Rocana/ Palaka/ Rupanuga/ contradictions

PADA: Palaka has been twisting things here all along. 

(A) Palaka says we need to read Rocana and his DOR, and yet Rocana is the number one promoter of the Gaudiya Matha folks and their bogus living guru ideology. Why is Palaka promoting the Gaudiya Matha's promoters? And Rocana is the promoter of people who insulted Prabhupada like the Madhava maharaja program. Why is Palaka promoting the insulters of Prabhupada? And Palaka says we need to hear from these offensive people? 

Rocana is just like Palaka, he also has no temples, no devotees, no programs, so we need to follow them and have a big fat nothing program? Rocana also advertises for the people who are spending $15m suing us, so Palaka says he is not for this lawsuit program, but he is for promoting the people who are defending these lawsuits folks? 

(B) Palaka says Srila Prabhupada is only the shiksha guru, when Srila Prabhupada said he is the diksha guru and the GBC are the siksa gurus. Palaka is defying the direct statements of Srila Prabhupada. Where does Srila Prabhupada say he is only going to be the shiksha guru of ISKCON? He never did, this is another lie from Palaka. 

(C) Palaka says Srila Prabhupada's vani can give full pure divyam jnanam which destroys sins (diksha), but then he says, no, this is bogus -- HDG's divyam jnanam is not sufficient to give diksha? He is minimizing the acharyas. Rupanuga says we should all pray to get a diksha guru, find but as soon as our people get one, Palaka says they are bogus Christians. And we could go on here, but the point is, Palaka does not even agree with himself, he contradicts himself here, over and over, never mind he also countermands Srila Prabhupada. ys pd