Hare Krishna news
Yes, Prahlad said that because the Windle Turley lawsuit was getting hundreds of kids pulled out of child molesting, and it was stopping the suicides of victims, therefore it is terrible. He still says that on his site now? And he began promoting Bhakta das, a big cheer leader of Radhanath. Prahlad has never explained why he wanted to keep hundreds of children in a molesting program, which was ending up causing the victims to commit suicide? I have made MANY videos about how the molesting program was causing suicides and have included testimony from victims -- saying our program saved them from suicide. So I am not sure why anyone would take delight in continuing that program, and object to our helping contain it? Yes, never mind if Prahlad wants me killed or not, but he surely wants molesting to continue and have victims to die because he vehemently opposes us saving them from that process. I won't tell you folks what some of the victims said about Prahlad and his pals wanting to see their victimization continue, since this is a public forum. Yes never mind if Prahlad wants me to die or not, but there is plenty of written evidence he wanted us to not bother saving abuse victims who were committing suicide. And since the New Vrndavana program has assassinated dissenters, and Prahlad has been promoting the Bhakta das / Radhanath program, well maybe that gives us a clue how he wants to have us offed? Why would anyone promote the program that has offed our friends for objecting to child molesting, unless they wanted us offed too? ys pd
Sulochana said people like Prahlad are "tossing children into a wood chipper," and of course Prahlad is infuriated when someone pulls the plug on the wood chipper? Or what? He never explains. ys pd
Yes prabhu, but none of this has anything at all to do with Bangalore? The child molesting issue came up way before Bangalore was even being discussed. HKC Jaipur said they agreed with Prahlad, that we are wrong to have saved children from the GBC's schools and to have stopped the suicides. They wanted the children to have remained in GBC schools and the suicides to continue, and they vehemently opposed us saving these children. OK to their credit, Prahlad's people did ask me "how many died," apparently not enough. I said dozens died and many more would, and they said it was not worth $400,000,000. Prahlad then began to promote Radhanath's biggest cheer leader Bhakta das, who is a big huge defender of the GBC's gurus. In addition, Bhakta das was arrested for selling millions of dollars of designer drugs, and he was running away from the FBI when when he was arrested in Puri for some sort of sex crimes charge. Bhakta was called the Dracula drug dealer in the newspapers and we said that the Krishna devotees should not be associated with (A) Radhanatha program, (B) drug selling, (C) sex crimes and (D) being wanted by the FBI. Then Prahlad got all the HKC Jaipur people to send me links to listen to their Bhakta das audio youtube. Yep, that is really going to help things, listening to Radhanath's best defending people. So they wanted me to surrender to the biggest defenders of the New Vrndavana scheme whose people were charged with killing Sulochana. And what happened to Aindra under these people? Why do I need to surrender to that process? Now all of a sudden they are bringing up Bangalore, which was never part of the original disagreement, its an ad hoc topic change smokescreen. Lets deal with the original point and not change topic midstream. ys pd
PADA: Sorry, but the only people who send me links to Prahlad's material are the GBC's guru's fanatical people. No Prabhupadanugas ever send me links to his material, ever. The Radhanath etc. people love what Prahlad writes, and forward his materials to us. No one else ever does? This does not appear to be a coincidence? Yep, the GBC's gurus / Bhakta das / Radhanath lover's club folks send me Prahlad's links from time to time, no one else does? I think this says all we need to know about this entire issue. A number of ex-kuli victims are also very upset with Prahlad's program, which self-evidently did not want a lawsuit that liberated them from GBC hands, never mind reduced the victim suicides. And I really cannot repeat what some of them have told me about what they think about Prahlad desire to continue the abuse and dying on this public forum. Prahlad was advertising everyone to listen to Radhanath program's cheer leader and criminal Bhakta das, and we all know whose side that agenda is on. We said that proves Prahlad is in league with that agenda, and most of our readers agreed. If he has anything new to add, we'd like to hear it and he can e-mail me privately. firstname.lastname@example.org. ys pd
Thanks prabhu, yep the Purujit people, after associating with Hansadutta, are now saying we are all "blasphemers of great devotees." Hmmm, sounds like what the GBC people said all the time? They simply cannot explain who authorized them to re-write the books, its a smokescreen reply. More and more people are agreeing, they are not authorized to re-write the books. They have no direct evidence that there is an order to do that, nor do they consult with the people who were there at the time. So they think they are the new editors by self-appointing themselves to the post. Not going to fly. ys pd
pada10081 hour agoYes, at the start of all this Prahlad and Mukunda were working close together, and they were promoting their anti-Illuminati / Nazi "world bankers are the problem" propaganda. OK and Jesus drove bankers out of the temple 2,000 years ago, and that means this banker problem will always be going on in the material world -- as long as there is a material world. Srila Prabhupada says its not important for devotees to be fixated on this issue, which will never be solved in any case. Its a diversion. Sulochana said that these people fighting the world banker's system cannot even fix the first simple problem -- of a few sexual predators sitting in big Vyasa seats in ISKCON. He said their "lets go after the world's bankers" program is a smokescreen diversion. And on the Mukunda / Prahlad web site at the time, they were using photos of Srila Prabhupada mixed with the names of these anti-Illuminati speakers, as if Krishna endorses these mundane speaking folks (some of whom are meat eaters and one of them was promoting hunting animals in case "the society collapses"). I still have a photo of their web site at the time with Prabhupada being mixed with these mundane people's names if anyone wants to see it, its still on my blog. At the time Prahlad said these Illuminati speaker's advertisements are great because "they are getting lots of hits." Well yes maybe so, but most devotees are disgusted to have Krishna linked to their third reich agenda. The complaint we get all the time is that these people are giving Krishna a black eye on purpose because they want to give Krishna a bad name. Then Mukunda / Prahlad team at the time made a youtube video of GBC cheer leader Bhakta das, and Prahlad jams the link to their video all over the place. They were at the time promoting the biggest cheer leader of the GBC's guru program, and a criminal. Now I do believe the HKC Jaipur people who say "we have no idea who Bhakta das is," which means Prahlad encouraged, if not jammed and coerced them, into promoting their Bhakta das video. That means Prahlad used these poor innocent HKC people as pawns in his political program of having people listen to the GBC's cheer leaders. Prahlad used these poor HKC folks for his political agenda, of sneaking the GBC's and Radhanath's cheer leaders into our Prabhupadanuga program. Many devotees were appalled that Prahlad would be sneaking the GBC defenders agenda into the Prabhupadanuga process and coercing HKC Jaipur into his politics. Thus most people agreed, that is also why he opposes fixing the molesting and suicide process, he is with the Bhakta das / Radhanath program and their agenda. That was the conclusion of many of our readers, and it is one of the most reasonable conclusions. Of course Prahlad also said my taxi driving money was contaminated and so on, because he did not want me to help Sulochana buy a can of beans. He wanted to dry us up take us down, and bring forward the GBC's defenders, and the problem is, me and our devotee associates are well onto his agenda by this time. ys pd
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.