Wednesday, July 4, 2018

Hanuman Das (Hrvoje Marjanovic) Is A GBC Puppy (IRM / PADA)

All glories to: Nobody! Hanuman says we have to worship a GBC guru.
But he never mentions which one?  

IRM / Back To Prabhupada, Issue 57, Vol. 1 2018

Subject: Hanuman das Croatia / Lasting impression on Youtube.

Hare Krishna. PAMHO. AGTSP.

Do you have reply for the Hanuman Das's lasting impression videos on Youtube? Thank you." - Hari Dasa, Solapur, India


"Dear Prabhu,

Check it out.

Your Servant,"

- Trivikrama Swami, Florida, USA

[PADA: Of course! The GBC's gurus like Trivrikrama love to cite Hanuman Croatia, because he still advocates that we have to worship a member of the GBC's illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara. The only good news being, sex with goats is not allowed in the GBC's / Hanuman's guru parampara, at least they have some standards! Trivrikrama was voted in by the same people who reinstated the GBC's "sex with taxi drivers acharya," of course that makes him a bona fide member of Hanuman's guru parampara!

At the same time, this is the same trouble we are having with Ajit Krishna / Torben / Kim Moller etc. ... they wanted us to read Rocana's site where his "ISKCON constitution" STILL says that the GBC will vote in more gurus. Ooops, the guru is not voted in? Rocana says that the GBC voting in gurus is a bona fide idea, there just needs to be better legislation, rules and "enforcement" when their acharyas deviate. 

Ooops, we are not supposed to promote the idea that acharyas deviate and need "better enforced rules" to correct them. Then again, the same people who vote for "sex with taxi driver's acharyas" should not even be certified to vote for "best dressed poodle" at the poodle dog show, they are not qualified to vote on any topic.

So what is the plan? 

Status quo. We will continue on having folks like Devamrta, Ravindra Swarupa, Hrdayananda, Badri Narayana, Kuladri etc still being the "police force" in charge of moderating their voted in acharyas. Didn't these same guys allow all sorts of deviations to go on already, proving they are not competent to moderate a bag of beans, much less moderate Krishna's guru successors.]

"Subject: Please refute the points by this Youtube user against ritvik system.

Hare Krishna Prabhu,


I found this video by a devotee named Hrvoje Marjanovic:

I found his points not convincing. However, looks like he is saying that ritvik may not be what Prabhupada actually intended. Please can you shed more light on this. I am from ISKCON Bangalore and my name is Achyutananda Dasa. 
Your Servant," - Achyutananda Dasa, Bangalore, India

Editor replies:

This video claims at the outset that:

"Ritviks are trying to kill Prabhupada in four major ways."

[PADA: Great! The ritviks need to STOP their worship of Srila Prabhupada and promote the GBC's living messiahs who are in Hanuman's illicit sex guru parampara, or else we are doing bad things! Hanuman cannot even answer the first question, who is the person who has the bhogha and disciples offered to him? We have asked him that for years and years and years, and he still has no clue what is the answer? All glories to: nobody? Hanuman says we cannot worship Srila Prabhupada, but he never promotes the actual name of any alternate guru? Neither does Rocana / Ajit / Torben / Kim. We should worship -- no one? Hanuman says we need to have a GBC guru, which one? 

So that is the first problem, Hanuman self-evidently thinks we can offer bhogha and disciples to a member of his debauchee's gurus program (which he himself admits IS a debauchee's guru program) and this bogus offering process will be accepted by Krishna. Hanuman asks us, how do we know the Prabhupadanugas bhogha and disciples are being accepted by Krishna? 

Ummm, well how did we know that even when Srila Prabhupada was here, and we offered things to him then? This is an atheistic question. How do we know Hanuman's service is being accepted by Krishna either? How do we know if Hanuman's sex with taxi driver's guru parampara is valid or not? So this is a side show smoke screen. The process established by the acharya is the process that should be used, its not up to us to question if it is being accepted by Krishna or not.]   

However, as the video does not quote the IRM (ritviks) even once, it completely fails in demonstrating this, as it simply uses fabricated arguments that are falsely attributed to us. For example, it states as one of these "four ways" that:
"The second claim by ritviks is that Prabhupada is a deviant from the Vaisnava-siddhanta."

[PADA: Right, Hanuman says that unless we accept that Srila Prabhupada authorized and created their illicit sex with men, women and children (and not goats?) guru parampara, we are deviating. There is no proof Srila Prabhupada ordered such a parampara. Nor does Hanuman provide any such evidence.]

But the IRM does not claim this, nor does the video produce Srila Prabhupada quoting the "Vaisnava-siddhanta" which we are supposedly claiming Srila Prabhupada is deviating from. So this is just a false, empty claim.

Then, in regards to another of these "four ways", the video claims:

"Fourth claim by ritviks is that Prabhupada is not empowered. Prabhupada was hoping to make at least one pure devotee, and he did."

[PADA: Wow, Krishna made one pure devotee, who is a member of the sex with taxi driver's guru parampara. Really?]

"But ritviks claim that he couldn't make any pure devotees who would continue parampara, and therefore he decided to put himself as the only guru even after he dies."

[PADA: We did not decide anything. If Hanuman's sex with taxi driver's guru parampara is bona fide, we'd just like proof that it is.]

