PADA: But Mr. PADA, Bhakti Caru was never in agreement with the GBC. He was more or less a ritvik. Ummm nope, he was one of their big promoters, cheer leaders and fund raising experts for their endless lawsuits.
BCS says Jayapataka will be "forever glorified" -- and he will be -- as a founding father leader of: The illicit sex with men, women and children guru parampara, which bans, beats, molests, sues and kills vaishnavas. Bhakti Caru swami says "Kali has thrown everything at Jayapataka but he bravely continues on."
Right, he bravely goes on promoting his homosexual and pedophile guru parampara without even realizing how offensive this is. And he does not even realize that all of his suffering is from promoting all these evils and he is getting bad karma.
=====
PERSONAL INSULTS SHOULD NOT BE RETALIATED.
PADA: Yes, prabhu I agree fully. But in the case of HKC Jaipur / Prabhupadanugas EU / Mathura Pati etc. they have been promoting Radhanath's cheer leaders and the writings of Hari Sauri. Sulochana said Hari Sauri is making us targets for assassination by discrediting us.
So they are promoting the Saint Radhanath program, and many of us believe Radhanath had a hand in Sulochana's murder. And Sulochana himself said Hari Sauri is trying to make us targets for assassination.
So they are insulting me, or not insulting me, is not the issue. They are promoting the homosexual and pedophile messiah's club's cheer leaders, while advertising as Prabhupada followers, this is called cheating.
Did I forget to mention, this club is also credited with poisoning a pure devotee? So we cannot agree with the people promoting the GBC's agenda while claiming to be Prabhupadanugas, they are not. We are simply informing people to beware of false Prabhupada followers, who glorify the people who helped have Sulochana murdered. If they are in bed with Sulochana's murderers, and clearly they are, then they are in the wrong bed. That's all, has nothing to do with me personally being insulted or not.
Same thing with Purujit's BLISS boys. They wrote me all sorts of personal insults, calling me an old fart and all that. Fine. I have no issue with that. Does that give them a license to re-edit Srila Prabhupada's writings and books, and pal around with the false Prabhupadanugas who are promoting the GBC's agenda defender folks? Nope.
ys pd
=====
AKRURANATH DAS
J DASI: Not true! Akruranatha never took part in the Turley case (the one with the kids). He did defend the BBT to be the owners of the copyrights of Srila Prabhupada’s books against Hansadhutta. Did you want Hansadhutta to take over the copyrights of Srila Prabhupada’s books?
PADA: Akruranath works all the time with the people who were sued in the Windle Turley case and he supports those leaders. He is with the program that promotes the living and / or departed pedophiles guru sampradaya.
PADA: Akruranath works all the time with the people who were sued in the Windle Turley case and he supports those leaders. He is with the program that promotes the living and / or departed pedophiles guru sampradaya.
Do I want to have 5,000 changes made to the Bhagavad Gita, or do I want the original? Well I prefer the original, and moreover Srila Prabhupada said the original should be printed. And no, I do not think Srila Prabhupada is their writer for hire. Hansadutta does not have his own Gita, he had the original made by Srila Prabhupada and Hansadutta said that is the correct version.
Akruranatha Das: ISKCON's GBC has reviewed the much-debated argument concerning guru succession for many years and has repeatedly declared it to be a heresy, not supported by scriptures, prior acaryas, or Srila Prabhupada's books and lectures, which always emphasized the traditional "parampara" system in which successive generations of disciples become gurus for the next generation in an unbroken chain (see, e.g., Bhagavad-gita 4.1-3)
Seven years is not just a period of time. It is almost my entire adult life. I dedicated myself to serving ISKCON. Not for profit. Not for the sake of position. But because I believed. I believed in the mission, in purity, in the instructions of Srila Prabhupada.
Every morning began with mangala-arati. The days were spent preaching and collecting donations. I did everything with joy, with the conviction that everything collected goes for the benefit of the devotees, for the development of the temples, for the spread of the holy name.
APPOINTMENT HOAX, TAKEOVER COUP
Yep, there you have it, drunks, predators, persons dating minors, people offering LSD to the shalagram, deviants, porno swamis, homosexuals, pedophiles, criminals, and the enablers of industrial scale child mistreatment are "gurus in the tradition of Krishna's guru successors."
Told ya! ys pd
angel108b@yahoo.com
=====
Confession of a former temple president (anonymous).
