Sunday, April 11, 2021

Paramadvaiti Swami "A Shell of His Former Self" (Update)


I won't fall into the honey trap,
like all the other fools!
Because, I am a resident of Krishna loka!
OK, not so fast there little cricket!




JD: A couple of months ago, a group of Paramadvaiti Maharaj's brahmachari disciples approached me to ask for Sanskrit lessons. Naturally I discussed with them the current situation at Vrinda Kunj and Yamuna Kunj where they stay and understood that they are still Paramadvaiti loyalists. Not that this had anything to do with my accepting their request. 

I am hungry enough for eager students that I would happily accept one from any quarter. Here were four men, all still young and vigorous, with adequate intelligence and discipline to stick to it, with an esprit de corps, all to be applied to to learning Sanskrit. I would not have said no.

Now I live here in Jiva Institute near one of Maharaj's fiercest opponents who has feelings towards him that could only be described as hatred. So I have been exposed to his worst misdeeds and to the pain and suffering of his victims. Nevertheless, since I judge everyone by the extent to which they love Sanskrit, I worried rather that Paramdvaiti's tendency to discourage education in favor of institution building might interfere with my new students' ability to remain steady in their study.

At around Dol Purnima time I found out that Paramdvaiti Maharaj was here, and when I heard that he was only staying for a few days, would be leaving on Monday for Haridwar and the Kumbh and then would be going back to Germany shortly after that. So I decided to go and visit him. He has been a friend. His disciples came to me because they knew me through the environmentalist days and Vrindavan Today and all that, when I had frequent meetings with Maharaj.

Maharaj is, as expected, something of a shadow of himself. Much chastened by events, which it seems have not yet left him, though much of the dust has settled. Naturally, the deflation of ego that results from such a "shitstorm" as he himself called it, takes time to adjust. But he has come to the point of seeing where the path forward lies.

[PADA: We heard this from other folks "he is a shell of his former self." Well yep, he was exposed as a fraud and now he knows, we all know he is a fraud etc. So he will have a hard time cheating more people now, and this has discouraged him. As it should ...]

He was quite open about the events, though it wasn't the kind of blood and guts confession that people seem to want these days as a catharsis. From what I could gather, circumstances were making it impossible for him to stay in Vrindavan. Nevertheless, he is not relinquishing his connection to Vrinda, even though much of Vrinda has relinquished its connection to him.

At the same time, he still has young men of quality as disciples there at Yamuna Kunj, several more than the quartet who came to me. I have always held a certain precarious pride in the fact that I have been given shelter in the Dham. I thought that this is the center of our universe and so, sooner or later, the world will come to me. This is the place of final attainment, and what I have to give should be for those who have given themselves to coming there.

But who is sowing the seeds that brings such people here from afar? Maharaj said to me that when his 40-year partner Atulananda, whom he had given sannyasa only a short while before, cut himself off entirely from Vrinda, even though Paramadvaiti had offered him sole acharyaship over the entire organization. 

[PADA: Right, when we have a problem with someone, we offer to make them Krishna's successor acharya. That is the whole problem with the Sridhara Maharaja group, they think they can give people acharya status by their rubber stamp. The acharya is empowered by Krishna and not their rubber stamp of approval.]

So nobody seemed able to take a leadership position, which made many of them turn to him again. But the situation made him assess how to reorganize things with himself out of the picture. As though dead, but alive somewhere. This is, as I recall, something like what I asked him to do in my letter when the shit first hit the fan.

[PADA: We cannot re-organize the mission unless we re-focus the worship on the acharya. People seem to miss that part of the process left, right and center.]

As many of you know, Paramadvaiti Maharaj had become a friend of the indigenous peoples of South America, especially those from the Shamanistic Ayahuasca-using nations. He was especially impressed by how many of their beliefs corresponded to those of Sanatan Dharma. One thing is that he has, through his own disciples, established congregations in remote, heavily indigenous places like Bolivia. 

He was saying, these people are poor, they will likely never have enough money to come to Vrindavan. How do we take care of them? So he has given many of the preachers in these areas the responsibility of initiating, thereby taking himself out of the picture.

[PADA: OK so we are going to make a second wave of acharyas, and hand out acharya certificates to all sorts of people now, to compensate for the failure of the first wave. How can the bogus first wave certify the second wave?]

Well, I expect that people will think I am being a bit soft on him. He says he had become lax in following the rules of sannyas and associating with women. I have my views on the problems of sannyas, and this was by the way another thing I wrote to him in one of my letters that was made public. Anyway, if there is one falldown that I "get" as it were is that of a sannyasi with women disciples. He said how much he loved them. I can just imagine.

With his disciples, my students, I sense that they feel a bit of freedom and independence also, even in his presence. They have a reverence for him because he truly has been their guru. He is the one who brought them to Vrindavan, so they have decided to stick it out with him. But they are determined to pursue the path of bhakti and get the most out of their Brajavas. I believe that is why they came to me.

