Matthew Mc Govern VS PADA / ISKCON's Desi Only Cows / Real Brahmana 12 25 25

PADA: My first attempt in GROK AI. Did some touch ups in Procreate. Fairly happy with the results. ys pd

MATTHEW MC GOVERN VS PADA

Matthew Mcgovern: I shouldve removed you earlier, as you were always putting others down and glorifying yourself like a true narcissisist.

PADA: Yep, as soon as we said there is a child mistreatment problem, you guys said I was putting people down and was a narcissist. And you still do. That means you are proud you suppressed my complaints. To say that child mistreatment is wrong is -- me -- self glorifying myself? Nope, it is pointing out a crime and the people who suppressed me helped the criminals. ys pd

Mattthew Mcgovern: You dont even know me, or even remember me from the 70s where I met you at the manor and also in berkley, you guys indeed.

PADA: I don't need to know who you are. To say that me helping have the GBC sued for $400,0000,000 for mass child mistreatment is -- all about a narcissist and I, me and mine -- is what the mistreaters and abusers also say. You are parroting them. Child abuse is a crime, and it needs to be exposed. The person reporting crimes is not glorifying himself, he is trying to prevent crimes against children. 

And Jayatirtha thus has no authority to remove us whistle blowers on child mistreatment, that is called aiding and abetting criminals. Yeah JT removed me from ISKCON when I said the children are suffering from his bogus program. And UK people like you were there and did not support me, you are right. 

But your Jayatirtha crowd got rid of me and then shortly after that, the chloroform on children abuse problem started at Croome court. This is called enabling criminals, and has nothing to do with me, that is their program. 

Discrediting us whistle blowers enables the regime. And even law enforcement told me that, the people who discredit you are enabling all these criminals. You guys got rid of me, and then the chloroform gang was enabled. That makes all the people who helped get rid of me -- co-partnered enablers of these odious crimes. 

Mistreating children is a crime, and if only us narcissists know it is a crime, then you are less than us. But even the HKC Jaipur people say the same thing, only us drunks and sahajiyas know that mass child abuse is a crime, that means they don't know, only we do. 

That means you guys are not as advanced as us narcissists, drunks, sahajiyas and ISKCON's junkyard dog. Jayatirtha was a leader over me and other citizens. And that means he has the responsibility to ensure the safety and well being of the other citizens, especially the children. 

Instead he is removing us whistle blowers, and thus removing the guard rails against child abuse, which makes him an enabler of these crimes against children. And it makes you part of the criminal team as his cheer leader.

Jayatirtha thought he was another Jesus who could absorb sins, and I told him he could not take sins. Anyone who helped him in these illusions helped him get his head whacked off and then dispatched to hell for misleading people. False gurus go to the most obnoxious regions, and so do their hand maiden defenders. 

OK that is the planet where all the actual narcissists will go and re-assemble the team there. Your guys narcissism and Jesus wanna-be-ism made thousands of children suffer, and even Jayatirtha has had to suffer, and your folks will all be held to account for encouraging all this eventually.

 

ys pd angel108b@yahoo.com

=====

ISKCON'S COW MIS-INFORMATION

JND: Recently there is a video on the news of a devotee business man in Madurai who was keeping 700 cows. In the video he says "A maharaja from ISKCON came to me and informed me these are not real cows, so I gave them all away and brought real desi breed cows". 

Because of this false philosophy being spread by ISKCON, that only desi cows are real cows, 700 cows will end up sold for slaughter, all because an ISKCON maharaj told him they are not real cows. ISKCON is the organization that has started and pushed this false philosophy that only Indian breed cows are sacred. 

Some years back (around 2018 or 2019) an article written by ISKCON Shastric Advisory Council member Hari Parshada Das was what started this philosophy, where he incorrectly and deceptively misused a fragmented quote to make the claim that western breeds are not real cows. At the time we refuted his article and showed the actual context of the quote and how it was being misused (you can see that article in the first comment).

