PADA: One of the major questions I get all the time from devotees, media, police, FEDS etc. is -- how did all of this damage and destruction happen to ISKCON and so many of its citizens, especially its children? Why were so many devotees adding fuel to the fire by supporting these false gurus (like Jayatirtha) and why weren't these devotees instead helping PADA -- put out the fires? And that means having these false gurus removed from office.
Hari-śauri: The one thing that shocks the Indians the most is Vivekananda.
Prabhupāda: Because they're rascals. Modern people in India, they are all rascals. Whole population is bokā.
Gargamuni: No. The Marwaris don't like him because he was a chicken-eater.
Prabhupāda: Marwaris are little religious. They...
Gargamuni: They never talk about Vivekananda. They don't like him.
Prabhupāda: He was rascal number one. He brought three women with whom he had intimate connection. That is very easy to make intimate connection with woman in America. With money also. He brought. And with their money. Aurobindo also, the same thing. With woman's money they became rich, not like me, with hard labor of writing books and selling. I could also do. There was chance. But this is not my business to make intimate relation with woman and get money. I could do. There was chance. When attempt was failed, the man who introduced that woman to me, he one day said, "I have seen many swamis, but none like you." (laughter)
Gargamuni: They advise you to grow a beard and to wear Western suit, the other swamis. (break)
Prabhupāda: ...in a different style. (break) ...money. These rascals are also after woman and money, in a different style. Asat eka strī-saṅgī. Caitanya Mahāprabhu immediately rejects him, that "He's a rascal. He's after women." Immediately. Asat strī-saṅgī. Two kinds of rascals—nondevotee of Kṛṣṇa and woman-hunter—reject immediately. That is Caitanya Mahāprabhu's... The sannyāsa life is... What is that? Cent percent, no connection with woman. That is sannyāsa. What we have renounced? We have renounced... We are using the motorcar, we are using this machine, we are eating, we are sleeping in nice room—what is the renouncement? Only renouncement is no connection with woman. That is the real platform of renouncement. If one can renounce woman's connection, then he's liberated man. That is very, very difficult. (break) Except myself, they go for woman and money, that's all, in foreign countries. This is the position. This Vishnu, Vishnu... Vishnananda, Vishnu-ananda? Now what is that? One yogi is in Montreal?
Satsvarūpa: Vishnu-something-ananda.
Prabhupāda: He also is after women. That's all.
Satsvarūpa: Swami Sac-cid-ananda.
I am 54 years old. Yesterday i cleaned out a nest of roaches. I lost my shit.
Memories of when Mother Dharini would pull my sleeping bag in the dirty kitchen they used as a garbage room. It started when i was 7 years old. For 3 years till we moved with the school to be tortured some more at the new gurukula in montocello, ny.
I would zip it all up with me in it.
Now im 54.
But i lose my shit when I see roaches. This was a big nest i found. Winning the law suit didnt do shit for my ptsd. 54 and Im over here still working on my ptsd. My biggest thing till this day is me working on not collecting difficult people in my life. They love me.
Its cause im still a hot fucking mess. I just have a great smile.
But we are making progress.
1) Srila Prabhupada enjoys the devotees chanting "Jaya Prabhupada," while Kailasa says those devotees are living in a fools paradise because the name of the guru should not be advertised, and kept secret. Secret guru and / or secret mantras are the trademarks of the mayavadas like Kailasa.
We cannot even give out Prabhupada's books to people because the books advertise "the name of the guru" right on the cover. We should not help others get to Krishna by naming our guru, we should keep all this secret like the mayavadas. This is mayavada on steroids. Srila Prabhupada never said we should keep the name of our guru -- or the books of our guru -- which has his name on the cover -- a secret. This was never stated by the acharya.
2) Kailasa is the topmost critic of Sulochana and parrot of the Bhakti pedos -- saying Sulochana is a fallen sahajiya, which Sulochan says -- makes him a target. And which his mom says is meant to discredit him and give him a bad name. Why has Kailasa dedicated his entire life to smearing the name of a great Vaishnava?
Now Kailasa is saying that when Sulochana complains they are calling him a sahajiya to discredit him, Sulochana is making "straw man arguments." Umm, he is not here! His complaint was and is valid, you Kailasa guys joined the Bhakti pedos to "give a dog a bad name and get rid of is" as Sulochana said all the time.