But I want to assure not only Maharaj and his disciples and devotees everywhere, that my interest and area of primary expertise for which I have some qualification is in Sanskrit. There is a very strong correlation between Sanskrit and Indian culture, in which Gaudiya Vaishnavism, by the grace of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu and the Six Goswamis and others, take part.

Without Sanskrit, the Holy Name will create colonies and offshoots everywhere, cultural versions that take on wider and wider differences as the years go by. Reading the same books, but taking on and creating new cultural forms. Perhaps in the modern interconnected world it will be more homogenous than it would be if we all lived in isolated villages in the Bolivian Andes. 

But Sanskrit, like Vrindavan, will always be the sun at the center of the solar system. After lunch he invited me to a dip in Yamuna Kund, a little square pool in the back of Yamuna Kunj. Maybe two meters across, with two or three steps going down, made of white Rajasthani marble. He talked me into it. The water was cold and even though the heat has come, it still hasn't touched me and I felt little pleasure in the fresh water. 

Maharaj usually goes for morning bath in the Yamuna, which is just in front of the door, across the Parikrama Marg and fifty meters of sand. He takes a group of five or six brahmacharis to mangal arati at one of the Gaudiya Maths in Seva Kunj, or to one of the main temples, but I think that Covid restrictions have been kept in place there. Don't quote me on that.

So to put a conclusion to all this, let me say that I do not think Paramadwaiti Maharaj is a crocodile. Jai Sri Radhe.

[PADA: Well, these people are going to be lucky when they finally take birth as a crocodile in our opinion. His victims are very upset still, well the whole world is his victim, he helped ruin the movement that was meant to save the whole world. There is no end to the numbers of victims of these frauds. ys pd]


============================

RKD: (Quoting) "Whatever I´ve said is because I acknowledge that Paramadvaiti did many nice things. But if on top of that you do many nasty things and do not properly respond to that, unfortunately, the nice things you did will be somehow lost in the way. And I don´t want that, and that´s why I´m saying what I´m saying."

And yes, there are many details you are unaware of, and I would humbly invite you to further research, since you are a respected public sadhu, and your opinion weighs heavily on those who follow you so that demands sober objectivity in topics like this.

And yes, I acknowledge the complexities of the sannyasa asrama in modern times and Western countries, but I would insist that Paramadvaiti´s problems were not only sexual, but due to an "intoxication of vatsalya" in the words of Srila Sridhara Maharaja: only listening to his children (disciples in this case) saying to him "you are the best dad / guru in the world!" and not being open to receiving advice from seniors or, even worse, peers.

Apart from this, unfortunately, he neglected his sadhana for decades, almost not chanting one single round any day, and his katha was generally full of misconception and relative topics. You can have a look at his presentation even nowadays.

But I would say the most delicate things of all have not been his papa (sinful actions) but the aparadha (offenses) he engaged in trying to justify his papa: he has publicly criticized many exalted sadhus who did not agree with his stance and were insisting that he may take a different turn (and what to speak of the abused Vaisnavis who were clearly offended by him!). 

This happened even to very sincere and surrendered devotees of him, whom Paramadvaiti started to present his enemies -- in front of his disciples -- because he saw them as potentially threatening to his own ideas. Sad to say the least. I think that´s why Dasa Goswami prevents about papa in his Manah-siksa: although that´s not directly affecting our bhakti, it can lead to aparadha if we apply our krodha, matsarya, lobha and what not in our relationship with the Vaisnavas.

You say that you got the impression that he has reduced his activities and you are right, but this happened by force and not by his own will I would say since almost 75% of his mission left him and many of his asramas were closed. Even many of his disciples in India remain in the asramas for the sake of comfort and not necessarily due to gurunistha. But although his activities were reduced by force, he nonetheless is preaching publicly on a daily basis. You can see his lectures here:

https://www.facebook.com/GurudevaLIVE

So yes, I agree that if a sannyasi and guru have such an embarrassing chapter in his life, he should totally disappear from the public sphere and get immersed in bhajan in the spirit of purification and repentance. He said he would do that at one point, but that didn´t happen till now, and sadly, for me, that speaks about his present condition: not having a taste for deep bhajana, and still mostly interested in popularity and relative issues. You can have a look at the topic he still speaks about in his present lectures.

You say in one of your messages, "Everybody seems to think everything is so easy." Well, I would apply that same quote to those who do not take the time and commitment to be empathic with each of the ladies abused by Paramadvaiti, to each of the disciples that have their faith affected, and so on. I am not promoting victim consciousness here at all, simply objective and compassionate viewpoints, hopefully.

[PADA: Yep, my friends from down there told me -- no one dares to speak out against Paramadvaiti. You will have the sh*t kicked out of you. He is a giant goonda and so are a number of his followers. And that is why his misbehaviors have gone on unchecked for such a long time. People are afraid of him and his vicious cult. And he will identify opponents by name in his lectures ... so that means you now had better watch your back ... they are coming for you. It is the same way the GBC operates ... which is why he is welcomed at their programs and temples.] 

