Tradition of the acharyas is -- illicit sex? (ISKCON) ys pd

Dear Agrani prabhu, I am not sure if they specifically specified that Ramanuja and Madhvacarya followers are bogus, but the GBC does say that anyone who worships a "posthumous acharya" like Madhvacarya is a bogus ritvik. What we do know for sure, and this is documented by GBC reports, is that they have said: (a) they are "following the tradition" of Madhvacarya, Ramanuja and India's acharyas, and (b) "the tradition" (according to them) is that acharyas are often "engaged illicit sex with men, women and children." So yes, they have attacked Ramanuja, Madhvacarya, Lord Chaitanya, Srila Saraswati, and of course Lord Krishna, by saying their "guru tradition" is full of illicit sex with men, women and even children. If I was living in Bangalore, I would go to Dayarama's house, and maybe even the judges who ruled against Bangalore, with a camcorder, and ask them why they are supporting people who say "the traditon of the acharyas of India is illicit sex," get that on video, and post that video everywhere. I would have done that years ago and attacked the root issue. ys pd