Monday, February 24, 2020

GBC Poison Conspiracy Video Re-emerges




TO PADA: Seems like a big difference in the revised video if they didn't use a forensic toxicologist in the video. The main difference being that pharmacologists deal with the experimentation and synthesis of therapeutic drugs, whereas forensic toxicologists examine the effects of toxins when a crime or poisoning has been committed, in order to aid a legal investigation.

PADA: Yes, they had a "forensic sound expert" in their original book who was actually a guy who ran a rock and roll recording studio, that went bankrupted.

====================================

[PADA: Yep, comments are still disabled. As usual, one way street, our way or the highway! Anyway, there are major un-filled holes in their explanation, and contradictions and so on. However the GBC policy of not allowing comments is how people came to think they are the conspirators in the first place. 

Nor does it explain why these tapes, and actually all of the 1977 tapes, were hidden for such a long time. Why was PADA editor given this tape in -- 1997? Why was it hidden, at all? Nor does it explain why the person who gave me the tape fears for his life and does not want his name mentioned. Nor does it explain why Srila Prabhupada says he is being poisoned and devotees and doctors on site at the time agreed he said there is poisoning going on. 

Nor does it explain why one of their chief speakers here, Amarendra, defended the GBC over the child abuse making him an evil man in the eyes of various victims. Nor does if explain why Dhanurdara is still self evidently welcomed after they clearly made a mistake defending his agenda in 1997, and why anyone from this group has credibility and etc. etc. etc. 

Of course immediately, some of the ex-gurukuli molesting victims (and / or their mothers) were unhappy that one the biggest GBC guru defenders / legal advisors / lawyers / named "Amarendra das" was featured as a keynote speaker on that video, considering he was one of the main persons to defend the GBCs when their child abuse issue surfaced. 

As one person said "Amarendra is the arch nemesis -- Simon Bar Sinister -- of all the children of the universe, and so these people wanted to promote him as their main truth talker?" And we even posted testimony from a woman claiming to have been a secretary of Amarendra when the abuse lawsuit was going on, saying -- they were all well aware that children were still committing suicide at the very exact time they were acting to defend the child molester regime. 

In other words, they were pouring gasoline on the victims and tossing burning matches around the place. Why is this person the person we now need to follow on -- any issue?  

Bottom line, there is no good explanation for the poison complaint from Srila Prabhupada. Even Harikesh, who was one of the members of their team at one time said that too, there is no good explanation for this complaint. Sorry! Your video does not explain it, and apparently, even you know it -- so it had to go down. 

I really cannot print herein what some of the ex-kuli victims wrote to tell me is their opinion of Amarendra and his associated pals, since we don't print a lot of cussing and swearing as a matter of etiquette. Of course, various victims were also cursing at Sanat / Prahlad / HKC Jaipur folks when they heard how these guys joined with GBC and Amarendra types and they attacked PADA to defend their favorite molester regime too. 

One of their pals named Gopijana was complaining that he had put a lot of time making buildings in New Vrndavana. And thus PADA was bad for helping getting rid of these buildings by encouraging lawsuits. OK so we can toss children into a wood chipper, to save a building? And we also need to remove PADA from the internet, to save the Judas people who may have been part of the poison conspiracy by suppressing our presentation of the evidence? Why are we always trying to save the devious guys, and not the victims?

Maybe by now people should have this figured out, defenders of child molesting regimes should not try to then paint themselves as experts in other fields? Just saying! And if there is a good explanation for the poison complaint, whispers, arsenic, testimony of doctors and witnesses and so forth, lets have it. We have been waiting for years for that to happen. This was supposed to be "the final nail in the coffin of poison conspiracy" headed by PADA and so on. OK maybe not so fast. Lets see what is going to be the next rabbit out of their hat trick. ys pd]        


http://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2020/02/gbc-reply-to-poison-issue-video.html



ys pd]

https://krishna1008.blogspot.com/2020/02/gbc-reply-to-poison-issue-video.html

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.