Bhakti Vikas swami with his co-messiahs
Hanuman Croatia: Conclusion
So, this is the clear proof that these two lectures were removed from Bhakti Vikasa Swami’s website and reuploaded by the terrorists who don’t want to follow His divine Gestapo-Hindu grace Anuttama das.
[PADA: Evidently the GBC ordered some Bhakti Vikas swami lectures to disappear. Not really a new thing. Lectures by various GBC gurus have been disappeared, banned, forbidden and removed by GBC's leaders -- for years. For example, Jayatirtha's "ecstacy tapes" were collected up and destroyed way back in 1979. Devotees were forbidden to hear Hansadutta's tapes in the 1980s, Sridhara Maharaja's tapes were banned after 1982, Narayan Maharaja's tapes were banned after 1993, and so on and so forth.
So the GBC has already been removing tapes and lectures from "GBC gurus" or their "advisors" while hiding and suppressing Srila Prabhupada's tapes. The real question is, why is Bhakti Vikas swami a mindless puppy in the hands of these bogus people, and he has to accept their "managing" of his videos and speaking? Is this the real reason he skirts the main problems going on?]
So the GBC has already been removing tapes and lectures from "GBC gurus" or their "advisors" while hiding and suppressing Srila Prabhupada's tapes. The real question is, why is Bhakti Vikas swami a mindless puppy in the hands of these bogus people, and he has to accept their "managing" of his videos and speaking? Is this the real reason he skirts the main problems going on?]
So, you are thinking that ISKCON is a free society where senior members are free to express the view on issues. Well, think again. If gurus are not able to speak freely, imagine the freedoms of ordinary members. You think that your guru is free to repeat Srila Prabhupada’s teachings without the interference of the Gestapo body commission. Well, think again.
You think that nobody in his right mind would follow Hindu Anuttama das and his ultimately spineless PR rules. Well, think again. ISKCON Gestapo machine is obviously not just Anuttama, all the GBCs had to push this Gestapo PR rules.
You think that nobody in his right mind would follow Hindu Anuttama das and his ultimately spineless PR rules. Well, think again. ISKCON Gestapo machine is obviously not just Anuttama, all the GBCs had to push this Gestapo PR rules.
[PADA: Well yes, after the GBC ordered Jayatirtha to go and take shelter of Sridhara Maharaja and make him ISKCON UK's personal shikha guru, then they suddenly realized JT and Sridhara Maharaja were starting to become popular and have some independent following. So then they banned anyone from associating with them or hearing their tapes. So this process of chopping, changing, removing, suppressing "words from the GBC acharya" is often used by contrary and hypocritical dictators like the GBC.]
So, gurus in ISKCON are not free to preach Krishna consciousness. They are managed and censored by the Gestapo body commission. Therefore, as a member of ISKCON, you are a not disciple of your guru, you are actually a disciple of the GBC.
So, gurus in ISKCON are not free to preach Krishna consciousness. They are managed and censored by the Gestapo body commission. Therefore, as a member of ISKCON, you are a not disciple of your guru, you are actually a disciple of the GBC.
[PADA: That should be self evident. The GBC votes gurus in, then censures, suspends, monitors, removes and excommunicates them etc. Of course then again, most of the GBC are the self-same gurus? That is why their system does not work. Its a contradiction to say that acharyas are subordinated to a committee. And instead it spawns one crisis after the next, as there is no practical way to manage things with 80 maverick acharyas -- some of whom may or may not listen to the GBC, while simultaneously participating in the GBC.]
Because they are the ones who are pulling the strings.
[PADA: There really is no coherent managing when the "managers" and the "gurus" are wearing the same hat. Who is pulling the strings, no one really knows, because when there is a problem its "some other gurus were negligent, I was the only person trying to rectify" and when there is some nice publicity, they all want to take credit. Oh yea, I was the only person making that program!]
And actually, there are no gurus in ISKCON. In ISKCON, we can find people who perform “the service of a guru”. But they are not actual gurus, because the GBC can suspend ISKCON gurus, GBC can reprimand ISKCON gurus, GBC can “remove a guru” and the GBC can censor a guru. It’s basically a puppy position, quite opposite from the teachings of Srila Rupa Goswami. Prabhupada writes in the Nectar of Instruction:
"It is also an offense to consider an empowered Vaiṣṇava an object of disciplinary action. It is offensive to try to give him advice or to correct him. One can distinguish between a neophyte Vaiṣṇava and an advanced Vaiṣṇava by their activities. The advanced Vaiṣṇava is always situated as the spiritual master, and the neophyte is always considered his disciple. The spiritual master must not be subjected to the advice of a disciple, nor should a spiritual master be obliged to take instructions from those who are not his disciples. (Nectar of Instruction 6, purport)"
Well, GBC is definitely issuing disciplinary actions against gurus and gives them instructions on which lectures they have to remove. Therefore, due to not following the Nectar of Instructions, corporate ISKCON gurus are not gurus in the real sense of the term, or in case they are, then GBC is offensive toward them.
