Creepalachia / PADA vs Gurukuli Holocaust / BBTI Director list 04 21 26

CREEPALACHIA VIDEO ON NEW VRNDAVAN

PADA: Yeah a lot of devotees have had no idea what has been the long term public image / historically recorded result / lasting effect / of promoting homosexuals and pedophiles as gurus cults. A program which incidently has a track record of banning, beating suing and killing dissenters. And making pedos into messiahs! 

So many devotees have told me: go away; you are not our authority; stay out of ISKCON's affairs; shut up; do not criticize; be humble and tolerant; it is your karma prabhu; you are an offender; you are criticizing seniors and pure devotees etc.  And they thus helped the regime by suppressing dissent. And as a bonus, have us dissenters made into targets for violence, assassinations and untimely deaths etc. 

And they made all sorts of rationalizing and justification types of arguments, to allow, enable and defend all this deviated process to continue. Well now what? The average Joe citizen from Apalachia is looking at all this and wondering, WTF is going on with these whacked Hare Krishnas? 

And that is why it is said, history it like looking at pottery in the pottery shop. You break it, you own it. I am glad at least some of us said, "wait, do not break all the pottery," and a small fragment of ISKCON or a few pieces were saved thereby. But yeah, the people who caused this -- and enabled it -- are part of the karma of making this result. They own it, or at least part of it. 

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com 

======

PADA: GURUKULIS HOLOCAUST

PADA: The whole system of India Bureau program folks -- like Basu Ghosh, Bhakti Vikas swami, Radhanath etc. has all along been big -- if not lifetime -- supporters of their predator gurus like Jokernath. And along with that -- supporting all the associated side programs like burying predators, porno swamis and similar others dubious folks in samadhis and etc. And propping up Mayapur's worse case child welfare fraud leaders like Jayapataka etc. 

And doubling down on re-supporting and re-propping up guys like Bhakti Vidya Purna swami, just at the same exact time I am having them sued for $400,000,000. These are essentially the same sabha folks that were trying to silence us, and shut us down for objecting to Kirtanananda -- when we reported Kirtanananda was "servicing" boys in his motorhome. 

Evidently, their program to have me hunted to be placed into the morgue untimely was all "my bad karma." Yep, everyone who is in favor of their program has good karma, everyone else's karma is bad, especially victims or us whistle blowers. And that justifies any and all of their process. There may be some gray area nuances here and there, but to me, it looks like "the enforced cult ritualistic worship of predators as messiahs project," emphasis on enforced. Same as it always was since we began protesting in 1978. 

As soon as I peeped up, the iron boots came down on my head, and have ever since. And that is why my gurukuli friend said to me recently, out of 500 kids at the 1997 festival, 145 are deceased, at least, maybe more. In other words, the entire GBC strategy the whole time has been, run out the clock, and spend $100,00,000 on legal fees to help keep the clock from timing them out. Sulochana called this "a smash and grab robbery." And he said after that, they will run, hide, evade, obfuscate, use lawyers, and using every trick in the book -- legal and not so legal -- to avoid being exposed. And they have. ys pd

PADA My gurukili friend said that out of all the 500 children at the Los Angeles meeting in 1997, 145 of those gurukulis are now deceased. It is probably more than that, maybe way more, because he has no means of record keeping. And a few of those currently surviving are hanging on by a thread with trauma and opiod problems etc. He told me, the GBC knows all about this and does keep track of them. They know very well they created this holocaust for these kids. 

And they are keeping it hidden because it will harm their Hindu money making scam. They want the meat eating Hindus to take over ISKCON, and they want these kids excluded from ISKCON, because if they include these kids, they will have to answer why these kids have been treated so badly on their control and watch. 

He said, the word comes from the Greek holokauston, meaning “a thing wholly burned”, originally referring to a burnt sacrificial offering. And that is what happened, these kids had to be offered up and sacrificed, so the GBC could make a Hindu money making retirement scheme for themselves. He said there is a good reason "no one knows what is happening to these kids," the GBC is covering it up just like they cover everything else up. ys pd

YEP! The gurukuli Holocaust. Some gurukulis told me this was Auschwitz for kids. Prithu's son made a movie "Burnt Laddus" about the children being like burnt milk sweets (Satanic child sacrifice offerings)? 

And how did you guess, the main people [apart from GBC folks] who opposed PADA in helping these children from being in Auschwitz were -- the Hitler-anugas: Mukunda UK, Prahlad das and Mathura Pati / Prabhupadanugas EU, and their India holocaust lover's branch Dayalu Nitai's HKC Jaipur. They even made a video using Radhanath's cheer leader as their defense team mate. Yep, oral sex with boys in the motorhome-pada's program is being offended by PADA!   

And we had to almost complain to the government that these guys are connected to the Racial Supremacist Nazi type programs. Who better to defend Auschwitz and the holocaust of children program, than the Nazi lover's club? OK unfortunately also IRM's Krishna Kant Desai helped these guys, and they all were upset PADA was inteferring with their lovely Auschwitz / Holocaust for kids program. Wow, kids are being treated brutally, and dying, and they are against saving them. Now you know how all this Satanic child sacrifice happens, it is enabled and empowered. Told ya! ys pd

-------------       

BBTI IMBROGLIO

Just found the following 2 documents in the files folder on my mobile phone. Have never seen these before, but thought worth sharing...

~•~•~•~

● SPIRITUAL NAMES OF BBTI DIRECTORS ●

Confirmed identifications

Emil Beca → Svavasa Das A legal filing directly identifies Emil Beca as "Svavasa das" in parentheses alongside his legal name. Wordpress Svavasa is a Sanskrit name meaning "self-luminous" or "dwelling in oneself." He is one of the most central figures — Svavasa Dasa was named as one of the four post-settlement trustees of the BBT, meaning he simultaneously held roles in both the BBT trust and the BBTI corporation.

Norman D'Costa → Naresvara Das A legal document directly identifies Naresvara (Norman D'Costa) by both names, confirming he is the BBTI director also known in the devotee community as Naresvara das. Wordpress Naresvara means "Lord of men," another name for Vishnu/Krishna.

Jay Matsya → Matsya Avatara Das / Jayadvaita Swami connection. "Jay Matsya" on the 990 filings appears to be Matsya Avatara Das, a devotee name meaning "servant of the Fish Incarnation of Vishnu." Matsya Avatara Dasa is mentioned in a BBT publishing context as being from Gopiparanadhana Prabhu's Sanskrit school in Govardhana, connected to BBT editorial work.

Separately, Jay Israel (a different person) is the civil name of Jayadvaita Swami, who was a major but now former director. Jay Israel received initiation from Srila Prabhupada in 1968, was given the spiritual name Jayadvaita Dasa, and later took sannyasa in 1978. He served as a BBT director from 1988 until resigning in 2017. Wikipedia

Massimo Brioli → Madhusevita Das -- The Italian director Massimo Brioli is known in the devotee community as Madhusevita Prabhu, who served as head of the Italian GBC and was connected to the Italian BBT operations. Madhusevita means "one who serves the sweet honey" — a name of Krishna.

Greg Stein → Gopal Bhatta Das / Gopal A 1999 GBC resolution refers to "Naresvara and Gopal Bhatta Prabhus" in a BBT administrative context, and the same documents identify Greg Stein as the BBTI president at that time, suggesting his devotee name was in that circle. ISKCON Governing Body Commission. However, this identification is not definitively confirmed in available sources.

