Friday, November 16, 2012

PADA Letter to Enver 11/16/12

Dear Enver, 

1) The charge that Madhu Pandit "stole the Bangalore property" is because he is using this property for the worship of Srila Prabhupada, and of course the child molester gurus project disagreed and they claimed he is a thief, and you agree MPD is a thief. That means you are agreeing with the molester acharyas program's view of things. I have no idea why you accept any of the "facts" and legal arguments provided by the molester acharyas program, or its lawyers, courts and so on?

And worse, you are also quoting Rocana, who ALSO accepts the molester acharyas program's "legal facts," because he is more in favor of the molester acharyas program and he is anti-ritvik. Why are these people our authorities? At all?

2) You say you accept the court's claims. You accept a court that says child molester gurus programs can enter their court and validly charge anyone with anything? This is a bogus court, but you and Rocana say you accept the claims of this court? Why are you accepting a court that validates a homosexual and pedophile guru process? Rocana's writers says the same thing as you, the court has "got the goods" on MPD, except if they did, why have they never arrested him since 1997? That means they do not have the goods, and why would we accept the statements of the molester acharyas program, or the bogus courts that supports them, anyway?

3) You and Rocana can accept a court that allows pedophile acharya's programs in their court as valid, whereas I do not accept such parties as valid. You and Rocana are quoting the legal side from the pedophile acharyas program, why are they valid? And why should we accept such a court, Rocana and you never explain?

4) You said that the Madhu Pandit program is making money, false, the temple here has $4,500 monthly expenses, the leaders here have to pay the rest because they do not get enough donations to pay these expenses.

5) You still have not explained why we should listen to Rocana when he has no program at all? Is this the example we need to follow, no temples, no deities, no preaching, no harinamas, no making devotees, no nothing?

6) Moreover you say we need to listen to Rocana, who says our worship of Srila Prabhupad program is apa-siddhanta and poisonous. That means you are publicly and openly promoting a severe offender. Therefore, what kind of discrimination do you have is the real question?

7) Madhu Pandit and his people are getting out the story of the molester gurus, the poison issue, the changed books issue, and so many other issues, all over the public media in India. They are exposing these bogus gurus to millions of people, whereas you and Rocana have zero impact on the media in India. Zero. The story is getting out because of these people, and they are risking their lives doing that. You support cowards like Rocana who backed off the poison case. Well we support the brave people who are getting the job done. Waiting for you folks, this job would never get done, ever.

ys pd



======================

Dear Enver, You said Rocana has something important to say, and he says worship of Prabhupada is poison. That makes him invalid. Rocana says a court in India that accepts homosexual pedophile acharyas is a valid court, and you said you agreed with their legal claims, that means you accept a court that allows homosexual pedophile acharyas in the door in the first place. 

Even a 5 years old child knows your logic is bogus, how can we accept a court that validates child molester messiahs? I do not accept such fools into a court. Then, when we said the court is promoting homosexual pedophile acharyas, you tried to say Srila Prabhupada would agree with such a court. This is trying to link him to your and Rocana's bogus claims. 

The criminal act here is Rocana: accepting homosexual pedophile gurus into the court in the first place, and that is why Rocana is for that court, and now you are citing him. The leader of the people who are propping up the pedophile acharyas court, and you are quoting him? 

You said Madhu Pandit program is making money, its not, the leaders here have to make up the difference in not enough donations. You said our program is bogus, but you have nothing to replace it with, which is what Rocana says, you are talking like him, quoting him and so on and so forth. So you can work with him, and have nothing. We are also having a nice festival for Srila Prabhupada here at the Sunnyvale temple, and all the ritvik temples like Bangalore, whereas Rocana is having, nothing nowhere. 

And he is our authority? He is simply envious that we have something and he has nothing, and that is why he is promoting the pedophile acharyas in court claim against us. And that is why he says worship of Prabhupada is poison, he is envious of Prabhupada as well as us. He should not be cited as an authority, and the fact that you are citing him will discredit you along with him. Anyway, this is what our people are doing, while your people, oh I forgot, you have no people.http://www.iskcontimes.com/Disappearance-day-of-Srila-Prabhupada


==================================================

11/17/12 Update: I never said the Akshaya program was ordered? I said it has protected them from your program, having those devotees going to jail and having no offerings to Prabhupada going on today worldwide. So thank goodness for Akshaya Patra, or you folks would shut everything down and have nothing. You idea is to have nothing, plain and simple, and that is why you are with Rocana. All glories to nothingness pada. Whatever the Bangalore folks had to do to protect themselves from the GBC gurus and their cheer leaders like Rocana had to be done. And Akshaya Patra is the first ever good publicity Krishna and ISKCON ever got in the West in 40 years, another reason you people do not like it, it FINALLY gives Krishna a good name after Rocana's supporting the bogus gurus gave KRISHNA a bad name for the past 40 years. Yes, Krishna and ISKCON finally got some good publicity from Akahaya Patra, so you guys immediately want to shut it down, that means you want the bad publicity for Krishna to win. That is what I thought you were saying, you are against Krishna getting good publicity like the GBC, Rocana etc. You are with them. ys pd   



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.