Now, of course, GBC’s treatment on Bhakti Vikasa Swami is not new. This is not the first time he was censored. Just over a month ago, he “was invited for a talk” by the Gestapo body commission. We wrote an article on that subject. He also had his book banned a few years back, he was also told not to attack Radhanath baba and had to apologize to him.
However, Bhakti Vikasa Swami is not the only victim of his decision to stay in ISKCON. His disciples are even bigger victims. They are all deeply embedded into ISKCON Gestapo paradigm. For example, Bhakti Vikasa Swami’s disciples in Croatia didn’t give me one word of support when I attacked Ramesh baba and his disciple Sacinandana Swami.
I was the only one recorded documentary movies about Sacinandana Swami and his girlfriend. But, interestingly enough, all disciples of Bhakti Vikasa Swami gave their support to Sacinandana Swami disciples who were trying to ban me from the temple. They thought that I am an offender and an envious fault-finder and that Sacinandana Swami and his girlfriend are divine.
They didn’t give me one word of support. After I was banned, not one Bhakti Vikasa Swami disciple said one word in my defense. I don’t have any other word for them than “traitors of Srila Prabhupada legacy”. When I say “traitor”, I especially think about Murari Gupta and Divya Prabandha. These two guys tried to shut me up long before anybody else. Pure Gestapo.
So, what does that tell us? If Bhakti Vikasa Swami leaves ISKCON, probably 90% of his disciples would stay in ISKCON and glorify and worship people like Herr Obersturmführer Anuttama das. Therefore he can’t leave, and he can’t stay also because he is constantly harassed by the GBC criminals. He is in a very peculiar position.
[PADA: Yes, the "guru program" only works when they stick together, so Bhakti Vikas swami has to "stick together" with the debauchee's acharya program and "tow the main line," that we are all authorized to accept sins like Jesus. So he is walking a tightrope of being somewhat critical, so he does not appear too foolish for going along with all sorts of deviations, but he has to limit how far his critical statements go -- so he does not get axed out. Yes, his followers will simply stay with the GBC guru process even if he leaves, because BVKS has brain washed them that they have to cooperate with the GBC -- like he has done. He has made his disciples mindless GBC clone robots -- just like he is.]
By the divine arrangement of Lord Krishna, we were able to act quickly and obtain a small glimpse of the Gestapo censorship system implemented in ISKCON. Now, it is time for you to start thinking about all the censorship which is not discovered. Ask yourself when did you last hear your guru speak about Sulocana das, a whistleblower who exposed fake guru Kirtanananda. Let me help you: Never.
And ISKCON will stay like that, Sulocana will never be mentioned, and Radhanath Swami who participated in his murder will continue to be worshipped. Bhakti Vikasa Swami will continue to be mistreated by the GBC until he dies. And his disciples in Croatia will continue to persecute anybody who speaks up against Sacinanandana Swami and his girlfriend. Guys, good luck in attaining Srila Prabhupada’s mercy by being members of such a movement.
[PADA: Good progress. Bhakti Vikas swami is not a guru, but simply an acquiescing puppy dog in the hands of bogus people. BVKS is a weak and compromised person, and he will die a weak and compromised person because he is too far in lock step with the false guru process. That is what we told Hanuman Croatia right at the start and he was infuriated, telling us BVKS is bona fide.
[PADA: There really is no coherent managing when the "managers" and the "gurus" are wearing the same hat. Who is pulling the strings, no one really knows, because when there is a problem its "some other gurus were negligent, I was the only person trying to rectify" and when there is some nice publicity, they all want to take credit. Oh yea, I was the only person making that program!]
And actually, there are no gurus in ISKCON. In ISKCON, we can find people who perform “the service of a guru”. But they are not actual gurus, because the GBC can suspend ISKCON gurus, GBC can reprimand ISKCON gurus, GBC can “remove a guru” and the GBC can censor a guru. It’s basically a puppy position, quite opposite from the teachings of Srila Rupa Goswami. Prabhupada writes in the Nectar of Instruction:
"It is also an offense to consider an empowered Vaiṣṇava an object of disciplinary action. It is offensive to try to give him advice or to correct him. One can distinguish between a neophyte Vaiṣṇava and an advanced Vaiṣṇava by their activities. The advanced Vaiṣṇava is always situated as the spiritual master, and the neophyte is always considered his disciple. The spiritual master must not be subjected to the advice of a disciple, nor should a spiritual master be obliged to take instructions from those who are not his disciples. (Nectar of Instruction 6, purport)"
Well, GBC is definitely issuing disciplinary actions against gurus and gives them instructions on which lectures they have to remove. Therefore, due to not following the Nectar of Instructions, corporate ISKCON gurus are not gurus in the real sense of the term, or in case they are, then GBC is offensive toward them.
Now, of course, GBC’s treatment on Bhakti Vikasa Swami is not new. This is not the first time he was censored. Just over a month ago, he “was invited for a talk” by the Gestapo body commission. We wrote an article on that subject. He also had his book banned a few years back, he was also told not to attack Radhanath baba and had to apologize to him.