Not yet publicly confirmed in available sources

The following directors' spiritual names could not be confirmed from publicly available records:

Legal Name Status

Govinda Cordua (Secretary -- "Govinda" itself appears to already be a Sanskrit / devotee name — it is a name of Krishna meaning "one who gives pleasure to the senses and cows." His surname Cordua suggests Latin American origin.

Robert Burnside (Treasurer) No spiritual name found in public records

Scott Krieger (Director) No spiritual name found in public records

Michael Auggenthaler (Director) No spiritual name found in public records

William Suczek (Director) Vaisheshika Das

Manogaran Ranggasamy (Director) No spiritual name found — name is Tamil / Malaysian

Ramchunder Singh (Director) No spiritual name found — name is already a Hindu/Sanskrit name

How to Find Remaining Spiritual Names

Since not all are publicly documented, here are your best avenues:

1. The Folio Vaishnava Reference Library — a comprehensive database used within ISKCON with devotee records including initiated names.

2. ISKCON Desire Tree devotee directory at iskcondesiretree.com — you can search by first name or location.

3. The BBT's own contact page at bbt.info — they list trustees and staff by their devotee names.

4. VNN (Vaishnava News Network) archives — historical articles often identify devotees by both civil and spiritual names.

5. GBC resolution archives at gbc.iskcon.org — resolutions consistently use devotee names, so searching the legal name alongside "BBT" in those archives is very productive.

It's worth noting that some directors — particularly those from South Asia or with already-Sanskritic names like Ramchunder Singh or Manogaran Ranggasamy — may not have Western birth names that were replaced, and may use their devotee names in a more integrated way with their original names.

~•~•~•~

Excellent — that ProPublica data from the IRS Form 990 filings is very revealing. Here is what you were missing, plus the full picture on directors:
What You Were Missing in the Comparison

1. The BBTI Is Officially Based in Florida, Not California

Despite being incorporated in California in 1988, BBTI is currently located in Alachua, Florida, and has been tax-exempt since December 1990, with EIN 95-4184400. ProPublica This is significant because ISKCON's North American hub shifted to Alachua, FL, and the BBTI followed.

2. The BBTI's Official Self-Description (vs. Critics' View)

The BBTI itself describes the situation as: "The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust (BBT) is a California religious trust that owns the copyrights to the works published by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada during his lifetime. The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International (BBTI) is a California corporation that has acted as an authorized agent of the Bhaktivedanta Book Trust since 1988. The BBTI also owns the rights to some later works. The BBT and BBTI work together to protect Srila Prabhupada's rights and serve his will." Bbti

Critics strongly dispute this framing, arguing the BBT never legally authorized the BBTI to act in this capacity.

3. The "Global BBT" Layer — A Third Tier Many Miss

There has always existed a "Global BBT" trustee group made up of some of the trustees of the trusts formed by Srila Prabhupada and, after 1988, directors of BBTI. This group is described as the spiritual governing body of the BBT worldwide. This is a layer most people are unaware of — it blends the original trust structure with the post-1988 corporate structure into a de facto combined governing body.

4. The BBTI's Financial Scale (IRS Data)

From ProPublica's IRS Form 990 data, the BBTI's finances show it is a relatively modest operation:

In fiscal year 2024, BBTI reported revenue of $768,331, expenses of $760,811, total assets of $3,004,487, and net assets of $1,949,828. Notably, 94.8% of revenue came from contributions, with only small amounts from royalties ($2,000) and investment income. ProPublica

This is a key gap in the comparison — the BBTI is not the large publishing house most assume. It functions more as a copyright-holding and licensing body, with the actual publishing done by regional BBT divisions.

5. No Executive Compensation (Recent Years)

In 2024, BBTI reported zero executive compensation and zero salaries and wages paid. ProPublica All directors serve without pay. This has been the consistent pattern since at least 2021.

BBTI Directors (from IRS Form 990 Filings)

These are the current and recent directors sourced directly from official IRS filings via ProPublica:

As of fiscal year 2024 (most recent):

Name Role

Emil Beca President & Director

Govinda Cordua Secretary

Robert Burnside Treasurer

Jay Matsya Director

Manogaran Ranggasamy Director

Ramchunder Singh Director

Massimo Brioli Director

Scott Krieger Director

Michael Auggenthaler Director

William Suczek Director

Previous directors/officers also on record:

• Greg Stein (former President, 2013–2020)

• Jose Fornos / Jose M Fornos Vicens (Director, multiple years)

• Norman D'Costa (Director, multiple years)

A notable pattern: Several core figures — Emil Beca, Michael Auggenthaler, William Suczek, Govinda Cordua, Robert Burnside, and Ramchunder Singh — have appeared continuously on filings from 2013 through 2024, suggesting a very stable and insular leadership group with little rotation. ProPublica

How to Find Director Names Yourself

For current and historical BBTI directors, you can search these free public sources:

1. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer — projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/954184400 — Shows Form 990 filings year by year with officer names.

2. IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search — apps.irs.gov/app/eos/ — Search "Bhaktivedanta Book Trust International."

3. California Secretary of State — bizfileonline.sos.ca.gov — For the original incorporation documents and registered agents.

4. Florida Division of Corporations — search.sunbiz.org — Since BBTI is currently based in Florida.

5. Charity Navigator — charitynavigator.org — For governance and accountability ratings.

For the original BBT trust (not BBTI), there is no comparable public corporate registry because it is a private irrevocable trust — its trustee appointments were made personally by Prabhupada and are documented in the trust agreement itself, not in state corporate filings.

======

ISKCON's Rukmini Krishna Swami / Krishnapath / Child Abuse Legal / Ex-Gurukulis Plight 04 20 26

SECRET TO SUCCESS: PEDOPHILE GURU LINEAGES 

PADA: Oh oh pilgrims! Worshiping pure devotees (ritvik system) "is never found in any shastra." OK what do we do instead then? Yep! We worship the GBC's illicit sex with men, women and children / homosexual / pedophile messiah's project. 

And why would we do that? Because the illicit sex / anal reconstructive surgery epidemic / Vodka drunk's messiahs program -- just 2/3 show of hands -- voted me in as another one of their co-messiahs. I am now an official messiah the oral sex with taxi drivers in the dham guru lineage! 

It is always amazing to us that these people cannot find even one example of anyone ever worshiping a pure devotee, but there are plenty of examples of worshiping oral sex with men in the dham "Vishnupada" sampradayas? What shastra is that? 

The good news is -- even the hamburger eating mlecchas know that illicit sex with men, women and children messiahs programs is ONLY found the modes of ignorance and is not EVER found in God's successors. ISKCON really has to search high and low, to find advocates for their homosexual pedophile messiahs project. Did I forget to mention this guy is in Vrndavana, where they buried one of their homosexual pedophile messiahs in a samadhi? ys pd 

angel108b@yahoo.com 

=====

Krishnapath Is back! 

=================

JUSTICE FOR SRILA PRABHUPADA LEGAL ISSUES

DND: If the Justice for Srila Prabhupada group can provide sufficient evidence, both the institution (ISKCON) and its leaders (GBC members and Temple Presidents) could face criminal liability in India—though the specific legal routes and burdens of proof differ.