4 comments:

  1. PADA: One thing some folks may -- or may not realize is -- that a diksha guru is taking on a lot of karma. Srila Prabhupada told us not to even let anyone touch our feet -- or we would be acting as diksha gurus, and we would be taking karma. And we would then get sick, fall down or both. I passed Jayatirtha close by in a narrow hallway and his presence sucked out my life airs and choked me. He was surrounded by a dark ball of bad energy. A psychic told Satsvarupa the same thing, you have a huge ball of blackness surrounding you. And when some of them are sick or falling, their followers say -- we have to pray for them because they took our sins. OK except, if we are not qualified to takes sins (i.e. are not pure and do not have the brahmana tejyas to burn them off) the sins can cause the person accumulating all these sins problems, in this life and the next. Of course a lot of them died prematurely. Another thing that happens evidently -- a person can just go totally insane, as we have seen happen to some of them personally. I do not believe these people have the shakti to be accumulating tons of sins, and it will affect them malefically. ys pd

    ReplyDelete
  2. LD: Sridhara Maharaja knew the GBC were falling ... and yet he still said ... the GBC should be acharya. That does prove ... he has no idea what is acharya.

    This is all some big ego thing. The other 100 or 200, or 300, they all tried to be acharya ... but failed. I will show them how it is really done! Except they forgot ... the same honey pot of illicit sex the others all fell into ... is the same honey pot they too will fall into.

    Everyone has to understand ... a person needs to be pure ... or else not be acharya. And if they try artificially ... same trap that caught all of the rest ... will catch them too. They thought ... I will never fall into that same trap ... I will be careful. But Krishna knows how to catch these cheaters and liars trying to imitate His acharya.

    And so now almost the whole GBC is saying ... gurus fall down ... it is common ... so they can cover their a** when they fall into the honey trap ... if they have not fallen there already ... and they are just doing a better job of hiding things.

    Oh yes! I know all about that honey trap ... I will never fall in like the other fools! Wait for it! Ker-plunk. Oh oh ... I fell in! Another one bites the dust ... caught in the same trap. It is amazing how the same trap keeps catching 1 of them, then 2, then 50, then 100, then 200, then more and more. And each new artificial acharya still thinks ... nah, I will never fall in ... I will outsmart the system. They cannot ... because the system of material energy ... is more powerful than these cheaters.

    And so eventually ... they are exposed. "I will never fall in"! Famous last words of actually millions of these bogus swamis, gurus, avatars, and GBC fools, since forever. The real problem is ... now ISKCON looks like a bogus cult of lusty cheaters posing as gurus ... so the public is disgusted with the whole thing. The preaching is being destroyed by these people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. GKD: "LD: Sridhara Maharaja knew the GBC were falling ... and yet he still said ... the GBC should be acharya. That does prove ... he has no idea what is acharya."

    Well, Prabhupada's godbrothers always wanted to do harm to Prabhupada. Therefore it is rather the case that they purposefully let the GBC down the wrong path in order to make Prabhupada's movement crash. How someone can possibly so stupid not to see that the legendary eleven were not qualified. Besides, Prabhupada had told Puri Maharaja that he would not appoint guru-successors. Prabhupada surely also told that Narayana Swami who visited Prabhupada in November 1977. So we can assume that ALL of them knew that Prabhupada did not appoint anybody as guru.

    [PADA: Yup. Jagat Guru swami / BG Narasmigha said the ritviks are bogus because they do not know if someone's guru is bona fide or not. Hello! Any 350 lbs. woman ordering a Big Mac Hamburger at Mc Donalds knows Sridhara Mahararaja is foolish to promote an illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara. Anyone and everyone else knows that Sridhara's illicit sex messiahs program is bogus, not only the ritviks. This is not rocket science!]

    ReplyDelete
  4. M Dasi: "I am not going to fall into that honey trap like all the others. And fall down with a woman." No? You are going to fall down with a number of women ... not just one! Hah hah! This would be funny except ... it is ruining Krishna's movement. And giving ISKCON a terrible reputation ... as a home for these perverts.

    Simple. Get married and get the honey ... the way the Vedas recommend. I do believe ... a lot of these sexually frustrated men are also the cause of all the child abuse ... not to speak of women abuse. But getting married is WAY too difficult ... because then they have to be honest. I am not suitable for them to go after ... I have a big bark and even bigger bite. Hah hah.

    I did see some postings and articles about a photo of Paramadvaiti having a naked small girl on his lap. Why was he not arrested ... if that is truly the case? Why do people simply allow all this to go on ... and on? It is a big mystery to me. If that was my little girl ... they would have to call in the riot police to stop me from going after them ...

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.