This is yet another fabricated straw man argument, as we never state this. The article on page 5 of this issue has already debunked this particular straw man argument in detail. Thus, 2 of the 4 "ways" that we are supposedly trying to "kill" Srila Prabhupada are straightforward straw man arguments.
In regards to the third way, the video claims:

"Third argument by ritviks is that Prabhupada is not a guru. How to explain that? Well, we have to look at the arguments that ritviks make."

However, as noted earlier, the video does not look at the actual arguments that the IRM makes, as it never quotes any of our arguments even once, and instead just offers its own speculations regarding what it thinks we must be saying. Hence, the video first claims: "Crown jewel argument by ritviks is that Prabhupada never named his successor gurus. "

[PADA: Right, supposedly Srila Prabhupada appointed Hanuman's debauchee guru lineage. Where is the evidence such a guru lineage was ordered?]

And then later on the video claims: "ritviks claim that Prabhupada gave "the final order" in which he named ritviks and that system should continue after he dies. This is really their crown jewel argument which is based on ignorance."

[PADA: So he named conditioned souls as Krishna's guru successors. Where was this order given?]

Thus, it first claims one thing is supposedly our "crown jewel" argument, and then later contradicts itself by claiming that actually it is another thing which is supposedly our "crown jewel" argument. It then continues:

"This order was given because Prabhupada was sick and couldn't travel, and the list of disciples who were waiting for initiation kept growing more and more. In order to solve that issue Prabhupada established such a system that his senior disciples can give beads to his disciples, his newly-initiated disciples, which is a very practical solution."

[PADA: So after Srila Prabhupada departs, we worship illicit sex deviants in the Hanuman parampara?]

This is another fabrication – as shown by the fact that no evidence is produced proving that the July 9th, 1977 directive ("the final order") was issued because Srila Prabhupada was sick and could not travel. Or that the "final order" established a system to "give beads" to his disciples. On the contrary, Srila Prabhupada was already mailing beads for initiations as early as 1967, and senior disciples were chanting on beads from 1973, and thus Srila Prabhupada was not even required to travel for initiations anyway. (See letters to Balai Dasi, 17/12/67 and Revatinandana, 4/1/73, for example).

The video then discusses the issue of how successor diksa gurus are authorised. But our actual position, as explained in this issue's Editorial, is that the question of authorising successor diksa gurus does not even arise, because:

a) Srila Prabhupada already established himself as the sole Acarya for ISKCON;
b) This includes acting as diksa guru.

This is proven with quotes from Srila Prabhupada in our book Srila Prabhupada, The Founder-Acarya of ISKCON: Presenting the Conclusions of the GBC Foundational Document. Thus, since it is proven that Srila Prabhupada did not actually himself stop acting as ISKCON's diksa guru, discussing how successor diksa gurus were authorised to fill Srila Prabhupada's position as ISKCON's diksa guru is completely irrelevant. 

So that's 3 of the 4 "ways" debunked.

Finally, we are left with the "first way", which is the only time the video even offers a quote from Srila Prabhupada regarding the issue in question. The video claims:

"So ritviks claim that Prabhupada is crazy because he made all these statements about parampara and then a few months before he left this world, he changed all that and all of a sudden there are hundreds of statements of Prabhupada where he explains how parampara looks. [...] In other words, ritviks claim that we should disregard all the quotes by Prabhupada, where Prabhupada directly says here, "They can make disciples and spread. They are competent.""

However, the facts are:

1) Despite the video speaking about "hundreds of statements" and "all the quotes by Prabhupada", Srila Prabhupada only ever made one statement where he said "They can make disciples and spread. They are competent."

2) We never say this one quote should be disregarded, so this is yet another false straw man argument about our position.

3) This one quote in question, which is provided by the video, states:

"Mohsin Hassan: You have ten swamis. And outside of swamis, what's the lower...
Srila Prabhupada: Now, they're competent. They can, not only the swamis, even the grhasthas, they are called dasa adhikari, and brahmacaris, everyone can, whoever is initiated, he is competent to make disciples. But as a matter of etiquette they do not do so in the presence of their spiritual master. This is the etiquette. Otherwise, they are competent. They can make disciples and spread. 
(Room conversation, 18/7/71)"

a) Srila Prabhupada clarifies that every one of his disciples, not just "swamis", can make disciples. There is no dispute from the IRM that the ability ("competent") to make disciples is not restricted to only swamis.

b) Srila Prabhupada also explains that at the time of the interview, the issue of his disciples making disciples would not even arise, because, as he explains, that is the "etiquette".

c) Whether, later, when Srila Prabhupada physically departed, his disciples would be required by Srila Prabhupada to make disciples, or whether Srila Prabhupada remained making disciples himself, is another question which this quote does not directly address.

But, as we just noted in the answer to the video's last point, we do know Srila Prabhupada did not himself stop making disciples in ISKCON, and therefore his disciples' competency to make disciples did not require to be exercised.

d) Thus, this quote, and any others about the "parampara", are neither dismissed by us, nor do they prove that Srila Prabhupada is "crazy" if he did not renounce his position as ISKCON's Acarya and diksa guru.

And thus, the final of the "four ways", like the other three, also makes a false claim that the IRM is somehow trying to "kill" Srila Prabhupada.

Return to Hanuman Das Index
Return to IRM Homepage

Bhakti Vikas swami's sannyasa guru, His Divine Grace Sex With Taxi Driver's Guru-pada

[PADA: OK wait a minute, Srila Prabhupada said that we neophytes cannot be diksha gurus -- because if we take that post we will be taking sins, and we will have to suffer if we do so -- ok --because we are not authorized to do so. ys pd]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.