=====
Confession of a former temple president (anonymous).
Seven years is not just a period of time. It is almost my entire adult life. I dedicated myself to serving ISKCON. Not for profit. Not for the sake of position. But because I believed. I believed in the mission, in purity, in the instructions of Srila Prabhupada.
Every morning began with mangala-arati. The days were spent preaching and collecting donations. I did everything with joy, with the conviction that everything collected goes for the benefit of the devotees, for the development of the temples, for the spread of the holy name.
But one day I had to prepare an internal financial report. I was given access to the accounting data - not out of curiosity, but simply because of my job. And what I saw made me take a different look at everything I had dedicated these years to.
60% of all funds went to the maintenance of the GBC apparatus: offices, flights, salaries for assistants, "consultations" that cost as much as half a year's rent for a temple. Another 20% was spent on so-called representative needs: hotels, events, expensive gifts for "important guests." And only the remaining 20% actually reached the temples themselves, the devotees, the prasadam, the repairs, the needy.
60% of all funds went to the maintenance of the GBC apparatus: offices, flights, salaries for assistants, "consultations" that cost as much as half a year's rent for a temple. Another 20% was spent on so-called representative needs: hotels, events, expensive gifts for "important guests." And only the remaining 20% actually reached the temples themselves, the devotees, the prasadam, the repairs, the needy.
I did not lose faith in Krishna. But I lost trust in the system. It became clear to me: I cannot be part of a structure that exploits the faith of ordinary devotees for the sake of its administrative stability.
I left. Without loud statements. Without video messages. I just quietly stopped being "president." Now I am just a devotee. Without titles. Without a position. But with a clear conscience.
======
APPOINTMENT HOAX, TAKEOVER COUP
“Not one of these Zonal Acharyas, not even the discredited and retired ones, or those who've gone off, outside of ISKCON – not even Hansadutta, Ramesvara, or Bhagavan– have ever revealed what went on during those four months between the time Srila Prabhupada departed and the time they launched their Zonal Acharya system. They obviously had many meetings with one another to discuss their plans.
By the time they announced the official position they had taken, at the Mayapur GBC meetings in March 1978, there had been plenty of get-togethers and strategy sessions. How much of a role Tamal Krishna Goswami played in all that, none of us can be sure. Only the Zonal Acharya participants themselves know the truth, and they're not talking.” (Rochan das, 2011)
Still, we have pieced together a pretty good picture of the events and key players in the guru hijacking of ISKCON 1977-78.
BTG ANNOUNCEMENT PRECEDED LATE MARCH GBC RESOLUTIONS
When Srila Prabhupada departed on Nov. 14, 1977, the Dec. BTG issue (Vol. 12, No. 12) was already at the printers and arrived at the North American temples by Dec. 1. Many North American ISKCON temples ran out of Back to Godhead magazines in early Jan. 1978. But the January 1978 issue, to be delivered Jan. 1, 1978, was very late. No one could understand why the January BTG was so late. There were eleven BTG issues every year, delivered to the USA temples like clockwork, and included a double issue (No. 3/4) for March-April when many devotees went to the Mayapur India festival.
BTG ANNOUNCEMENT PRECEDED LATE MARCH GBC RESOLUTIONS
When Srila Prabhupada departed on Nov. 14, 1977, the Dec. BTG issue (Vol. 12, No. 12) was already at the printers and arrived at the North American temples by Dec. 1. Many North American ISKCON temples ran out of Back to Godhead magazines in early Jan. 1978. But the January 1978 issue, to be delivered Jan. 1, 1978, was very late. No one could understand why the January BTG was so late. There were eleven BTG issues every year, delivered to the USA temples like clockwork, and included a double issue (No. 3/4) for March-April when many devotees went to the Mayapur India festival.
Instead, the first 1978 issue was another double issue, No. 1/2, for Jan.-Feb., and it arrived at the USA temples in mid-March, ten weeks overdue. This was at the start of the March 15-26 GBC meetings. What happened?
