Bhagavat Maharaja And "Vaishnava Etiquette"

Bhagavat Maharaja.

PADA is in Texas helping Tamal get sued for $400,000,000

while Narayan Maharaja is in Texas yelling at our associates

for attacking Tamal.

Why do these people always support pedophile messiah's programs?

And then NM says -- the abuse victims are just "getting karma."

Umm, who authorized them to give children molesting karma? 

Let us not forget, Tamal is the person who bought NM into ISKCON.

And because PADA does not support telling children to worship

illicit sex with men, women and children guru programs --

PADA "does not understand Vaishnava etiquette"?

 

https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100057731496702

PADA: A follower of Bhagavat Maharaja (Narayan Maharaja groupie) is trying to defend these Gaudiya Matha folks who were challenging us for using the title of "Prabhupada."

When we were in India in 1971 a number of the Mayapur Gaudiya Math God brothers -- assisted by Narayan Maharaja -- were infuriated that Srila Prabhupada was being called "Prabhupada." Their spokesman Madhava Maharaja was yelling and shouting at Prabhupada in a meeting, and we thought we were going to get into a big brawl at the time with their group. It came close to coming to blows. 

After they left, Srila Prabhupada said, post a guard at my door, my God brothers might try to harm me, or kill me. They were calling him "swami maharaja" instead of Prabhupada, and they kept doing that the whole time, as does Narayan Maharaja. 

So it was the same thing, they made false gurus, some of them had illicit sex problems, and they were creating the same types of problems we have now with Lokanath swami. And the follower of Bhagavat Maharaja says I do not understand Vaishnava etiquette? 

The etiquette is that none of these people has any authority to tell us what name we followers apply to our guru. Nor do they have any authority to tell an acharya to either use -- or not use -- a title. They have no qualifications to challenge what the acharya is doing, or what his followers are doing. 

Meanwhile they gave "acharya" titles to illicit sex deviants, causing the same problems we have now with Lokanath. They do not allow proper titles to be given where it is due, and they give high titles to people who do not deserve these titles, exactly the same as the Lokanath problem. 

They call our guru "swami maharaja," and call illicit sex deviants "acharyas," that is not proper etiquette whatever. There is no etiquette where persons can challenge the activity of, or titles used by, the acharya. That is never done by bona fide devotees. 

The bona fide devotees respect the authority of the acharya. Meanwhile the Gaudiya Matha made illicit sex gurus like Lokanath, all of this is well documented. The Gaudiya Matha folks missed the point ... not Srila Prahbupada, nor his followers. 

Where in shastra does it say the etiquette is -- we should yell at the acharya and challenge his titles? And we should give pedophile people like Lokanath high titles? I am not missing the point, that is the point. And that is what we are dealing with now, Lokanath does not deserve these titles. 

Of course Narayan Maharaja was Tamal's top bucket boy defender of their homosexual and pedophile messiah's program that has been banning, beating, molesting, suing and killing Vaishnavas. Then, after NM caused all this havoc he said we and the molested children "are getting karma." He is authorized to dish out karma to others? So Bhagavat Maharaja has become a big promoter of the NM program, i.e. a program that promotes Tamal's worship of illicit sex with men, women and children, and which bans, beats, molests, sues and kills Vaishnavas.

And NM's guru told him not to initiate anyone, but he did anyway. Then he got cancer and his followers said he was sick from taking their karma. Well yep, he was told not to take karma. Of course anyone who supports a pedophile guru program, and crams their pedophile guru worship program down the throats of little children, is going to get bad karma in any case.

Of course NM says that Madhava Maharaja is a bona fide acharya, because he yells, shouts and screams insults at pure devotees and makes them feel their life is threatened. As soon as NM finds some highly offensive people who love to attack pure devotees, he falls off his chair and licks their boots. 

And then Bhagavat Maharaja says, oh goody, we now get to worship the cheer leaders of these "swami maharaja" offenders, and we get Tamal's nice pedophile sex guru program for ISKCON too, sign me up! And then we wonder why ISKCON has problems? Why is Bhagavat Maharaja supporting the cheer leaders of the offenders and pedophile messiahs club? And then Bhagavat's followers write to me, I don't know Vaishnava etiquette -- because I do not support the offenders who attack and threaten pure devotees, or the founder fathers of pedophile acharyas programs like Tamal, and their hand maidens like NM?       

ys pd