Thats of course what Prabhupada totally rejects. His disciples, his movement, put under the whims of a karmi court, karmi lawyers. And the whole menure presented on tv for people in general to watch the mud-wrestling live.
What people dont understand is that Vaishnavism is of no interest for karmis. If Vaishnavas fight with other Vaishnavas the karmis do only one thing, kick out both and stamp Denied Entry in their passports.
It is evidence of incapacity to maneuver Lord Caitanya's Sankirtan movement - right in front of general public - on the desk of karmi lawyers, karmi judges. With what kind of money? Donated funds.
There are still idiots out there who believe a judge is a prosecutor who gets to the bottom of things.
Never! Judges simply examine legal means appealed by lawyers. If there's no claimant, there's no judge. Judges never listen to laymen.
The procedural arrangements of the involved parties requiring representation by a lawyer in appeal cases will apply.
Thats of course what Prabhupada totally rejects. His disciples, his movement, put under the whims of a karmi court, karmi lawyers.
ReplyDeleteAnd the whole menure presented on tv for people in general to watch the mud-wrestling live.
What people dont understand is that Vaishnavism is of no interest for karmis. If Vaishnavas fight with other Vaishnavas the karmis do only one thing, kick out both and stamp Denied Entry in their passports.
It is evidence of incapacity to maneuver Lord Caitanya's Sankirtan movement - right in front of general public - on the desk of karmi lawyers, karmi judges. With what kind of money? Donated funds.
There are still idiots out there who believe a judge is a prosecutor who gets to the bottom of things.
Never! Judges simply examine legal means
appealed by lawyers. If there's no claimant, there's no judge.
Judges never listen to laymen.
The procedural arrangements of the involved parties requiring representation by a lawyer in appeal cases will apply.