Bhakti Niskama Shanta's Fellow Acharyas "Monkeys"?

Yes, as a matter of fact I am another Jesus.

I can absorb the sins of others.

Then again -- so could the deviants Sridar appointed

as gurus after 1936, and after 1977.

pada = angel108b@yahoo.com

DIKSA GURU LINE IS SAHAJIYISM

-By Srila Bhakti Niskama Shanta Maharaja, Ph.D.

Many in our mission have deviated from the original teachings of Gaudiya sampradaya, which were revived by Srila Bhakti Vinoda Thakur from the filth of Sahajiyaism and later preached vigorously by Srila Bhagti Siddhanta Saraswat Thakur.

Many alleged followers of Srila Bhakti Rakshak Sridhar Dev-Goswami Maharaja have tried to ignore the central conception of the teachings that he has presented to the world from the teachings of Srila Saraswati Thakur. For example, many in our mission, influenced by the concept of Lalita Prasad Thakur, have started following the diksha sampradaya line and have completely neglected Srila Saraswati Thakur's concept of siksha sampradya preached on Gaudiya line of Guru Parampara. Srila Saraswati Thakur and all her genuine followers call sahajiyaism to that path.

[PADA: Wait? BR Sridhar Maharaja said in 1936 we are exclusively a -- diksha guru lineage only -- and that is why he wanted to make his bi-sexual and / or homosexual pals into diksha gurus. Then later on (post-1978) BR Sridhar Maharaja wanted to make his illicit sex with men, women and children diksha gurus in ISKCON. 

And Sridhar started saying there is "the acharya of the zone," which is another foolish idea etc. In short, BR Sridhar never supported the idea that us neophytes should act a shiksha devotees -- or ritviks etc. and in fact we MUST act as agents for the acharya because imitation of the acharya is a deviation.

If we are a shiksha line only (which would have ritviks, proxies or agents preaching for the acharyas), then why would Srila Bhakti Niskama Shanta Maharaja support Sridhar's bogus diksha guru lineage of homosexuals, pedophiles, porno swamis and assorted drug addicts, drunks, deviants, and criminals? 

Then BG Narasimgha says that the GBC gurus are neophytes in a "feel good" society. Why is Sridhar Maharaja making neophytes into diksha gurus? The ritviks are saying that we are mainly a shiksha lineage, which is why we are banned, beaten, sued, exiled and removed by the Sridhara Maharaja diksha gurus. Does this make sense?] 

Many in our mission have considered themselves devotees of the highest race and have tried to illogically criticize our preaching services such as the scientific presentation of Krishna consciousness. They felt there was no rift in the so-called dry scientific presentation of Krishna consciousness.

They even reached to such a point that they denied that the book “Subjective Evolution of Consciousness” is not a part of Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math and is not compiled from the conception of Srila Sridhar Maharaja.

[PADA: Sridhara Maharaja's conception is that acharyas go mad after money, women and followers. That is not the vedic science. The vedas say that the acharyas are free from all material contamination.]

We consider such individuals in our mission as ordinary monkeys who have foolishly tried to jump from their selfish mountain to the highest plane of the divine lilac witch.

[PADA: OK Narayan Maharaja said all of the ISKCON disciples are monkeys, but oddly, 11 of these monkeys are acharyas. Why is Sridhara Maharaja making monkeys into acharyas? And now they are saying the other gurus in their own mission are monkeys. Why is the Sridhar program always making monkeys into acharyas? And they attack the shiksha line (of ritviks) and make monkeys into their diksha gurus, over and over repeatedly.]

To delve deeper into the meaning of Srila Saraswati Thakur’s expression “visaya range”, Srila Bhakti Sundar Govinda Dev-Goswami Maharaja has elaborated on these ordinary monkeys in the “Best Concept” section of her book “Truth Revealed.” a". Srila Govinda Maharaja has explained that Hanumanji can jump from one mountain to another because he has a pure sense of service towards his master, Lord Sri Ramachandra. 

Srila Govinda Maharaja has also emphasized elsewhere that we should have a mood of service towards our Gurudev as Hanumanji has towards his master, Lord Sri Ramachandra. Without that, according to Srila Govinda Maharaja, if common monkeys try to jump to higher divine pastime, then they are destined to fall to the highest level.

[PADA: OK so the other acharyas in the Sridhar mission are monkeys because they do not accept Srila Bhakti Niskama Shanta as the only acharya. But since he supports the whole Sridhar idea of making pedophiles and / or monkeys into acharyas, why is he any better than the others? 

Notice they are stealing our idea, the rank and file devotees should act as agents for the acharyas (the shiksha line). And now they are fighting like cats, dogs and monkeys, while claiming to be acharyas. How will that impress the public that they are bona fide?

ys pd]

=======================

Who are we trying to fool? – It’s getting weird by the day.

