Saturday, November 11, 2017

Fundamentalist Church Losing More Youth

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/report-woman-says-roy-moore-initiated-sexual-activity-when-she-n819426


More and more victims coming forward to raise abuse allegations.

PADA: There are reports that an increasing number modern day Christians, especially the youth sector living in places like "The Bible Belt" (southern USA) are rejecting their faith because of rampant hypocrisy. Main case in point: various big church leaders and / or the politicians the Church supports appear to be corrupt, and as such they should not be supported. 

Instead, corrupt folks are often being forwarded as the Church and / or political leaders of the "Christian" community. Recently there has also been a flood of abuse victims coming forward, and they are also exposing Hollywood elites, as well as some "Christian conservative" political leaders simultaneously. 

"Its an avalanche" as one report suggests. 

What is interesting is that more and more of the Christian youth as a class are rejecting the elders and the formal religion, because of the double standard of (a) preaching that we need to oppose deviants as religious or political leaders, while (b) practicing supporting and promoting deviants as leaders of the Christian community. 

This is largely what has happened in ISKCON. The leaders have been complicit in corruption, and the youth as a class have rejected the religion. Before ISKCON can regain credibility with its alienated youth, it needs to present credible leadership. A common complaint we hear from some of the ex-youth is that the same leadership group that created the mass exodus, scandals, abuse, embezzling, lawsuits, murders, and so on -- are still pretty much in charge. 

Worse, some GBC's biggest leaders buried Kirtanananda in a samadhi. 

Recently we were told the GBC will appoint Radhanath, Devamrita and Vaisesika as the "new managers" of New  York temple in Brooklyn. What? Some of the same people who buried Kirtanananda in a samadhi are going to fix things? Often, the lieutenants or helpmates of the original deviants are in charge. This has to change, or else the ISKCON religion will empty out just as the Christian faith is losing membership. ys pd        

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/04/breaking-faith/517785/


https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/m/994a063e-993a-3f68-aba5-867aa552ec09/ss_why-millennial-women-are.html



Krishna Hankers to see Radha (Video)


Thursday, November 9, 2017

Delhi is "A Gas Chamber"

https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/5459328c-81b6-3288-b695-303d06bd573a/ss_%22gas-chamber%22-delhi-10-times.html

PADA: A devotee friend got stuck in Delhi trying to get to Vrndavana after their bus was cancelled, and they suffered intense headaches, blurred vision, shortness of breath, nausea and other distressful ailments from the toxic smoke. It seems like India and extreme use of technology are -- not a good idea. They were upset that while they could get out of there eventually, the cows cannot escape, they are stuck there to suffer until they die. ys pd 

Conversation with ISKCON GBC and Sridhara Maharaja #4

Second Conversation With Srila Sridhara Maharaja, Part 4

BY: SUN EDITORS

Nov 06, 2017 — CANADA (SUN) —

BCS: Bengali: 


Dhira Krsna Maharaja says that Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Thakur will not tolerate any conclusions which are against the ideas of Srila Rupa Goswami. He will not tolerate them at all. That all the apa siddhantas should be done away with and in that case is it not also our duty to act under the same instruction not to tolerate the apa siddhantas.

[PADA: It was well known all along that various GBC leaders were falling down left, right and center. Again very well known and -- all along -- during the 1960s - 1970s. Why would the falling down sector magically become pure devotees and acharyas all of a sudden -- simply by dint of the fact that Srila Prabhupada had departed? And why would it not be apa siddhanta to declare people with such a dubious track of record of failing -- as acharyas? And why do Rocana and others keep insisting these falling down folks were meant to be worshiped as acharyas and to become Srila Prabhupada's diksha guru successors?


Is is not an offense to say that the successors to God are often falling and deviating? 

Dhira (Sudhir) Krishna has become a big defender of Sridhara Maharaja, who supported the GBC's guru appointment idea, but there is no evidence 11 gurus were appointed? Before we discuss what is proper siddhanta and what is not, should we not establish first of all -- whether or not conditioned neophytes can take the post of acharya? 

Shouldn't "evidence of the guru appointment" be the first topic being discussed, and what are the specific guidelines and policies that Srila Prabhupada gave for how these "11 appointed acharyas" are to operate? Why was there no discussion of how this process was going to operate according to Srila Prabhupada, rather Sridhara Maharaja was being asked how it would operate? 

The fact that Sridhara Maharaja is being asked how this so-called appointed guru process is going to operate proves, there are no other guidelines given by Srila Prabhupada on this process, because he did not order an appointed guru process. When Satsvarupa said that Srila Prabhupada told the GBC to go to Sridhara Maharaja to get instructions on how the appointed guru program would function, that itself proves, there are no "orders" from Srila Prabhupada to make this process.]  

SM: Of course. Two things, one positive and one negative. Negative, atattva, which is not truth, to eliminate that, and tolerance around what is truth, we have to culture cultivate that. These two aspects of the life, of the activities of everyone's life two things: elimination of the undesirable and to acceptance of the desirable. Every second, every point of life, every second we have to do that. Krsna. Hare Krsna.

DKS: Well, I mean I have more questions, after that one question was answered… well, how are they seen in relation to that question. One point was from yesterday. The lowest level description he gave of a madhyama adhikari was one of has both feet in this world, but who has, who is, he said he is "fully experiencing the divine place" so he can… and he says that he can clearly see the divine … so we don't see anyone who practically fits even this lowest description of the madhyama-adhikari guru. Well, I just want to confirm…

[PADA: Hee hee, yes, they even admit they are discussing people who have "both feet in the material world." How can such persons be worshiped as liberated acharyas? Rocana and Kailash keep saying there can be Madhyama diksha gurus, but herein people on the scene admit these 11 GBC are not even on the lowest rungs of the Madhyama platform. So they are kanistha at best, which means literally "the qualified brahmana platform," but they are barely even that level.] 

BCS: Bengali:


Translates the above into Bengali and then further adds that from the descriptions of the third class guru, none of the present eleven acaryas fit even to that category. So what are we then supposed to do with this present situation?

[PADA: Right, it was clear -- even from the out set -- that these 11 people were barely fit even for the third class platform. And this was being relayed to Sridhara Maharaja, so he knew they were not qualified to be acharyas. And so did Bhakti Caru swami and many / most others know this as well. Didn't Rocana also know that these people were faling on a regular basis? Why would they all agree that the failing sector are simultaneously the acharya sector, unless they never understood what is an acharya from square one? Yep, none of the 11 are even fit to be in the third class guru designation, therefore, lets make them full blown acharyas?] 