How Indian Law Addresses Institutional & Leadership Liability

Indian courts have established clear precedents for holding both an organization and its management accountable. The legal principles at play include:

· Corporate Liability: The doctrine of attribution holds that the intent of key decision-makers (like the GBC) can be imputed to the organization itself as the "directing mind and will". This means if senior leadership knew or should have known about abuse and failed to act, ISKCON as an entity can be held criminally liable.

· Failure of Mandatory Reporting: The POCSO Act imposes a strict duty to report child sexual abuse. If those in charge knew (or had an "apprehension") and failed to report, they could face imprisonment of up to one year and/or a fine.

· Criminal Conspiracy & Negligence: Leaders could also face charges for a systemic "cover-up" under the IPC/Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for Criminal Conspiracy (Section 120B), Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 405), or Criminal Negligence (Section 304A), depending on the evidence.

The Legal Path Ahead for Leaders

The GBC's institutional authority makes them potentially more vulnerable to charges of conspiracy and dereliction of duty. Meanwhile, Temple Presidents and local managers could be directly charged under POCSO for failing to report incidents, especially if they were aware of the abuse and did not inform the police.

Critical Challenges to Proving Liability

While the legal framework supports such charges, there are significant hurdles that make this a difficult path:

· Proving Intent: Prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that GBC members had specific knowledge of the abuse and consciously chose to ignore it or actively conceal it.

· The Factional Dispute Defense: ISKCON's legal team has argued that the petition is part of an ongoing internal dispute between the Bangalore faction and the central GBC. The court has sought to keep this matter focused on child protection.
This case is now at a critical juncture with the Supreme Court ordering the NCPCR to investigate the claims, ensuring the allegations will be examined by a neutral, statutory authority.

=========

The League of Devotees is at Hare Krishna Centre - Leicester, UK.

28m ·Leicester, United Kingdom ·

Celebrating 21 Years of The Hare Krishna Centre - Leicester, UK - Kirtan Festival 

Film 4 - Lively festival kirtan led by Neera Haria Sankirtan

Thank you to everyone who joined us on Saturday night for a very special event to celebrate the 21st anniversary of the opening of The Hare Krishna Centre in Leicester and the installation of Their Lordships Sri Sri Nitai Sachi-Sundar
A blissful evening of chanting, dancing, feasting and philosophy with Gauranga Sundara Dasa Prabhu and The League of Devotees

"In order to be recognized by Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one should chant the holy name of the Lord continuously, twenty-four hours a day."
- Srila Prabhupada (Srimad Bhagavatam 4.23.7)
#HareKrishna #Leicester #HareKrishnaCentre #LeagueOfDevotees #SaturdayNightKirtan #AnniversaryEvent #21Years

=================


“𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗴𝘂𝗿𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗼𝘂𝘀?”

An answer to this is given in the work Kali-viḍambana (“The Hypocrisy of the Age of Kali”):

Sanskrit (Verse 9):

agatitvam atiśraddhā
jñānābhāsena tṛptatā |
trayaḥ śiṣyaguṇā hyete
mūrkhācāryasya bhāgyajāḥ ||

Translation : 𝗛𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 (𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗻𝗼 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲), 𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝘁𝗵, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘀𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲—𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿.

Explanation of Terms

𝗔𝗴𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘃𝗮𝗺 — Helplessness

A condition in which the disciple feels he has no other option ,no alternative teacher, path, or possibility of departure. Even when he perceives flaws in the teacher, he remains bound and continues to stay.

𝗔𝘁𝗶ś𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗵ā — Excessive / Blind Faith ,A form of devotion bordering on fanaticism. 

Such a disciple does not engage critical thinking, does not ask questions, and accepts even the teacher’s misconceptions as absolute truth.

𝗝ñā𝗻ā𝗯𝗵ā𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗮 𝘁ṛ𝗽𝘁𝗮𝘁ā— Satisfaction with the Shadow of Knowledge The word ābhāsa means “semblance,” “reflection,” or “shadow.” The disciple is so superficial that eloquent speech or external displays of wisdom are enough to satisfy him. He does not seek genuine realization, and thus is easily deceived by imitation knowledge.

These qualities in foolish disciples allow an ignorant teacher to flourish. From the standpoint of genuine spiritual learning, they are serious defects—but for a mūrkha-ācārya (foolish teacher), they are a stroke of great fortune.
A false teacher can maintain authority only among those who are unable or unwilling to to think independently.

=======

WHY EX-GURUKULIS ARE NOT INTERESTED

PADA: Yes, most -- almost all -- of the ex-gurukulis around here are not interested in being publicly interviewed, because they basically want nothing AT ALL to do with the whole situation. Nor do they want their name or their story to become public. They do not want to be publicly associated with the institution, past or present. 

A small group of them used to show up here at Rathayatras, but lately, almost none show up at all. I think just a few came -- and it is less every year. Basically, they see the ISKCON situation as hopeless as long as the current admins are in charge. They think the current admins are corrupt to the core. 

And unless we can change the core, nothing else of substance will change. They also notice that the GBC is still shunning, abandoning and ignoring them. And thus the GBC is handing off future admins of ISKCON to the Hindus. Including, making Hindus the legal signatures on the local temple property and corporations. 

One temple here on the West Coast has 7 Hindu legal corporation signers on the property board, and one Caucasian GBC man. And that means his one vote can be silenced and annulled by the other signers. And a number of the Hindus who come to ISKCON are mayavadas and many eat meat. So many ex-gurukulis think they were used as stage props to build a giant Hindu congregation hall business. 

And then get rid of them once the Hindu money was lining the GBC's pockets. In other words they feel used, and they think the leaders used them to make a giant Hindu business so they can profit financially, at the expense of the victims. I cannot argue with them about any of this. 

But yeah, mostly they do not want to be known even as ex-members, because they think being associated with any of this is going to make them look foolish or worse, contaminated. Because? ISKCON is public known as foolish, corrupted and contaminated. Unfortunately, many of the parents of these kids in the 1980s and 1990s were telling me to shut up and mind my own business when all this was going on. Many parents helped make the situation worse, for their own kids. And that is why most of them also do not want to be interviewed, their hands are dirty. ys pd

The cooling fragrance of Chandan Yatra is finally here!
Immerse yourself in the bliss. Let’s start the day by offering our love and devotion to the Lord. pic.twitter.com/rlIBdtv70F

— Krishna Consciousness Society (@KCSociety_India) April 20, 2026

False Gurus Created by Yogamaya? 04 18 26

PADA: Guru Tattva like we never heard of before? Sorry, we have all heard of the Gaudiya Matha's false gurus, and Narayan Maharaja then saying Sridhar and the other founders of their 1937 bi-sexual deviant acharya program are also acharyas. 

I did not listen to the whole thing but did catch Mukunda mentioning 1986. OK that is when Narayan Maharaja was helping Satsvarupa write the "Guru Reform Notebook," where they were going to vote in more illicit sex with men, women and children deviants as acharyas, and keep the current ones in office. And they reinstated sex with taxi drivers in the dham as Vishnupada. Nothing "new" here, it is what false acharya programs have done in many examples. 

And simultanesously, the Satsvarupa "reformers" excommunicated Sulochana, to demonize us and make us targets. Sulochana was killed and I would have been without help from the FEDS. Then Mukunda mentions 1997, which is when we were writing about all the child abuse going on in Tamal's empire. Around the time Narayan Maharaja was in Texas boosting Tamal and saying we are bogus and poison ritviks. Around the time we were getting lined up for the $400M child abuse case.

