The GBC's Aeroplane Guru Tattva

The New Jesus of Alachua

Yep, Alachua temple is where we can find the supporters of their homosexual pedophile messiah's club. And we have diksha gurus (who can absorb sins like Jesus) like Adikarta das. Why worship Jesus when we can worship Adikarta, who is "voted in" to their anal reconstructive surgery epidemic messiah's sampradaya?

And they are even telling children there to worship their illicit sex with men, women and children messiah's program. After they had only several thousand children molested, they are still saying that their homosexual pedophile messiah's program is "the tradition of India." 

We got several thousand molested and ISKCON bankrupted with lawsuits, and that is "the tradition." Hee hee!  And this guy thinks he and Jesus are diksha guru equals, because this guy promotes homosexual pedophile guru programs, no wonder they allow him to speak there! Their hero!

IRM

PADA: Does this have something to do with Bhakti vikas swami's "crashing like Jumbo Jets" guru parampara?

Back To Prabhupada, Issue 72, Vol 1, 2022

In last issue's article "The GBC's Aeroplane Guru-Tattva", we documented how the GBC introduced a new type of ‘guru-tattva' wherein the status of a diksa guru can be determined by wherever his plane happens to land. The GBC invoked this in the case of one of its voted-in gurus, HH Lokanath Swami, allowing him to continue to give initiations and be worshipped as good as God in some countries, while permitting other countries to completely avoid him as a potential child sexual abuser.

[PADA: Yep, the India ISKCON India ICC bureau knows that in the USA the ICC's whole idea that little children need to worship their illicit sex predators (or pedophiles) as messiahs -- is not universally popular. Therefore, some allowance for sectors of ISKCON to not allow pedophile worship must be established. However, their main program in Vrndavana will enforce their pedophile samadhi program's cheer leaders. In other words, there is no ISKCON wide uniform policy on their making pedophiles into their acharyas.] 

Now, the GBC has gone further with this aeroplane-tattva, by attempting to establish it as an institutional principle, which can be used for any resolution the GBC may seek to pass. In its latest Resolutions, the GBC resolved the following:

"1. The GBC Body may, on exceptional occasions, pass resolutions which may, due to differing cultural norms in certain parts of the world, require special attention, and thus the GBC may designate such a resolution as potentially a "culturally sensitive resolution."

[PADA: Correct. The India ICC bureau folks told me that we mlecchas are too degraded to worship their illicit sex with men, women, children (and cats) acharya's society. Only the advanced ICC people are worshiping pedophiles because they are "more culturally advanced" than the Western people who worship pure devotees. 

In other words the ICC is trying to say that worship of illicit sex with men, women and children is the "cultural norm" and tradition of India, which is more advanced than the West -- where we only worship the Lord's pure devotees, ok like Jesus or Srila Prabhupada. The ICC people told me that worship of pure devotees is "never found in our tradition" -- ummm, because only worship of sex with taxi drivers in the dham is found in our tradition?]  

2. A Regional Governing Body (RGB), or where there is no RGB, an authorized national council with the support of their GBC, or where a national council has more than one GBC, a majority of their GBCs, may apply to the GBC Body with a request to modify a culturally sensitive resolution for their area / yatra."

(GBC Resolution 206.02, 2021, issued 2022, all emphases in article added)

Thus, they have allowed themselves to create different rules for different places. And, in the same 2021 Resolutions, the GBC exercised this new "culturally sensitive" law for the first time in the case of female diksa gurus ("FDG"):

"Therefore, the Resolution regarding Vaisnavi Diksa Gurus of 2019, 701.6, ISKCON Spiritual Masters, Vaisnavi Diksa gurus 2019 is amended and replaced by the following: [...] Vaisnavis are eligible to give diksa within ISKCON [...] this resolution is designated as a "Culturally Sensitive Resolution." [...] Thus, by designating this as a Culturally Sensitive Resolution, the GBC hereby establishes that an RGB or other authorized ISKCON leadership body as denoted in the above referenced law may opt out of this mandate and choose to not allow any Vaisnavis to initiate within their jurisdiction."

(GBC Resolution 701.06, 2021, issued 2022)

Hence, in proposing to allow some countries to reject FDG – such as ISKCON India, whose leadership vehemently condemns the GBC's FDG program as unauthorised – while allowing FDG to operate in other countries, the GBC has tried to institutionalise its aeroplane-tattva, where a diksa guru can be considered bona fide or non-bona fide based purely on where the pilot of the aeroplane one is in decides to land!

Although the above mentioned FDG Resolution 701.06 is supposed to be undergoing further review by the GBC before it is implemented, by passing Resolution 206.02 which allows "culturally sensitive resolutions", the GBC has demonstrated that it believes spiritual principles can be altered simply based on geographical location, given that the very first thing the GBC applied this resolution to was the highly spiritual matter of guru-tattva, and who can be a guru.

But principles are absolute. They either apply or they do not, rather than being subject to where an aeroplane lands. This nonsensical approach to dealing with principles was even recognised by ISKCON India, with the ISKCON India Advisory Committee (IIAC)'s Executive Committee stating in regards to the vitally important issue of who can be a guru, that:

"Whereas the IIAC disagrees that this is a Culturally Sensitive issue, but in fact it is a core value of our society, as is vegetarianism. Therefore it is resolved: That considering the division within the society and the lack of satisfactory direction from the GBC the members of the IIAC request the Bureau to suspend active relations with the GBC body."

(Proposal drafted by IIAC EC, 31/12/21)

The Bureau is the legal body that controls ISKCON India. And Bureau Vice Chairman Basu Ghosh Dasa also stated that: "this adoption of "culturally sensitive" is just a smokescreen to try and fool the leaders of ISKCON India."

Thus, as shown also on pages 6-7, after Srila Prabhupada's physical disappearance, ISKCON's GBC has been a completely spiritually bankrupt organisation, with no spiritual principles, that simply makes things up to try to appease different factions (just as we showed it has tried to also do in regards to the investigation of HH Lokanath Swami – please see BTP 70, "GBC Politics Case Study"). But, even in trying to do that, the GBC is useless, since its "culturally sensitive" concoction was in any case completely rejected by ISKCON India, for whom it was invented to appease!

[PADA: Yep, the India ICC Bureau says that we mlecchas are WAY too backwards, because we only worship pure devotees, while they are "advanced in Vedic culture" -- because they worship a "guru chain from heaven" that contains: Vodka drinking sexual predators; little girl grabbers; oral sex with taxi drivers in the dham; illicit sex with men, women and children and -- cats, etc. 

And they bury homosexual pedophiles in samadhi in the dham. Wow, we have a long way to go to be as advanced as them! We mleccha folks are too "culturally sensitive" to worship homosexual pedophiles in samadhi! 

So maybe we have to back pedal on promoting our pedophile messiahs in the West due to our cultural sensitivity. Who knew! Yee hahh! Us mlecchas are not advanced enough to worship the ICC's Andy Warhol / Rasputin / Satanic / Pedophile's/ Drunk on Vodka "guru parampara from Vaikuntha. 

TOLD YA!

ys pd]

angel108b@yahoo.com