SM: And if it's going, it is in his view, he is also going and taking the whole retinue with him.

DKS: At most we have some general view.

BCS: Bengali: Not only are both their feet firmly planted in this material world, but also their vision is very much in this material world.

[PADA: Wow, these 11 have BOTH their feet planted in the material world, and their vision is clouded by the material energy. So it was clear to Sridhara Maharaja, Dhira Krishna swami, BCS and others, and of course Rocana et al. that the 11 are conditioned souls, thus not qualified to be gurus or acharyas.] 


SBD: If none of them fit even this lowest category of guru then what is to be done by others who are part of the society?

[PADA: Great question. What is going to happen to the other 5,000 disciples of Srila Prabhupada who may not want to support these "two feet in the material world" "not yet Madhyama" gurus?]

SM: The question will come, this sort of vision is coming from what section? That is to be examined, the foundation on which you stand. That is that soil is to be examined by particular cases. If you like my advice about the decision then particular cases should be given to me.

SBD: Particular persons, and their personalities.

SM: The personal defects, the sample of personal defects. "This is the objectionable practice, in this gentleman. Is it bona fide? And spiritual color? Spiritual color or mundane color?

DKS: We don't want to embarrass him with the details.

SM: So in this action we think it to be mundane but if it may have any spiritual color? The particular case you may put before me and I shall try to understand. If such…

DKS: I am saying that I don't want to embarrass him with any unpalatable details.

[PADA: Now it is further clarified, not only the 11 have two feet here in the mundane world, they have a tendency to act in an unpalatable (fallen) manner, or even a depraved manner. OK, some of the 11 might tend to be sexual predators or worse, and all this was made clear to Sridhara Maharaja right out of the gate. So they may at any moment act in an abominable and unpalatable manner, therefore, they are acharyas? Is this not an attack on the acharya platform?]


BCS: translates

SM: kanak, kamini, pratistha. Generally those undesirable activities will come under these three groups. Prathistha is find, that one wants to take the credit, the whole credit within his clutches, just as you say about (name). (name) says that "I am the person who has received the maximum grace of guru maharaja and confidence." 


That is pratistha, may come into the category of pratistha. Another is kanak, means money, men and money. hmm. The power. He is very … he has got thirst, unquenchable thirst to acquire money, men and power. Must have power. Another is kamini, that he is falling prey to the women. Hmm. charm, and mixing beyond the limit. These three classes complaint may come, and highest is prathistha, and in there also it may include that he is even, he's excluding guru maharaja and he's trying to take his position that he is greater than him.

[PADA: He has two feet here, and he wants to be recognized as the acharya. That means he is already "trying to take his guru's position" or worse, he is saying "that he is greater than" his guru. Again, shows that many people were well aware of the fallen nature of the 11, and it was being predicted the types of failures they could, or eventually would succumb to.] 

DKS: Like he once said to one of Prabhupada's disciples, he inferred that Prabhu… he said, "You must serve a person, not a concept." So he was inferring that Srila Prabhupada was reduced to a concept and he was the living embodiment of this guru tattva.

BCS: Bengali… you cannot serve a concept… Prabhupada is not a person now, he is only a concept… he reduced Srila Prabhupada to a concept … I am the person so you must serve me, must go through me…

[PADA: Now they are discussing that Srila Prabhupada is clearly being minimized, while the bogus 11 are being artificially conflated to the post of acharya. So they all knew Srila Prabhupada was being minimized, and they also knew the strategies and techniques that were being used to minimize him.]


SM: guru bhognike This is not objectionable to the extreme, but partially objectionable because, suppose there are five sons of a father and the eldest son says to the youngest, "You don't know the ways how to satisfy the father. You must what I shall say. You do that to please my departed father. These things were very favorite, to offer these things…" 

This sort of advice may be given. If it is in… such color then of course it is innocent. That I have got more experience about Prabhupada's nature so if you really want to do favorite work of Prabhupada, you use my experience, this will help you a great deal. Don't try to connect direct … connection … relation with him. You'll be deceived. You'll not able to come to his concrete self, it will be only vague. This sort of…

[PADA: Guru bhoghi, yes a person who desires to enjoy the post of his guru. How does that qualify them to be gurus? Guru bhogha, that means Sridhara Maharaja is identifying that they are possibly or probably diseased and contaminated with the desire for guru position. Why was this issue not discussed threadbare, that they have two feet in the material world, perhaps their only qualification is -- sheer audacity and blind ambition, aka guru bhognike.]

BCS: Maharaja, we heard about the characteristics of a parama-hamsa, that he extracts the nectar. Separates the milk from water, and he takes the milk That now we can see in you the manifestation of that quality, like from… you are always taking the nectar…

SM: ki bolche? (What is he saying?)

SBD: repeats the statement in Bengali

SM: (laughing) Bright side…

Bengali:

SM: Yes, I am simply trying to see the brighter side of it so that we may not commit any mistakes against the other party. We must always see the brighter side. Let me say this in Bengali. When Srila Prabhupada disappeared, left this planet, then Vasudeva was made the acarya and then many senior disciples like Nemi Maharaja objected. 

He said that when a branch is directly connected with the trunk and he is then asked to connect himself with another branch, is that possible? This was the argument he forwarded. And then I started pleading the case of Vasudeva because he was like my elder brother. I said, according to Srila Rupa Goswami the service to a devotee is the greatest and it is at the same time service to the Supreme Lord. Although the bhakta is only a part, but yet by serving the bhakta even Lord Krsna is receiving the service, is being served. 

By trying to serve the Lord directly, the Lord might be served or may not be served. But by serving the Lord's devotee, definitely both the devotee as well as the Lord, is served thereby. The Srila Rupanuga vicar according to Srila Rupa Goswami is that once you serve the sadhu, the guru, vaisnava, then the Lord is also being served. So that is how I approached this particular situation. That if an elder godbrother is being served and through him our guru is being served, then we are being successful in our devotional life and when the senior godbrother is very favored of the Lord, is dear to the Lord, then I am serving the guru through him and ultimately the Lord Himself. This is the conclusion. 
[-->]

[PADA: Correct, Sridhara Maharaja said serving falling down people like Ananta Vasudeva is serving Krishna. Its not.]  

My own speculation might say so many things but this is the actual conclusion of the sastras so when I am approaching such a subject I should be very careful so as not to commit any mistake. I should always see the brighter side to avoid any mistake. 


