Nityananda: ISKCON GBC: ACTIVE COLLUSION, SILENT CONSENT 08 14 25

===

OUR MUSIC CHANNEL

Our Music Channel is gaining momentum. That is 25,000 times in a month someone heard Krishna's name. We are working on more music to get up there. Thanks to all of you who are watching.

Yeah I know, they already told me, it is the Hare Krishna "Church version," hee hee!

======

PSYCHOLOGY?

PADA: Yeah, what is the psychology of people who create a program to force little children to worship homosexuals and pedophiles as their messiahs from heaven? And then, after their homosexual and pedophile messiah's program is sued for $400,000,000, then various leaders help bury one of their worst case known homosexual pedophile gurus in "a samadhi" so he can be worshiped until the end of Kali Yuga. This psychology -- according to a lot of people is, these people are pretty very twisted and sick.  

Nityananda das Prabhu: ISKCON GBC: ACTIVE COLLUSION, SILENT CONSENT

As one who has investigated, researched, and exposed the hijacking of Srila Prabhupada’s Divine Mission by rascals and imposters (or by those more sinister) since 1988, it may be time to once again review whether this line of activity is actually beneficial or detrimental to the Hare Krishna Movement. 

Those of us who are fighting for truth in the history and deviations thereof are very often criticized as actually further worsening the problems that exist, that the “bad publicity” will discourage people from taking advantage of Srila Prabhupada’s teachings, and is a negative to spreading Krishna consciousness.

Or is this advice from some devotees simply a misunderstanding, born out of frustration and a distaste for the bitter poisons that have been introduced into our Vaishnava community by ambitious opportunists and the agents of Kali? 

Discussion of this topic could be helpful to many in better realizing what Srila Prabhupada wants us to do, assuming our real purpose is to sincerely serve him.
The ISKCON GBC deceit and hypocrisy is extreme. They want to have it many ways at once. 

One, they say hair tests are unreliable. Two, they say that these unreliable hair tests were not done correctly. Three, they say that the results from these unreliable and wrongly-done tests are normal and do not show poisoning. Four, that the abnormal poison levels in the hair test results can be explained in various ways other than homicidal poisoning. Five, there was no poisoning, and there is no evidence of it. Neti, neti… rascal denier word jugglers.

MANY persons are implicated in Srila Prabhupada’s now scientifically proven heavy metals poisoning, by willfully associating with the crime. There are three types of involvement in a crime:

(1) Direct Commission, (2) Aiding and Abetting, (3) Accessory After The Fact.

Srila Prabhupada’s criminal poisoning was a conspiracy by a few to hijack the movement and its assets for personal aggrandizement. They wanted to become absolute gurus with worship, position, power, wealth, and many disciples. As time went on after 1977, those who were involved in the crime or were aware of it were joined by many others as accessory after the fact. 

The distribution of the spoils from the takeover of Srila Prabhupada’s institution induced many others to support the original poisoners, knowingly or unknowingly, directly or indirectly. 

PADA: Sulochana said the GBC are throwing out left over table scraps from their table to watch all the dogs (the other devotees) fight over who gets which, what and how many left over scraps. 

Tamal, as the chief poisoner (beyond a reasonable doubt), was expert at implicating others in the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada by arranging for them to sit on the acharya’s seat and take the acharya’s worship, disciples, and wealth. That is, as long as they supported the poison-party line without asking any honest or intelligent questions. Thus, the complicit sold their soul for the profits of false guruship.

Generally speaking, anyone who destroys evidence of a crime becomes, at the least, an accessory after the fact to that crime even if they didn’t actively participate in it. Further, there is the possibility of conspiracy charges. 

Clearing up corruption in ISKCON and the GBC is going to be a daunting task. Only by a massive purge of every one of those who have betrayed the Founder-Acharya by aiding and abetting, as an accessory after the fact, the crime of Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, will ISKCON become relieved of the maha-offenses against the pure devotee.

In Mahabharata, Kashyapa Muni said: "If one knows the truth but does not disclose it upon being questioned, or, if out of anger, fear, or some other motive, one gives a false reply, then he is bound up by 1,000 nooses of Varuna... 

"If someone commits a sinful act in an assembly, then it is the duty of all those who are present to chastise the wrong doer. If they fail to do so, then the perpetrator of the sin receives one-fourth of the reaction, the leader of the assembly has to accept one-half, and all others present suffer one-fourth. A witness is one who has seen, heard of, or otherwise understood a thing, and he should always tell the truth, for in that way his pious merit will never suffer diminution.”

