Rasabihari Dasa Defends Navayogendra Swami

Yes, I am a member of the:

"Illicit sex with men, women and children"

Guru Parampara from God!

Any questions?

https://iskconleaders.com/nava-yogendra-swami/

All glories to Śrīla Nava Yogendra Swami (NYS) Maharaj Ji.
All glories to the Saviour of the fallen souls, Śrīla Prabhupāda Ji
All glories to Śrī Śrī Kṛṣṇa Balarāma.
All glories to Śrī Śrī RādhāGolokānanda.

Dear Hanuman Das Prabhu,

Please accept my humble obeisance. Hope this meets you in good health and mindfulness. On the occasion of Narsimha Dev appearance day, I would like to offer you a question mark on your Sherlock Holmes type of activity; of whether it is exposing the truth or webbing an illusion; for your technique of using hearsays and photographs as tools / evidence have big limitations and loopholes for you and your audience which can led to serious offences in Spiritual life. 

[PADA: So when we see photos of Navayogendra swami's (i.e. his co-ISKCON leaders) program of pedophile swami's samadhi, and photos of their pornography swami's samadhi -- both in Vrindavan, that is hearsay evidence? And when we see photos and videos of ISKCON people aiding and abetting these bogus samadhi programs, that is not evidence? 

There are photos of some of ISKCON's leaders bowing to these samadhis, and Navayogendra is also advertised by them as a co-leader -- so he is part of that sabha. Why does Navayogendra promote the samadhi worship of sexual predators of boys and young men, as God's samadhi guru successors, by participating in their sabha? 

Meanwhile our friends in Vrndavan are disgusted and barfing every day, because they have to see these bogus samadhis in real life. Why are photos of pedophile samadhis not "proof" that Navayogendra's GBC folks are promoting pedophile worship in samadhis? Why aren't photos of Radhanath on all sorts of GBC web sites not proof that ISKCON promotes Kirtanananda's ex-henchmen as their current messiahs?

And the India ICC just now wrote a letter saying they want to keep their other pedophile "God's successor guru" -- aka Lokanath swami in the acharya's seat, being worshiped as good as God. So according to the GBC, at least much of it, pedophiles are fit to be worshiped as good as God, either now or later in samadhis. And Navayogendra swami is part of that system. Or what? 

First of all, why doesn't Navayogendra evidently know that homosexuals and / or pedophiles and / or pornography swamis / are not fit to be placed in samadhis in the HOLY DHAM, and / or worshiped as good as God; when this fact is ALREADY known to every high school child in the USA? He seems to have less brains that the average hamburger eating child of the USA, at least self-evidently, and yet he is posing as a spiritual person. Why? Why is he in this sabha?]   

You are quite honest in what you do but it can play against you or you can be played by people cleverer than you if you are not cautious enough to verify what you are publishing; for your publishing is damaging to the reputation/image of the sincere and the sensitivity of devotees’ sentiments.

[PADA: All of this has been verified over and over and over. The GBC started to have the children of ISKCON worshiping their "pedophiles as the children's acharyas" process. And now they are burying some of these pedophiles in samadhis and keeping them in the acharya's seat (like Lokanath) -- OK like they have done with their previous sexual predator messiahs who ALL had problems with their sexual predatory behaviors. 

This is a pattern, starting when they booted me out of ISKCON for objecting to Jayatirtha's predatory behaviors. There is plenty of evidence this has been going on all along. There is a lot of concern for damaging the reputation of the pedophile messiah's club members, but no concern that Krishna's name is being discredited by claiming pedophiles are His samadhi successors.] 

Upon seeing my Gurumaharaj and two of my own pictures (the obese man by the back in the demonstrative pics) on your page and after listening to your video, I felt it a duty to clarify you of how you are making a wrong trial. What is my qualification? I am a simple disciple of His Holiness, still full of anarthas but each time He has come to Mauritius, I would take leave from my job (Design and Tech Educator) and accompany His Holiness 24hrs/7days as the local relay between Maharaj Ji, His associates, His Indian guests and the management team of local Mauritians Godbrothers and God sisters. 