[PADA: Seeing the brighter side of neophytes posing as acharyas is a mistake in itself? We should see the brighter side of the pirates taking over the ship, ok then we will lose the ship and all its passengers?] 

We must eliminate all the undesirable elements and try to see the brighter side of everything. Judging it very exhaustively in order not to make any mistake and then even if we fail in that endeavor, then of course there is nothing left for us to do. There is no recourse to that. Do you understand? We must see all the possibilities from their point of view. 

We must choose all the possible arguments they might face. Once the great learned advocate Rajmeri Gosh came to the court quite drunk and started pleading the case of his opponent and the lawyer Abhira of the other side was looking on quite amazed at this thing. He was thinking that "This advocate is stating all the facts and points of my client." And then the junior advocate of Rajmeri Gosh suddenly reminded him that, "Sir what are you doing? You are stating all the arguments for your opponent." 

The advocate exclaimed, "Is it so?" Then he started telling the judge that, "You honor, these are the different points and arguments my opponent may raise, so now I am placing forward my argument, the points I want to bring to you." And when he started speaking about the points he originally wanted to say for his own client, then the other lawyer was quite dumbfounded and had practically nothing to say. 

So all the arguments that the other party might want to give, we shall discuss them in detail and bring out the salient points so that we might not make any mistakes. We must be aware that we are not influenced by any prejudices. Just like they are being influenced by prejudices, we should be careful not to commit the same mistake. We must be well-guarded so that we are not led astray of the path of truth.

English: We must be safe. To make our position safe we shall try our best not to commit any mistake, so we shall try to see the bright side of the other party, eh? This may be like that, you see… (Bengali re: Vasudeva Prabhu) … the friend of mine on the other party may say as much like this something now, please hear that I am cutting everything… Bengali…

SBD: Bengali:
Maharaja, the advice (name) gave his godsister (name), she joined much earlier to (name) and had Srila Prabhupada's association from earlier times and longer.

SM: Bengali:

Not everything can be judged according to the time span. Just like Bhakti Caru Swami, he came much later and became very beloved of Srila Prabhupada. Not everything can be judged according to the time factor.

English: Seniority is not the only criterion.


[PADA: Great, so they almost all knew all along the 11 are not fit to be acharyas, but they crammed that forward anyway. That means Sridhara Maharaja and everyone who knew this was wrong from the outset is responsible for the ensuing: banning, beating, molesting, murders, degradation of the acharya post, bad publicity, scandals and so on ad infinitum; -- which all happened as a result of their helping the promoting of conditioned souls as de facto messiahs. Yep, they are not acharyas, but we should forget that, look to the bright side and pretend that they are, and then chaos, scandals and murders will be the result. 

Now the GBC is holding "management classes" where they say, "we have to learn from our (acharya's) mistakes," so they are officially now saying acharyas are defective people who make mistakes, who fall down, who make scandals and etc. This is the result of all this, the acharya is now a mundane person who has "two feet here."

ys pd]

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Stephen Hawking: Earth Will Turn into Hell



https://www.yahoo.com/news/stephen-hawking-latest-doomsday-prediction-031307653.html

[PADA: This guy really does not have a lot of confidence in the future of the modern technological lifestyle. The scientists do not have faith in their mundane science created lifestyle? Neither do a lot of other people have much faith in the current situation, i.e. those who believe Kali Yuga is marching forward and indeed, this will make the earth into a hellish region. ys pd] 

=======================

Delhi is "a gas chamber"

 https://www.yahoo.com/news/authorities-declare-public-health-emergency-053359086.html

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

De-monetizing India has hurt the Rural sector

Kill Guru and Become Guru "Critical Thinking Required"

Ch. 55 KILL GURU BECOME GURU: POISONING SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BODY, continued:


CRITICAL, ANALYTICAL THINKING IS REQUIRED TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUTH
Critical, analytical thinking is required to reach an enlightened and clear understanding of the evidence that implicates certain persons in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, starting with the foremost suspect Tamal Krishna Goswami. Unbiased readers who carefully study the total evidence presented herein can appreciate the facts as to how Tamal was the “bad apple” or “bad disciple” cited in the quote at the beginning of the section. 

By the last chapter of this section, it will be established beyond a reasonable doubt that Tamal not only physically poisoned Srila Prabhupada, but was also the leader in poisoning Srila Prabhupada’s institution as well. The evidence will move an objective examiner from seeing Tamal as a suspect to being the poisoner of Srila Prabhupada and his movement. 

Critical thinking is also called critical analysis, and is the objective evaluation of an issue to form a judgment; it is clear, rational thinking involving critique. Two further definitions of critical thinking are:

1) The process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information to reach a conclusion

2) Disciplined thinking that is clear, rational, open-minded, and informed by evidence

FROM WIKIPEDIA: Critical thinking is an important element of all professional fields and academic disciplines. Within the framework of scientific skepticism, the process of critical thinking involves the careful acquisition and interpretation of information and use of it to reach a well-justified conclusion. Critical thinking is considered important in the academic fields because it enables one to analyze, evaluate, explain, and restructure their thinking, thereby decreasing the risk of adopting, acting on, or thinking with, a false belief. 

Critical thinking includes identification of prejudice, bias, propaganda, self-deception, distortion, misinformation, etc. Critical thinking is used as a way of deciding whether a claim is true, partially true, or false. It is a tool by which one can reach reasoned conclusions based on a reasoned process.

THE NECESSITY OF REVIEWING TAMAL’S LIFE RECORD

The following chapters will review the available record of Tamal’s life and activities. Could he have actually been involved in the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada? The facts and evidence will paint the picture. The reader must make the judgement carefully.

Tamal’s duplicity, immense ambitions, and very checkered history will illustrate that Tamal was an enigmatic paradox: ostensibly living as a Vaishnava, but also fully capable of horrendous deeds. Those with weak stomachs, thin skins, or fear of offending Tamal’s ghost or memory might like to skip the next 16 chapters. Srila Prabhupada engaged Tamal in his service and often appeared to depend on Tamal’s service. There is no doubt Tamal rendered great service to Srila Prabhupada in his 34 years in ISKCON, which is due to Srila Prabhupada’s mercy. But Srila Prabhupada accepted the services of all those that Krishna sent to him, and he rarely refused any service, if ever.