(1) "...one who is mischievous, he is culprit. But one who tolerates mischievous activity, he is also culprit. If you are mischievous, you are criminal. But if you tolerate mischievous activities that is also criminal." (SPConv May 3, 1973)

(2) Harikesh: They are being quiet. They are too afraid to say. 

SP: That means they are accepting. […] Quiet means... Maunam samyati raksanam. If there is some argument and you remain quiet that means indirectly you accept. (SPConv, July 9, 1975)

Everyone understands the full complicity of direct involvment in a crime. Less understood is that one the silent consenter who aids after the fact, or one who benefits from the crime afterwards- they are also complicit. For ex., not only the butcher incurs the sin for animal killing, but also one who transports, eats, cooks, sells, or raises the animal. Similarly, those who:

(1) Silently knew it was occurring but did nothing to stop it,

(2) Afterwards covered for or protected the poisoners,

(3) Accepting benefits that came as a result of the poisoning (sharing the stolen goods).

They Are Also All Guilty of Srila Prabhupada’s Poisoning.

The original poisoners implicated many others, by creating a miasma or poisonous atmosphere, by sharing the assets of Srila Prabhupada’s mission. Active collusion or silent consent- both are complicit. (1) Aiding and abetting, (2) silent partner, (3) complicit after the fact- these phrases relate to those who knew or came to know of Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, or even those who unknowingly benefited from it. There are ISKCON leaders who came of know of the crime but unconscionably and deceptively have remained silent to protect their positions and benefits.

Otherwise, why have they adamantly and unreasonably denied all the evidence and demonized those who want the truth instead of supporting an honest, impartial, open investigation? Srila Prabhupada exposes how silence and association is collusion:

(1) “Because we are doing business, we are getting money from these rascal government, so if you expose me, then I will not get money, and if I expose you, you will not get money. Let us remain together and let them remain fools. That's all. This is it. If a common man like me can understand the whole policy, how the scientist will not understand? But they have made a compromise that ‘Don't expose me, I'll not expose you, and let us take money from the government.’ This is going on.” (SP Conv 18.5.75)

(2) “A person who knows things as they are and still does not bear witness becomes involved in sinful activities." (CC Mad 5.90)

(3) “Regarding the position of a person who does not speak even when he knows the truth: jani saksi nahi deya tara papa haya. 'A person who knows things as they are and still does not bear witness becomes involved in sinful activities'.” (SP Conv May 17, 1975)

(4) “Brahmanas [...] are generally unaware of the happenings within the material world because they are always busy in their activities for spiritual advancement. Nonetheless, when there is a calamity in human society, they cannot remain impartial. If they do not do something to relieve the distressed condition of human society, it is said that due to such neglect their spiritual knowledge diminishes.” (S Bhag 4.14.41 Purport)

(5) "In the name of bhakti in many places people are engaged in illicit or anti-bhakti activities in the name of practicing bhakti. If one does not expose those issues (cases) very clearly, then pure bhakti will never be victorious or be established." (Bhaktivinode Thakur, Sajjana Tosani)

(6) Jagadish: If you know that someone is committing criminal activities, then if you associate with them, you’ll also become implicated. 

SP: Yes. Sangat sanjayate kamah. (SPConv Jan. 11, 1977)

Sins of omission are as telling and culpable as sins of commission.

Silence is complicity.

It is our duty as messengers of the Absolute Truth to always stand for truth and resist corruption, starting with our own spiritual family and society. Srila Prabhupada’s poisoners must be exposed. That also means the removal of the entire current GBC-guru regime, those who have aided and abetted, covered-up the crime, profited from the crime, denied the crime. They fear “political regime uncertainty” that is caused by the poison evidence. This truth will be their end.

Those who have received benefits from Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning in post-1977 ISKCON (a very many persons) should meditate carefully on their situation, take measures to disengage, and not become further implicated in this great crime. Do the right thing. Why have ISKCON devotees, despite their intelligence, which can easily appreciate the overwhelming mountain of evidence clearly proving Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, go along with, acquiesce, or remain silent while their leadership perpetrates deceit and lies in ever-more sketchy cover-ups of that evidence?

Srila Prabhupada explains the important, parallel example of the Kurus like Bhishma.

(1) “…It was an open secret that Duryodhana wanted to usurp the kingdom of the Pandavas by evil plans, in collaboration with his father, Dhritarastra. Therefore, all persons who had joined the side of Duryodhana must have been birds of the same feather…” (B Gita 1.23)

(2) “… According to scriptural codes, a teacher who engages in an abominable action and has lost his sense of discrimination is fit to be abandoned. Bhishma and Drona were obliged to take the side of Duryodhana because of his financial assistance, although they should not have accepted such a position simply on financial considerations. Under the circumstances, they have lost the respectability of teachers.” (BGita 2.5)

COMMENT: Bhishma, though a great devotee, sided with Duryodhana because of financial considerations and having been maintained by him, and thus Lord Krishna wanted him to be killed. Similarly, because they are attached to their maintenance and positions, all the ISKCON misleaders and senior devotees have sided with the primary suspects on the poison issue and will suffer much for this. 

