Mukunda Datta Mahasraya / The Godly and Demonic 02 04 24

PADA: Someone asked me to comment on Mukunda Datta Mahasraya. He is a member of the ISKCON Shastra Advisory Committee [SAC] -- which is "advising" their messiahs from Vaikuntha. Evidently their "advice to God's successors" is not working out too good for them -- since their messiahs keep falling down and creating various scandals left, right and center.

Thus, the first question is -- how has Mukunda Datta become a superior authority and advisor -- over the successors to God, i.e. the shastra advisor of God's successors. However, Srila Prabhupada never said the Governing Body or GBC  would become "The Shastra advisors Of Krishna's Guru Successors." 

So this means, Mukunda Datta is another person attempting to say God's successors / gurus are defective, because God is defective and therefore so are His shaksat successors. And thus God and His successors need "advice." And he is one of the advisors. 

There has been a whole discussion going on about women being gurus, and Mukunda Datta was not happy with the direction the discussion is going. Which means! Mukunda Datta and BVKS are not happy when God's successors do not agree with them. Which means, they are saying they are superior to God's successors -- because they are the advisors of God's successors. None of this makes any sense. God -- and therefore His successors -- need to be corrected for deviating? 

In any case, now MD is glorifying Bhakti Vikas Swami -- who is one of the biggest promoters and cheer leaders of the Jayapataka Mayapur Regime. When some of the disciples of Harikesh wondered what they should do next -- Bhakti Vikas swami ordered -- they should take "reinitiation" from the king of their child beating and child raping empire in Mayapur -- Jayapataka swami. Did I forget to mention -- someone wrote to tell me they believe Mayapur has a full on child trafficking business going on there, among numerous other complaints about that place and its track record with child abuse? 

So yeah. Jayapataka's regime in Mayapur has had and extensive track record of rampant child abuse, including an anal reconstruction surgery epidemic, of children who were raped there. In sum, Bhakti Vikas Swami has been a lifetime cheerleader of the whole Mayapur regime. And BVKS is the Sannyas disciple of Jayapataka swami -- the leader of Mayapur --where all of this child mistreatment, in fact many say -- rampant child mistreatment -- has been going on left, right and center. 

And Bhakti Vikas Swami has acted as an apologist for some of the predators floating around Mayapur. Of course, the overall program of Bhakti Vikas Swami has been -- mass banning of devotees; some beatings; mass child molesting; giant lawsuits; assorted police raids; mass bad media publicity for Krishna; and sometimes orchestrating dissenters being terminated. 

And he has been a team member / apologist / supporter of the regime and this process. Someone sent me a video of Mukunda datta some time ago -- trying to tell me he is an independent agent, who has no real connection to supporting the GBC regime. And he is not working with the bogus governing body system. 

However, it turns out, he is a member of the GBC's shastra advisory committee. Which means he thinks Krishna and His acharyas are a bunch of fools, dopes and jerks -- who need to be corrected and advised by people like himself. And it also means he is a card carrying member of their homosexual and pedophile Messiah's regime. Of course, so is Bhakti Vikas Swami. 

So now they are having a mutual glorification party after they helped orchestrate thousands of devotees being banned; some beaten to a pulp; many children being abused / molested / perhaps raped -- some say there are thousands of victims; and assorted Police raids and other problems. Never mind orchestrating assassinating dissenters by calling us bogus. 

And this is a big glorious program for these folks. And that is why so many devotees tell me they are totally out of touch with the thousands and thousands of victims of their process. In any case, I held off discussing Mukunda datta for a while -- to kind of wait until we have a smoking gun -- of him promoting the Mayapur homosexual pedophile messiah project, and one of its chief cheer leaders and apologists like BVKS -- as he is doing. 

And This is why many people ask me on a regular basis -- are some -- or many -- of these ISKCON leaders themselves homosexuals and / or pedophiles, because otherwise why do these type people keep manifesting left, right and center in and around their process. Or, as one India devotee wrote me recently, if I toss a rock at the saffron clad leaders of a GBC parade, what are my chances of hitting a homo?

So this is bad news and good news. The bad news is -- what we suspected all along about Mukunda Datta, that he is a cheer leader and apologist for the mass molesting pedophile messiah's project -- turns out to be correct. And the good news is, I don't have to do any heavy lifting, he is pretty much admitting to that by glorifying one of the key contributors to the illicit sex with men, women and children messiahs project, that bans, beats, molests, sues and assassinates Vaishnavas. 

Or as Sulochana says, these people [enablers, defenders and apologists] are the velvet glove that covers the Iron Fist. And they are trying to paint a happy face on their program of having devotees being banned, beaten, molested, sued and killed. 

