Prabhupada Replacers of a Feather Flop Together
Jadurani / Shyamarani and Radhanath swami
http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-narayan-maharaja-hoax.html
Jadurani / Shyamarani and Radhanath swami
http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-narayan-maharaja-hoax.html
PADA: Some of the ex-kuli students of the ISKCON GBC tell PADA's editor that they experience "PTSD" (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) whenever they see Radhanath at a program, because they remember him as a big leader of the New Vrndavana regime -- that was oppressing if not abusing them as children. A person who causes spontaneous PTSD symptoms amongst ex-children victims, is the same guy we should be promoting as the big leader of the Gaudiya Vaishnavas, and an important book author no less?
Worse, some Narayan Maharaja folks are still writing to us EVEN RECENTLY to say PADA's ideas are "very offensive" because we oppose their false advertising of various Gaudiya Matha and / or GBC deviants as acharyas. Yep, anyone who says deviants, drunkards, sexual predators, fools and debauchees are not God's successors is "making serious offenses." Who knew! And this is the program Jadurani aka Shyamarani has signed up for?
*** Meanwhile, there are a number of people who claim Radhanath was part of the conspiracy to have Sulochana assassinated, in addition to having a role in many other odious New Vrndavana activities. Check this Jyotidhama dasa testimony:
https://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2019/03/my-involvement-in-sulochan-murder.html
*** Meanwhile, Radhanath helped bury sexual predator Kirtanananda and porno swami Gunagrahi in samadhis in the holy dham. Ooops, another process PADA is "making offenses" for not going along with?
*** Meanwhile, Radhanth's writings are being viewed as mayavada even by some other GBC types.
*** Meanwhile, Radhanath made a whack doodle video about MAFIA lawyers which does not even mention Srila Prabhupada or Krishna.
Anyway, Narayan Maharaj has helped promote the GBC's bogus guru program and its biggest members -- like Tamal, founder father of the illicit sex acharya's program. And Tamal was also a HUGE cheer leading assistant in promoting of the Kirtanananda / Radhanath et al. program. Tamal used to lecture that Kirtanananda's / Radhanath's "New Vrndavana" scheme was the best example of a Krishna community in ISKCON (because it was worshiping a sexual predator as their acharya)?
And Narayan Maharaja was helping Satsvarupa Das Goswami write "The Guru Reform Notebook" wherein their idea was floated to "reform the ISKCON gurus." The acharyas need to be reformed for deviations? And eventually, under their "guru reform" scheme, they VOTED IN more gurus into their GBC's guru process, such as Radhanath. What kind of gurus need reform, except for the GBC / Gaudiya Matha / Narayan Maharaja ilk? And how can gurus who need reform for deviations, vote in more gurus -- like Radhanath?
Our gurus are deviating, they need reform, therefore: lets have them vote in more gurus? Really? Why didn't Narayan Maharaja simply inform Satsvarupa, you guys are not gurus and therefore you cannot certify another wave of gurus (like Radhanath). And then they voted in many more folks like Badrinarayan, Prithu, Sivarama, Indradyumna and others -- some of whom also joined Tamal and became cheer leaders of Narayan Maharaja's "rasika" program as well.
Narayan Maharaja forgot to tell us -- that when us neophytes take the post of diksha guru / have our feet touched, we are taking karma. And us neophytes are UNQUALIFIED to take said karma. Oh, I almost forgot, this is all NM's "rasika-ness" program, which does not need to follow the actual rules for neophytes.
Taking Karma is not for neophytes
So devotees are being banned, beaten, molested, sued and assassinated and NM is giving the leaders of that program "rasika classes"? How rasika is that?
Of course even ordinary non-devotee type folks sometimes write to ask us, "How can Radhanath be the guru of ISKCON, when he is evidently one of the biggest leaders of a program that is full of deviation and corruption"?
Narayan Maharaja does not seem to consider any of these minor details when he encourages Satsvarupa and their GBC's guru reform / guru vote process, which ends up certifying people like Radhanath as Krishna's guru successors?
