RUSSIA MELT DOWN
*** Seems to be getting more fanatical over there. Someone sent me a copy of a big conversation about all this, in Russian. Really could not understand much except the words "ritviks" "guru aparadha" and such were evident. It was clear these were GBC folks not happy with the Prabhupadanuga process. And from their fanatical responses, it looks like more people are studying the issue. We also have a few nice connections there and one of them wants to make PADA stuff in Russian language. So our process will win, its just a question of time.
RE: ISKCON HISTORY
*** A devotee writes a few days ago -- its a good thing PADA recorded the ISKCON history accurately, because no one else would have done so in such a manner. And without this history, it would have been very confusing for him. He says that when all of us "senior" history recording folks are dead and gone, others will really have to rely on the information these records left behind. BTW. We get these type messages regularly.
I said yes, and if I take birth here again, I'd like to know all this from reading the history too. Its a hard job to figure all this out -- not knowing how all this came to happen.
BROOKLYN COURT CASE
*** A devotee says Ramabhadra is still counter suing the GBC in Brooklyn and its a big expense for the GBC. Yep, we are down the road to Gaudiya Matha pt. 2 ... lawsuits.
RE: AINDRA DASA
*** More devotees are writing to ask me about Aindra's departure, an accident or something sinister? Well he did say -- if my book is published while I am alive, I will be burned at the stake by the powers that be. And then he was burned to death? Is this a coincidence? What do you think?
HKC JAIPUR AND DAYALU NITAI / PRAHLAD Das et al.
*** Had a long conversation about the problem of HKC Jaipur teaming up with Prahlad das (Paul Coats UK). Some people have complained that I am "picking on the little guys" by addressing HKC Jaipur's promoting Prahlad das, and the Bhakta das video he was promoting at the time.
OK, perhaps the HKC people really had no idea who Bhakta das was, or what his criminal problems were, or that Bhakta das is a promoter of the Gaudiya Matha folks and / or GBC's guru's folks like Radhanath. Nor did the HKC probably know that Bhakta das hangs out with folks like SWARUP HEBEL, who just complained that we are attacking his best pal Jayadvaita swami.
In other words, it appears that Prahlad intentionally hid the real story of who Bhakta das really is, and what his agenda is -- from the HKC party. In any case, Prahlad then got the HKC folks to help him promote a video of Bhakta das, and the HKC folks got into such a frenzy they were sending me a slew of links to the Bhakta das video repeatedly in the same day.
Now Prahlad is complaining we are attacking innocent people. OK, but who got these innocent people involved in all this mess? Who incited the HKC folks to be promoting the GBC cheer leaders? OK this was done by none other than Mr. Prahlad and no one else. So I'd like to get back to having a more friendly footing with the HKC people. And we never really wanted to make a huge counter campaign against them, but solving this is really up to Prahlad and them to rectify these misunderstandings.
Then Prahlad complains about Bangalore group people. Well maybe, but at least some members of their group send me nice questions about these issues from time to time, because some of them want to know what is the real history here. At the same time, we keep getting nice reports of their preaching, making devotees and temples, and holding nice Vaishnava festivals from these folks on a regular basis. OK fine. We also hear complaints that Bangalore folks are doing things wrong. And maybe there are some problems, but then again, we had all sorts of problems going on even when Srila Prabhupada was here. The real question is, why don't the critics just show us how to do things right?
And now Prahlad just now admits to a friend that he was indeed working with Mukunda at the time they made the Bhakta das / GBC friendly video, and subsequently we were sitting in a room with other people listening to the Bhakta das video following the Prahlad link. So there are many eye-witnesses and PADA readers that verify that the Mukunda / Prahlad team made this Bhakta das video and they promoted that video, and they got HKC to help them promote said video.
Bottom line, ALL ALONG the Sanat / Mukunda / Prahlad / HKC Jaipur people opposed our idea of saving children from abuse and suicide. Then they conjointly promoted a Bhakta das video, and he is a big cheer leader of the GBC gurus. Lets sum up, they -- all along -- and still think we were wrong to help the abuse victims. So whatever ink was spilled trying to explain all this in the past, they re-affirmed just now they opposed our saving children in the past and still oppose our saving children now. And we are still helping various victims even now, who write to us about these issues.
ys pd
===============
*** Seems to be getting more fanatical over there. Someone sent me a copy of a big conversation about all this, in Russian. Really could not understand much except the words "ritviks" "guru aparadha" and such were evident. It was clear these were GBC folks not happy with the Prabhupadanuga process. And from their fanatical responses, it looks like more people are studying the issue. We also have a few nice connections there and one of them wants to make PADA stuff in Russian language. So our process will win, its just a question of time.
