Then, when these children were being starved, beaten, molested and treated very badly, the argument started to surface "these ISKCON victims (OK such as the children) made bad choices for gurus." They are still saying the same thing now, victims suffered because they (five years old children) needed to be cautious about selecting their gurus. Exactly what they said at the start of all this.
Or worse, "the victims just got their karma." Umm, wait, nope! You leadership guys made the choices for these children, and crammed the worship of deviants into the children's lives. When ISKCON's Mahatma says -- people (children) got a bad guru because "they did not study the shastra properly," he is essentially saying the five years old children did not read the Vedas properly. Why didn't Mahatma read the Vedas and make proper gurus for these children?
Wait? This is always the same question, why didn't the other leaders, and people like Hari Parsad and Mahatma, study the Vedas, figure out what and who is a guru, and then give those pre-selected gurus to these children? The five years old children have to administer "who is and who is not" God's successor for ISKCON?
And when the leaders do not administer this properly, various victims have been starved, beat, molested and mistreated to the point they claim they were in "Auschwitz for kids." How did the children victims "choose" and select this process, when they were only five years old? Victim blaming on steroids!
Sorry, the kids did not choose to make Auschwitz for kids, they did not create anything for themselves. Nor does it make sense that small children have the proper discrimination position to choose anything, because they are kids. That means the children are dependent on these leadership guys to make the right choices -- for them.
When a six year old child finds a gun in the house, and goes to school and shoots his teacher, which happened recently, the child is not charged with any crime. The parents are charged for negligence. The child should not be charged because the child has no mature idea of any of this. How did the children all of a sudden become responsible for the Auschwitz for kids project -- made by the GBC leaders, not them? Bait and switcheroo!
But look what happens, ISKCON and Hari Parsad's program -- charges the children as the prime culprits in making "the wrong choices of guru." Now Hari Parsad repeats the same bogus thing they said all along, the new people (children) have to be cautious in choosing their guru. Why is the GBC making bad gurus in the first place, which means the rest of us (and children) have to be cautious in having one of their gurus?
And why is the penalty for children making the wrong choice, Auschwitz for kids? Who authorizes these folks to make Auschwitz for kids -- one of the choices? And how did the victims get to choose that?
Anyway good, we should be careful when selecting GBC gurus. Good idea. What are the only allocated selections available in the Hari Parsad guru parampara?
1. Homosexuals, pedophiles, drunks, drug addicts, oral sex with taxi drivers, oral sex with boys, porno swamis and assorted deviants. OK as Jayadvaita summarizes, the GBC's illicit sex with men, women and children gurus.
2. The next group we get to select from are: the founding fathers, enablers, promoters, re-instators, cheer leaders, position paper writes, and overall hand maidens of the homosexuals and pedophiles messiah's project from the group no. 1 category.
3. The persons hand selected -- 2/3 show of hands voted in -- to be gurus by groups no. 1 and no.2. In other words, this group is hand selected to be voted into the illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara by the deviants who made this process in the first place and / or their enablers.
4. There are no other groups available, you have to select from the above. Rather amazing, Hari Parsad says we should "seek guidance" from the homosexual and pedophile messiah's project's leaders.
5. OK someone tried to tell me Radhanath should not be included in any of this because he has "reformed and rectified." Sorry, he is the co-founder father of the New Vrndavana Auschwitz for kids project, which was condemned by the Dallas courts as "the worst cases of child abuse seen in this court." Neither does an acharya require reform.
And then he helped bury Kirtanananda in a samadhi. Same things with Lokanath swami, well yes he is a pervert, but he has apologized and rectified. Nope, he promised the victim he would not hold a post, but he still does -- ok he is a fraud liar.
This of course begs the question, where does Srila Prabhupada say the five years old children will be in charge of selecting gurus for ISKCON? And if the children select the founders of Auschwitz for kids as their messiahs, it is because they did not study the shastra? Or worse, it is their karma.
Sorry, the five years olds do not need to be cautious in selecting gurus, you leaders need to be cautious. Mula Prakriti das said to me "You (PADA) just want to make a Nuremburg Trial for the leaders because you are offending our seniors"! Umm, well yeah, Nuremburg trials are required for the operators of Auschwitz. That is the normal process. That is required for accountability and justice.
So -- all these Hari Parsad people are doing is AGAIN pouring salt into the wounds of the child victims AGAIN, by blaming the victims AGAIN for -- selecting Auschwitz co-operators -- as their gurus. The kids did not make this choice, they were frog marched into Auschwitz by the ISKCON leaders.
