https://www.sedonavedicculture.com/
PADA: This is a project of Dasarath prabhu. He is against the GBC and has had some major run ins with their leaders. At the same time, he advertises Sridhar Mahajara's biggest leaders like ex-Jagat Guru swami (BG Narasimha) who was one of the people encouraging the bogus 11 GBC gurus along with Sridhar Maharaja in 1978. And Sridhar Maharaja was ghost writing / assisting most of the early post 1978 GBC documents -- being advertised as the GBC's "senior most advisor" -- and we believe SM had a role in their horrendous 1980 paper "The Mahajanas Have Difficulties."
Yep, acharyas are falling down, the Mahajanas are falling down -- left, right and center. Any questions? First question, is it not the mad elephant offense to say pure devotees are often fallen debauchees? Which is what the rascals say, which generally leads to the rascals saying -- Krishna is also a fallen debauchee. We are not supposed to be on the same page with the rascals.
NOT TO BE DONE PILGRIMS!
And these folks have been telling us "none should protest" -- so their bogus 11 acharyas would be cemented in as ISKCON's messiahs. Never mind Sridhara made a bi-sexual deviant the Gaudiya Matha's guru in 1936 -- where dissenters were banned, beaten, sued, had their faces pushed into dog stools, had their skulls cracked with bricks, and some were assassinated. Yep, that is the pattern we should all follow for success! Really! In sum, Dasarath Dasa is a little all over the map, loyal to all comers?
So we wanted people to unify under the banner of promoting the worship of Srila Prabhupada as the acharya, and it just has not been happening as we had hoped. We now have folks like Sridhar Maharaja, the founder father of a 1936 bi-sexual guru project, and co-assistant of the 1978 GBC's pedophile acharyas project -- being advertised as another acharya. Why would anyone want the the founder father of sexual predator acharya's programs to be listed as another acharya?
Although we do have lots of people following the Prabhupadanuga idea here and there and all over, but they are mostly scattered. Some of the people associated with Dasarath's program enjoy PADA, some -- not so much -- and etc. He really needs to get his siddhanta in order to make things clear for the innocent public and followers, many of whom just cannot tell what is what here. Of course if he himself cannot tell what is what here, then we have a problem. Overall he is a nice guy and he has been doing some sort of program for a long time and we admire that, but we hope he will clean things up and get people straight on the issues.
When people write to ask me, "What is an acharya who is mad after money, women and followers," we already know they are reading Sridhar's bogus materials, or they are listening to the followers of Sridhar. We need to cut that type thing out, or it will grow and fester into something bad, as we have seen in spades.
ys pd
BGD: HISTORICAL FACTS Actually, Śrīla Guru Mahārāj (Srila Sridhar Maharaj) himself did not make Vāsudev Prabhu an Āchārya. Also, he was not in a position to have any right to do so, but when it was declared by that special group of Śrīla Saraswatī Ṭhākur’s disciples that Vāsudev Prabhu be the Āchārya of the Gauḍīya Maṭh, Śrīla Guru Mahārāj agreed and immediately felt relief that the responsibility of being Āchārya did not come to him. Furthermore, when Śrīpād Keśava Mahārāj heavily proposed his name in the Governing Body (He proposed Sridhar Maharaj as Acarya), that also he cleverly avoided because actually Śrīla Guru Mahārāj did not want to be involved in the management. Only, he wanted to stay as a humble preacher and friend to all the Vaiṣṇavas. Earlier also, seeing the situation of his Mission, Śrīla Saraswatī Ṭhākur fully depended upon Kṛṣṇa to select the future Āchārya of his Mission. Actually, this was the fact at that time.
ReplyDelete---Srila Bhakti Sundar Govinda Dev Goswami Maharaj
(Divine Guidance)
[PADA: Sorry, Srila Prabhupada and other Gaudiyas claim that Sridhar Maharaja insisted on making Ananta Vasudeva the acharya. At the same time we see that Sridhar supported the bogus 11 GBC gurus and he said acharyas go mad after money, women and followers. That means Sridhara is saying my trash collector man is more advanced than Krishna's acharyas because my trash man is not "mad after money, women and followers." That means Sridhar is not advanced enough to worship my trash man. Sridhar supports false acharyas, over and over, as we have seen ourselves. ys pd]