There is nothing new here at all. It is the same recycled illicit sex with men, women and children messiah's program Narayan Maharaj supported the whole time. And look at the misconceptions of these folks, deviating acharyas were created by Yogamaya, God's internal energy. And the internal energy is personified as Radharani, Krishna's consort. And she is making false gurus? 

Say it ain't so folks! This is why the previous article from these folks said, we made a false acharya and it was like sticking our hands in stools. And now the smell is everywhere. OK smelly stools and Yogamaya are not in the same category, which unfortunately us mleccha-heads have to point out to these folks.

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com

====

  

Shyam Das Babaji (Narayan Maharaja)

Deviation is Yogamaya (Radharani's domain)?  

𝐁𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐢𝐬 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝟒 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 “𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐓𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐤 (𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦) 𝐨𝐟 𝐌ā𝐲ā𝐝𝐞𝐯ī 𝐭𝐨 𝐓𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐚𝐥𝐥-𝐃𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐂𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐕𝐚ṁ𝐜𝐚𝐧ā-𝐦𝐚𝐲ī 𝐋ī𝐥ā.”

[𝐄𝐗𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐋𝐄] - 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊-𝐔𝐏 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐆𝐀𝐔𝐃𝐈𝐘𝐀 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐀: 𝐖𝐇𝐎 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐀 𝐕𝐀𝐒𝐔𝐃𝐄𝐕𝐀?

PADA: The followers of Sridhar Maharaja and Narayan Maharaja are now trying to say that promoting a false acharya after 1937 was "Yogamaya" or the desire of Krishna and / or the internal potency of Krishna (personified by Radharani). Nope. Krishna and His Yogamaya does not desire that people worship lusty dog predators, homosexuals, bi-sexuals and people who reject their guru and call Srila Saraswati a deviation. Nor is it the Yogamaya desire of Krishna that Sridhar and Narayan support the GBC's homosexual and pedophile messiah's club. 

Yogamaya is said to be controlled and operated by the personality of Srimati Radharani and is not subject to material contamination. The fact that these people assume Yogamaya creates contamination, indeed homosexual acharyas, means they have no idea that Yogamaya and Mahamaya are different energies.

An event that is not very well known, but can help us to better understand the reasons for the split of the Gaudiya Matha and also the many dangers we faced in the past and will face in the future

During the 1980s and 1990s, there was a sequence of scandals in our movement, with devotees in high positions falling down in troublesome circumstances. This was of course an eye-opener that made us understand that it is not so easy for someone to become a pure devotee with just a few years of practice, as well as a warning about the consequences of electing unqualified people for positions of leadership in spiritual organizations.

PADA: Correct. And who helped elect these unqualified people to the post of guru? We all know, Sridhar and Narayan have been among the biggest cheer leaders of making these false ISKCON GBC acharyas, and they were helping them write bogus position papers, giving them rasika classes and etc.

What many may not know was that half a century earlier devotees in the Gaudiya Matha suffered from a similar event, whose repercussions were even more serious. This is an event that is not very well known, but it can help us not only to better understand the reasons for the split of the Gaudiya Matha but also to better understand many dangers we faced in the past and that can appear again in the future. 

This is also an essential topic for understanding the challenges followers of Srila Prabhupada face when interacting with devotees from the different Gaudiya Mathas. Often things are not so black and white as they may seem at first as followers of different Gaudiya Mathas may be affected by different philosophies to different degrees.

In a conversation from 18/06/1976, Srila Prabhupada mentions:

"One of my Gauḍīya Maṭha Godbrothers, big, he became the head of this Bhag Bazaar Gauḍīya Maṭha. So his wife was debauched, and she was bringing new paramour, and the child protested. And the boy, he was ten years or twelve years old, he could understand: "Who is this man?" So he protested and said, "I shall tell all these things to my father." And he was killed"... "His wife was a regular prostitute, and she killed her child, and on this shock, he took poison and died"... "He became shocked, that "This is my family life—the wife is prostitute and son is killed. What is the value of my life?" This was his spiritual realization. Just see. And he was made the chief."

Here he is speaking about his godbrother Ananta Vasudeva, who was elected the acharya of the Gaudiya Math after the disappearance of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura. Srila Prabhupada apparently didn't have good a consideration about him, since later in the same conversation he even accuses him of being "homosex and everything".

In his poem entitled "Viraha Astaka" composed in 1958 Srila Prabhupada is even more direct when addressing His spiritual master:

"Your so-called disciple, the jackal named Ananta Vasudeva, disobeyed your final instructions to keep the mission united, and thereby created a scandalous fiasco. The result of this philosophical deviation is evident to this day as imitative sahajiyas are being worshiped as gurus in your temples."

Srila Prabhupada spoke some harsh words to some of his godbrothers in certain circumstances, reacting to some of their actions, but nowhere do we see him directing such direct personal attacks on any of them, especially on a deceased person. Who was Ananta Vasudeva and what terrible thing did he do?

This story is described in a document entitled "The Sons of the Son: The Breakup of the Gaudiya Matha", written by Jalakara Prabhu, a disciple of Srila Prabhupada who collected a great volume of citations connected with these incidents. This is a document that can still be found online.

As described by him, Ananta Vasudeva was one of the most prominent disciples of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura, who used to call him "My Ganesh" because he helped him so much in his writing and in other aspects of his preaching. He also had the opportunity of associating with Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura. 

He had an extremely sharp intelligence and was described as being able to remember everything he heard. Often other disciples of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura would ask him to explain lectures of their spiritual master that they could not understand, and Ananta Vasudeva could remember and properly explain to them. 

Because of this gift, he became the chief editor for all the publications of the Gaudiya Math. From these descriptions, we can understand he was not an ordinary soul. His downfall shows thus how even very elevated devotees can fall later if they deviate from the path and start criticizing their spiritual master.

PADA: What it shows is that no one is authorized to imitate the acharya without being a pure devotee himself. Srila Prabhupada says imitating the acharya causes one to eventually become degraded, and we have seen that over and over. Just because a person can cite some shastras does not mean he has already realized and attained perfection. But even after knowing all this, Sridhar and Narayan Maharajas went ahead and endorsed the ISKCON GBC guru's program knowing these people are not qualified. And knowing the result is very odious, creates bad publicity, if not beatings and murders and so on.

The Gaudiya Math started as a revolutionary movement, and the devotees were well respected for maintaining strong sadhana and living austere lives. However, as time passed, money and properties started to accumulate, and devotees started to fight over material facilities. At some point, there was a fight over which rooms each would use, something that Srila Prabhupada also commented on occasion. 

In a famous lecture in Mayapur (06/10/1974), he said:

"My Guru Mahārāja said. Personally he said that "When we were living in a rented house, if we could collect two hundred, three hundred rupees... We were living very nicely at Ultadanga. And since then—Jayavidatta has given us this marble palace, Gauḍīya-Maṭha — there is friction between our men. 'Who will occupy this room? Who will occupy that room? Who will be proprietor of room?' Everyone is planning in different way. So Guru Mahārāja said"... "He was personally instructing me that "If I could sell this marble of this temple, and secure some money, and if I could print some books, that would have been better. That would have been better."

After Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura passed away in 1937, these conflicts came to the open. He had left instructions for the disciples to form a governing body to manage the mission (just like Srila Prabhupada later implemented in our Iskcon society), but this proved difficult to implement, and as a result, most of the leaders in the Gaudiya Math went back to the idea of having a single acharya managing the mission. 