However, Bhakti Vikasa Swami is not the only victim of his decision to stay in ISKCON. His disciples are even bigger victims. They are all deeply embedded into ISKCON Gestapo paradigm. For example, Bhakti Vikasa Swami’s disciples in Croatia didn’t give me one word of support when I attacked Ramesh baba and his disciple Sacinandana Swami.
I was the only one recorded documentary movies about Sacinandana Swami and his girlfriend. But, interestingly enough, all disciples of Bhakti Vikasa Swami gave their support to Sacinandana Swami disciples who were trying to ban me from the temple. They thought that I am an offender and an envious fault-finder and that Sacinandana Swami and his girlfriend are divine.
They didn’t give me one word of support. After I was banned, not one Bhakti Vikasa Swami disciple said one word in my defense. I don’t have any other word for them than “traitors of Srila Prabhupada legacy”. When I say “traitor”, I especially think about Murari Gupta and Divya Prabandha. These two guys tried to shut me up long before anybody else. Pure Gestapo.
So, what does that tell us? If Bhakti Vikasa Swami leaves ISKCON, probably 90% of his disciples would stay in ISKCON and glorify and worship people like Herr Obersturmführer Anuttama das. Therefore he can’t leave, and he can’t stay also because he is constantly harassed by the GBC criminals. He is in a very peculiar position.
[PADA: Yes, the "guru program" only works when they stick together, so Bhakti Vikas swami has to "stick together" with the debauchee's acharya program and "tow the main line," that we are all authorized to accept sins like Jesus. So he is walking a tightrope of being somewhat critical, so he does not appear too foolish for going along with all sorts of deviations, but he has to limit how far his critical statements go -- so he does not get axed out. Yes, his followers will simply stay with the GBC guru process even if he leaves, because BVKS has brain washed them that they have to cooperate with the GBC -- like he has done. He has made his disciples mindless GBC clone robots -- just like he is.]
By the divine arrangement of Lord Krishna, we were able to act quickly and obtain a small glimpse of the Gestapo censorship system implemented in ISKCON. Now, it is time for you to start thinking about all the censorship which is not discovered. Ask yourself when did you last hear your guru speak about Sulocana das, a whistleblower who exposed fake guru Kirtanananda. Let me help you: Never.
And ISKCON will stay like that, Sulocana will never be mentioned, and Radhanath Swami who participated in his murder will continue to be worshipped. Bhakti Vikasa Swami will continue to be mistreated by the GBC until he dies. And his disciples in Croatia will continue to persecute anybody who speaks up against Sacinanandana Swami and his girlfriend. Guys, good luck in attaining Srila Prabhupada’s mercy by being members of such a movement.
[PADA: Good progress. Bhakti Vikas swami is not a guru, but simply an acquiescing puppy dog in the hands of bogus people. BVKS is a weak and compromised person, and he will die a weak and compromised person because he is too far in lock step with the false guru process. That is what we told Hanuman Croatia right at the start and he was infuriated, telling us BVKS is bona fide.
OK so he is gradually coming to agree with us, we should not listen to these people and we should listen only the words of the bona fide guru -- Srila Prabhupada -- which is what we told him at the beginning of all this. ys pd]
PADA: Just today got another contact from a BVKS follower. He started writing to ask some nice questions. He did not even know that Bhakti Vikas swami is the "sannyasa disciple" of the founder father of the illicit sex acharya's program Jayapataka. And that BVKS is "voted in" by the reinstators of the "sex with taxi drivers-pada" Bhavananada etc.
ReplyDeleteBVKS clearly keeps his followers in the dark, because they don't even know there is no such thing as a debauchee acharya's guru parampara, and that gurus are not "2/3 show of hands"voted in to a "sex with taxi drivers" guru paramparas etc. This prabhu seems to think that Hanuman Croatia is correct, the followers of BVKS would stay with the GBC even if he left because he has told the followers they have to be loyal to the GBC primarily, just as he is. The blind leading the blind.
And he agrees BVKS is always back pedalling on major criticism because he fears getting axed out, so he makes peripheral criticism but never attacks the root issues i.e. -- deviants are not, were not, and could not have been God's successors, nor could said deviants "vote in" BVKS as another acharya for that sabha. So BVKS has to be very cautious and aware of how deep his critical remarks are going, so he does not cut too deep into the root issues, which might get him expelled. In other words, BVKS is a compromiser with the evil guru sabha and that is self-evident.
I also told this devotee how those of us who complained about problems like the child molesting process were banned, beaten, and sometimes killed. He said that is "awful," so he is catching up to speed. So this is very nice progress, he is going to study our sites and so we get another guy here and there. And then that guy talks to his friends and associates and so forth, so we are expanding slow but sure. As Srila Prabhupada says, if we can liberate even one person, then our liberation is assured, and apparently our process is liberating lots of folks in various ways all over the place. Goody. In sum, we told this person to simply accept Srila Prabhupada as his guru, thus hear from the right source, and make progress from there. ys pd