3) Kailasa promotes the worship of the non-existing, non-entity, no-named, phantom, nobody, zero -- proof of existing -- Madhyam guru, because he wants people to worship no one at all. Worship of nothingness and no one is called mayavada. Kailasa says Prabhupada wanted everyone to be guru, that is a generic idea, but that is not the name of any guru.
We cannot worship a generic idea, we need to worship specific persons. Kailasa says we should worship the principle of guru, not any actual guru. Driving the principle of a car means, we go no where. We have to have an actual car to go somewhere.
There is no such thing as worship of the principle of guru, but no actual guru, this is mayavada. We worship the principle of God, but not the actual God Himself. Kailasa thinks he can survive by eating the principle of food, and not actual food, he would not last a week, this is a foolish argument. I am going to eat the principle of food, but no real food, this sounds like looney tunes on steroids.
4) Srila Prabhupada says the Goswamis would not debate anyone -- unless they identified their guru and lineage, whereas Kailasa admits he has no name for his Madhyam guru, no lineage, no nothing, because there he has no Madhya guru.
It is 100% myth and fiction. The guru he promotes is a phantom ghost. A person who cannot name the guru they promote is a mayavada, and should not debate Vaishnavas. No Vaishnava has ever promoted the worship of nothingness, which is clearly mayavada.
Where does Srila Prabhupada say we should promote the worship on nothing and no one?
5) Kailasa says worship of a pure devotee like Srila Prabhupada is heresy, but he does not even have any name for the Madhyam guru he promotes, which is called mayavada (heresy). Srila Prabhupada says the mlecchas are more advanced than these mayavadas like Kailasa, because they worship a specific named pure devotee guru.
Because the mlecchas believe in personal guru and personal God, unlike the people who promote the worship of zero, like Kailasa. When is Kailasa going to understand, the Vaishnavas worship actual persons and not phantom non-entity ghosts who are made up in Kailasa's imagination -- and do not exist anywhere else? The no name Madhyam is a figment of his imagination, he does not exist. He is selling nothing and calling it something, which is mayavada. We are not interested in mayavada, we worship actual persons.
6) Did I forget to mention Kailasa writes position papers for the GBC, and Ravindra Swarupa and Trivrikrama swami were advertising their new GBC 1990 paper, penned by Kailasa. And it was penned by Kailasa and he admits he penned it. Why are we writing papers for the homosexual and pedophile messiah's club?
ys pd
PADA: Hasya Rati says they have a living guru. OK, sign me up, but their living guru evidently has no name, no living existence, no books, no devotees, no temples, no nothing existing anywhere. In other words, they have no living anything anywhere, it is all a bluff.
We have a live guru, who is evidently, a ghost. Srila Prabhupada says that a person who does not name their guru is a mayavada. Told ya! We have a living guru, but, he does not exist! These guys are arguing with their own shadow. They never had a living Madhyam guru, and even if they did, what happens when he departs? No one lives forever, but the worship of the pure devotee does live forever. ys pd
JS: An image of 1 person and text that says "I took sannyasa from a known pedophile."
Bhakta Ernest
Due to all the hate and anger (because Kailasa exposes your ritvik-in-physica-absentia-rascaldom), you have become a madman. Kailasa traveled with Sulocana for three months in 1985 in his van and edited his book "The Guru Business."
Doktorski, Henry. Killing for Krishna: The Danger of Deranged Devotion (p. 514).
PADA: Yes prabhu, Henry's book confirms you Kailasa guys were joining the Bhakti pedos in attacking me and Sulochana as fallen sahajiyas, to make us targets and to discredit us. We all agreed to this a long time ago.
Sulochana told me over and over and over. They (Kailasa and Bhakti pedo folks) are calling me a fallen sahajiya to discredit me and make me a target. He said "Give a dog a bad name and get rid of it." He was their target. And Srila Prabhupada says -- the people who orchestrate the untimely departure of Vaishnavas are never forgiven by the Lord or any agents of the Lord. In other words, there is nothing more sinful. Except there is something way more sinful. It is when the person being targeted is a major whistle blower on mass child mistreatment. That means many children also became targets of mistreatment by silencing their advocate. None of this is authorized by guru, sadhu or shastra. Of course as a bargain they also made me a target, which caused all sorts of mental distress to my own children and others. Which is also sinful. ys pd