This resulted in devotees dividing into two factions, one smaller, supporting Kunjabihari Vidyabhusana Prabhu (who later became Tirtha Maharaja) and another bigger, supporting Ananta Vasudeva (who later became Bhakti Prasad Puri Maharaja, and eventually Puri Das).

There are a lot of different details connected to these disputes, but the result was that the Gaudiya Math split into two factions, centered around these two leaders. Eventually, Ananta Vasudeva was voted as the acharya of the Gaudiya Math by most of his Godbrothers, leading to a decisive split between the two camps that started fighting over temples and other properties.

PADA: OK and most of our God brothers ALSO all went along with the illicit sex with men, women and children messiah's club. And many of them later ran off to the spin offs made by the GBC's "advisor" cheer leaders like Sridhar and Narayan. 

But what these deviated God brothers did not realize after 1937 and 1977 is: they have no authority to rubber stamp, select, elect, create, concoct and / or "vote in" Krishna's guru successors. The acharyas are descending from the higher plane, they are not ascending by the votes of mundane committees, and / or our God brothers who are barely getting weaned from eating at Mc Donalds.

This led to the fratricidal legal disputes that drained the funds of the mathas and resulted in a serious volume of offenses being committed on both sides. This politicized environment also seriously affected the preaching and especially the publication of transcendental literature. At this point, even the press opened by 

Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura was sold to pay for legal expenses.

PADA: And the GBC guru program spent millions on lawsuits, some Jayapataka people told me -- $100,000,000.  

Srila Prabhupada wrote his view on these events on his purport on CC Adi 12.8:

"In the beginning, during the presence of Oṁ Viṣṇupāda Paramahaṁsa Parivrājakācārya Aṣṭottara-śata Śrī Śrīmad Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura Prabhupāda, all the disciples worked in agreement; but just after his disappearance, they disagreed. One party strictly followed the instructions of Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, but another group created their own concoction about executing his desires. Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, at the time of his departure, requested all his disciples to form a governing body and conduct missionary activities cooperatively. 

He did not instruct a particular man to become the next ācārya. But just after his passing away, his leading secretaries made plans, without authority, to occupy the post of ācārya, and they split into two factions over who the next ācārya would be"... "Despite the spiritual master’s order to form a governing body and execute the missionary activities of the Gauḍīya Maṭha, the two unauthorized factions began litigation that is still going on after forty years with no decision."

Apart from the legal disputes, there was another factor that caused a lot of confusion: the actions of Ananta Vasudeva, who gradually became critical towards Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura's teachings and eventually left the sannyasa asrama, getting married to a society girl and becoming a Babaji in Vrindavana. Jalakara Prabhu quotes the following:

"He insisted that all his disciples cease preaching activity and study the Bhakti Sandarbha. He especially criticized the use of texts like Gaudiya Kantha Hara, which give scriptural quotations for various philosophical positions, but which do not present the arguments. He and Sundarananda Vidyavinoda eventually came to the conclusion that Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati's diksa was invalid, and he advised all his disciples to seek initiation elsewhere. 

"Many of them did, and some became leading Vaisnavas in Vrindavan. Puri Maharaj [Ananta Vasudeva] sealed his infamy in Gaudiya Math circles by getting married and moving himself to Braja."

The events connected with his marriage were also the source of a scandal. It is described in the document by Jalakara Prabhu that he had an affair with the sister-in-law of a rich devotee, who was later discovered because of the interception of a love letter. The scandal went on for several years, as Ananta Vasudeva (now Bhakti Prasad Puri Maharaja) tried to maintain his post. This affair, which later led him to leave the sannyasa asrama and become a grihastha Babaji (and later kill himself after discovering the betrayal of his wife) is confirmed by Srila Prabhupada in the first quote.

PADA: Yes, some post-1937 dissenters intercepted some of these love letters and exposed them. And thus some of them were beaten, had their faces pushed into dog stools, and some were killed for "dissenting." That means everyone knew that making the same fanatical false guru process in ISKCON could be dangerous for us dissenters. And it has been.   

The most serious problem however was not the sexual scandal, but his rejection of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura's teachings. This is also quoted by Jalakara Prabhu:

"Now, every action has a gross cause and a subtle cause. One action is that he suffered a fall down from the brahmacari platform. The other is that he openly criticized and ultimately rejected his guru and rejected his initiation and line."

"Ananta Vasudeva and his close friend Sundarananda Vidyavinoda began to formulate criticisms of their guru, Sri Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati. The were unhappy about the lack of siddha-pranali at initiation and felt that neither they nor their guru were linked to that vaishnava line by initiation, that the initiation as practiced by Sri Saraswati Thakur, both diksha and sannyasa, were invalid, eventually coming to the conclusion that only those born in certain families can be initiated, and can initiate. 

They also considered the wearing of saffron and Brahmin threads incorrect for those in the vaishnava line."

"In this way they began an active program of scholarly criticism of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta’s philosophy, abandoning the literature of their guru and concentrating on the original works of the Six Goswamis. Ananta Vasudeva therefore eventually rejected the initiation given by Sri Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati, and urged his disciples to take diksha from what he called accredited acharyas, thereby rejecting his guru. 

Thus he justified on the basis of his understanding of the early writings of the followers of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Sundarananda Vidyavinode wrote an essay on the subject entitled “The Characteristics of the Guru According to Vaishnava Theology."

"Ananta Vasudeva and Sundarananda Vidyavinoda defected from his lineage and wrote books criticizing a number of Sri Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati’s policies several years after he left the world"… "all opposition to Bhaktisiddhanta also includes the fact that he did not receive siddha pranali from Bhaktivinoda or Gaura Kishora. Some critics go so far as to question whether he was initiated at all.”

"Ananta Vasudeva / Bhakti Prasad Puri Maharaja then went to Vrindavan, married one of his disciples - although it is not clear if that was to the sister-in-law of Sri Jagatbandhu dasa - and lived out his life in a reclusive manner, calling himself Puri dasa, writing a number of books. His criticism and rejection of Sri Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati has caused him to be viewed with repugnance by the Maths to this day. His supporters and defenders were left disillusioned."

"Many of his former disciples became renounced residents of Radha Kund. Puri dasa (Ananta Vasudeva) had promulgated a style of kirtan known as ‘Sri Krishna Chaitanya Gaura Gunadhama’, and that kirtan can be heard there to this day, although it is interesting to note that Puri dasa eventually believed that congregational chanting of the Hare Krishna mahamantra was unauthorized."

This succession of scandals led to the collapse of the camp led by him, although many of the Sannyasis continued preaching by opening their own mathas. The smaller faction, left by Tirtha Maharaja (previously Kunjabihari Vidyabhusana Prabhu) was able to continue as a unified mission, although plagued by politics. When Srila Prabhupada came to the United States he wrote to Tirtha Maharaja offering to cooperate with him, but after receiving a discouraging letter he proceeded to create his own organization in the form of our Iskcon society, counting just with the help of his first disciples.

Ananta Vasudeva spent his remaining days living in Vrindavana, writing books with his interpretations of the writings of the Goswamis under the name "Puri Dasa". These books were not accepted by most of his Godbrothers, since they openly disagreed with the teachings of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura. However, they became popular amongst other babajis and some scholars and devotees associated with them.

