Hare Krishna news
When BV Puri, the Gaudiya Math, in fact everybody except for Srila Prabhupada in all of India say that we do not fall from Goloka you say they are in maya. When BV Puri said Prabhupada made ritviks you say he is correct. But when BV Puri said after Prabhupada left the ritviks were supposed to become full fledged gurus you fail to mention that fact as well. Your "selective guru proof quotations system" leaves something to be desired.
BV Puri says that Srila Prabhupada told him he had appointed 11 ritviks. That is the main item that matters, what Srila Prabhupada said. BV Puri was pals with Gopal Krishna and other GBC gurus later on. He was all over the map, he supported (a) the idea they are only ritviks, and (b) the idea you need a living guru, he was very confused so he promoted two mutually exclusive ideas at once. As for many folks from the Gaudiya Matha saying we came from brahman, yes, Srila Prabhupada said many of his brothers are tinged with mayavadi. Meanwhile, we have no idea what you support or do not support, you are all over the map as well. What idea exactly are we supposed to follow then? You forgot to say! All you are saying is that we are wrong, maybe so, however if you do not tell us what is right, that has no value to anyone. ys pd
Anonymous writes -- Srila Prabhupada made ritviks, and after he departed, they could be full fledged gurus, because anonymous thinks debauchees are his messiahs. I thought this guy was saying debauchees are his messiahs? Well ok, you can worship illicit sex, drugs and criminals, we choose not to, thanks anyhew! ys pd
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.