garnered by the movement in the form of “laxmī,” new temples, new devotees, etc. They would combine that with a personal offense to the critic—despite the fact, as often as not, that the devotee was justified in his or her criticism.

The Party Man would demand to know what results the critic had produced within the arena of “ISKCON.” Of course, if you did not at all believe in what “ISKCON” was doing, you would have no such results to reference. You would have left the institution or would have been kicked out for being outspoken about its dreadful flaws.

About freedom from “ISKCON tyrant authorities”:

There was an ever-increasing exodus of Śrīla Prabhupāda’s disciples from “ISKCON” in order to take their chances in the outside world, trying to prosecute Kṛṣṇa conscious activities, preaching, and sādhana as best they could “outside the walls.” The question may be broached as to how all of this hell could have gone on when, at least initially, the movement had been directly connected to the Supreme Universal Controller, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Ultimate Overseer. 

This question may be justly raised. Many very bad things happened to devotees both within and without the “ISKCON” faction after Prabhupāda disappeared, but there were also some silver linings provided after he left us. These should be recognized. One of the big silver linings was new-found freedom from all of the little tyrants inside those institutional walls.

About all the crimes performed by “pure devotees” in the eighties:

When the Party Men took over the movement, their more charismatic and flamboyant section, the eleven pretender mahā-bhāgavats, considered themselves all-powerful. They considered themselves no longer under man-made laws, in the sense that there was no applicability of these in relation to them. And, as allegedly the embodiment of all the demigods, the zonals also believed that they could transgress many laws of Nature, and they did just that.

You can order the book “Beyond Institutional Gurus, Initiations, And Party Men” by clicking here

Author’s website: https://www.therealexplanation.org/

Author’s Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/VFaudioRec/videos

[PADA: Sulochana said that Kailash's telling our children to "go out and find a guru like we did" was acting as an evil pied piper -- sending our children to a bogus guru program, and thus sending them to hell. He said there is no difference between Kailash's idea and the Gaudiya Math's and GBC's idea, to send our children off to "hunt" for another guru somewhere else, and not accept Srila Prabhupada as their guru. Sulochana said PADA is right to tell our children to have Srila Prabhupada as their guru, and he did not agree with this endless Kailash and GBC "hunt for another guru" preaching AT ALL.

Worse! The children did exactly what Kailash wanted. They went off the reservation, off to various GBC's gurus, Gaudiya Matha gurus, Babaji gurus, Mother Amma and who knows what. So its amazing, Sulochana says Kailash is another GBC compromiser and another pied piper leading our children away from Srila Prabhupada, and thus on their way to hell, and Hanuman thinks this is "a great preacher."]    

[PADA: Sulochan said that Kailash chandra's idea of having our children run off

"to find a guru like we did" is -- sending them to endless speculation at best, or hell at worst. Sulochana said it is our duty to direct our children to take shelter of the proper guru and not send them on a wild goose chase "guru finding" expedition, which will make ISKCON: 

EMPTY OF CHILDREN

Just like the pied piper emptied out the town of children.

Why does Hanuman Croatia support the program Sulochan said is:

the pied piper

FROM HELL?]  

PADA @ angel108b@yahoo.com