Nowadays these books are seeing a resurgence, as devotees from Iskcon and different Gaudiya Mathas come to study them, assuming them to be authorized translations and commentaries of the works of the Goswamis, something they aren't. One important thing to keep in mind about translations is that translations, and especially commentaries of Sanskrit works, including works of our previous acaryas are strongly susceptible to interpretation. 

No translation is "clean" of interpretations, since it is practically impossible to keep the meaning of the text in a literal translation. When we read a " translation" of a Sanskrit work, we are thus actually reading an interpretation that conveys the beliefs of the author. A follower of Prabhupada will translate according to his conclusions, a Mayavadi will translate emphasizing the impersonal aspect, while a Babaji will translate according to their philosophy. 

One should thus consider carefully not just the qualification, but the philosophical understanding of the author. In general, only Vaishnavas who have a very clear philosophical understanding can write bonafide translations and commentaries of anything. Members of different apasampradayas, as well as Mayavadis and ordinary scholars, will always distort the texts.

Once, a disciple of Srila Prabhupada received an offer to exchange a collection of Srila Prabhupada's books for a set of the works of Ananta Vasudeva. Not knowing the whole story, he thought it was a good idea and accepted the exchange. When Srila Prabhupada knew about it he was very displeased and ordered him to immediately return the set books and get his books back. He didn't want anything to have with them.

It's also interesting to note that these same points raised by Ananta Vasudeva about Siddha-Pranali and other points continue to echo today amongst devotees who go to Vrindavana and get in contact with this literature or who come in contact with it indirectly. As a result, a huge number of otherwise innocent Iskcon and Gaudiya Matha devotees come in concept with these concepts, and due to an immature philosophical understanding accept them, without knowing they come from a line that is offensive to their own spiritual masters.

The fact is that there are lines in Vrindavana that are much older than the Gaudiya Math and had thus time to establish their ideas through numerous books. Many of these books are well written from a scholarly viewpoint, but their conclusions are incorrect, as exposed by Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura, and Srila Prabhupada, as well as Srila Jagannatha Das Babaji and Srila Gaura Kishor Das Babaji. 

The reason these five acaryas had to come and do their preaching was precisely to put the sankirtana movement back into its tracks after centuries of deviations introduced by caste goswamis and babajis.

Many contemporaneous Vaishnavas now get in contact with such books, but the demise of Ananta Vasudeva, who after all his actions ended up killing himself after discovering that his wife was not only betraying him but had killed their child, serves as an important eye-opener in this connection.

Source: https://www.ccdas.net/p/ananta-vasudeva

𝙀𝙉𝘿 𝙉𝙊𝙏𝙀:

Dandavat pranam dear devotees!

Although we are not followers of Svāmī Mahārāja, we acknowledge that he is respected and accepted by many. Therefore, we have presented his opinion regarding Ananta Vāsudeva for consideration.

We have shared this external article solely to highlight this particular point and to bring attention to the truth. While we do not agree with everything expressed there, we recognize that, in this instance regarding Ananta Vāsudeva, Svāmī Mahārāja has made a valid point.

At the same time, we do not endorse all of the article’s statements. For example, we do not accept the claim that the Gauḍīya Maṭha “broke up.” As is well understood, Gauḍīya Maṭha is an eternal reality—non-different from Vṛndāvana—and was manifested in this world by the endless mercy of Śrīla Prabhupāda Sarasvatī Ṭhākura.

Please find out a clarification on the matter of the "break-up" of Gauḍīya Maṭha in this Q&A (question n5):

𝐐𝐔𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝟓:

Material nature always holds complete power in this material world. What His Divine Grace said about the breakup of the Gauḍīya Maṭha — has not the same thing happened to ISKCON? If not worse…

𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐖𝐄𝐑 𝟓:
​
What Svāmī Mahārāja said about the breakup of the Gauḍīya Maṭha, mostly when he was already hostile towards his godbrothers, is not so important, because he was not actively participating in the life of the Maṭha, nor actively serving the mission of his Gurudeva. His information was that of an outsider (as a gṛhastha busy with his pharmaceutical business).

PADA: Srila Prabhupada did not know that their making a bi-sexual deviant as the acharya was wrong, because he was an Grihastha and an outsider? Srila Prabhupada said his bogus God brothers called him a "paccha Grihastha" (Rotten householder). 

Why are his complaints not important or not valid? Sorry, his complaint is 100% valid, making deviants into acharyas is not authorized. And the people who cheer lead false guru programs like Sridhar and Narayan are also not authorized.  

​

What happened in the Gauḍīya Maṭh after the disappearance of Śrīla Prabhupāda was arranged by Yoga-māyā. ​

PADA: Yogamaya is the internal shakti of Krishna, sometimes said to be managed by Srimati Radharani. And this shakti has nothing to do with material contamination, or the homosexual and pedophile gurus created by these contaminated and degraded beings.

Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura Prabhupāda left so many powerful qualified Gurus that they could not all stay together in one place like lion. They had to open different branches in order to serve the mission of their Guru to the maximum most level of their capacity and according to the sevā entrusted to them — it was a must.

PADA: Srila Prabhupada says, among my God brothers NO ONE is qualified to be acharya. 

What happens in societies managed by bonded souls is entirely the responsibility of Mahā-māyā and completely a separate issue.

PADA: OK sorry, when the Gaudiya Matha folks endorse homosexuals and deviants as acharyas, that is Maha maya and not Yogamaya. An acharya is a servant of Radharani direct, and is therefore not a deviant, pervert, predator, pedophile, criminal etc.

It is true that some renowned disciples of Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura Prabhupāda fell down due to offence — but this too is under the jurisdiction of Mahā-māyā, and it is a great warning for all of us that even very elevated personalities (even a jivan mukta) can commit mistakes and can fall down.

PADA: Some of them fell down and the rest of them did not fix the problem, make a Governing committee, and re-establish the mission. 

But if we accept Śrīla Bhakti Rakṣaka Śrīdhara Deva Gosvāmī Mahārāja, Śrīla Bhakti Dayita Mādhava Gosvāmī Mahārāja, Śrīla Bhakti Hṛdaya Vana Deva Gosvāmī Mahārāja, Śrīla Bhakti Vilāsa Tīrtha Gosvāmī Mahārāja (Kunjada), Śrīla Bhakti Pramoda Pūrī Gosvāmī Mahārāja, etc., as pure devotees or Prabhupāda-pārṣadas, then yāhāṅ Kṛṣṇa, tāhāṅ nāhi māyāra adhikāra — where there is Kṛṣṇa, there Māyā has no right to remain. So how could Mahā-māyā ever influence all those great personalities?

PADA: Mahamaya has had control of these people because they first made a false acharya and then when he fell, they declared themselves to be acharyas. And Srila Prabhupada said they never implemented a Governing Body, and instead they made many artificial gurus. 

