[PADA: What? We "presume" that -- Srila Prabhupada wanted conditioned souls to be Krishna's successor gurus? And he wanted the parampara to continue (with neophytes?). Srila Prabhupada wanted extensive book edits? Srila Prabhupada said he was being given poison, but its "very offensive" to agree with his statements? Why?
A woman also asks BVKS if she should be the secretary of her sannyasa guru? He says the woman should refuse the offer to be the secretary, good advice. He also says the sannyasa should not have a female secretary because it can lead to fall down. OK what kind of gurus does BVKS have if they are prone to fall? Where was BVKS when all his previous acharyas were falling down left, right and center due to "attraction to liquid beauty"?
Why is he not taking up the current problems of some of his contemporaries and their "female assistants," and why did he not address the past problems very forcefully? And why would he even have to discuss acharyas falling for liquid beauty in the first place, since even a Madhyama devotee does not fall for liquid beauty?
Anyway, its good that the GBC is having to deal with some of these "PADA issues" which we have been promoting all along. That means -- their people are asking about these issues. ys pd]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.