Did I forget to mention that folks like Mukunda Datta telling people like BVKS to go ahead and take sins -- and make pretend they are another Jesus -- means he is simply helping BVKS head into a tailspin to the lowest regions of the universe, because there is no way he can burn these sins off in this life, or in perhaps the next 1,000 lives. 

So Mukunda Datta is "helping" his brothers stay glued to the wheel of samsara, and in fact he is opening a giant can of glue to stick them to that wheel for the indefinite future. Shastra says these false religionists will be cast to the depths of hell, and -- we believe shastra is correct. Of course, they dragged ISKCON to hell already, so they will have to go down just for that crime alone. Cannot imagine telling Yamaraja "I was one of the cheer leading enablers of the process of mass banning, beating, molesting, suing and killing Vaishnavas, do I get to go to the higher planets"? Ummm, nope. 

YS PD 

angel108b@yahoo.com

=============

FROM THE BOOK―GODLY OR DEMONIC?

TRYING TO TURN OFF THE LIGHT OF KNOWLEDGE by Dhanesvara Das

The Bhaktivedanta Books Trust (BBT)!

The legal application from the ISKCON GBC also states that any contribution to the book was "commissioned work". You can find a copy of the application on our website www. divineordemoniac.com

The application says:

Author's nationality: United States.

Contribution to work: Not anonymous, not pseudonym.

Year the creation of this work was completed: 1985

Date and country of first publication of this particular work: March 6, 1985. USA & ENGLAND [1985 !? And what about England?! ].

Srila Prabhupada was not a US citizen, and the Bhagavad-gita as it is was completed in 1972, not 1985. But BBTI claims that Shrila Prabhupada was hired by BBT to write the Bhagavad-gita!. His name does not appear as a copyright holder, not even as an author. This is absurd! This is an outrageous robbery!

It is evident that those who have undertaken such actions can be more than atheists, regardless of how they present themselves, who do not believe they will be responsible for their actions after this life. Undoubtedly, those who make these changes, or those who pursue them, cannot, under any consideration, be considered devotees of the Lord or sincere followers of Srila Prabhupada. 

They show with their actions that they are actually Kamsas and Putanas, and we tremble to think how much more they will destroy with their atrocious activities.
Examples of changes in Bhagavad-gita as it is.

A superficial examination of the changes to the Bhagavad-gita As It Is Original by Srila Prabhupada shows that the vast majority of them are unnecessary and even capricious, adding nothing to the understanding of the translation, and in dozens, if not hundreds, of cases, they change the meaning of the translation. It is worth noting that Srila Prabhupada personally read his Bhagavad-gita daily (he knew his own book), but never asked for such changes.

Omission of meaningful words.

Original authorized edition from 1972:

"It is said that the soul is invisible, inconceivable, unchangeable and UNCHANGEABLE." Knowing this, you shouldn't regret the body.”

BBT International posthumously edited the 1983 edition:

"It is said that the soul is invisible, inconceivable and unchangeable." Knowing this, you shouldn't regret the body.”

Original and authorized Macmillan Edition 1972:

"All of them, as much as they give themselves up to Me, I reward them accordingly." All follow My way in every aspect, O son of Prtha.”

Posthumously Modified 1983 Edition of BBT International:

“When all give themselves to Me, I will reward them accordingly. All follow My way in every aspect, O son of Prtha.”

Changed words with changed meaning.

Original authorized edition from 1972:

"The great generals who have highly esteemed your name and your fame will think that you have left the battlefield only out of fear and therefore will consider you a COWARD."

BBT International posthumously edited the 1983 edition:

"The great generals who have held in high esteem your name and fame will think that you have left the battlefield only out of fear, and therefore they will consider you INSIGNIFICANT."

Original and authorized Macmillan Edition 1972:

“All the liberated souls in ancient times acted upon this understanding AND SO THEY ACHIEVED LIBERATION. Therefore, as the ancient, you must fulfill your duty with this divine consciousness.”

BBT International posthumously edited the 1983 edition:

“All souls liberated in ancient times acted upon this understanding OF MY TRANSCENDENTAL NATURE. Therefore, you must fulfill your duty, following in His steps.”

Original and authorized Macmillan Edition 1972:

Oh Descendant of Bharata, He who dwells in the body IS ETERNAL AND CAN NEVER BE KILLED. Therefore, you need not feel sorry for any CREATURE.
BBT International posthumously edited the 1983 edition:

O descendant of Bharata, He who dwells in the body [OMISSIONS] can never be assassinated. Therefore you don't need to regret any BEING ALIVE.
Original and authorized Macmillan Edition 1972:

... Fulfilling one's specific duty in any field of action according to VARNASRAMA-DHARMA serves to raise one, to a higher state of living..

BBT International posthumously edited the 1983 edition:

... The performance of specific duty in any field of action according to THE ORDERS OF THE HIGHER AUTHORITIES serves to raise one, to a higher state of living.