“In New Orleans we had a standing monthly BTG order of 10,000 because people always looked for the latest issue and we sold a lot of them every day on the streets. We never had much overstock because we were efficient, organized, and the devotees went out every day selling them. So when we ran out in January, the book distributors were upset and demanded more. Although I called the BBT several times, and I even spoke twice with Satsvarupa himself, there was no explanation for the delay. I remember 1978’s first issue did not arrive until end of March, during the GBC meetings in India.” (Nityananda das, 2014)
This first 1978 issue was the Srila Prabhupada Memorial issue on his passing away from this material world. It was the same 36 pages as usual, with only four short articles about Srila Prabhupada’s life and departure, so why the holdup? There was no additional preparation needed for this issue than any other issue. From Nov. 14, this BTG issue honoring Srila Prabhupada could easily have been produced and delivered by the Tennessee printers between Jan. 1-15 at the latest. Each magazine issue was started and finished within 4-6 weeks, called “lead-time.” There was no reason for this long delay.
“In New Orleans we had a standing monthly BTG order of 10,000 because people always looked for the latest issue and we sold a lot of them every day on the streets. We never had much overstock because we were efficient, organized, and the devotees went out every day selling them. So when we ran out in January, the book distributors were upset and demanded more. Although I called the BBT several times, and I even spoke twice with Satsvarupa himself, there was no explanation for the delay. I remember 1978’s first issue did not arrive until end of March, during the GBC meetings in India.” (Nityananda das, 2014)
This first 1978 issue was the Srila Prabhupada Memorial issue on his passing away from this material world. It was the same 36 pages as usual, with only four short articles about Srila Prabhupada’s life and departure, so why the holdup? There was no additional preparation needed for this issue than any other issue. From Nov. 14, this BTG issue honoring Srila Prabhupada could easily have been produced and delivered by the Tennessee printers between Jan. 1-15 at the latest. Each magazine issue was started and finished within 4-6 weeks, called “lead-time.” There was no reason for this long delay.
So BTG #1-2 was held up for well over 2 months, and arrived in temples March 18-20 or so, before the GBC decided or announced the new gurus on March 24. . It was similar to the New Zealand newspaper announcement of President Kennedy’s assassination 8 hours before it actually happened.
However, due to the normal lead-time required in publishing periodicals, the content of this BTG had already been finalized and given to the printers for layout and prep-work at least several weeks earlier, or weeks before the GBC meetings. The zonal acharyas were secretly decided upon by BTG chief editor Satsvarupa and other gurus-to-be (for sure, Tamal) maybe a month before the GBC approved and announced them by official resolution on March 24. It was indeed a conspiracy of silence.
Apparently Satsvarupa deliberately held up 1978’s first issue so that it would not announce the new gurus too much before the GBC in Mayapur did so Mar. 24, 1978. A BTG announcement made too early would have given skeptical ISKCON members, such as Yasodanandana, Gurukripa, Balavanta, and others time to organize and challenge the GBC to allow open debate and discussion on the guru succession question. Also, it would then be clear that Satsvarupa somehow knew there would be new gurus before the GBC got around to deciding the same (or that “the fix was already in”).
While the general devotees had no information about the upcoming announcement of new gurus, and while Srila Prabhupada (or any ISKCON leaders) had never announced such a thing, and while everyone was waiting for the GBC to meet and decide on future initiations, meanwhile the BTG announcement already had been sent to the printers a month before! There was a secret decision and plan by some of the eleven ritviks to assume the post of initiating guru. This plan evolved from before May 28, 1977 right up to the 1978 GBC meetings, when the GBC votes to approve new zonal acharyas were lined up in secret discussions. It was a gurujacking coup.
In Mayapur, the hundreds of devotees gathered there only learned of the new gurus when it was suddenly announced on Mar. 24 with the GBC policy paper on continuing the disciplic succession (see Vol. 6). In America, the devotees read about the new gurus in BTG a week before the GBC announcement! Satsvarupa had carefully coordinated this scheme of delayed release as a concealment of their take-over coup. It resembled how a rogue military unit will seize the Parliament and have a proclamation issued to the general public that a new government was approved by the old government, it all being lies and a hoax.
======
Problems at GBC ISKCON in Italy.
Reports have emerged about financial misconduct at GBC ISKCON Italy, involving Madhusevita Prabhu.
Madhusevita Prabhu is one of the devotees and leaders of GBC ISKCON, actively participating in the life and activities of the GBC ISKCON temple in Italy. He holds important administrative positions within the organization and frequently participates in events such as kirtans, lectures, and major festivals related to the movement.