"Another man comes to be guru, then another then another, and another and in some camps the guru is being changed three times a year." "Kill guru and become guru" is how Srila Prabhupada summed them up. Sorry, these folks were aiding and abetting false gurus in 1937 and they just started doing that again by promoting GBC gurus after 1977. ys pd

ISKCON Child Abuse Investigation / Wet Stools / Varnasrama 04 16 26

ISKCON and CHILD ABUSE

April 16th, 2026

Nationwide Crackdown Gains Momentum: WBCPCR Steps in on ISKCON Child Abuse Allegations Following UPSCPCR Action

In what marks a decisive and escalating phase in the fight for child rights, the communication dated 30.03.2026 issued by the West Bengal Commission for Protection of Child Rights (WBSCPCR) has brought renewed momentum to the cause championed by the Justice for Srila Prabhupada Foundation (JFSPF). The Commission has formally taken cognizance of the complaints (of JFSPF) and initiated proceedings in accordance with law, extending the scope of inquiry into serious allegations of child abuse within institutions linked to the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, particularly in West Bengal, including the globally prominent Centre at Mayapur.

Find the Letter from WBCPCR here: 

https://justiceforsrilaprabhupadafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Letter-from-WBSCPCR-to-Garg-and-Garg-Advocates.pdf

The significance of this development lies not merely in the issuance of a formal acknowledgment, but in the concrete steps that have already followed. Acting in compliance with the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India dated 25 November 2025, the WBCPCR has moved swiftly to convene a meeting with the district administration, bringing together key stakeholders including the Child Welfare Committee. This coordinated institutional response signals that the matter has crossed the threshold of preliminary concern and is now firmly within the framework of active investigation and administrative action.

The Commission has further issued directions to ensure that a thorough inquiry is conducted and that action is taken strictly in accordance with law. By forwarding the complaint to the District Magistrate, Nadia, the process has been anchored at the district level, ensuring that the allegations are examined on the ground with the seriousness they demand. The matter is presently under active consideration, with further action contingent upon the findings of the inquiry and the compliance reports that follow.

This crucial step in West Bengal comes in direct continuation of the earlier directions issued by the Uttar Pradesh State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (UPSCPCR), which had already set the process in motion in Uttar Pradesh especially Vrindavan by directing police action on similar allegations. The involvement of multiple State Commissions now unmistakably points to a widening recognition that the issue is systemic in nature, cutting across geographical boundaries and demanding coordinated scrutiny at the highest levels.

For the Justice for Srila Prabhupada Foundation, this moment represents a powerful validation of sustained legal advocacy and relentless pursuit of accountability. What began as a meticulously documented complaint—backed by survivor testimonies, expert inputs, and substantial evidence—has now compelled statutory authorities across States to act.

The spotlight on West Bengal, and particularly Mayapur, carries profound implications. It ensures that the inquiry is not confined or fragmented, but comprehensive in scope. As the investigation progresses, it is increasingly evident that accountability will not remain abstract. Based on the seriousness of the allegations and the material already on record, legal action is likely to follow against those responsible, including Gurus, Governing body members, Temple presidents, teachers, staff members, and other individuals who may have played a role—whether by commission, omission, or concealment—in acts of abuse or in the suppression of complaints. This marks a crucial shift from institutional opacity to individual accountability.

While the proceedings are ongoing, the direction of progress is clear. The actions initiated by the WBCPCR, read alongside those of the UPSCPCR, demonstrate that persistent and principled efforts are beginning to dismantle long-standing barriers to justice. Each step forward strengthens the possibility that victims will be heard, protected, and ultimately granted the justice they deserve.

The Justice for Srila Prabhupada Foundation remains steadfast in its commitment to this cause. We will continue to engage with authorities, support victims, and ensure that the process leads not only to accountability but also to lasting systemic reform.

We thank our readers and supporters for standing with us. This is no longer just a struggle for recognition—it is a movement toward justice, and it is gaining ground.

Your Servants,
JFSPF Team

Copyright (C) 2026 JUSTICE FOR SRILA PRABHUPADA FOUNDATION INC. All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
justiceforsrilaprabhupada@gmail.com

PADA: A pedophile messiah's program is going to produce -- a multiplied pack of more and more pedophiles. Duh-oh! And then have a program of empowering, protecting and ENABLING them, and giving them sympathy and covering up for them, and so on. We become what we worship. 

And worshiping deviants as God's messiahs -- who are engaged in illicit sex with men, women and children, it going to produce a flood of more illicit sex with men, women and children. We become what we worship! So this is a good development, the mundane child welfare programs and courts are going to look into the ISKCON Vrndavana and Mayapur projects. LONG OVERDUE. Better late than never. 

Unfortunately it is often the media, government, law enforcement and courts that have to help us -- and "the devotees" are often as not -- against us. That means the materialists are often more advanced than many / most of the so-called devotees. Sometimes MUCH more advanced. 

Meanwhile one of my other senior God brothers died in a nursing home evidently with no devotees around, after he spent years chastising me for opposing Tamal's bucket boy Narayan Maharaja. Sorry, there is a lot of EVIL karma associated with supporting pedophile messiah's projects. 

Of course this begs the question, why would anyone want small children to worship homosexuals and pedophiles as their messiahs? None of these leaders ever gives us a good answer. Neither did this God brother follower of Narayan Maharaja. 

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com   

The Enforced Cult Ritualistic Worship

of homosexuals and pedophiles

as messiahs project.

====

WE STUCK OUR HANDS IN WET STOOLS

𝐍𝐨 𝟔 — 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐤 (𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦) 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐢 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐚 𝐜𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐚-𝐦𝐨𝐲𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐥𝐚

IF YOU ARE ALWAYS IN ILLUSION THEN DELUSION IS A MUST, SO WHAT SOLUTION CAN BE THERE FOR THE POLLUTION INSIDE YOUR HEART

𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫

(By Srila Bhakti Vijñana Bharati Gosvami Maharaj)

After the disappearance of Śrīla Prabhupāda Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvati Ṭhākura, the time came to select a new President-ācārya of the Gauḍīya Maṭha. Guru Mahārāja believed Śrī Śrīmad Bhakti Pradīpa Tīrtha Gosvāmī Mahārāja to be the worthiest candidate. However, in due time, Śrī Ananta-vāsudeva Prabhu was unanimously appointed to the position, with Śrī Vinoda-bihārī Brahmacārī serving as Secretary. 

When Śrī Ananta-vāsudeva Prabhu’s ill repute came to light, Śrī Vinodabihārī Brahmacārī called for Guru Mahārāja and said, “Hayagrīva Prabhu! We have stuck our hands in wet stools. Had it been dry, it would not have been so revoltingly foul-smelling. But unfortunately, the reality is that its stench and repulsiveness are excessive. 

"We must feel remorse and atone for having supported Ananta-vāsudeva and for having taken so long to understand what was actually going on. An incompetent person should be helped, but an incompetent person who makes fools of the general public by playing the part of a competent leader must be shunned. Let us help the people of the world by exposing this person, so that everyone may see his true nature. 

“Because of your refined, gentle Vaiṣṇava temperament, everyone considers you a friend and gives importance to what you say. Therefore, please bring everyone together and arrange a meeting, so that we may together determine how to oppose him.” 

As per Śrī Vinoda-bihārī Brahmacārī’s request, Guru Mahārāja gathered their godbrothers together and held a meeting, whereupon it was decided to file a court case against Śrī Ananta-vāsudeva Prabhu. It was this court case that made it possible for the Gauḍīya Maṭha to legally split into two factions.

𝐇𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐝𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

Śrī Vinoda-bihārī Brahmacārī’s preaching inspired his elder brother to take shelter of Śrīla Prabhupāda and join the maṭha. When Śrīla Prabhupāda ordered his brother to accept sannyāsa, he was unwilling. Although Śrī Vinoda-bihārī Brahmacārī was younger, he chastised his older brother, saying, “Why are you not fulfilling Śrīla Prabhupāda’s desire to give you sannyāsa?” 