[PADA: So there is an illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara, which has only one good quality evidently, their messiahs are at least not having sex with the family goats. And there are many "God brothers and sisters" who support that process. Sorry, worship of the GBC's illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara is not part of anything to do with GOD. 

Again, ask any hamburger eating high school kid if worship of illicit sex with men, women and children as "God's messiahs for children" is connected to God. Nope, connected to Satan maybe, but not God. Why are the hamburger eating children more advanced than Navayogendra and his God brothers and sisters project? "Proof" you say! Pretty much, every average high school kid already knows that worship of illicit sex with men, women and children has gone ten trillion miles away from God, and is sitting DOWN IN HELL at the bottom of the universe in the lowest hells. I knew that already when I was a teen ager?]

I am fed and stay by the door of His Holiness NYS room during His visit; I would be responsible of relaying communications, act as driver and also make sure that Maharaj and His Indian disciples/congregational guests have a good stay without any hurdles. Maharaj Ji has been coming to our small Island since 2004. He used to come at first with one assistant, then often along with His own group of Indian guests consisting of high calibre couples mostly such as army officials of J&K, lawyers, politicians, businessmen, and recently with His senior disciples – an entourage who are surrendered for many years under His shelter and mostly temple presidents in India. 

The goal of His Holiness is preaching programs day after day as per a schedule which are already set up before His arrival. His entourage helped Him in His preaching recently and if it is His guests from India, they attend the everyday mangal aratee and the evening local house / temple / tent programs. Maharaj Ji has at most one or two rest days during his two weeks visit. 

What I reproach Your Grace is that You have boiled down all the above preaching and devotional activities to only pinpoint the occasions when Her Grace Kunti Mataji travelled to Mauritius along with Her Spiritual Master in the same plane as a leverage to make claim that His Holiness NYS is wrong somewhere and that His Holiness as a Sannyasi should not travel with women. Where is His Holiness travelling with unmarried or married women? 

By placing local devotional program pictures on your webpage, you are trying to prove sannyasi travelling with unmarried women. Is this your good judgement? But do you know that Mataji travels Economy class along within a group of other
accompanying devotees while Maharaj Ji is traveling Business class in the same aeroplane? Do you know that when she came along with Guruji, she was accompanying Maharaj Ji’s VIP guests couples who came only on her arrangements to take association in Spiritual local programs as an act of patronage in order to help the orphanage she manages? 

Is it because she is not married, she cannot travel in the same plane as Maharaja Ji? In what century are you? She gave her own life to the movement, and this is your question of whether she is married in order to be able to travel in the same plane? Do you know that on other occasions she came accompanied with her now late mother because her own blood brother lives in Mauritius as a local national resident? Is the Mataji guilty of visiting her own family and acquaintances when her Spiritual Master is coming to Mauritius? 

Is she guilty because she seized the opportunity to travel along with Maharaj Ji in order to see her family and serve the local yatra at the same time? What
are you cooking with the 6000 km thing and that local say that she is wife of Maharaj Ji? Would Your Grace not correct someone ignorant if the person wrongly took your daughter to be your wife? If someone ignorant thought like that
about Mataji and Maharaj, now it is an embellishment for your website. I cannot even say bullshit but garbage of great speculation in order to create sensational publishing for your website. 

[PADA: Jayadvaita swami is a spokesman for the Navayogendra GBC, and JAS says their parampara contains illicit sex with men, women and possibly children. We are not making sensational statements, your folks are. How many people want to worship a chain of gurus from God that contains illicit sex with men, women and children? You are making people turn away from God, which is what Srila Prabhupada says is the business of the asura class of rascals.]

How cheap is this? How can you allow yourself to publish things without proper verification of source? How can you allow yourself to try to demean His Holiness’s

disciples such as Indranuja Das and Madhupriya Das as if you thought of them as zombies who would be blind to anything “not sannyasa”? They have had high education from prestigious institutions, first was a marine engineer and the other is a doctor by material educational qualification. If the disciples are blind, will the Indian guests be blind too?

[PADA: Where is the prestige of promoting an illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara? And how is this being done by the educated people, when any high school kid who eats hamburgers in the USA knows your illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara is bogus, sinful, and hellish. Your guru parampara has ZERO connection to Krishna's.]