Distasteful as it may be, it is necessary to pursue the facts and truth of Tamal’s life to:

• Understand the nature of his personal ambition,

• Appraise the value of his words, actions, and writings, such as TKG's Diary, his account of Srila Prabhupada's illness and events in 1977,

• Safeguard against misinformation which obscures the truth about the poison issue, and many other issues critical to the welfare of Srila Prabhupada’s mission,

• Uncover the rationale behind his multiple, changing interpretations of the guru and initiation systems,

• Ascertain if he had the motive to poison Srila Prabhupada, and

• Understand how Tamal has systematically over many years subordinated Srila Prabhupada’s instructions to his own ideas and goals.

It is because there is so much at stake in the restoration of Srila Prabhupada’s mission that it becomes necessary to examine Tamal’s legacy in detail. Tamal’s life was one of expert manipulation and exertion of his powerful influence on a genuine spiritual movement, and to study the Hare Krishna movement we also have to study Tamal. Later in Part Seven we will ascertain the results of our careful and thorough studies.

“I knew Tamal personally: I was always wary he might lose his temper, as I had seen him do before, once with me over not much at all, but he seemed to be dedicated to the mission and to pleasing Srila Prabhupada. The only reason to examine his dark side is because Tamal is so much responsible for today’s deviant policies and doctrines in ISKCON. So, to confront these anomalies and to try to restore the mission, sometimes one must carefully dig out the dirt so it can be recognized clearly and then disposed of properly and effectively. 

If we simply go on chanting without ferreting out the weeds that are being watered along with the chanting process, soon those weeds, which were largely planted in ISKCON by Tamal, will become prominent and overwhelm us. Sometimes the situation is critical and for the sake of the many who are being misled, a spade must be called a spade and then dealt with accordingly.” (Nityananda das, 2016)

DIVINE AND DEMONIAC NATURES ARE MIXED IN THE CONDITIONED SOULS

We live in this nasty fallen age of Kali Yuga, and it would be naïve to expect that this nastiness would not affect our spiritual family and organization, the Hare Krishna movement, or ISKCON. The institution, its participants, and everyone else in this material world are subject to the contaminations of the three modes of nature, which can lead to the worst kinds of corruptions and abominations. For spiritualists to transcend all danger of degradation depends on three things:

1) Spiritual sincerity as exhibited in our standards of sadhana, or spiritual practices.
2) Renunciation and purification of material desires and ambitions harbored in our hearts and minds.
3) Service to the acharya without offenses.

“Let people chant the Hare Krishna mantra constantly. Then their demoniac tendencies will be killed, and they will become first-class devotees, happy in this life and in the next.” SBhag 10.1.64, Purport
Everyone and everything in this material world, save and except the real pure devotee such as Srila Prabhupada, is under the influence of a combination of the divine and demoniac natures. This is explained in the Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 16. We should not be so naïve and gullible to think that all the leaders in the modern Krishna consciousness movement are totally divine and can do no wrong. This can be seen by their activities and the results. In this section we examine Tamal Krishna Goswami, his words, deeds, philosophy, life, and books -- to profile his actual character and psychology.

It may be surely said that Tamal Krishna rendered significant and valuable services to Srila Prabhupada. Accounts of his “divine” service and accomplishments are impressive. This is fully recognized. However, Tamal’s mundane or “demoniac” nature is also well-known; it is of such depth that it is shocking. Faced with this contradiction, there is no alternative but to analyze Tamal’s words, writing, and other actions to determine his involvement in the now-proven poisoning of His Divine Grace.
“Our duty is therefore to be very, very careful. The poison is personal ambition.”
--Srila Prabhupada letter from Bombay, Nov. 1, 1970.

QUOTES FROM SRILA PRABHUPADA

(1). “The specific words used in this sloka are vama-svabhava, "mild and gentle by nature." A good man or woman accepts anything very easily, but a man of average intelligence does not do so. But, anyway, we should not give up our reason and discriminatory power just to be gentle. One must have good discriminatory power to judge a thing on its merit. We should not follow the mild nature of a woman and thereby accept that which is not genuine.” (SB 1.7.42)

(2). “We have to defeat tryany in the realm of thought, and create a will for world peace.” (BTG, March 1956)

(3). “They desire to be worshiped by others, and demand respectability, although they do not command respect.” (BGita 16.4 Purport)

(4). “Satyam, truthfulness, means that facts should be presented as they are, for the benefit of others. Facts should not be misrepresented. According to social conventions, it is said that one can speak the truth only when it is palatable to others. But that is not truthfulness. The truth should be spoken in a straightforward way, so that others will understand actually what the facts are. If a man is a thief and if people are warned that he is a thief, that is truth. Although sometimes the truth is unpalatable, one should not refrain from speaking it. Truthfulness demands that the facts be presented as they are for the benefit of others. That is the definition of truth.” (BG 10.4-5)
On a morning walk in Los Angeles, July 13, 1974, Srila Prabhupada pinpointed some activity by some devotees that he characterized as politics, diplomacy, fraud, cheating, and he mentioned their names to those on the walk. From this we understand that these things must be addressed openly, not remaining silent and going along to get along, and thus allowing them to “spoil the movement.” Of course, one must do so in consultation with other devotees, preferably senior devotees, and do so with full reference to shastra and Srila Prabhupada’s instructions. 

Individual loose cannons can cause a lot of undue damage.

[PADA: This same basic "loose cannon" type thinking is happening now with the neo-Nazi crew of Sanat, Mukunda, Prahlad (Paul Coats?) and their Dayalu Nitai HKC Jaipur allies. Their program is trying to make videos to connect Hitler, Nazi-ism, anti-semitism and so many other mundane programs to Krishna, thus they are dedicating their lives to giving Krishna a bad name intentionally. So many devotees have wrote to us to complain about these folks, but they are just like the GBC, they do not care what the devotees think. 

For example, members of Dayalu Nitai's HKC Jaipur kept sending me links to Prahlad -- who has been advertising Mukunda and their neo-Nazi process. I kept telling the HKC folks repeatedly, we cannot connect ourselves to these mundane things, which simply encouraged them to re-send me the links! 

A "karmi" writer has recently asked me about their web sites -- which are full of pro-Hitler materials, Illuminati propaganda etc. and this writer has been asking me if these Mukunda people represent the whole religion? Me and the writer also discussed how Mukunda advertises conspiracy folks like Alex Jones, who was recently cited by the Food and Drug administration for having toxic levels of lead in his Paleo diet Chicken Bone soup. So Prahlad wants people to buy into advertising his Paleo Chicken Bone soup (with lead) program, and the Dayalu Nitai HKC Jaipur folks are advertising this man and his sites? And these guys are all upset with PADA because we will not help them advertise all this?  