Immediately Urmila Dasi (Edith Best) contacted me and wanted me to delete the article, saying it reflected poorly on Hari Parshada Das's position as a Sanskrit scholar (though I had not even mentioned his name in my article). She arranged a group chat with her, myself, and Hari Parshada Das, where he proceeded to curse me for the offenses I made against him.

PADA: Urmila is a big trouble maker. When I sent her an early version of PADA news, talking about child abuse, she returned my mail saying "no interest in this topic." She wanted an article deleted? Well yeah, it makes the pedophile messiah's program look bad.

After he left, she again tried to convince me to delete the article, admitting that he was wrong to have written it. At the end of the discussion she said she would "Ask Shivarama Swami", and then went on to unfriend me, while Hari Parshada Das blocked me in Facebook - all because I wouldn't delete the article I wrote, where I never even mentioned them by name.

PADA: Shivarama was a big Tamal groupie, and we had to have Tamal's program sued twice for mass child mistreatment. Asking Shivarama is asking the cheer leaders of the pedophile messiah's project for the right idea. They do not know the right idea.    

Now we see this philosophy has become a mainstream Hindu belief in India, and is also promoted by many politicians and devotees. At one point ISKCON invited famous politician Subramanian Swamy to an ISKCON cow protection conference, where he said openly, "only Indian breed cows should not be killed, other cows can be killed" and not a single member from ISKCON said anything against it. 

How can ISKCON hold a cow protection conference where it is said in the microphone we can kill cows if they are not desi breeds? Yet not a single person raised any objection. This philosophy is completely against the position Srila Prabhupada had regarding cows. It is recorded that Srila Prabhupada wanted to import foreign breeds of cows to Vrindavan, and he said they are very nice. 

He never said they are not real cows, or that only desi breeds are sacred.

Again and again we hear cases, like in the recent news video, of devotees abandoning protected cows because someone has told them they are not the "sacred breed". There is no device to measure how many of the 33 crore devatas are in an animal. Neither is there a device to measure the three modes of nature in an animal or the level of sacredness. Such talk is pointless.

Everyone knows what a dog is. You don't look at the breed and then say, that's not a dog, he isn't a desi breed dog. Everyone knows what a cat is. You don't exclude other cats because they aren't desi breeds. Somehow when it comes to cows, these people now believe, despite all science, that only desi breeds are cows, and other breeds are another animal. 

Who profits from this philosophy? The killers of cows. It justifies and gives them a sanction to kill 90 percent of the cows in India without repercussion, because they are not "sacred".

Both humans and animals (and even plants) can be selectively bred for certain traits to become prominent. In the west some breeds of cows (not all breeds) have been selectively bred to produce more beef, some have been bred to be hornless, some have been bred to be less aggressive, some have been bred to produce more milk, etc. Despite whatever positive or negative trait an animal may have, it doesn't become a new species. 

Humans have also been bred sometimes for slavery or manual labor over centuries. Dogs have been bred, sometimes to create ferocious breeds like pitbulls. Many times the motivation of this selective breeding is demonic, and the animals are a victim. Regardless, they never stop being the species they were.

If you want to know whether a cow is sattvic, live with cows, serve cows, interact with cows, and speak with cows. Then you will know what are cows and what is their nature. Desi cows do not differentiate the Jersey cows they live with, only the humans are making this distinction, a distinction that will ultimately support, justify and increase cow slaughter, while providing a supposed religious justification.

This is not just a discussion as to which breed is more beautiful, which is more friendly, which has better milk, etc. They have directly stated, "they are not cows", they are not sacred, they are not worshipable, they are not unkillable. Can you understand how sinful such a statement is?

Everyone may have a favorite breed of dog or cow, or someone may favor one milk taste over another, someone may say one color of cow is more beautiful, that is all irrelevant. They are saying these are not cows and are not sacred. They have passed a death judgement on them.

