My new reader friend is only a young man, and he has come to Krishna all from the internet, includes reading from PADA. He wants to make his own brand new Web Site with his friends to explain IN SUMMARY the whole history of ISKCON since 1978. And he sent me his "summary framework" of what his Web Site will contain. He asked for my feed back. And he wants to run this by others to make sure it is accurate.
2) ISKCON leaders then viciously oppressed, removed, exiled, and sometimes orchestrated murders of anyone who would not accept their rascals are as good as God.
And so I am asking you readers -- if this is accurate? Then he can say he has approval of many devotees and GBC people also?
ys puranjana dasa angel108b@yahoo.com
PROPOSED NEW WEB SITE FRAMEWORK:
1) ISKCON leaders in 1978 declared that rascals are as good as God.
PROPOSED NEW WEB SITE FRAMEWORK:
1) ISKCON leaders in 1978 declared that rascals are as good as God.
2) ISKCON leaders then viciously oppressed, removed, exiled, and sometimes orchestrated murders of anyone who would not accept their rascals are as good as God.
3) GBC has made piles of bogus "annual resolutions" to "prove" that rascals are as good as God, because they are the self same rascals in question.
4) Nothing has changed from 1978 to 2021 on this basic process.
5) He says I am right, GBC cannot even officially resolve that homosexuals and pedophiles are not, were not and could not have been -- God's guru successors as of May 2021.
6) Instead GBC folks are burying dead homosexual pedophiles in samadhi to "prove" that pedophiles are, were, or could have been in fact, as good as God.
That is the basic framework of the Web Site he is working on. He wants to simplify the whole thing in a nutshell so anyone could immediately figure it out in a short time. I think it is a great idea.
Can he make this without anyone objecting?
ys PD
That is the basic framework of the Web Site he is working on. He wants to simplify the whole thing in a nutshell so anyone could immediately figure it out in a short time. I think it is a great idea.
Can he make this without anyone objecting?
ys PD
PADA: Correct JD. This newer devotee wanted me to post this summary as factual history, and he wanted me to ask if anyone objects to this version of history. Fair enough. I said sure, let's do it.
ReplyDeleteYes! It is odd that (A) some people say "no one listens to PADA," and then other people say (B) "oh no, millions of people are hearing about the molesting issue, because of PADA." Just make up your minds please?
Anyway, PADA materials are being lifted off to other sites all the time. We have 177 other sites with links to harekrsna.org for example, and probably 100s more who just hijacked our stuff and used it elsewhere. We have people always asking us if they can copy and paste our articles, and we have been cited in many publications and so on. So if people wanted to say, no one listens to us, they are not informed, or they are fanatics.
Anyway, I really like this guy's approach. It is too much material and it is too confusing for the average reader. We should have a specific simplified site that condenses the whole thing down to a few points. Great idea in my opinion. So these are younger people, and they get it, they have the whole thing figured out. So I am confident they will convey it accurately. They wanted to make a disclaimer -- that this history was cited already on another public devotee information board, and no one objected. Or objections were made, but none were serious etc. Again, good idea. ys pd