When are they going to quit blaming their victims and take responsibility for their creating Auschwitz, not -- the victims? This is horrendous, the people who ended up in Auschwitz -- made bad choices -- and they made the choice -- to be in Auschwitz. WTF! ys pd
angel108b@yahoo.com
========
November 12th, 2025
From Justice For Srila Prabhupada Foundation
Digging in Their Heels
We’ve noted on the Bhaktivedanta Institute for Higher Studies (BIHS) facebook page a posting dated October 14, 2025, announcing that BIHS has officially named its library, the Tamal Krishna Goswami Memorial Library. That posting includes pictures of members of BIHS under a plaque commemorating the Tamal Krishna Goswami Memorial Library. There is a comment on that posting, exclaiming, “Jaya Tamal Krishna Goswami!”, and another comment asking, “Why?”.
We offer here, for the consideration of our readers, some conjecture in response to “Why?” Some have written to Justice for Srila Prabhupada Foundation (JFSPF) expressing that it seems to them, curious, perhaps strange, that BIHS didn’t dedicate their library to Srila Prabhupada. Peculiar, particularly considering that, as far as we’re aware, Tamal Krishna Gosvami wasn’t, relative to several others, particularly involved with the projects of Bhaktivedanta Institute.
He wasn’t amongst the founding members of Srila Prabhupada’s Bhaktivedanta Institute. Those charter members, from December 10, 1976, were Dr. Svarup Damodar das (Thoudam D. Singh, Ph.D.), Dr. Sadaputa das (Richard Thompson, Ph.D.), Dr. Rabindra Swarup das (William H. Deadwyler, Ph.D.), Dr. Madhava das (Michael Marchetti, Ph.D.), and Rupanuga das (Robert F. Corens). Others, such as Robert S. Cohen (Brahmatirtha dasa) and D.J. Webb (Jnana dasa) were also very involved in the beginning stage of the Bhaktivedanta Institute. We are not saying that Tamal Krishna Gosvami did not at all participate in the Bhaktivedanta Institute, in the 1970s, and after that. Still, we are left to wonder about dedicating the library to him, considering his relatively lesser involvement, compared with many others.
On November 2nd, 2024, the ISKCON GBC Executive Committee wrote to JFSPF, “The GBC acknowledge receipt of your letter of September 16, 2024 and pack of material. We are ready to meet with you and discuss the subject matter of the letter. We have requested the Bhaktivedanta Institute for Higher Studies to provide technical support to the GBC EC on this matter. Please provide to them all of the back-up of your data and give them direct access to the Truth Labs to review your alleged new evidence. In this way we can be prepared for a discussion.”
And, for more than a year, representatives of JFSPF have been meeting and discussing with representatives of BIHS, particularly the Executive Director, Brahmatirtha Prabhu (Mr. Bob Cohen). So, top-level representatives of BIHS are very aware of the evidence indicating that Srila Prabhupada was given poison with homicidal intent by persons close to him in 1977, and this includes understanding that Tamal Krishna Goswami is a primary suspect in this unsavory event. This evidence includes, most primarily, Srila Prabhupada’s own words, and, also, forensic toxicology, audio and medical findings that support Srila Prabhupada’s words, that he was being administered poison.
Since the year 2000, and to this day, the ISKCON GBC’s official stance is, “There is no evidence at this time to support the allegations of poisoning of Srila Prabhupada.” We suggest that BIHS dedicating its library to Tamal Krishna Goswami is a sort of, digging in its heels, not permitting the door to open even a sliver, to the possibility that Srila Prabhupada was assassinated by poison.
We’re not even speaking here of, conclusive evidence, or, even, of a preponderance of evidence, but, rather, at least, reasonable cause to suspect, that perhaps Srila Prabhupada was deliberately given poison. The library dedication seems to be a stance that states, “Srila Prabhupada’s statements constitute no evidence.
The professional audio forensic analyses amount to nothing, zero, and the same for the detailed professional toxicology and medical reports”.
It seems to us that organizational leadership fears that, to give even the slightest credence to the possibility that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned by persons close to him, would devastate embedded institutional structures.
Our stance, as we’ve consistently expressed, is that the ISKCON GBC statement, “There is no evidence at this time to support the allegations of poisoning of Srila Prabhupada”, is a farce, a sham, and a mockery.
"The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody has decided not to see." – Ayn Rand
We assert that it is glaringly evident that there is strong, credible evidence, that the GBC’s “no evidence” position is absurd.
"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." – Upton Sinclair
“Salary”, of course, can mean, monetary reciprocation, and also it can imply, image, status or standing, in a community, or, adoration, popularity, distinction, or fulfillment of a need for approval. Each of us has opportunity here to consider the extent to which attachment to “salary”, has prevented us from thoughtfully applying our heart and intelligence, to the realities surrounding Srila Prabhupada’s departure.
We encourage readers to research this topic for themselves, and below are some links to assist in that endeavor.
September 16, 2024 Cover Letter Link: