PADA: Right JD, this is odd. They are making a temple for Lord Narasimgha, and it comes crashing down and turns into dust. Same thing that happened when the real Narasimgha came to protect Prahlad, the stone pillars turned into dust.
Yeah, odd that! The government may be looking at charging people criminally, ok we know who the culprits are, the GBC's mis-managers. And yet they always have another $20,000,000 on hand to sue Bangalore all over again, but no money to get proper building permits and construction experts. They only want their lawyers to have nice buildings, not the citizens of ISKCON.
Told ya! ys pd
=====
Wait, what? Therefore when their acharyas are engaged in illicit sex with men, women and children -- that activity is pure and perfect, and moreover shastra agrees that homosexuals and pedophiles acharyas are pure and free from defects.
That means people like Bhakti Vikas swami, Krishna Kirti, Sridhara Srinivasa, Basu Ghosh etc. do not even know that worshiping homosexuals and pedophiles is not pure and free from defects? Or what?
Their real purpose? To contaminate children and train little children to believe that a chain of gurus that include debauchees and pedophiles is pure, and that is why my legal friend says they are "corrupting the morals of minors" by telling minors that homosexuals and pedophiles are part of a pure chain of gurus from God, and even deserve samadhis in the holy land. But yeah, if anyone knows how to contact all these guys let us know.
I hope Bangalore uses this in their court case, they are now saying that a chain of gurus that includes debauchees is pure and free from defects and they are degrading Krishna's guru parampara. In other words, they hate Krishna and want to see pedophiles and deviants being worshiped as His successors, which is what they have been doing since 1978.
ys pd
OFF-THE-WALL CONCLUSIONS, SELECTIVE OMISSIONS
=====
GBC’S DECEIT # EIGHT of TEN:
(1) GBC stated that since many devotees ate Srila Prabhupada’s maha prasadam in 1977 and they did not become ill, therefore Srila Prabhupada was not poisoned. This insane logic assumes Srila Prabhupada was poisoned via food that was then distributed. However, most likely, poison was given intermittently or in food/drinks which were not distributed. Poisoners would know not to poison others too, to avoid detection.
(2) GBC never explained their hero Tamal Krishna Goswami’s “mercy killing” interview, Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning statements, nor Srila Prabhupada’s conversation with his caretakers, who clearly accept and acknowledge Srila Prabhupada’s homicidal poisoning. Why?
(3) A GBC film included a clip from Primeau Forensics on how whispers are often misinterpreted by what the listener wants to hear, recommending a forensic analysis, and yet, the GBC never countered eight expert audio forensic studies on these whispers with their own study. Why?
(4) GBC stated that caretakers would not talk/whisper about poisoning on tape, so the “poison theory” is ridiculous. BUT: multiple forensic studies have verified the poison whispers, so it appears the caretakers thought the tape recorder could not pick up their background speaking! Also, why were they whispering?
(5) GBC says the “poison theory” was concocted from nothing due to malice. What matters is the messenger’s hidden motives, not the real evidence? This is standard propaganda methodology: to attribute an ill motive to the adversary and discard the facts. But the evidence of poisoning is irrefutable, certified, and not a theory.
(6) GBC book: “To suggest that Srila Prabhupada felt like he was being poisoned by his most trusted men implies he didn’t have common sense to immediately send anyone away he did not trust. …he could summon mystic powers and know who was betraying him… Srila Prabhupada just went along with it? Srila Prabhupada would have outsmarted his envious disciples and is offensively portrayed like a confused martyr, willing to sacrifice his own life, being so tolerant, compassionate.”
This errant interpretation negates Srila Prabhupada’s poisoning? This idea that he would have saved himself and stopped the poisoning is flawed. Jesus accepted his crucifixion, carrying his own cross, and did not use mystic powers to save himself. Did Haridas Thakur stop his tormentors? What of Prahlad or Mirabhai? Yes, the pure devotee has inconceivable mercy and tolerance.
(7) GBC: “With all due respect to Dr. Morris and his Hyperpure Dermanium Generator Detector at Univ. Missouri, he simply isn’t a toxicological expert.” But Dr. Morris did not make a toxicological evaluation of the cadmium findings (he simply did the tests). Meanwhile, the GBC has no experts on 250 X normal average hair cadmium, and instead, they ridicule Dr. Morris. Such hypocrisy! Dr. J S Morris has testified in court hundreds of times and his credentials were never questioned.
(8) GBC: “If this were heard by a trial jury, the prosecuting attorney would have to explain with great detail where the poison was acquired, who obtained it and how they learned to administer it.” Actually, the hair tests are court-quality proof that Srila Prabhupada WAS lethally, homicidally poisoned, and who did the poisoning is a separate issue. The GBC ridicules the notion of cadmium poisoning as “complicated, difficult.” But cadmium salts are readily available and can easily taint food/drink, and hair tests prove a lethal poisoning took place. A six-year forensic study by Truth Labs (India) determined the caretakers did it, likely led by Tamal.
(9) GBC: “This poison conspiracy has caused so much alienation, hurt, resentment, and chaos in all branches of the Vaishnava community, and this rumor has been so disruptive to Lord Chaitanya’s movement.” Well, the truth can hurt, but ultimately it heals, and honesty is the best path. Why hide from or fear the truth? We must use our intelligence to ascertain the truth. Study the facts and evidence-- judge for yourself.
(10) GBC: “The hair samples, which changed hands many times, were not stored in a clean, controlled environment and could have even been replaced with other hairs by a zealot disciple, are all possible.” This is false. The hair samples’ chain of custody was impeccable, fully documented, and the GBC had custody throughout (and no one else). Dr. Morris was engaged by the GBC’s Balavanta das. This doubt-mongering is dishonesty and deception. Why does the GBC disparage the tests they arranged with Dr. Morris and invited others to pay for? Further, there is so much other evidence confirming the hair tests.
PADA: Yeah but worshiping homosexuals and pedophiles as messiahs has not caused any hurt and alienation. See what I mean with these guys? ys pd
angel108b@yahoo.com
=====
PADA: Oh oh pilgrims, this is the person who said he was going to stop America from wasting billions and trillions of dollars on foreign wars:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.