Although presented with the evidence, they choose to deny even Srila Prabhupada’s own clear statements about being poisoned, just to politically favor the ISKCON ruling elite. They have acted just like Bhishma and Drona and will surely have to face the consequences for this great misdeed. Some of them have laughed at the idea of Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning. Such corrupted, dishonest persons have used fraud, lies, deceit, and total denial to cover up the conclusive evidence in this matter.

There are many levels of complicity. For ex., after a bank robbery, someone who knowingly partakes of the loot also becomes complicit. Seven persons are implicated in cow-killing, not just one who kills the cow. It is the same for the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada. In the future many more persons will become complicit, so great is the contamination of this offense. Thus, increasing numbers of persons are implicated in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, though they were not directly involved in the administering or handling of the poison.

(1) Those who knew about Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning while it happened and remained silent: they are also guilty of the crime.

(2) Those who learned about the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada after the fact and remained silent: they are also guilty of the crime.

(3) Those who abetted the poisoning of Srila Prabhupada (to approve, encourage, support, or its cover-up during or after) are implicated and they are also guilty of the crime.

(4) Those who share in the material benefits (at any time after the poisoning, even today or centuries from now) that resulted from Srila Prabhupada’s removal by poisoning, are also implicated and they are also guilty of the crime. Of course, there will be differing degrees of complicity and responsibility. 

Even if only a handful of persons had physically poisoned Srila Prabhupada (say, the prime suspects), still, all those who took advantage of the results by assuming Srila Prabhupada’s position and exploiting his assets for their own purposes, are also implicated as guilty in the crime. Therefore, all the zonal acharyas and GBCs in 1978, plus all the ISKCON gurus and GBCs from 1978 until the present, are implicated in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning by aiding and abetting, even if they did not administer the poison themselves. 

They are benefiting and taking advantage of the poisoning of the Acharya. They are complicit after the fact and guilty of collusion with the crime.

(5) Those who know about Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning but have always kept it secret and denied it, are as guilty as the actual poisoners themselves. They have aided and abetted the crime.

(6) And those who come to understand the evidence that Srila Prabhupada was poisoned, but do not adjust their lives to conform with the truth, they are also complicit.

(7) Also, those that know nothing of the poisoning, but have heard of it and did nothing to verify the truth in it, or those cooperating with those who have benefited from it, they are also complicit. Any pleas that they are just trying to help spread the movement for Srila Prabhupada, do not have time or interest in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning issue, will also not excuse them from some complicity.

ISKCON leaders have lied to us about Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, and they lied to us about a whole lot of other things as well. Some of these other things we already know about, as discussed later. Interestingly, they all refuse to reveal their personal finances or assets.

CONCLUSION

Once some momentum grows with an enlightened lower tier of institutional leaders who can see the truth in Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning, senior leaders will begin to capitulate by “coming clean” and making excuses for their negligence and ignorance. That day cannot come soon enough. Those who make public apologies may be forgiven, but they can never be trusted again as leaders.

“The first and worst of all frauds is to cheat oneself. All sin is easy after that.” (Bailey)

The GBC created false narratives about diabetes, poisoning from medicines, covered up the evidence with sham “investigations,” never questioned the suspects, suppressed and forbade legitimate efforts to properly investigate, endorsed the 1978 guru-jacking, and has protected the poisoners. The entire GBC body is complicit in this horrific crime.

And they have hair samples and teeth from Srila Prabhupada which would settle the poisoning issue once and for all, but they have hidden this evidence and refuse to allow tests on them. An honest GBC would have long ago arranged for these tests to be done by law enforcement or neutral forensic testing laboratories, just to affirm the truth one way or the other. 

Their course of action is classic obstruction of justice, tampering with evidence, false testimony, and constitutes clear complicity in the crime of the millennium. Throw them all out!

“You are maintaining offense personified, Duryodhana, as your infallible son, but he is envious of Lord Kṛṣṇa. And because you are thus maintaining a nondevotee of Kṛṣṇa, you are devoid of all auspicious qualities. Relieve yourself of this ill fortune as soon as possible and do good to the whole family!” 

(Srimad Bhagwatam 3.1.13)

A lot of these guys are suffering already.