RE: ISKCON HISTORY
*** A devotee writes a few days ago -- its a good thing PADA recorded the ISKCON history accurately, because no one else would have done so in such a manner. And without this history, it would have been very confusing for him. He says that when all of us "senior" history recording folks are dead and gone, others will really have to rely on the information these records left behind. BTW. We get these type messages regularly.
I said yes, and if I take birth here again, I'd like to know all this from reading the history too. Its a hard job to figure all this out -- not knowing how all this came to happen.
BROOKLYN COURT CASE
*** A devotee says Ramabhadra is still counter suing the GBC in Brooklyn and its a big expense for the GBC. Yep, we are down the road to Gaudiya Matha pt. 2 ... lawsuits.
RE: AINDRA DASA
*** More devotees are writing to ask me about Aindra's departure, an accident or something sinister? Well he did say -- if my book is published while I am alive, I will be burned at the stake by the powers that be. And then he was burned to death? Is this a coincidence? What do you think?
HKC JAIPUR AND DAYALU NITAI / PRAHLAD Das et al.
*** Had a long conversation about the problem of HKC Jaipur teaming up with Prahlad das (Paul Coats UK). Some people have complained that I am "picking on the little guys" by addressing HKC Jaipur's promoting Prahlad das, and the Bhakta das video he was promoting at the time.
OK, perhaps the HKC people really had no idea who Bhakta das was, or what his criminal problems were, or that Bhakta das is a promoter of the Gaudiya Matha folks and / or GBC's guru's folks like Radhanath. Nor did the HKC probably know that Bhakta das hangs out with folks like SWARUP HEBEL, who just complained that we are attacking his best pal Jayadvaita swami.
In other words, it appears that Prahlad intentionally hid the real story of who Bhakta das really is, and what his agenda is -- from the HKC party. In any case, Prahlad then got the HKC folks to help him promote a video of Bhakta das, and the HKC folks got into such a frenzy they were sending me a slew of links to the Bhakta das video repeatedly in the same day.
Now Prahlad is complaining we are attacking innocent people. OK, but who got these innocent people involved in all this mess? Who incited the HKC folks to be promoting the GBC cheer leaders? OK this was done by none other than Mr. Prahlad and no one else. So I'd like to get back to having a more friendly footing with the HKC people. And we never really wanted to make a huge counter campaign against them, but solving this is really up to Prahlad and them to rectify these misunderstandings.
Then Prahlad complains about Bangalore group people. Well maybe, but at least some members of their group send me nice questions about these issues from time to time, because some of them want to know what is the real history here. At the same time, we keep getting nice reports of their preaching, making devotees and temples, and holding nice Vaishnava festivals from these folks on a regular basis. OK fine. We also hear complaints that Bangalore folks are doing things wrong. And maybe there are some problems, but then again, we had all sorts of problems going on even when Srila Prabhupada was here. The real question is, why don't the critics just show us how to do things right?
And now Prahlad just now admits to a friend that he was indeed working with Mukunda at the time they made the Bhakta das / GBC friendly video, and subsequently we were sitting in a room with other people listening to the Bhakta das video following the Prahlad link. So there are many eye-witnesses and PADA readers that verify that the Mukunda / Prahlad team made this Bhakta das video and they promoted that video, and they got HKC to help them promote said video.
Bottom line, ALL ALONG the Sanat / Mukunda / Prahlad / HKC Jaipur people opposed our idea of saving children from abuse and suicide. Then they conjointly promoted a Bhakta das video, and he is a big cheer leader of the GBC gurus. Lets sum up, they -- all along -- and still think we were wrong to help the abuse victims. So whatever ink was spilled trying to explain all this in the past, they re-affirmed just now they opposed our saving children in the past and still oppose our saving children now. And we are still helping various victims even now, who write to us about these issues.
ys pd
===============
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.