Ramesvara's "Worshiped as a type of JESUS"
PADA: An elderly lady who visits Krishna temples saw this photo of Kirtanananda recently. She noted how he was always surrounded with "his boys" and she said this man is obviously a child fetish pedophile. And she said it has been very disgusting that this man has been worshiped as a TYPE of JESUS in ISKCON. And how severely damaging this must be for the CHILDREN of ISKCON.
I said yeah, even more disgusting is that people like Ramesvara / Radhanath et al. have been making it deadly and dangerous for us "dissenters" to oppose their child molesting worship, and child molesting regime. Good question -- how did they mistake this guy for another Jesus? Because they don't believe in Jesus?
==============
PADA: Thanks for your question. Regarding Ramesvara dasa (Robert Grant) having illicit connections to his minor aged female follower or followers, there has been many accounts of his "dating a minor aged gurukula student" going on over the years. I believe Mithiladisha's then wife and others followed Ramesvara to the Santa Monica Mall to see him taking one of his female students out on "a date."
And that detailed account was published many years ago, I think Pushkar and others were circulating it. And people like Vadiraja were saying that Ramesvara was seating young girls on his lap in his office, "chatting it up" with them. And there are other accounts of him going in the swimming pool with young female students dressed only in revealing simming outfits, taking a minor aged female to the mundane movie cinema -- and so on.
However, even if he is one ISKCON leader who has been involved in personally sexually exploiting his own follower or followers, either covert or overt, we should never forget that he had a much wider role -- as a ring leader -- of the whole child molesting rings, webs and nests regime of the overall ISKCON society at the time. And he was suppressing whistleblowers like me and Sulochana.
In 1986 Sulochana was compiling testimony from mothers of molesting victims, and Sulochana published some of them. He had planned to make a much more thorough investigation and published public compiliation -- to identify perps, and the GBC leaders who were covering for, enabling and empowering these perps.
For example Sulochana was claiming that Kirtanananda was in fact one of the perps, and he was engaging in sexual affairs with young males at New Vrndavana. We should not forget that Chakradhari was assassinated when he was bringing out complaints about Kirtanananda's sex-capades. And Ramesvara took the side of Kirtanananda against me and Sulochana.
According to ex-Los Angeles "enforcers" like Krishna Katha, Ramacandra and perhaps others, Ramesvara was working closely with Kirtanananda's people to identify Sulochana's Los Angeles location for their "hit man" from New Vrndavana to find him. Ramachandra said Ramesvara said "Sulochana needs a new body."
Meanwhile, I was helping put together testimony -- and this later became the Windle Turley lawsuit. According to some victims, it seems like several thousand kids were victims in one form or other. And while all this was going on, left, right and center, Ramesvara was a leader. And people like Ravindra Swarupa, Svavasa, Badrinarayan, Ratna Bushana and others were all on his team. Satsvarupa was writing that we are "poison pens," which Sulochana said is "painting a bull's eye on our backs to have us exterminated." And he was exterminated.
And of course if we read Henry Doktorski's New Vrndavan account, he names Radhanatha as the money handler "bag man" paying Tirtha to come after us. And after Sulochana went down New Vrndavana sent three hit guys to take me out, but the FBI had them intercepted when they came to Berkeley, or else I too would be transpired.
So there is the individual complaints about Ramesvara, which are not good, but he was giant ring leader of his entire overall "enforced cult ritualistic worship of homosexuals, pedophiles, drunks, drug addicts and deviants as messiahs project." And there are thousands of children victims of his regime, and maybe some of them may be his personal ones. I am going to be interviewed on National TV this fall where I hope to expose this mass abuse regime and its main organizers, handlers, enablers, sycophants etc.
Hope this helps. ys Puranjan Dasa
angel108b@yahoo.com
Hope this helps. ys Puranjan Dasa
angel108b@yahoo.com
Former "Srila Rage-Isvara"
====================
We finally did it! Our lifetime work almost done!
We now have illicit sex with men, women and children,
drunks, drug addicts, Vodka drinkers,
porno swamis, condom wearing deviants,
men who lust after children,
men who "date" young female students,
AND MORE! All included in our post 1977
"Chain of Gurus from God."
We got devotees all over the place
banned, beaten, molested, sued, and assassinated!
We are almost there!
PADA: Ramesvara's fake Jesus was also a molester:
ReplyDeleteAugust 9, 2008: On this date in history 15 years ago, a New Vrindaban gurukula alumnus claims, “I got molested by Kirtanananda. I couldn’t speak about it to anyone for years until I got counseling. So when I saw the post [on the Sampradaya Sun] glorifying this madman [Kirtanananda], I got nauseated. . . . I still hurt from what Kirtanananda did to me but I’m going on with my life.”
(Gold, Guns and God, Vol. 4, p. 202)
M Dasi: I would argue ... Ramesvara knew. Mahatma knew. They all knew more than us ... Kirtanananda is not "another Jesus." But they also knew ... if they help him, they enjoy their own pujya, kama, pratistha, and get a position of glory. So they went along with him to get their own place in the inner circle.
ReplyDeleteBut did they really like Kirtanananda? Doubtful.
Kamsa also had many princes and kings who were on his side. They just went along with Kamsa so they could improve their own post. The Krishna book children had to suffer under Kamsa, and the ISKCON children suffered under them. Did these other princes and kings like Kamsa really? Doubtful. It is a conspiracy of like minded crooks.
I don't really know what happens when you join a gang to make pedophiles into another "Jesus" ... but it is probably part of the unwritten Vedas ... describing the real situation in the most obnoxious regions. It is so painful to read ... it is like going to hell just thinking about their fate. So we are spared from having to even think about them. But that won't save them from going there.