PADA: Thanks for our exchanges, which leaves us with a few questions:
First of all, you folks all said we need to promote Kailash Chandra das, who is suffering from paranoid delusions living in the Moab desert -- waiting for WW III, and he has no active preaching project, and he is not making any new devotees. Yep, our survival does not depend on Krishna, it depends on hiding out under a rock in the desert for 35 years! Why are you folks always attracted to these types of paranoid delusional programs?
Of course, the good news is that your hero Kailash at least has written that Sridhara Maharaja's jeeva tattva is mayavada and that Sridhara Maharaja has a tendency to support deviants as acharyas, so SM should not be consulted. Then, just after you guys said we all need to get behind your Moab Utah-pada and his idea that Sridhara Maharaja is preaching mayavada -- and that Sridhara supports deviants as acharyas, your associate Kim Moller came out and said no, we all have to support Sridhara Maharaja and the Gaudiya Matha's self appointed deviant's as acharya's program.
Srila Prabhupada also says Sridhara Maharaja's idea created the "kill guru and become guru" mentality program. Why do you folks always end up in bed with this lot? OK, and its also well known that your new savior / spokesman Sridhara Maharaja made a false guru program after 1936, and after that, dissenters were banned, beaten and some were killed. Kim says this is "not a serious deviation." And Srila Prabhupada summed it all up by saying that Sridhara Maharaja is not qualified to be an acharya, and he should not be consulted.
What amazes us all the time is how you folks are always attracted to programs that create false gurus, with devastating consequences. You folks still have not figured out yet -- that this is wrong? Did we forget to mention devotees who dissented Sridhara's post-1936 guru were severely mistreated, why do you want more of this program? And then Sridhara Maharaja supported the false 11 GBC gurus, with even more victims. So it seems you folks are always going back to supporting the original deviation, that conditioned souls can be gurus.
You also claim you are for the original books, and yet you know its the ritviks who are the main people getting the legal rights for, and also printing and distributing, the original books, but you are against us, which means, you are more in favor of the changed books program. Anyway, your idea that we need to get behind the founder fathers of the deviants acharyas program has failed, its not going to fly. We defeated your whole program a long time ago, and even the public mass media has rejected your Sridhara Maharaja idea that deviants are messiahs. Its dead on arrival.
Anyway we are glad you are saying we both need to reject Sridhara Maharaja and promote Sridhara Maharaja, simultaneously, That means no one can follow your orders, they are self contradictory. Even you cannot follow your own idea, you are fighting your own shadow.
ys pd
First of all, you folks all said we need to promote Kailash Chandra das, who is suffering from paranoid delusions living in the Moab desert -- waiting for WW III, and he has no active preaching project, and he is not making any new devotees. Yep, our survival does not depend on Krishna, it depends on hiding out under a rock in the desert for 35 years! Why are you folks always attracted to these types of paranoid delusional programs?
Of course, the good news is that your hero Kailash at least has written that Sridhara Maharaja's jeeva tattva is mayavada and that Sridhara Maharaja has a tendency to support deviants as acharyas, so SM should not be consulted. Then, just after you guys said we all need to get behind your Moab Utah-pada and his idea that Sridhara Maharaja is preaching mayavada -- and that Sridhara supports deviants as acharyas, your associate Kim Moller came out and said no, we all have to support Sridhara Maharaja and the Gaudiya Matha's self appointed deviant's as acharya's program.
Srila Prabhupada also says Sridhara Maharaja's idea created the "kill guru and become guru" mentality program. Why do you folks always end up in bed with this lot? OK, and its also well known that your new savior / spokesman Sridhara Maharaja made a false guru program after 1936, and after that, dissenters were banned, beaten and some were killed. Kim says this is "not a serious deviation." And Srila Prabhupada summed it all up by saying that Sridhara Maharaja is not qualified to be an acharya, and he should not be consulted.
What amazes us all the time is how you folks are always attracted to programs that create false gurus, with devastating consequences. You folks still have not figured out yet -- that this is wrong? Did we forget to mention devotees who dissented Sridhara's post-1936 guru were severely mistreated, why do you want more of this program? And then Sridhara Maharaja supported the false 11 GBC gurus, with even more victims. So it seems you folks are always going back to supporting the original deviation, that conditioned souls can be gurus.
You also claim you are for the original books, and yet you know its the ritviks who are the main people getting the legal rights for, and also printing and distributing, the original books, but you are against us, which means, you are more in favor of the changed books program. Anyway, your idea that we need to get behind the founder fathers of the deviants acharyas program has failed, its not going to fly. We defeated your whole program a long time ago, and even the public mass media has rejected your Sridhara Maharaja idea that deviants are messiahs. Its dead on arrival.
Anyway we are glad you are saying we both need to reject Sridhara Maharaja and promote Sridhara Maharaja, simultaneously, That means no one can follow your orders, they are self contradictory. Even you cannot follow your own idea, you are fighting your own shadow.
ys pd
Yep, this is strange, Ajit, Torben and Kim claim to be against the changed books, while at the very same time, they promote the GBC's living gurus program that is changing the books. That is why they are now blocking me, they know we see that they actually support the book changer's regime -- and vociferously, and they even admit, none of the current living gurus in their program has opposed the book changes in any meaningful way.
ReplyDeleteSame problem we are having with Dayalu Niati's HKC Jaipur program, they claim to be against the GBC, then most of their members send me links to Bhakta das and Hari Sauri, the biggest cheer leaders of the GBC's gurus. First of all, decide what program you are going to support, then come out and support it, you cannot serve two masters, as the Bible says. ys pd
Yes Torben and Ajit told us that there is not one single one of their living gurus who supports original books, they want us to surrender to the book changers, you got it. Yep. They are with them, it really is that simple. ys pd
ReplyDelete