How is all of this connected to Krishna? 

It isn't, they are trying to tie Krishna together with all this because they are intent on connecting Krishna's name to all their concocted foolishness, hence they are loose cannons as described above. The GBC wants to link Krishna to their foolishness, and so do these guys.

Even this writer agrees, all they are doing is intentionally giving Krishna a bad name, period. At the same time they are very proud of promoting these deviations in the name of Krishna. Prahlad for example tells me Mukunda's neo-Nazi and Chicken Bone Paleo soup program is wonderful because "its getting lots of hits." 

Fine, and the Miami Beach Bikini contest videos are also getting lots of hits, that is the criteria of truth for these people? Yep, also Paleo Chicken soup recipes gets lots of hits, so -- its wonderful? Then again this lot also attacked Nityananda dasa, apparently they are upset someone is pursuing the poison issue. 

Unfortunately all they (and the GBC) are doing is creating confusion, if not a totally rotten impression of Krishna, for people like this writer. I might be able to at least partially fix the giant mess they are creating with this author, but maybe not. Anyway, the good news is, at least a number of devotees see that these people are going the wrong way, and they write complaints about them to me regularly.] 

=============================

http://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-infowars-supplements-tainted-lead-687019

PADA: Odd? Lead is also a toxic heavy metal?

==========================================

Prabhupada: Now, the Revatinandana and this man and Syamasundara is making a clique. I can understand. What they are planning, that also I know. But I don't wish to disclose it. So if these things come, then how this movement will go on? Politics, diplomacy, fraud, cheating, these are the general qualification of the western countries. 

Jayatirtha: Sitting?

Prabhupada: Politics, diplomacy, fraud, cheating. These things are the general qualification of the western people. Do you admit or not? 

Devotees: Yes.
Prabhupada: If they are, these things come within our movement, then it will not be succesful. Tat-paratvena nirmalam [CC Mad 19.170]. 

One has to become purified. Even sometimes we have to take... But that is for Krsna's. There must be now checking that all these rascals may not join and spoil the movement. You should not admit. 

Bali Mardana: Yes. 

Prabhupada: They can come and go.

COMMENTS: The devotees that Srila Prabhupada mentioned are very devoted to Srila Prabhupada, yet somehow by the influence of some maya, they were acting at that time in a negative way. Srila Prabhupada warned that the movement could be stopped from the inside, not from the outside. Therefore it is completely legitimate to examine the internal activities of devotees inside the movement to guard against deviation.

BUT THE RASCALS WILL BECOME ANGRY WITH THE TRUTH
“No, it is due to their impurity, they do not take. What you are saying, that is pure. But the difficulty is if you instruct a rascal, he becomes angry. The example is given that if you give milk and banana to the serpent, he increases his poison. Payaḥ-panaṁ bhujaṅganaṁ kevalaṁ viṣa-vardhanam. Therefore we have to select sometimes that our preaching is in the proper place. Because a snake-like person, they will not hear. But if you are a good charmer, you can charm the snake also. (laughter) 

That depends on your quality. Just like Chaitanya Mahāprabhu did. He made these snakes, the tigers, the elephants, all dancing Hare Krishna. That is possible by Chaitanya Mahāprabhu.” (Conv, Jul 8, 1975)

Speaking the truth will be met with opposition from those that are threatened by that truth. ISKCON gurus will oppose the truth that Srila Prabhupada never appointed or authorized anyone to become a diksha-giving guru. Similarly, those who are threatened by the truth that Srila Prabhupada was actually maliciously poisoned will become angry, declaring these ideas to be “blasphemy.” This is a convenient defense for them, but truth is never blasphemy. Wrong accusations are blasphemy.

[PADA: That is what these people say about everything, exposing changed books, child molesting, abuse of women, embezzling, pot smoking gurus, you name it, its all blasphemy to address these things. And that is how all of these problems were enabled and empowered. ys pd] 

Monday, November 6, 2017

Tripurari Swami et al. "New Gita Commentary"



Tripurari Swami and Ramesvara dasa

Yes, I have also heard that Tripurari swami has joined the list of folks making their own Gita commentary. And Tripurari supports that Srila Prabhupad is wrong to say we all originated in Krishna's leela or sport. He apparently knows more than the acharya. And now he joins the list of dubious folks like Kirtanananda, Narayana Maharaja, Krishna Balarama swami and others who also make their own Gita commentary. If there is one thing Srila Prabhupada is opposed to for sure, it is various fools and / or neophytes making their own Gita re-write projects. 



I am not sure what Ramesvara's position is on all these divergent commentaries, but he certainly failed to do his duty as a trustee to insure that the original Gita of Srila Prabhupada be protected, hence the original was changed. And so now we see a flood of competing commentaries. Yes, Ramesvara helped them open up the flood gates of all these bogus commentaries by de facto allowing the changing of Srila Prabhupada's books into bogus Jayadvaita and GBC commentaries. And of course that is why he is great pals with many of these people. 

Worse. Most of these dubious people supported that conditioned souls should sit on a Vyasa seat and make pretend they can absorb sins like Jesus. Then, they sit around and re-write the Vedas to fit their bogus ideas. This has gone on since time began, bogus people making changes to the Vedas, the so-called Veda vada rata. Srila Prabhupada says it would have been better if these Veda vada rata had never even heard of the Vedas. They will face a future way worse than the ordinary mundane man, because editing the Vedas is always forbidden and its apparently way more sinful than just being a regular karmi person. 


Held hostage to housewife syndrome?

Yes, I also heard that too, that Hanuman Croatia supports these deviants as acharyas process because his wife is a disciple of one of these GBC's gurus, apparently BVKS. So he either supports one, some or many of them -- or he has to sleep on the couch. Hah hah, right, that would mean the GBC has got him by the knackers. Did we forget that the GBC as a body is supporting book changes?

Some original Srila Prabhupada disciples told me the same thing, they had married a woman who was a disciple of the GBC's gurus, so they had to keep quiet, acquiesce, and even support -- or else end up sleeping on the couch. Their wife would reject them. Its simply another example of compromise, and changing the Gita is yet another compromise which the GBC as a body is allowing by facilitating Jayadvaita swami's mass editing. Yep, agreed, these guys look like peas in a PADA.
     
ys pd





Yogi Adityanath to establish Gausalas

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/state-will-set-up-gaushala-in-every-up-district-says-yogi-adityanath/articleshow/61524669.cms

UP should make cow protection a priority issue, but what about the rest of the districts of India? A devotee sent me heart rendering photos of cows eating from a giant trash heap in Vrndavana, this is not the way to treat your mother! So this is already a big problem even in the holy dham. Lets hope this wakes up some other districts to take action. And lets see how efficient this program ends up. There is a big call to stop animal slaughter in India, and to get Narendra Modi and BJP to help pass more laws to prohibit animal slaughter etc. Fine, but how will these animals be cared for if they remain alive, and who will provide that care?

ys pd 

Sunday, November 5, 2017

Sridhara Maharaja and the ISKCON GBC



Very Little Analysis

BY: PRAHLADA NRSIMHA DAS

About the reports of the past meetings between ISKCON leaders and Sridhara Maharaja recently posted by the Sun, I see some little things. From the one which happened in 1980, I have very little to say except about the few things said by Bhakti Caru Swami in it, which are at the image of what he actually is. Bhakti Caru is maybe not a demon (not sure....) but in this case, he was and is still what he was, meaning a completely sentimental and deluded devotee. 


He is excellent for diplomacy, public relations and politics and is maybe excellent for managing a mundane religious movement. The problem is that Krsna Consciousness is precisely not a mundane religion and ISKCON is not supposed to be a mundane religious movement.

[PADA: Right, ecclesiastical appointed and voted in gurus are mundane, such as "voting for the Pope" in the Vatican. Sridhara Maharaja also instructed the GBC to "vote in" more acharyas every year at Mayapura, which they are still doing now. Of course Rocana's "constitution" agrees with Sridhara Maharaja, and says we still need to "vote in" more gurus, offer bhogha to their photos etc. Rocana is now a disciple of Sridhara Maharaja, along with Hanuman Croatia and other Vatican "guru voting" advocates.   


Rocana keeps telling us that the GBC's original 11 gurus were "appointed," and they were authorized to later on "vote in" more gurus, but that would mean Rocana thinks conditioned souls would have been appointed as acharyas, which is what Sridhara Maharaja has supported. Of course not only are these so-called acharyas appointed, their "acharya board" formed the voting block to coronate more acharyas. Yes, the town's dogs should select who shall be the King of the town? How can deviants "vote in" a bona fide guru / acharya / messiah? 

Whereas! Srila Prabhupada says -- mundane votes have no juristiction over the acharyas. So the deviants think gurus are voted in, and they accept this process as bona fide -- never mind there is no order to create a system of voting in acharyas, nor are acharyas legislated by a Governing Body. All of this is a concoction.]



Bhakti Caru swami is another guru who was "voted in" and he encourages other neophytes to take the post of messiah, and absorb sins, but this is not helping these ersatz messiahs -- at all. They are being overburdened by accepting these sins. So this is a classic symptom of false religions, they think conditioned souls can take the post of messiahs and absorb sins. And people like Bhakti Caru are encouraging this process along ...  

About the 1978 meeting, we should maybe not have a too much idyllic vision about Sridhara Maharaja. Even though it appears that Srila Prabhupada held him in high esteem, I also remember that, hearing a tape of one of his Godbrother's talks, Srila Prabhupada said that Sridhara swami was envious of him. Therefore, I don't know what were Maharaja's real intentions at this time, but his endeavour in this "entrevue" with devotees is a little strange. I will give a pessimistic version of it. Or maybe realistic.

In the GBC meeting with Sridhara Maharaja, I see first that Jayapataka Swami starts the meeting with the established postulate that Srila Prabhupada ordered 11 persons to become acaryas. Maybe Sridhara Maharaja does not know the details of what Srila Prabhupada wanted to be done after his departure. But it looks like the version which is given by Jayapataka, however, fully satisfies him. We see that he does not argue even one second about it! 

[PADA: Same problem we have with Narayana Maharaja. He said that Srila Prabhupada told him ALL of the disciples are monkeys, but then NM went along with the idea that 11 of these monkeys are the appointed guru successors. Apparently none of these Gaudiya Matha people ever considered that neophytes cannot be diksha gurus and absorb sins either? In any case, many Gaudiya Matha people bought into the "big lie" that 11 gurus had been appointed.] 

Moreover, very quickly, right in the beginning, after a very brief formal strictly necessary and unavoidable introduction, through the pretext of Bhavananda ex-so-called swami's previous class (which maybe indirectly gave this idea to Sridhara Maharaja), he starts to speak about vipralambha mood, without really explaining the actual meaning of it. 

[PADA: Right, "Vipralambha" is generally the love in separation that is exclusive to madhurya-rasa topics. What does this have to do with conditioned souls who want to pose artificially as messiahs? No explanation is ever given. Tripurari swami does the same thing, he talks about high class rasika feelings like Vipralambha, without ever explaining why Sridhara Maharaja endorses deviants as acharyas, who are allegedly in Vipralambha rasa with Krishna? 


Why are they mixing Vipralambha with deviants? 

They never explain. Rank and file devotees were also never even allowed to have their teeny sense of Vipralambha -- or feelings of separation from Srila Prabhupada in 1978 -- because immediately the GBC's guru program was crammed and foisted onto these suffering Prabhupada devotees.]

But strongly suggests to the devotees the very pernicious idea that their present situation is somehow, from this moment, even much better than theirs when Srila Prabhupada was still on the planet. 

[PADA: Well yes, some of the GBC's gurus said -- things are going even better than when Srila Prabhupada was here, this was around 1978-9. And apparently Sridhara Maharaja encouraged those foolish rationalizations to prop up their false guru process. However, this was a very pernicious idea. Self-evidently things were not going better, rather it was deteriorating rapidly.]

In the name of siddhantic truths. Vipralambha spiritual superiority and great transcendental opulence! He seems to have the desire to make the devotees feel very comfortable, optimistic and secure about their new situation. Thanks to Maharaja's magic wand, Srila Prabhupada's disappearance becomes, somehow, a very auspicious event for their spiritual life.

Of course, he probably knows that, for still conditioned souls to feel like that (so comfortable and secure) is the perfect and ideal basis and frame to fully let Maya come and enter, both in their own life and in their institution. Nothing is more favorable than that. Maharaja seems to carefully "forget" preventing the devotees that this superiority of vipralambha mood is a true reality (without deadly flaws) ONLY for self-realized devotees. 


[PADA: Correct, actual Vipralambha is experienced by pure devotees while neophytes are only able to experience some "shadow" of these moods or attachments, and these moods should not be juxtaposed together. Of course if Srila Prabhupada was poisoned, then some of these GBC's guru people were feeling happy and glad that he was gone, there was no Vipralambha (feelings of separation) at all. The mere fact that a pack of people wanted to sit on their guru's seat immediately after he departed is another sign they did not miss him, they were anxious to take his seat, and that means -- they were essentially glad he was out of their way.] 

He forgets to say that this separation from the spiritual master is also the most dangerous event and situation for those who are not in such a self-realized condition. Even more, of course, if they believe or are made-believe that this situation is itself even spiritually much better for them than the previous one. Which is curiously precisely the psychological condition that Maharaja has just created, and obviously introduced in their mind.

[PADA: Right, Sridhara Maharaja encouraged their mood of assuming they were acharyas, and this fed these illusions that overtook the society.] 

As I can see, Sridhara Maharaja will speak about the very dangerous chaos which automatically comes after the acarya's disappearance only at the 1980 meeting! 


[PADA: Right, Sridhara Maharaja knew that false gurus create chaos, yet he again supported the GBC's false gurus in 1978. He knows that false gurus create banning, beating, molesting and murders, so he supports that again?]


When it is anyway too late. The zonal acaryas got already used and attached to their wealth, prathista, positions and power. There is not anymore question for them to back out and to renounce those opulences. And as well, to their perverted new philosophy. Sridhara Maharaja seems to perfectly know that. 

[PADA: Its never too late to express the truth. Sridhara Maharaja should have said that this guru appointment is a fraud later on when it became self evident.]

At this point, he can sleep quite peacefully. In my opinion, the 1980 meeting up to this point is only anecdotal and is just an opportunity for Sridhara Maharaja to relish his success and the fruits of his work. And to have some ISKCON leaders very kindly coming and giving him naively fresh news about the ISKCON problems which he has greatly contributed to create.

Therefore, coming back to the 1978 meeting, from this ideal landscape which Sridhara Maharaja presents and the wonderful and idyllic description he makes about the new situation of the ISKCON devotees in this year '78, through this fake argument of vipralambha rasa, he probably knows that he is putting the worm in the fruit. 


[PADA: Right, endorsing false acharyas has "put a worm in the fruit." And Rocana is the current biggest advocate of promoting these false acharyas, he still advocates that they are the "appointed successors."]

After that, he has almost nothing more noxious to do and say. Everything is already perfectly done, provided the ISKCON leaders believe what he said. That's what I call a real good manipulation! Some in our Movement have still progress to make if they want to compete... Romapada Swami is still a child! 

I guess that for Sridhara Maharaja, it was anyway very easy to manipulate those new converted western devotees. That's the reason why Srila Prabhupada told his disciples not to go and see his Godbrothers. But, of course, the very first thing they did.........VLAAAM! I knew a French ISKCON devotee who took shelter of Sridhara Maharaja in the late 80's. Surprisingly, he became very much a declared enemy of ISKCON and even of Srila Prabhupada.

And we can see, indeed, that after this crucial point of vipralambha mood was expressed, what follows seems to be almost perfectly parampara, except if I was inattentive. Only the very end looks again very pernicious. We will see that later. Maharaja is a little complacent with the idea of non self-realized gurus but also introduces the notion and words of "relative" and "absolute". 


[PADA: Right, Sridhara Maharaja came up with this notion that acharyas are simultaneously absolute and relative, which simply confuses people. Gold is simultaneously, the metal of a rusty tin can?

Sridhara Maharaja also said: Some gurus have both feet in the spiritual world; Some have one foot here and one foot there; And some have both feet here. What? If a person has one foot with Krishna and one foot with Maya, he is not yet liberated, he is not yet a guru. He is a mixed devotee, and that means he is prone to failure, fall down, deviation and so forth. As such -- he should not be declared as a guru. My guru is absolute, and relative? And he has both feet in Krishna's realm; Ooops no hold it, actually one foot there and one foot here; Ooops hold it, actually both feet here?]  

So he clearly defines the difference between both conditions. Therefore, there is nothing really to argue about it, except about the actual use of such relative gurus. But that is another subject. So, Maharaja can afford, at this point, to go on with the meeting, being completely parampara. Why take the risk and why bother himself to be aparampara any longer?

Later, there is this discussion about the collective photos of the new acaryas and the one who will be in the center, according to who is the guru of devotees. By itself, all that is not so important, except that it was maybe the unique reason why the "acaryas" decided to have their own geographical zone in order to solve this very impossible photo problem! Lol.

[PADA: Yes, Sridhara Maharaja said there will be the acharya of the zone, which is already a relative plane idea of acharyas. Same thing when he said acharyas can go mad after money, women and followers. Relative plane idea.]

At the end of this meeting, it looks that it is time for Sridhara Maharaja to finish with a firework display. Therefore, he introduces this idea that the dress and the function make ultimately make the man. To put the dress of acarya will, sooner or later, makes you an acarya. Wonderful! 


[PADA: Right, lets wear a brain surgeon uniform, and this will make us brain surgeons! Yas think so pilgrims?]


Let's make a material parallel... Let's suppose that someone has not his diploma of surgeon and is even very very far from having finished his studies. But never mind! Let's us give him (her) the right to be surgeon and he will learn everything which is still missing in his education by doing his job. Great! Personally, frankly speaking, I do nevertheless prefer not to be his patient!!! 

But it is right, however, that after killing one hundred patients, he will maybe learn something from those experiences, with God's help and mercy, and will save person number 101. And will start a new series of 100 other patients who will have another kind of pathology and will, at last, maybe save the lucky number 201 and possibly the number 202. Therefore, somewhere, there is some kind of success... Personally, I don't want to depend on this surgeon, but if you really want to be his guinea-pig, I can give you his telephone number. Just let me know!



Is this art from their artist acharya?


[PADA: Right, ISKCON was Sridhara Maharaja's guinea pig experiment. Lets make a pile of false messiahs and they will "learn on the job." Right, would you want your brain surgeon to be learning on the job, or would you want a trained person? And if these gurus are saying their acharyas are often deviants, as the GBC gurus are saying, how will their situation ever get better if they advocate that acharyas are often defective, which means, acharyas cannot ever be rectified since they are forever fallible souls? Anyway, this is good, we need to go back and see where ISKCON took the wrong turn in the road. ys pd] 

Saturday, November 4, 2017

Hanuman's (Croatia) Taxi Driver Sex Guru Sampradaya (update)


Hanuman das (Croatia)

Srila Prabhupada is -- a zombie?