Will the local devotees be blind too? You should understand that the local and Indian guests are all hindus by birth and know the culture; a mere slack of sannyasa standard would have been such a great outcry and great disturbance.

Why have Maharaj Ji’s disciples not leaved Him or protested at Iskcon level? You have been led by the path of the garden.

[PADA: Yep, some of my Vrndavana friends are astonished that PADA has to decry worship of pedophiles as acharyas, in samadhi no less, and most of the people of India are not helping us. One of the Brijabasis told me, you (PADA) are a better Hindu than all of these lot put together.]

By talking with a certain enthusiasm and a sort of sarcasm, you have implied many unholy things and have breached much etiquette. Sannyasis should not travel with matajis? Yes, You are right if they are side by side. What? Are you

implying that there should not be any women in the plane? Hilarious. If Her Grace is travelling in the same plane as Her Spiritual Master, then is it Sannyasi travelling with women? 

What are you saying? There is a big difference between travelling in the same plane and travelling with women. The entourage of Maharaj Ji have tried to enlighten you but you took down to it to showcase of Your mocking reading of what they wanted to convey without hearing.

Maharaj Ji travels in big groups; it is almost impossible for matajis to approach Maharaj Ji. Her Grace Kunti Mataji also functions as a local leader in His Holiness NYS Yatra for Mauritius responsible for the empowerment of matajis aspiring
or already initiated, solving their problems with Spiritual life and guiding them in their services to Maharaj Ji during His visits. 

She also collects funds by begging from local people to donate for the orphanage in Udhampur. What wrong do you see Prabhu? If such a mataji is delivering on her effort to progress Prabhupāda’s mission, you associate her travelling to Mauritius as a means to degrade Her Spiritual Master because she travelled in the same plane and that she is not married? I see this as cruel and misogynistic on your part. I dare think that if I send You a picture of His Divine Grace, Śrīla Prabhupāda and some matajis pictured together with Him, along with a certain criticism, You will publish that too and wait for devotees to come and play barrister to defend Śrīla Prabhupāda against the claim. 

Why are You functioning at such a simplistic level of ignorance? What is your gain? How is it helping? You talk of personalities of whom you never met, and You have become the instrument of people who want to cause havoc. You have created a great damage to Yourself by creating a hocus pocus based on an email and some pictures and by being judgemental of the sincerity of devotees. Yes, you are right that the person who wrote the info email has right to question but do you know the latter’s credentials, background, intention and mental health?

Who are you?

[PADA: I am a person who is against Navayogendra and his illicit sex acharyas process. And rest assured, the Yamaduttas are on my same team.]

Who empowered you? You are also a mere human who has the propensity to be illusioned. Beware Prabhu! 

(S.B.7.1.18) 

You are putting to question the integrity of His Holiness NYS when Srila Prabhupada Himself classified HH NYS as a real brahmana. 

[PADA: What kind of brahmanas promote a program that has children worshiping pedophiles as their acharyas? What kind of brahmana can evidently be defeated by any hamburger eating high school kid?] 

You can’t be holier than the Pope. As a critic myself, I would request you to apologize and rectify. Forgive me for my tone, I am just trying to make you
understand the truth as you are a real bully drifting from being pragmatic to a puritanic mad revolutionary devotee who has only his own mind as association.

HARE KṚṢṆA. Your well-wisher: rasbihari das nys. (Mr. Ram Doyal) 

(TEL: +23054991008, Email: awe@live.com)

[PADA: Well we are in good company. All, at least probably almost all, of the high school kids agree that it is bogus to promote pedophiles as God's acharyas, and so do all the acharyas agree, and so do the Yamaduttas agree, and so on and so forth. It is good that Hanuman goes after their female secretary program, it is a problem, but there is a much larger problem here such as: promoting pedophiles as acharyas and then banning, beating, suing and killing some of those who object. And that is the process given by educated brahmanas? NOPE! 

If we are wrong on ANY OF THIS, please explain where and how? I also have friends in Mauritius -- and they say that the Prabhupada worshipers are not welcome at ISKCON -- but members of the illicit sex guru parampara are. What is up with that? 

ys pd] 

angel108b@yahoo.com