History lessons of ISKCON

Right, well in 1977 Srila Prabhupada said that sannyasa was not working and he suspended sannyasa. So he was trying to pull the carpet out from them. This is where the poison in his hair sample started to build up (there was chronic poisoning according to his hair sample).

I think that Srila Prabhupada was depending on us, most of his disciples, 97 percent of us who were householders, to contain the gays. Instead, most of my brothers surrendered to the gays, and they harassed me for attacking the gays and they still do. In short, most of my brothers wanted the gays to win, and that is what occured.

At the same time I do believe that the gay partee poisoned Srila Prabhupada. Srila Prabhupada said that we need to be "vigilant" in ISKCON, and yet, the bulk of his disciples were only vigilant to -- defend the gays and contain us protestors. So this was all a test from Krishna, most of them failed, obviously.

So you are right, the people who were entrusted to defend ISKCON, the 97 percent of us who were householders, we failed to defend it, and the gays took over. This is turning around gradually, we have many new people who are working with us and they are helping us fight the gay conspiracy, so it will turn around in time. The only good news is that at least some of us did fight and we will get the credit, just like Arjuna got the credit. So in sum, the gays won because the householders supported their conspiracy to take over. They failed to defend their guru and his mission, they failed the test given them from Krishna. This also occured in the Gaudiya matha, the gay guru Ananta Vasudeva took over, and the householders fled, they failed there too.

So all the more reason for us to be vigilant and defend the right idea. ys pd