In other words, we can thank Narayan Maharaja for helping Satsvarupa establish the "guru reform" process and their subsequent "voted in gurus," ... so they could establish that the henchmen to Kirtanananda are "Krishna's successor gurus."
So it seems like the ordinary person on the street realizes that leaders of a corrupt regime cannot be voted in as God's successors, whereas NM did not figure this out? And in 1990 when the GBC was smack in the middle of their ghost busting scam, Narayan Maharaja was deputed by the GBC to be their top defence team leader. And he was thus quoted by the GBC in their "ISKCON Journal":
Narayana Maharaja, p.23, ISKCON Journal 1990:
“Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura has not mentioned that so many others will do acarya, yet they have done. This is the system. So Tirtha Maharaja, Madhav Maharaja, Sridhar Maharaja, our Gurudeva, Swamiji Swamiji Bhaktivedanta Swami they all became acaryas.”
But Srila Prabhupada says:
“He never recommended anyone to be acarya of the Gaudiya Math. But Sridhara Maharaja is responsible for disobeying this order of Guru Maharaja, and he and others who are already dead unnecessarily thought that there must be one acarya. If Guru Maharaja could have seen someone who was qualified at that time to be acarya he would have mentioned. Because on the night before he passed away he talked of so many things, but never mentioned an acarya. His idea was acarya was not to be nominated amongst the governing body.
He said openly you make a GBC and conduct the mission. So his idea was amongst the members of GBC who would come out successful and self effulgent acarya would be automatically selected. So Sridhara Maharaja and his two associate gentlemen unauthorizedly selected one acarya and later it proved a failure. The result is now everyone is claiming to be acarya even though they may be kanistha adhikari with no ability to preach. In some of the camps the acarya is being changed three times a year. Therefore we may not commit the same mistake in our ISKCON camp. Actually amongst my Godbrothers no one is qualified to become acarya. So it is better not to mix with my Godbrothers very intimately because instead of inspiring our students and disciples they may sometimes pollute them.”
[PADA: Tirtha Maharaja, Madhava Maharaja, Sridhara Maharaja are the specific named people Srila Prabhupada identifies as the deviants who made false gurus in the Gaudiya Matha. How are they equals to Srila Prabhupada? Of course then again, how is Radhanath another acharya aka equal to Srila Prabhupada? Anyway, all these people are supporting deviants as Srila Prabhupada's successors / replacements, to the peril of the movement he started and to the peril of the citizens of his society, and the peril of the citizens of the entire world who are under the malefic influence of NM's bogus gurus and their bogus certification process. ys pd]
http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2017/04/bv-narayana-maharaja-brahmanas-must-be.html
[PADA: Tirtha Maharaja, Madhava Maharaja, Sridhara Maharaja are the specific named people Srila Prabhupada identifies as the deviants who made false gurus in the Gaudiya Matha. How are they equals to Srila Prabhupada? Of course then again, how is Radhanath another acharya aka equal to Srila Prabhupada? Anyway, all these people are supporting deviants as Srila Prabhupada's successors / replacements, to the peril of the movement he started and to the peril of the citizens of his society, and the peril of the citizens of the entire world who are under the malefic influence of NM's bogus gurus and their bogus certification process. ys pd]
http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2017/04/bv-narayana-maharaja-brahmanas-must-be.html
Yes, Narayan Maharaja was supporting Sridhara Maharaja's idea that acharyas can deviate, and need reform. Paramadvaiti swami is a by-product of their idea, and he has often quoted BR Sridhara Maharaja saying that acharyas can go mad after money, women and followers, as it says in the book Sri Guru and His Grace. Sorry, that is not correct, acharyas are fully Krishna conscious beings, whereas pretenders are the persons going mad after material things. Paramadvaiti blended together "acharya" and "pretender" to uphold his false acharya's status. Some of his ex-followers are in touch with me now and telling me really awful examples of the problems they endured in his program. Of course as soon as I said these GBC gurus are deviating in 1978 Sridhara Maharaja said "none should protest." In any case, we should be careful how the guru parampara is represented if we want to promote the religion of the Vaishnavas. ys pd
ReplyDelete