This change is significant as, as I have commented in several places, ISKCON authorities are striving to remove any smell of social reform from Srila Prabhupada's teachings and align ISKCON with the status quo of today's atheistic and materialist civilization. Any mention of the words "varnashrama dharma" and its concepts is actively discouraged.

Original and authorized Macmillan Edition 1972:

If someone abandons SELF-SEEKS and works on Krishna consciousness and then falls for not completing his work, what loss is there on his part?

BBT International published posthumously 1983

If someone abandons HIS OCCUPATIONAL DUTIES and works on Krishna consciousness and then falls for not completing his work, what loss is there on his part?

Obviously these two concepts aren't the same.

Changes in the chaitanya - charitamrita

Original 1975 edition of Chaitanya-charitamrita, Madhya 19.157:

If one thinks that there are many pseudo devotees or non devotees in the Society for Krishna Consciousness, YOU CAN KEEP THE DIRECT COMPANY OF THE SPIRITUAL MASTER, AND IF THERE IS ANY DOUBT, YOU SHOULD CONSULT THE SPIRITUAL MASTER. However, unless one follows the instructions of the spiritual master and the regulatory principles governing singing and hearing of the Lord’s holy name, one cannot become a pure devotee.

BBT International posthumously edited the 2003 edition:

EVEN IF ONE THINKS THAT THERE ARE MANY PSEUDO DEVOTEES OR NON-DEVOTEES IN THE SOCIETY FOR Krishna Consciousness, ONE MUST STAY IN THE SOCIETIES, IF ONE THINKS THE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY ARE NOT PURE DEVOTEES, ONE CAN KEEP DIRECT COMPANY WITH THE SPIRITUAL MASTER, AND IF if any doubt, consult the spiritual master. However, unless one follows the instructions of the spiritual master concerning regulatory principles and singing and hearing the holy name of the Lord, one cannot become a pure devotee.

The added word “even” implies NO pseudo devotees! But if you think they still exist, you must stick to society (not spiritual teacher). This is a very brazen effort to manipulate innocent devotees into denying their own intelligence.

Change the Shastra to match the current deviations of GBC

An atrocious example of the mindset behind the changes in Srila Prabhupada's holy books is the effort to make them adjust and support the current thought and practices of a GBC that has deviated from the siddhanta vaisnava.

BBTI editor Dravida Dasa has made a surprising change in one of the earliest slokas of Srila Prabhupada's Caitanya-caritamrita. A paragraph at the beginning of the first chapter, written by Srila Prabhupada, was initially published as:
Srila Krishnadasa Kaviraja Gosvami's direct disciple was Srila Narottama dasa Thakura, who accepted Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti as his servant. Shrila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura accepted Shrila Jagannatha dasa Babaji, who INITIATED Shrila Bhaktivinoda Thakura, who in turn INITIated Shrila Gaurakisora dasa Babaji , the spiritual teacher of Om Visnupada Shrila bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Gosvami Maharaja, the divine teacher of our humble self.

However, in the recent edition of Caitanya-caritamrta (a 9-volume edition, not the original 17-volume edition) that same passage was changed to say:

Srila Krishnadasa Kaviraja Gosvami's direct disciple was Srila Narottama dasa Thakura, who accepted Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti as his servant. Shrila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura accepted Shrila Jagannatha dasa Babaji, the spiritual teacher of Shrila Bhaktivinoda Thakura [NOTE: the word 'INITIATED is absent], who in turn ACCEPTED Shrila Gaurakisora dasa Babaji , the spiritual teacher of Om Visnupada Shrila Bhktisiddhanta Sarasvati Gosvami Maharaja, the divine teacher of our humble be.

This edition drastically changes the understanding of parampara and how it goes forward, which Srila Prabhupada has explained in several places.
The uproar that followed this edition forced Dravida Dasa to explain his reasoning:

On the side of not changing the phrases “INITIATED” we have the strong tendency against changing the books unless absolutely necessary and the fact that Shrila Prabhupada actually said that Jagannatha das Babaji initiated Bhaktivinode.
[However,] Leaving one or both 'initiated' will strongly imply that the use of the phrases 'direct disciple' and even 'accepted [as your disciple]' indicate formal initiation as we know it in ISKCON, which is far from the truth.

Keep in mind that Dravida clearly ADMITS that Shrila Prabhupada DID write that “Jagannatha das Babaji INITIATED Thakur Bhaktivinode”, and for any sincere disciple this would be the ONLY reason required to NOT alter the writings of Shrila Prbhupada. But Dravida believes that the motive for his changes goes beyond what Srila Prabhupada herself actually wrote and taught. He affirms that we must change the teachings of Srila Prabhupada to ensure that they match what is currently understood and practiced within ISKCON regarding initiation.