Yes, some cow may be more beautiful, some cow may have nicer features, some cow may be very friendly, some cow's milk may be very sweet, but they are all cows and are all sacred. Where are the ISKCON leaders who are willing to stand up and speak in defense of mother cow? They are silent just like they are silent when the children are abused and molested in their schools.

jani’ sakshi nahi deya, tara papa haya

"A person who knows things as they are and still does not bear witness becomes involved in sinful activities." - Chaitanya Charitamrita 2.5.90

PADA: Yep, the ICC Scholars Bureau people told me -- you are a mleccha. They are on the bodily platform of illusion. And that is why they support the pedophile messiahs program, they think the guru parampara is full of mundane and contaminated fools, who engaged in sinful acts, and it is not exclusively pure devotees. Now they are taking their bodily identity idea to -- the cows? ys pd

========

(Excerpt from 'Brahmana & Vaishnava' by Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakur)

"There are four varnas - brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya, and sudra. According to the statements of the Vedas, the brahmanas are the highest class. This is confirmed by the smrtis as well. Therefore the question now comes: Who is a brahmana? The living entity, the body, the caste, the knowledge, the activities, or the religionist - of these, which is the brahmana? 

If it is proposed that the living entity is the brahmana, that is not correct. The living entity remains the same in the past, present, or future. Though he receives various types of bodies according to his karma, he remains unchanged. Therefore the living entity is not the brahmana. 

Then is the body the brahmana? No, it is not. The bodies of human beings down to the candala are all made of the same five gross elements. Therefore birth and death and religion and irreligion equally effect all bodies, and since there is no law that the brahmanas are white, the ksatriyas are red, the vaisyas are yellow, and the sudras are black, the body is therefore not the brahmana. 

Moreover, when the son of a brahmana burns the body of his dead father, he does not commit the sin of killing a brahmana. Therefore the body is not the brahmana. So, then, is caste the brahmana? No, this is also not the case. Many great sages have been born of other living entities. Rsyasrnga was born from a deer, Kausika was born from kusa grass, Jambuka Rsi was born from a jackal, Valmiki was born from an ant hill, Vyasadeva was born from a fisherman's daughter, Gautama was born from the back of a rabbit, Vasistha was born from Urvasi, and Agastya was born from a pitcher. 

Apart from these personalities, there are many other wise persons born from other castes who became sages. Therefore caste is not the brahmana. So, then, is knowledge the brahmana? No, it is not that either. Because many persons, such as some ksatriyas, were very learned and knew the Absolute Truth. Therefore knowledge is also not the brahmana. 

Then are activities the brahmana? No, they are not. Because every living entity shares the common nature of having to suffer the matured reactions of his karma that come to him in the future. By karma, human beings are engaged in further karma. 

Therefore activities are not the brahmana. Then is the religionist the brahmana? No, he is not. Because many ksatriyas give gold in charity. Therefore the religionist is not the brahmana. Then who is the brahmana? 

Anyone who knows the Self as one; devoid of mundane caste, qualities, and activities; devoid of contamination by the six enemies and six waves; the personification of transcendental knowledge and bliss; beyond duality, yet the basis of all material dualities; the Supersoul of all living entities; all-pervading inside and outside like the vast sky; endowed with uninterrupted bliss; immeasurable; known only through spiritual realization; and directly self-manifesting one who directly realizes the Self (as one sees an amlaki fruit in the palm of his hand), who lives always satisfied, devoid of faults like lust and anger, who posesses qualities like peacefulness and self-control, who is devoid of envy, the thirst for material enjoyment, illusion, and other faults, and who is untouched by pride, false ego, and so on - such a person is a brahmana. 

This is also the opinion of the srutis, smrtis, Itihasas, Puranas, and other scriptures. Otherwise one cannot be a real brahmana. The Upanisads instruct us that the Supreme Soul is sac-cid-ananda and the Absolute Truth, one without a second."