https://www.facebook.com/hridayanandadasgoswami/posts/249624130310159
PRD: Unfortunately Hridayananda Goswami is a known child abuser supporter.
NJD: And insufferable arguer.
MED: Very true!
KD: https://www.facebook.com/100057877216282/posts/249624130310159/
AGD: I think Maharaj was clear that a fair trial is what he supports. He says so in the article.
AGD: I think Maharaj is basically explaining why GBC members do not engage in such online forums, and he cites a personal example from his own history. Therefore, Maharaja is basically saying that this is the ground floor of debate and nothing much will happen if the GBC is not willing to counter “devotee cancel culture” with real engagement.
Personally, I am not familiar with the allegations of misrepresentations of truth that you are referring to, per se, apart from the highly contentious “poison question” regarding Srila Prabhupada’s disappearance lila.
My guess is that my previous analysis holds true. The GBC would rather be criticized for not submitting the case to the ICPO than for having the ICPO whitewash it. Maybe they will eventually explain themselves.
S Dasi: The ICPO has never handled the case.
AGD: I was abused as a kid. I don’t see that the term cancel culture applies to the abuse itself. Other terms for sure, but cancel culture in my mind is about dialog in a Public forum and how it is used to destroy the lives of people who hold ‘wrong moral views’.
S Dasi: Do you really believe the GBC doesn’t have the power to whitewash the ICPO’s handling of the case if they were to receive it? Not with Kamlesh Krishna and Gandharvika at the helm. Why do you think the GBC is so reluctant to give them the case?
AGD: I feel like Maharaja is also pointing out how effective vigilantes can be. I agree with Maharaja that vigilante justice is likely to be the only satisfying Avenue of resolution to those devotees who do not want to be victims of the somewhat perversely neutral debates of managing authorities who have larger organizational considerations to attend to.
[PADA: Cyber vigilantes is what to expect when the GBC promotes deviations, then oppresses those who complain. The oppressed folks best outlet is to become a cyber vigilante, as is happening more and more.]
AGD: I prefer to think that they have decided to be criticized for this rather than suffer the outcome of the investigations. Which means they could be hiding something.
S Dasi: Hiding something? The GBC? Never!
AGD: Well, he wrote his essay in a generic way. He is revealing a perspective that shows why it’s such an uphill climb now. Frankly, I think his also goading the vigilantes by pointing out that their cancel culture is effective sometimes, but terrorism is really the only effective means of dealing with these situations, due to BG 9.30 and how people disagree on how to apply it.
ASM: Well. Honestly he lost me when he mentioned the other trial he was involved with. He said there was no fair trial and the life of one devotee who was ruined. He sided with that devotee, when he should have said -- the lives of her many many victims were ruined. I would love to live in a religious society where leaders side and advocate for the society's children first.
AGD: I don’t know the details of that case at all. He apparently believes that a fair trial would have been the right course of action, and in a civilized society how can that not be the case. However, if the punishment doesn’t fit the crime, then vigilante justice is the only way.
ASM: If you follow him (I have -- as I was once his disciple), you would notice his classist tendency. Here he clearly is referring to it again, those who are brahmans hold the debate ... let the non brahmans (he has said many times in the past sudra-Americans) quietly accept the fair trial.
[PADA: Hee hee, yup his society of the worship of illicit sex with men, women and children acharyas is the braminical path. Who believes that rubbish?]
AGD: Thanks for the extra context. I am not defending Maharaj. I am only analyzing his words to extract what he is revealing. You have rightly pointed out that he is did not address the victims in any way, which seems to indicate that he and other GBC members see the victims as receiving the fruits if their past life karma in this life, which is a highly unpalatable perspective.
[PADA: Yep, same thing Narayan Maharaja said. Sure, I kicked jack boots on anyone who did not accept the GBC gurus and Tamal. So I supported the pedophile messiahs in Texas etc, but hey, the victims just go their karma! So who gives a crap about the victims, they got what they deserve! Is that their idea of a fair trial?]
HRD: #BeLikeVidura
Hridayananda Dasa Goswami ... a brahminical discussion presupposes the existence of brahmanas (or at least people who behave like brahmanas). The most important brahminical quality, especially in the age of Kali, is truthfulness. The behavior of most GBC members, including you, doesn't speak favorably in that regard. For instance, the cover-ups, the lies, the deceit, place most of you in a different varna altogether. So in a sense, you're correct, we cannot have a brahminical discussion. However, the reason is not the "internet vigilantes" but the deceitful GBC members.
CH: TBH I believe that compassion is the very basic of all also of truthfulness. Without compassion how can someone be truthful?
S Dasi: It would be helpful if just ONE ISKCON leader, just one, can stand up and say "yes, I will do everything I can to protect our children and enforce child protection policies, and this is how I will do it... "
HRD: The bar is too high. Half a leader would do.
KDM: Seems like a fancy way of telling us to be quiet. The assembly of "brahmins" have never demonstrated that they are willing to hear from us and respond to us like "brahmins." They can keep trying hard to be brahmins, while we just try to protect children like civilized people.
IID: I wrote the GBC. Child abuse is wrong. I also read Acharyadeva's article and it is fair and balanced. In it, His Grace says, "I have personally been viciously attacked because I insisted on a fair trial for a senior devotee accused of abuse.
PDD: This is not unreasonable if it was done 50, 40, 30, 20,10 or even 5 years ago, time for talk is over, talk is cheap now, ZERO tolerance for child abuse, child abuser and for people who cover up and support it, CHILD ABUSE IS AND WILL ALWAYS BE VAISHNAVA APARADHA!
S Dasi: In 1997 the GBC RESOLVED:
"[LAW] 501. THAT the GBC Body hereby declares that the International Society for Krishna Consciousness does not condone abuse of any kind, especially that which is directed towards dependents such as women, children, aged and cows. Battery, verbal and emotional abuse are destructive to the devotional creeper and thus considered serious Vaisnava aparadhas. Any attempt to justify this type of abusive mentality on the basis of sastra is misconstrued and is firmly rejected by all practicing Vaisnavas." https://gbc.iskcon.org/1997
1997 – ISKCON GBC
GBC.ISKCON.ORG
1997 – ISKCON GBC
1997 – ISKCON GBC
· Reply · 11h
SF Dasi: Does anyone knows what is that all about : " ..>> " been egregiously violated. Thus a devotee’s life was ruined without a fair trial.
I have no intention of.... <<.Who is that "devotee " the poor innocent victims if unfair trial that he found necessary to mention.(Starting to think that the case that cause the essay is that alleged unfair trial.)And trials are done only by Government Institutions ,IIRC .
BWD: Point one. Abused Gurukulis and the abused children of Iskcon and its life members are not 'random' Internet vigilantes, out to take down Lord Chaitanya's movement. Point two. Gurukulis are advocating for a fair trial and investigation, which is the purpose of the ICPO.
ASM: Exactly!!
ASM: It shouldn't have to take all of these legal battles for leaders to see their flaws... this is supposedly to be a religious society with highest moral standards... why are we even debating whether or not a leader should be accountable for his crime? So tired of their shameful attempts to hide their abusive standards.
TBD: The ping pong guru! I wanna play ping pong, can I join his sanga!?!? What a joke. Why aren't they least like Hansadutta (who they all talk so badly about), who least could figure out he was doing wrong, admit it, and say sorry? He never touched someone like that anyways either. All his "falldowns" weren't really like that afaik. He also says japa mala were given to India by the Cathoics.
SRD: Maharaj talks of "massive evidence that fair process had been egregiously violated". He doesn't consider the possibility that perhaps the leaders didn't share his opinion that the adjudication was flawed and didn't give the same weight to the said 'evidence'...
Instead of taking this opportunity to speak out in support of child protection, HDG positions himself as the victim and laments the hardships he has endured.
PTD: These ISKCON "gurus" should be ashamed of themselves. After 43 years, they haven't initiated even one famous person!
S Dasa: Another way of looking at it: the brahmanas, (the truthful, honest Vaishnavas/Vaishnavis) are trying to deal with child abusers correctly, but the ICC and GBC’s actions to block and bury appear vigilante with a thirst to lynch anyone speaking the truth