Or? Hanuman's guru sampradaya members becoming zombies?

[PADA: Wow! Srila Prabhupada said we neophytes cannot be diksha gurus and absorb sins, it will take us down. Yet! After all the fall down, sickness, premature death -- and endless assorted sufferings -- that Hanuman's GBC's gurus are enduring from accepting sins without authority, Hanuman wants them to take on EVEN more sins! Yep, load us up with boatloads of more sins and contamination, there has not been enough suffering over here yet!

Hanuman really wants to pile them up with so much sinful reaction baggage, they will have to suffer numerous future lives to burn off all this accumulated karma. One of these Hanuman's GBC gurus was on his way to the hospital for treatment of his terminal illness and someone was touching his feet as he went out the door, so he could take on -- yet another boat load of karma! 

All of this seems to be making Hanuman's guru sampradaya look more and more, like zombies? Why does Hanuman want more of his guru parampara members to fall down, get sick, suffer, and / or die prematurely?, and take boatloads of sins with them into the next life since there is no way they can EVER burn them off in this life? Srila Prabhupada said we neophytes cannot absorb sins and if we do we will suffer severe consequences.] 

==================================================
  

Ritvik Sri Gurvastakam challenge (Hanuman das Croatia) 

[PADA: Oh no! Not only does Hanuman das say that worship of Srila Prabhupada is "zombie" worship, he says his GBC's illicit sex with men, women and children GBC guru parampara can have the "Guruvastakam Prayers" sang to them. Why does Hanuman keep saying that people who are supporting a guru parampara that is often engaged in illicit sex is -- assisting the gopis?  

And Hanuman says people like Bhakti Vikas swami are authorized gurus. Is this because BVKS is "voted in" at the 1986 recoronation of sex with taxi driver's acharya Bhavananada? Why does Hanuman keep saying his sex with taxi driver's guru parampara is authorized? We need to sing the samsara prayers to the "sex with taxi driver's guru parampara" members? Why doesn't Hanuman even know that his sex with taxi driver's guru parampara is bogus, when any ten year old child anywhere on the planet practically speaking, knows this is bogus?]

Hanuman das: Few days ago, I received an email from a person who contracted contagious disease called “Zombie guru theory”. 

[PADA: Why does Hanuman keep saying acharyas like Srila Prabhupada are like dead zombies? Worse, Hanuman's "living guru's" aka sex with taxi driver's guru parampara members are "alive," whereas the bona fide acharyas are dead zombies. Wow! So the acharyas are dead, the sex with taxi driver's guru program is "living"? Who knew! 

Thus! 

Only the worshipers of Hanuman's sex with taxi driver's guru parampara are  worshiping that which is "alive," whereas people who worship the bona fide acharyas are worshiping the zombie dead and gone. What kind of person says Krishna and His acharyas are -- dead zombies? Yep, Rocana, he says the acharyas are posthumous, post samadhi, and post mortem, same idea. 

Amazing, only the people who support the illicit sex guru parampara are "living." And then they wonder why so many children were molested under Hanuman's illicit sex guru parampara idea? Hanuman does not get it, the worship of the bona fide acharya is not "zombie worship," while worship of Hanuman's illicit sex guru parampara is actually zombie worship.]



Thanks Hanuman for telling people to load me up with their sins!

HD: Proponents of zombie guru theory claim that Prabhupada is Jesus and that he is only guru for the next 10,000 years, and that he should be the diksa guru of all members of the Hare Krishna movement. They draw this silly argument from the arrangement that was made by Prabhupada while is was sick and not able to travel to initiate every disciple personally.

[PADA: OK so Srila Prabhupada "made an arrangement" to declare worship of acharyas is going to be zombie worship? And we need to worship Hanuman's illicit sex with taxi driver's guru parampara? When was this "arrangement" made?]

One of the arguments which zombie guru theory proponents use to justify their nonsense is perfectly exemplified in following email from above mentioned zombie:

But I ask this, when devotees are sing Samsara Davana in the mornings who are they singing about, Devamrita, Radhanath, Sachinandana etc? NO!! They are singing about pure devotee acharyas who can enact those activities mentioned in those verses, do you think any ISKCON ‘guru’ can arrange amerous pastimes between Radha and Krishna?

[PADA: However, the whole GBC guru body is authorizing the samsara prayers to be sung to various deviants, and has done so all along? Is there any single GBC guru who has come out and said we cannot sing samsara prayers to the other members of their concocted parampara? Rocana also says something similar, we can place the photos of GBC gurus on the altars and worship them, and offer bhogha to them. Where was this arrangement made? 


Amazing. Hanuman thinks that only these three guys are deviants, and NOT all the rest. Yet all of the rest are the people who prop up these three?]

HD: Well, he is right about the three guys he mentioned, but his claim that all ISKCON gurus are “bogus” is hilarious. This is not the first time I see this rtvik argument.

[PADA: ALL -- every single one -- of the GBC's gurus are either: (A) Molesters and / or sexual predators; skirt chasers; taxi driver sex; Vodka drinkers; football TV watchers etc. and / or (B) the founding fathers, advocates, promoters, cheer leaders, reinstators and / or defenders of this parampara and / or (C) those "voted in" by the two above groups. And yet, some of them are bona fide acharyas, who we can sing the samsara prayers to? We can sing samsara prayers to BVKS, because he was "voted in" when sex with taxi drivers was re-certified as his parampara's acharya?]

Answering this person is beyond my level of dignity, he is below level of where I can help him. I think he will require brain surgery. I am not brain surgeon, but I find this challenge interesting.


[PADA: Anyone who does not worship the BVKS "man to man sex" guru parampara needs brain surgery? Why does Hanuman want us to worship his man to man sex with taxi drivers in the holy dham guru program? Hanuman's gurus are having sex with taxi drivers in the holy dham, and we need to sing the samsara prayers to this lineage and its members?]

So, although ISKCON has many fake gurus, there are also some genuine ones, so, let’s try to give explanation of Sri Gurvastakam in the context of Prabhupada disciples:


[PADA: The Hanuman guru program reinstates homosex in the holy dham as their Vishnupada acharya, and this is why -- they should be glorified with the samsara prayers? Nope! ys pd] 



Hanuman is empowering the theft of Krishna's assets with his false gurus.



Did we forget to mention, many folks thinks Hanuman's core guru parampara members -- poisoned the acharya?