After considering these words of encouragement, his brother agreed to accept sannyāsa, and he became known as Śrī Śrīmad Bhakti Kevala Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja. Some time after the disappearance of Śrīla Prabhupāda, Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja observed Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja and his followers deviating from the teachings of Śrīla Prabhupāda in three ways: 

(1) they taught that the hare kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra is not to be chanted loudly, but rather silently in such a way that no one can hear the sound vibration; 

(2) although Śrīla Prabhupāda had personally initiated some of his disciples, including Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja, into the sannyāsa order, they gave up their saffron sannyāsa-veśa (dress) and instead wore white bābājīveśa, preaching that sannyāsa-dharma is strictly prohibited in Kali-yuga; and 

(3) although Śrīla Prabhupāda personally established Śrī Navadvīpa parikramā, they rejected its performance. Unable to tolerate even the slightest deviation from Śrīla Prabhupāda’s teachings, Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja completely severed his relationship with Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja and those who followed him. 

He would never allow his disciples to go to Ananta Vasudeva's Bāgbāzār Gauḍīya Maṭha or to any other place where Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja and his followers resided. If Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja were to discover that one of his disciples went to Śrī Auḍulomi Mahārāja’s maṭha, he would order that devotee to fast for three days, taking only pañca-gavya (the five products of the cow— milk, yogurt, ghee, dung and urine) as his atonement. 

He would say, “Why have you gone there? You are now impure; you must purify yourself by performing this atonement.” Finally, Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja decided to file a case against Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja and his followers, boldly announcing that because they did not accept many of Śrīla Prabhupāda’s teachings, they could not be considered his true disciples, and consequently should not be allowed to reside in his maṭhas. 

My Guru Mahārāja, Śrī Śrīmad Bhakti Dayita Mādhava Gosvāmī Mahārāja, gave me the service of transcribing Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja’s dictations regarding the court case. I would then take those dictations to Śrī Śrīmad Bhakti Rakṣaka Śrīdhara Gosvāmī Mahārāja, who would adjust the language and edit for clarity. 

When everything was complete, I would go to the court and submit the finalized documents. The day the judge was to present the verdict, Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja and his followers appeared in court wearing saffron sannyāsa-veśa and were followed by a large procession loudly chanting the mahā-mantra. 

Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja had given eight people sannyāsa just that day. In front of the judge, they said, “We are doing Navadvīpa-dhāma parikramā, wearing saffron dress, and carrying our sannyāsa-daṇḍas. Also, we have established a maṭha in the name of Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura, and have established his mūrti (deity form) in the maṭha we are constructing in Godrumadvīpa.” 

Although previously they had no plans of having a maṭha in Śrīla Prabhupāda’s name or keeping his mūrti there, feeling threatened by the bold endeavors of Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja, they named their maṭha Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Gauḍīya Maṭha. They denied all the allegations put forth by Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja, and audaciously said, “Just see! We are chanting loudly, wearing sannyāsa dress, and we have named our maṭha after Śrīla Prabhupāda. How can he claim we are not disciples of Śrīla Prabhupāda?” 

Seeing this to be true, the judge awarded the decision in favor of Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja and his followers. It appeared as though Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja had been defeated. I pleaded, “Many of your godbrothers were involved in building this case for a long time. I too labored so much in transcribing your dictations, going to Śrīla Śrīdhara Gosvāmī Mahārāja for editing and providing information to the court. Now that we have lost the case, will you not appeal the judge’s verdict?” Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja replied, “We will proceed further only if they again go against Śrīla Prabhupāda’s teachings.” 

He then asked, “How many punches can you tolerate?” I replied, “Not even a single punch. I would strongly object to being punched.” Śrīla Mahārāja asked, “And how many could you tolerate if your hands and legs were tied with ropes?” I replied, “I would be forced to tolerate however many were given.” “In the same way, whenever someone makes mistakes and goes against the teachings of Śrīla Prabhupāda, we will bind their hands and beat them to our fullest capacity until they accept those teachings.” 

He then explained, “My only desire was for them to again follow the line of Śrīla Prabhupāda, and we see that they are now doing this. They are now wearing sannyāsa dress, awarding sannyāsa to others and loudly chanting the hare kṛṣṇa mahā-mantra. This was my objective. In this way, we were victorious. 

Our fight was not for anything other than establishing the proper siddhānta (conclusive truths) and reconnecting them with Śrīla Prabhupāda.” Even now, all of Śrīla Auḍulomi Gosvāmī Mahārāja’s followers and devotees of Bāgbāzār Gauḍīya Maṭha accept sannyāsa, perform Navadvīpadhāma parikramā, loudly chant mahā-mantra, and perform harināma saṅkīrtana. This is all due to the mercy of Śrīla Keśava Gosvāmī Mahārāja.

PADA: Sulochana said that the anal reconstructive surgery epidemic of boys "GBC guru program" is a "sex with stools sampradaya." Well it looks like this is not new. In 1936 they made a false guru and it was like "placing our hands in wet stools." 

And the smell is over powering and everyone knows it, including the public. Much the same as ISKCON. They made false gurus, they stuck their hands in wet stools, and the smell is everywhere. Even the public is aghast. 

Unfortunately, Madhava Maharaja, Sridhar Maharaja, BP Puri and others did not help us out after 1978, and they ended up compromising with the GBC's guru process. In other word, the SAME false guru wet stools smell started all over again. ys pd  

=======

VARNASRAMA 

PADA: Yes Bhaktavasal here in America there are thousands of animal welfare programs. They never say the other animal welfare programs are "pyramid money making corporate business scams," because they actually cooperate among themselves and move animals from one shelter to the other when needed. And move personnel around etc. especially in emergencies and so on. Because their main interest is helping animals and not proving they are holier than the other programs. 

For example, when there is a flood, the various agencies will get help from outside welfare programs to bring in helpers and shelter the animals and so on. Whereas your Hare Krishna animal welfare program is battling other Krishna animal welfare programs, fighting like cats and dogs and that is not helping any of their programs. It is making people not want to support any of them. 

Maybe some day we can also grow up, and act as good as the mundane animal welfare programs do. And learn how to cooerate like mature adult people who actually care for animals and not -- who has the bigger better operation and fight among themselves, caring only for who has the better welfare program, rather than caring for animals. 

Same as Kris Drboy, he has no care for children. He wants me to neglect caring for children and have me sit chant my rounds, and do nothing to help others. This is exactly how the GBC talks to me. It is not mature and adult to try to take down programs that help others. It is immature, foolish and basically a lot of big ego and not care for others. The karmis are doing way better, and that is also why they helped me with their courts while your type guys were chanting your rounds, and giving me grief and harassment. 

I had a neighbor who had a horse trailer and when there was flooding in another state he drove there to help the horses. He did not start blabbing about how his program is better than someone else's, he does the needed work because he is not full of ego "my program is better than yours" like kindergarten children. 

He wants to actually help suffering animals and not harm programs that help animals. You guys need to come up to the standards of the mundane people and take interest in helping others, and not tooting your own horn about how you are greater than others. If you are not happy that the Jaipur cows are better off, you are not actually in favor of helping cows. You are only interested in self promoting and not animal's well being. 

ys pd