Additionally, Madhusevita is considered an authority among the local devotees and plays a role in managing GBC ISKCON temples in Italy, including organizing spiritual programs, ceremonies, and maintaining connections with the local community.
The allegations concern financial manipulation and accounting.
However, due to the normal lead-time required in publishing periodicals, the content of this BTG had already been finalized and given to the printers for layout and prep-work at least several weeks earlier, or weeks before the GBC meetings. The zonal acharyas were secretly decided upon by BTG chief editor Satsvarupa and other gurus-to-be (for sure, Tamal) maybe a month before the GBC approved and announced them by official resolution on March 24. It was indeed a conspiracy of silence.
Apparently Satsvarupa deliberately held up 1978’s first issue so that it would not announce the new gurus too much before the GBC in Mayapur did so Mar. 24, 1978. A BTG announcement made too early would have given skeptical ISKCON members, such as Yasodanandana, Gurukripa, Balavanta, and others time to organize and challenge the GBC to allow open debate and discussion on the guru succession question. Also, it would then be clear that Satsvarupa somehow knew there would be new gurus before the GBC got around to deciding the same (or that “the fix was already in”).
While the general devotees had no information about the upcoming announcement of new gurus, and while Srila Prabhupada (or any ISKCON leaders) had never announced such a thing, and while everyone was waiting for the GBC to meet and decide on future initiations, meanwhile the BTG announcement already had been sent to the printers a month before! There was a secret decision and plan by some of the eleven ritviks to assume the post of initiating guru. This plan evolved from before May 28, 1977 right up to the 1978 GBC meetings, when the GBC votes to approve new zonal acharyas were lined up in secret discussions. It was a gurujacking coup.
In Mayapur, the hundreds of devotees gathered there only learned of the new gurus when it was suddenly announced on Mar. 24 with the GBC policy paper on continuing the disciplic succession (see Vol. 6). In America, the devotees read about the new gurus in BTG a week before the GBC announcement! Satsvarupa had carefully coordinated this scheme of delayed release as a concealment of their take-over coup. It resembled how a rogue military unit will seize the Parliament and have a proclamation issued to the general public that a new government was approved by the old government, it all being lies and a hoax.
======
Problems at GBC ISKCON in Italy.
Reports have emerged about financial misconduct at GBC ISKCON Italy, involving Madhusevita Prabhu.
Madhusevita Prabhu is one of the devotees and leaders of GBC ISKCON, actively participating in the life and activities of the GBC ISKCON temple in Italy. He holds important administrative positions within the organization and frequently participates in events such as kirtans, lectures, and major festivals related to the movement.
Additionally, Madhusevita is considered an authority among the local devotees and plays a role in managing GBC ISKCON temples in Italy, including organizing spiritual programs, ceremonies, and maintaining connections with the local community.
The allegations concern financial manipulation and accounting.
Summary of the scandal:
1. Allegations of financial misconduct — It is claimed that Madhusevita and other senior devotees of GBC ISKCON Italy were involved in financial abuses, including:
1. Allegations of financial misconduct — It is claimed that Madhusevita and other senior devotees of GBC ISKCON Italy were involved in financial abuses, including:
Manipulation of accounting,
Creation of fake entities and accounts,
Concealment of income.
2. Sale of temple property — There are accusations that property was sold or used for improper purposes without the knowledge or consent of the community.
3. Links to criminal organizations — There are suggestions of "mafia-like" management methods, intimidation, and the removal of dissenting members of the organization.
4. Internal protests — It is mentioned that some devotees tried to draw attention to the issue and initiate an investigation, but their complaints were ignored or "swept under the rug."
5. Video evidence — Videos with exposés and comments, including from former participants, have been posted.
Video appeal from Chanchalapati Prabhu (February 2025):
1. Financial violations: He claims that Madhusevita and those associated with him used temple funds for personal enrichment. Fake organizations were created through which large sums of money were channeled. Some real estate transactions, he claims, were made in violation of the law and without the knowledge of most devotees.
2. Corruption and pressure: He describes an atmosphere of fear at the temple, where those who disagreed with the management were pressured or excluded. The issue of "cover-ups" by the GBC is raised, with Chanchalapati stating that complaints were received but not addressed.
3. Calls for justice: He urges devotees not to remain silent, to unite, and to demand an independent investigation. He also states that such abuses harm not only GBC ISKCON Italy but the reputation of the organization as a whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.