In the utopian world in which the GBC is authorized by Srila Prabhupada to regulate who can be an initiating guru sounds logical to accept them as the referee and guide the multitudes into accepting a spiritual master, be him a Kanistha, Madhyam or Uttama Adhikari. However in the real world in which we live this never happened. Srila Prabhupada DID NOT authorize the GBC to elect, regulate, chastise, put in probation, censor, remove and re-instate spiritual masters. It just did not happen. Period.

The GBC have derailed the tracks and have disobeyed Srila Prabhupada by becoming a self-regulated body that has speculated since the departure of His Divine Grace on how to continue the Parampara. Let me refresh your memory.

First they have selected the 11 ritviks as the representatives of God by installing them as the Acharyas of Iskcon. Next they removed them from being the Acharyas (As good as God) and established a system (As good as they gets) in which the devotees who wanted to be initiating gurus needed a ten man vote support from the local temple / preaching area to get the blessings of the GBC and start initiating disciples. 

Then they directed the foolish souls who could not distinguish Kanistha from Madhyam and Uttama to accept re- initiation and who therefore ended up taking re-initiation two or three times. But that of course it’s their fault isn’t it? 

After all we get what we deserve. Karma! Who can they blame but themselves for having obeyed the GBC? If that is not enough for any intelligent aspiring devotee to accept that the GBC is indeed incapable enough to direct anybody to light they are now saying (the GBC) that the guru is subordinate to the GBC and cannot instruct his disciples when such instructions contradicts the temple President or the local authorities. Isn’t getting weird?

If the GBC was meant to preserve and spread the teachings so kindly given by His Divine Grace we can conclude that on this count they have made fools of themselves and have mocked the sacred institution of the spiritual master. Hardly a qualification for us to accept that they can indeed be instrumental in our quest for finding a Bona-fide spiritual master.

We can go on and on describing the glories of the present and past GBC and their goof ups. This is not my intention. My intention here is to give the reader an idea of what we are getting into when we allow conditioned souls to be initiating spiritual masters and when we allow conditioned souls to select and authorize spiritual masters. It’s weird. It’s insane. It’s not in Sastra.

"Mundane votes have no jurisdiction to elect a Vaisnava acarya. A Vaisnava acarya is self effulgent, and there is no need for any court judgement. A false acarya may try to override a Vaisnava by a High Court decision, but Bhaktivinode Thakura says that he is nothing but A DISCIPLE OF KALI- YUGA ." !!!

(CC (BBT 1975) Madhya 1.220)

Doesn’t this sound familiar? GBC Voted gurus? And:

In addition to ISKCON’s current guru system not having any order from Srila Prabhupada to justify its existence, the GBC’s official “brain”, the “Sastric Advisory Council” (SAC), has said that the process by which it does authorise gurus, via voting them in, is not based on “guru, sadhu and sastra”:

“Our present system has institutionalized a process of senior devotees voting or offering no-objection to prospective gurus. But we do not find that this institutionalized blessing seeking process is mentioned by guru, sadhu or sastra as the way that one is authorized to become a guru.”

(Balancing the roles of the GBC and the disciple in Guru selection, SAC)

Any more eye openers? Let me remind you what our Srila Prabhupada so boldly and conclusively stated.

"Unless one is a resident of Krishna Loka, one cannot be a Spiritual Master. That is the first proposition. A layman cannot be a Spiritual Master, and if he becomes so then he will simply create disturbance. "

(SP Letter Mukunda 6/10/69).

The GBC are not the authorized body to direct prospective disciples to take initiation from a bona-fide spiritual master. They are not. It is simple as that. They have no mandate or any authority given them by Srila Prabhupada. They have done so on their own whims disregarding all scriptural evidence and have created the biggest hoax the Vaisnava world has ever seen.

Let me conclude with these words.

What we know and is accepted by all is that Srila Prabhupada instituted a system in which aspiring disciples would be initiated through a system of representatives. This system was followed until his physical departure in November 1977 and it was stopped. After that it was a jump in the dark.

A darkness we are still trying to find our way out to day, 42 years later.

Begging the dust of the feet of the Vaisnavas and the mercy of Srila Prabhupada
Remaining your worthless servant

Sattvic Dasa

[PADA: OK we are all consciousness. Sign me up. What happens to people's consciousness when they worship Sridhar's illicit sex with men, women and children messiahs? OK the consciousness of people who worship Sridhara's deviated acharyas is, their consciousness deteriorates. And then they start to think pedophiles and deviants are fit to be worshiped as acharyas, ok just like Sridhar does. 

Can someone tell these guys, pedophiles and deviants are not, were not, could not have been God's successors and acharyas. And the cheer leaders of deviant acharyas (like Sridhar) are also not acharyas. ys pd]